Answer to Petition.pdf
14761 32 Mile Road LLC Petitioner Vs. Township Of Washington Respondent · 26-000801-TT
Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS AND RULES MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 14761 32 MILE ROAD, LLC Petitioner, -VS- MTT Docket No. 26-000801 CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF WASHINGTON, Respondent. / SARAH R. BELLOLI CHRISTINE D. ANDERSON (P45141) Representative for Petitioner SEIBERT AND DLOSKI, PLLC 101 West Big Beaver Road, Suite 945 Attorney for Respondent Troy, MI 48084 19500 Hall Road, Suite 101 (313)230-0104 Clinton Township, MI 48038 Sarah.Belloli@Ryan.com (586) 469-3800 canderson@seibertanddloski.com CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF WASHINGTON’S ANSWER TO PETITIONER'S ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PETITION The Charter Township of Washington (“Respondent”), by and through its attorneys, SEIBERT AND DLOSKI, PLLC, for its answer to Petitioner's Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition states as follows: 1. Respondent admits the allegations contained in Paragraph 1. 2. Respondent admits the allegations contained in Paragraph 2. 3. There are no factual or legal assertions set forth in Paragraph 3, therefore no response necessary.
Page 2
5. There are no factual or legal assertions set forth in Paragraph 5, therefore No response necessary. 6. Respondent admits the allegations contained in Paragraph 6. 7. Respondent admits the allegations contained in Paragraph 7. 8. There are no factual or legal assertions set forth in Paragraph 8, therefore no response necessary. 9. There are no factual or legal assertions set forth in Paragraph 9, therefore no response necessary. 10. Respondent admits the allegations contained in Paragraph 10. 11. Respondent admits the allegations contained in Paragraph 11 12. Respondent neither admits nor denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 12 as it lacks sufficient knowledge to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations contained therein. 13. Respondent neither admits nor denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 13 as it lacks sufficient knowledge to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations contained therein. 14. Respondent admits the allegations contained in Paragraph 14. 15. There are no factual or legal assertions set forth in Paragraph 15, therefore no response necessary. 16. Respondent admits the allegations contained in Paragraph 16.
Page 3
17. Respondent neither admits nor denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 17 as it lacks sufficient knowledge to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations contained therein. 18. Respondent neither admits nor denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 18 as it lacks sufficient knowledge to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations contained therein. 19. Respondent denies Petitioner is entitled to the relief requested. 20. Respondent denies the allegations in Paragraph 20 for the reason they are untrue and denies Petitioner is entitled to the relief requested. WHEREFORE, the Respondent respectfully requests the Tax Tribunal dismiss the Petition and award the Respondent its costs and attorney fees. Respectfully submitted, CN A By: Christine D. Anderson (P45141) Attorney for Respondent SEIBERT AND DLOSKI, PLLC 19500 Hall Road, Suite 101 Clinton Township, MI 48038 Dated: July 1, 2026 (586) 469-3800