25-003150.pdf
Bernard T Rocca, Rebecca Rocca, Petitioners Vs. Township Of Leelanau, Respondent · 25-003150-TT
Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.
Page 1
RECEIVED AUG 2 5 2025 STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL BERNARD T. ROCCA, IV and REBECCA ROCCA, » 824-1 08/ Petitioners, 0.00 TTI VERWETTEN POPOUITS v. MTT Docket No. 25-003150 LEELANAU TOWNSHIP, Respondent. Michelle L. Schubert (P86331) Pezzetti, Vermetten, Popovits & Umulis, P.C. Attorneys for Petitioner 600 E. Front St., Ste. 102 Traverse City, MI 49686 231-929-3450 mschubert@mich-legal.com MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION Petitioners, Bernard T. Rocca, IV and Rebecca Rocca, through their attorneys, Pezzetti, Vermetten, Popovits & Umulis, P.C., and for their Motion for Reconsideration state as follows: 1. On July 31, 2025, Petitioners filed the attached Petition (See Exhibit 1) via first class mail. 2: On August 13, 2025, Petitioners received an Order of Dismissal from this Tribunal stating that “[t]he petition was not filed by July 31 or the next business day after the Tribunal offices were closed. See MCL 205.735a.”
Page 2
A petition is considered filed on or before the expiration of the time period provided in this section or by law if 1 or more of the following occur: (a) The petition is postmarked by the United States postal service on or before the expiration of that time period. 4. As seen on the last page of Exhibit 1, Petitioners’ Petition was postmarked July 31, 2025, and therefore, was timely filed. 5. MCR 2.612(A)(1) allows a court to grant relief from an order due to clerical mistakes on motion of a party and after notice. WHEREFORE, for the aforementioned reasons, Petitioner respectfully requests that this Tribunal set aside its Order of Dismissal pursuant to MCR 2.612(A)(1) and grant Petitioner any such other relief as this Tribunal deems appropriate. PEZZETTI, VERMETTEN, POPOVITS & UMULIS, P.C. fan ESE Michelle L. Schubert (P86331) Attorneys for Petitioner Dated: August 15, 2025 By: I certify on this date I served a copy of this Motion, and any additional documentation, on the opposing party or their representative. Dated: August 15,2025 By: TL ——¢ Michelle L. Schubert (P86331)
Page 3
EXHIBIT 1
Page 4
FECEIVED AUG 0.6 2025 STATE OF MICHIGAN MIGHIG, DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS AN TAX TRIBUNAL MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL BERNARD T. ROCCA, IV and REBECCA ROCCA, Petitioners, MTT Docket No. LEELANAU TOWNSHIP, Respondent. Michelle L. Schubert (P86331) Pezzetti, Vermetten, Popovits & Umulis, P.C. Attorneys for Petitioner 600 E. Front St, Ste. 102 Traverse City, MI 49686 231-929-3450 mschubert@mich-legal.com PROPERTY TAX PETITION Petitioners, Bernard T, Rocca, IV and Rebecca Rocca, through their attorneys, Pezzetti, Vermetten, Popovits & Umulis, P.C., petition this Tribunal as follows: 1. Petitioners are husband and wife and reside at 1414 Forest Ave., Evanston, Illinois 60201. 2. "The property that is the subject of this Petition is located in Leelanau Township, County of Leelanau. 3, The property at issue is an undeveloped parcel of land, with the common address of E Seth
Page 5
10. 11. 12. 13. 14. Parcel 1 is one of four parcels that were created by a split of a larger parcel. See Exhibit B — Certificate of Survey. This appeal involves Petitioner’s claim that the assessed and taxable values of the Property were incorrectly determined by the local assessing unit, Leelanau Township. The tax years at issue are the current year (2025) and later years, On or about March 11, 2025, Petitioner submitted a Petition the Board of Review. See attached Exhibit C — Petition to Board of Review. The values for Parcel 1, as affirmed by the 2025 March Board of Review Decision, are as follows: Tax year: 2025 2025 Taxable Value: $450,100 2025 Assessed Value: $450,100 Petitioner contends that the values for the Property are: Tax year; EER 2025 True Cash Value : $700,000 2025 Taxable Value: ) $350,000 2025 Assessed Value: $350,000 The amount in dispute for the taxable value of Parcel 1 is $100,100 and the amount in dispute related to the assessed value of Parcel 1 is $100,100. MCL 211.27a(1) provides that “fe]xcept as otherwise provided in this section, property shall be assessed at 50% of its true cash value under section 3 of article IX of the state constitution of 1963.” For purposed of the General Property Tax Act, the term “true cash value” means the “usual
Page 6
15. 16. 17. 18. at auction sale except as otherwise provided in this section, or at forced sale.” MCL 244.27(1). The term “true cash value” for purposes of The General Property Tax Act is equivalent to a property’s fair market value, Menards, Inc. v City of Escanaba, 315 Mich App 512, 522; 891 NW2d 1 (2016). To determine the true cash value, the Property is to be valued at its highest and best use, which in this instance, given the current undeveloped state of the Propetty, the location on Lake Michigan, applicable zoning laws, and economic feasibility, is the continued residential classification. The three valuation methods used to determine the true cash value that have been found by this Tax Tribunal and the courts as acceptable and reliable are: (i) the cost-less depreciation approach; (ii) the sales-comparison or market approach; and (iii) the capitalization-of- income approach. Jd. ar 523. Based on an appraisal conducted by a certified appraiser incorporating valuation methods that the Tax Tribunal has found reliable for determining a Property’s true case value, Petitioner contends that the tru thse value of the Property is $700,000, and accordingly, the taxable value and assessed value should be set at $350,000. See Exhibit D — Appraisal. WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests that this Tribunal correct the taxable value of the subject property and reduce the assessed value of the subject property based upon an accurate valuation of the property’s true cash value, award Petitioner costs pursuant to TTR 792.10217 and MCL 205.7582; and grant Petitioner any such other relief as this Tribunal deems appropriate.”
Page 7
PEZZETTI, VERMETTEN, POPOVITS & UMULIS, P.C. Dated: July 24, 2025 By: Michelle L. Schubert (’86331) Attorneys for Petitioner
Page 8
EXHIBIT A
Page 9
cig Depart of Tose THIS 18 ‘NOT A TAX BILL L-4400 Notice of Assessment, Taxable Valuation, and Property Classification This form is issued under the suthority of PA, 200 of 1893, Soc. 214.24 (¢) and Sa¢.211.94¢, 88 amended, This Is a mods} assessment notice lo ba usad by tha loca) assessor, FROM LEELANAU TOWNSHIP PARCEL IDENTIFICATION ATTN: ASSESSING DEPT PARCEL NUMBER: 008-232-014-00 PO BOX 338 NORTHPORT, Mi 49670-0338 PROPERTY ADDRESS: E SETH RD NORTHPORT, MI 49670 PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE EXEMPTION OWNER'S NAME & ADDRESS/PERSON NAMED ON ASSESSMENT ROLL: | % Exempt As "Homaawnars Principal Reside 00% ROCCAIV BERNARD T % Exempt As "Qualified Agricultural Property 00% ROCCA REBECCA % Exempt As "MBT Industria) Parsonal®: 00% Tt KOCH KNOLLS % Exempt As "MBT Commercial Personal” 00% RVILLE, IL 60565 Exempt As "Qualified Forest Property™ [7] Yes No Exempt As "Development Property [] Yes No LEGAL DESCRIPTION: -00 PARCEL 1 PRT OF GOVT LOT 4 SEC 32 T32N R11W COMAT TH S % COR; TH N 00 DEG 35' 25" W 445.45 FT, TH N 87 DEG 43' 21" W 346.26 FT TO POB; TH N 87 DEG 43' 21" W 76.01 FT, TH N 82 DEG 05' 15° W 1163.17 FT TO TH SHR OF LK MI; THN 2 ACCORDING TO MCL 211.34¢ THIS PROPERTY IS CLASSIFIED AS: 402 Residential PRIOR YEAR'S CLASSIFICATION: 402 Residential’ Jiu PRIOR AMOUNT CURRENT TENTATIVE CHANGE FROM YEAR: 2024 AMOUNTYEAR: ppg CRE ean 1. TAXABLE VALUE: 562,300 . 450,100 -112,200 2. ASSESSED VALUE: 562 =112.200 3. TENTATIVE EQUALIZATION FACTOR: 1.000 : 4. STATE EQUALIZED VALUE (SEV): 562,300 450,100 112,200 5. There WAS or WAS NOT a transfer of ownership on this properly in 2024 WAS 6. Assessor Change Reason(s): Spli'Combined The 2026 Inflation rate Multiplier is: 1.031 Questions regarding the Notice of Assessment, Taxable Valuation, and Property Classification may be directed to the Following: Name: Phone: Email Address: CHRISTY M BROW, MAAD 231-386-5138 ASSESSOR@LEELANAUTOWNSHIPMI.GOV Cori March Board of Review Appeal Information: BOARD OF REVIEW WILL BE HELD AT THE TOWNSHIP OFFICES, HEARINGS WILL BE HELD MONDAY, MARCH 10 TH FROM 1:00 PM TO 4:00 PM & 6:00 PM TO 8:00 PM, TUESDAY, MARCH-11 TH FROM 1:00 PM TO 4:00 PM, WEDNESDAY, MARCH 12TH FROM 1:00 PM TO 4:00 PM, THURSDAY, MARCH 13TH FROM 9:00 AM TO NOON. ALL APPEALS MUST BE RECEIVED IN WRITING, AT THE TOWNSHIP OFFICES, NO LATER THAN BY THE CLOSE OF THE FINAL HEARING. APPEALS MUST INCLUDE
Page 10
EXHIBIT B
Page 11
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
in
E
N.S l/dline
©
N0O'35'25"W
NOO'35'25"W
gE
~————10
Sch Boul
428,67
7
445.45
3
Ea
i Seb ca
(WY
ve
!
st Ey
BS
iz
|
£4 =<
ag
§
|g
18
&82d
<
§ 2
™
IN
8
|
3
8 SBR
I
i)
pg
ix 5
fag
3
ro
Ba
ge
3 w8y
Te
[s
a
% =
"mw
A
oN
w
M3028. 505
F0ly
B
:
iF
ail
|:
Sailer
2028
8
CERNE EK]
EYE
Jul
totus]
2
5
(SIRS 2
5 5
>
Zofia
mil
89
@)
Sal
Ee
3
20%
DAI
DI 212 05)
= 2)
AY
NOT'O9'53"W
i531
=]
han
E
r
Eiki
alo
ET
$28
\:
TREY
BA
ery Fl
2
Bn
F424
Jog
g
fh
8
i
fp
J
S
=
wl
5
i 3
£8
s
5
35
583
3
ef
5S 94%
5:
8
of
=~
rg&
e
aig
+
Py
g<2
-
olz
=
0
£53
I
%
58
Eos
ge
fr
§
428
52
Hh
o£
[BHE
f
8
5
fg
TR
=
[232
fC)
elt
—
jd]
55%
E|8
Tg
22H
£30
HF
7p
23
535
3%
“TX
gga
ixx
dl
Es
|2%3
8&3
5
85
|5x3d
8gaz
KEE
LEGEND
neds
gigs
o
= IRON (SET)
258
®
= IRON (FND)
i & 0
R= RECORD
SCALE:
TI
5 [ny 2
M
= MEASURED
0
1g
3
EEN
©
= compute
(Ed
=
{ hereby certify thot
| hove surveyed and mapped the fond obove plotted
.
and/or described on
5/26/23"
and that the relative positional precision
:
of each corner is within the limits nccepted by the practice of professional
by:
id
BARA
surveying, and thet olf the requirements of PA. 132, 1970 as amended have
LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR
been complied with.Page 12
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS
PARCEL
|
Part of Government Lot 4, Section 32, T32N, REIW, Leelanau Twp, Leelsnav County, Michigan, more
fully described as follows:
Commencing at the South 1/4 corner of said section; thence, along the Nosth-South 1/4 line, NOO®35'25
Ww
445.45 feet; thence N§7°4321"W 346.26 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence, continuing
N87°43'21"W 76.01 feet; thence N82°05'15°W
| 163.17 feet to a traverse fine along the shore of Lake
Michigan; thence, along Suid traverse line, N23°22'L 7° 99.83 feet; thetice, along said traverse line,
N35°23'46"E 345.78 feet; thence S76°56'23"E 636.00 feet; thence N88°28'15"E 415.04 feet; thence
506°32'04"W 406.65 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 10.0 acres of land,
Together with afl lands lying between the sidelines of said parcel and extending to the waters of Lake
Michigan, with riparian rights of record incident thereto,
Together with and subject to non-exclusive usage rights over and across 33 foot wide Easements A,BandC
to Seth Road per Document #2022001426, as recorded in the Leelanau County Register of Deeds,
Subject to and together with afl agreements, easements and restrictions of record, if any,
Subject to and together with a 33 foot wide easement in part of Governimen( Lot 4, Section 32, T32N,
RIEW, Leelanau Twp., Leelanau County, Michigan, the centerfine more fully described as follows:
Commencing at the South § corner of said section; thence, along the North-South 4 fine, N00°35'25"W
445.45 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of sald casement centertine; thonce N87°4321"W 422.27 feet (0
the POINT OF ENDING of said easement,
Subject to and together with a 30 foot wide walking easement in part of Government Lot 4, Section 32,
T32N, RH W, Leelanau Twp., Leelanau County, Michigan, the centertine more fully described as follows:
Commencing at the South 1/4 comer of sajd section; thence, along the North-South 1/4 tine, N0OO°35'25"W
445.45 feet; thence N87°4321"W 422.27 fect to the POINT OF BEGINNING of said easement centerline;
thence N82°05't5"W {163.17 feet to the shore of Lake Michigan and the POINT OF ENDING of sald
easement,
PARCEL 2
Part of Government Lot 4, Section 32, T32N, R11 W, Leolanau Twp., Leelanau County, Michigan, more
fully described as follows:
Commencing at the South 1/4 corner of said section; thenco, along the South line of said section,
SB7°18'55"W 482.57 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence, continuing along said South line,
S8TCIR'SS'W 150.47 feet; thence NOT209'35"W 280.52 feet; thence $87°29'27"W 1123.47 feet to a (raverse
line along the shore of Lake Michigan; thence, along said traverse line, N23°22'1 7° 458.30 feet; thence
$82°05'15"E 1163.17 feel; thence S06°31'S7T"W 487.98 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing
10.02 acres of land.
Together with all fands lying between the sidelines of said parcel and extending to the waters of Lake
Michigan, with riparian rights of record incident thereto.
Together with and subject to non-exclusive usage rights over and across 33 foot wide Easements A,BandC
(0 Seth Round per Document #2022001426, as recorded in the Leslunau County Register of Deeds.
Subject to and together with all agreements, easements and restrictions of record, if any,
Together with a 33 foot wide easement in part of Government Lot 4, Section 32, T32N, RI1W, Leelanay
Twp. Leelanau County, Michigan, the centerline mare fully described as follows:
Comniencing at the South 1/4 comer of said section; thence, along the North-South ¥ line, NO0°3525"W
445.45 fest to the POINT OF BEGINNING of said easement centering; thence N87°43°21"W 422.27 feet to
the POINT OF ENDING of ‘said easement.
Subject to and together with a 30 ioot wide walking casement in part of Government Lot 4, Section 32,
T32N, RITW, Leelanau Twp, Leclanau County, Michigan, the centerline more fully described as follows:
Commencing at the South 1/4 comer of said section; thence, along the North-South 1/4 line, NOO"35'25W
445.45 feet; thence N87°43'21"W 422.27 feet to the POINT OF BEGI NNING of said casement centeriine;
thence N82°05'1S"W 1163.17 feet to the shore of Lake Michigan and the POINT OF ENDING of said
easement,Page 13
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS
PARCEL 3
Part of Government Lot 4, Section 32, T32N, R) |W, Leelanau Twp., Leelanau County, Michigan, more
fully described as follows:
Commencing at the South 1/4 corner of said section; thence, along the North-South 1/4 tine, N00°35'25°W
445.45 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence N87°43'21"W 346,26 feet; thence N06°32'04"E 406.65
feet; thence NB82S'| SE 295.43 feet; thence SO0°3535°E 425.67 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Containing 3.05 acres of land.
‘Pogether with and subject to non-exclusive usage eights over and across 33 foot wide Easements A,BandC
to Seth Road per Docuntent #2022001426, as recorded in the Leelanau County Register of Deeds.
Subject to and together with all agreements, easements and restrictions of record, if any.
Subject to und together with a 33 foot wide easement in part of Government Lot 4, Section 32, T32N,
RIIW, Leelanau Twp., Leelanau County, Michigan, the centerline more filly described as follows:
Commencing at the South 1/4 corner of said section; thence, along the North-South 1/4 line, N00°3525"W
445.45 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of said easement centerline; thence N87°432{*W 422.27 feet to
the POINT OF ENDING of said casement.
Together with a 30 foot wide walking easement in part of Government Lot 4, Section 32, T32N, RHW,
Leelanau Twp, Leelanau County, Michigan, the centertine more fully described as follows:
Commencing af the South 1/4 corner of said section; thence, along the North-South 1/4 line, NOG°35725"W
445.45 feet; thence N87°43'21"W 422,27 fect to the POINT OF BEGINNING of said easement centerline;
thence N82°05'I5"W 1163.17 feet to the shote of Lake Michigan and the POINT OF ENDING of snid
easement,
PARCEL 4
Patt of Government Lot 4, Section 32, T32N, R1{W, Leelanau Twp, Leelanau County, Michigan, more
fully described as follows:
BEGINNING at the South 1/4 comer of said section; thence, along the South tine of said section,
SB7°L8'S5"W 482.57 feet; thence, NOG°31I'57"E 487.98 fest; thence S87°43'2 ["E 422.27 feet; thence
S00°35°25"E 445.45 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 4.82 acres of land,
Together with and subject to non-exclusive usage rights over and across Easements A, Band Cto Seth
Road per Document #202200 1426, as recorded in the Leelanau County Register of Deeds,
Subject to and together with all agreements, easements and restrictions of record, If any,
Subject to and together with a 33 foot wide easement in part of Government Lot 4, Section 32, T32N,
RUIW, Leelanau Twp., Leelanau County, Michigan, the centerline more fully described as follows:
Commencing at the South 1/4 corner of said section; thence, along the North-South
§ tine, NO0°35125"W
445.45 feel to the POINT OF BEGINNING of said easement centerline; thence NS7°43'21"W 422.27 feet to
the POINT OF ENDING of said easement.
Together with a 30 foot wide walking easement in part of Government Lot 4, Section 32, T32N, R1 1w,
Leelanau Twp, Leelanau County, Michigan, the centerline mors fully described as follows:
Commencing at the South 1/4 commer of said section; thence, along the North-South 1/4 line, NOG°3525"W
445.45 feet; thence NB7°432(*W 422.27 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of said easement centerline;
thence N82°05'I 5"W 1163.17 eet to the shore of Lake Michigan and the POINT OF ENDING of said
casement.
R
by:
*
oy)
LICENSED LAND SURVEYORPage 14
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS
PARCEL
1 Conservation Easement
A Conservation Basement to burden Parcel
1 of this survey - being part of Government Lot 4, Section 32,
T32N, RHIW, Leelanau Twp., Leelanau County, Michigan, more fully deseribed as follows:
Commencing at the South 1/4 corner of said section; thence, along the North-South 1/4 line, N00°3525"W
871,12 feet; thence S88°28'1 5"W 710.47 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of said Conservation
Basement; theuce, along a bluff edge for (he following 4 courses, thence $29°10'59"E 96.61 feet; thence
S14°58'19"E 32.88 fest; thence S08°02'16"W {24.77 feet; thence S09°29'45"E 119.24 feet; thence
NB2°05'15"W 926.08 feet to a traverse tine along the shore of Lake Michigan; thence, along said shoreline
traverse, N23°22'1
7° 99.83 fect;thence N35°23'46"E 345.78 feet; thence, along the North line of Parcel
|,
876°56'23"F 636.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Containing 6,92 acres of land.
Together with all lands lying between the sidelines of said parce and extending to the waters of Lake
Michigan, with ripatian rights of record incident thereto,
Subject to and together with a 30 foot wide walking easement in part of Government Lot 4, Section 32,
T32N, R1TW, Leelanau Twp, Leelanau County, Michigan, the centerline more fully described as follows:
Commencing at the South 1/4 corner of said section; thence, along the North-South 1/4 line, NO0°35:25"W
445.45 feet; thence N87°43'21"W 422.27 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of said easement centerline;
thence N82°05'15"W 1163.17 feet to the shore of Lake Michigan and the POINT OF ENDING of said
easement,
PARCEL 2 Conservation Easement
A Conservation Easement to burden Parcel 2 of this survey - being part of Government Lot 4, Section 32,
T32N, RUW, Leelanau Twp., Leelanau County, Michigan, more fully desciibed as follows:
Commencing at the South 1/4 corner of said section; thence, along the South fine of said Section,
S87°18'55"W 633.04 feet to the North ¥ corner of Section 5, T3IN, RITW; thence NO1°09'53"W 280.52
feet; thence, $87°29'27"W 208.37 feet to the POINT QF BEGINNING; thence, along the bluff edge for the
following 6 courses: thence N79°4727°E 55.91 feet;thence NG9°3236"E 72.07 fect; thence N12°(2718"W
17.84 feet; thence N23°37'06"E 41.88 feet; thence NI1°38'52°E 88.00 feet; thence N21°24'02"E 81.61 feet
to the North fine of Parcel 2; thence along said North line, N82°05'15"W 926.08 feel to a traverse along the
shore of Lake Michigan; thence, rlong said shoreline traverse, 523°22'17'W 458.30 feet; thence
NB87°2927"E 916.84 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 7.54 acres of land.
Tagether with all tands lying between the sidelines of said parcel and extending to the wators of Lake
Michigan, with ripatian rights of record incident thereto.
Subject to and together with a 30 foot wide walking easement in part of Government Lot 4, Section 32,
T32N, R11W, Leelanau Twp, Leelunau County, Michigan, the centerline more fully described as follows:
Commencing at the South 1/4 comer of said scetion; thence, alang the North-South 1/4 line, NOD°35'25'W
445.45 feet; thence N8724321"W 422.27 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of said easement centertine;
thence N82°05'15"W 1163.17 foet to the shore of Lake Michigan and the POINT GF ENDING of said
casement,
by:
H
LICENSED
LAND
SURVEYOR
Lie.
# 4001040158Page 15
EXHIBIT C
Page 16
287s
Michigan Department of Tienstiry
818
(Rov. 11-12]
Petition to Board of Review
L.-4035
This form Is Issued yndsr
the authorlly of P.A, 206 of 1893, as amended. Filla Is voluntary, howeuar you may not appest to the Michigan Tax Tribunal
or the State Tax Commission unless you first protest
to the Board of Review,
TO BE COMPLETED BY OWNER OR OWNER'S AGENT
Ownars Name {Please Pilnt of Type)
*[Pabdonsrs Nama (if Other then Owner, Plagse Pint Tyee)
|
Bernard T. Rocca IV
UR
p—
_—
FownstiporCity
TT
County
Leelanau Township
4 leslanay
“The undersigned protosts tho [— valuo andlor the tontative {axabile value and/or the property classification and/or tho qualified
agricuilural property exvrmption of tha following doscribed property:
|Propaty idontiod (Perosl code required, Properly address & logs! desorption oplondl]
\
008-232-014-00
Protostod (tem
[] Assessed Value
[FF] Tentalive Taxable Value
[Classification
[} Qualied Agricuttural
,
)
erty
Exemption
1. PROTEST OF ASSESSMENT
Property
Exemp
{Complete Ihis saction for a protest of assessed value andlor fontative taxable value)
“{A2ea6d Amount
[Guinors Entivala of Trug Cash Valde
| Teniaiiva Tarablo Vallis
TT i
-
$450,100
| $709,000
$460,100
2028
2. PRQTEST,
QF CLASSIFICATION.
.-,
“
.
CE
{Complete this section for a request to change the tlassificalion. The Board of Review must make thelr decision regarding classification in
accordance with Seatlon 213,040 of the Michigan Compiled Lewe. The Board of Review shal not ba Influenced by the effect lhat a particular
classification haa on thal prapery’s stalus as a homeownar's principal rosidence or qualified agteuliural property.)
a
TCinsaltioetion of proporty on this year's aasaRarannt iolt
Classiiiadlion should bs (cheok ono of fo tollowingh:
i
1
7) Agricuttural
[1 industrial
{7} Timber Sutover
[7] utiity (Personal Property Only)
[7] commercial
[I residential
{7} Developmental
3. PROTEST OF EXEMPTION FOR QUALIFIED AGRICULTURAL PROPERTY
{if the assessor has denlad or changed tte percentage of the exemption {rom (he 18 mills of tocal school opatallng tax for qualified agricultural
roporly, the owner may appeal this action to the March Board of Roview, THE BOARD OF REVIEW HAS NO AUTHORITY TO CONSIDER OR ACT
PON THE EXEMPTION
| ROM THE 18 8
\. OPERATING MILLS FOR HOMEOWNER'S PRINGIPAL RESIDENCE PROPERTIES.)
Parcant quaiiiad tar
SRmaon gina by
+ (Ertor 0 It “axompion
Ferani oliad somata) sxempllon requosted by wnat (Enter 100 If full
dented)
exeniplon fequasted)
4, REASON FOR PROTEST
Stato
ressonfs)
for profoat of aa:
alo andor fhe t
\axatlo value andlor clessifioalion endfor queliisd ay
Parcel was purchased for $709,000 as part of a $900,000 transaction for two parcels and should be assessed based
on the paras! sale value of $708,000. 8.92 of the 10 parcel acres is being held in consetvation trust with Leelanau
Township (soe survey), which should lower taxable vale,
topary oxempilon
CERTIFICATION
anPage 17
Disposition by Board of Review, The Board of Review must slate tha reas Tor Te acllon below.
TT
i
TT
[T] &xemption Request Danlsd
© [J Exemption percent modified from,
,
nA
; ecard’ "of vote - Board or throo mombar comenlilea of prey
Ea
ha
-
’
|. Chalrparson: (} Yes Cno HE.
Member: IN Yes [ LIN
INo
Ho
Member: tl Yes Ine EEE
| Ronsan for board action
[i
|
i you dlangree with {he decision of the Board of Review regarding tentative taxable valve you may fopedl {hat doclslon by filing a patillan with the
J hn o tat #1 P.0, Box 30202,
Form 618, Page 2
FOR BOARD OF REVIEW USE ONLY
INSTRUCTIONS: Incorporate a gopy of thls form and the assigned nuntber In the Board of Revlaw minutas:
Patiion Norsbar
TER
[parcel Code
TT
Hime,
TT
mn
1. ASSESSED VALUE
mans
-.
¥
Disposition by Board ol Rovio, Tho Board a FE
gg
+
E
Denled
[7] Assessed Valua Changed From
‘| Record of vote « Boord or ras. ‘macmber commen of booed
{ Chalmersan: [J] Yes Divo 446
Member: :{¥ ves [No afl Member: [X
Yes
[
Foden eran aion NEFb
thyD a LUE 147s CONES
oi
EASEMENT
It you disayrea wlth the dsclslon of the Board of Review regarding tentative assessed valus, you tay appeal thet desision by fling 3 palifion with tha
Michigan Tax Tribunal al Bs Box 80232, Lansing, MI 48900. Commiarcld) Real, ndustlat Ren, Davelopmental Real, Gommercidl
Parsonajl a.
industdat Parsonafiand Utitly Personal Property may be appealed by May 81,, Agricultural Real, Residential Real, Timber-Gutovar Real and
AEG
;
Fopeon) Eibporly may be appoaled by July 31, The petition must be fifed of Pi Michigan Tax Tdbunal form or a form approved by the Michigan Tax
Wome IMF
Tax Taibmal forms ere
BVIAIE
at VRB EORRIR AGE BR,
~
MN
2, TENTATIVE TAXAB) E VALUE
cm ==
I
Disposition by Board of Review, The Boaed of Review must stala the tesson for its action below,
X] Danled
0 Tentative Taxable Value Changed Fron
er
el
er
Member:
Record of vat
of vote + “Condo Fihies téber cariiee a board
Chalrperson: 1
Yes = No ae
’
Member ives a No
nits
Initials”
a
nego
BAER
His
Ni fib
HSE
Hi
:
5
LL
3 haute
og
i
Disposition By Bound
( of Revlaw. The Board of Review ust state the regson tor ita action below,
|
[Jbenled [] Classification Changed From,
,
Racou of vote ~ Bantd orthrae member gomAiied 81 posi
*
v
-
| Chalperson:[
] Yes Lr No ©
Member: [3] Yes [] No ge
Member: [Yes [ INo SHE
[Reason for board li
if you disagrag with the decision of the Board of Review topardng essifcalory you may appaaihy sending Form 2187 to the State Tax Commission
24 PO. Box 30471, FING, M) 48908 by Juge 80s
4, QUALIFIED AGRICULTURAL PROPERTY EXEMP]
Lansing, M1 48008 by July
31, The petlon, at
be fled oni
a
form
eine
lohjgar Tax Tebunel form or a formPage 18
EXHIBIT D
Page 19
APPRAISAL OF REAL PROPERTY Subjgct E Seth Rd, “Parcel 1 | LOCATED AT £ Sel Rd, "Parcel 1 Northport, Mt 49670 “Parcel 1 ses attached survey FOR Berard T. Rocca IV 1414 Forest Ave, Evanston, IL. 06/02/2001 AS OF 12/31/2024 Juan Carbonell Carbonell Appraisal, Inc.
Page 20
SAREONELL APPRAISAL, INC. JUAN CARBONELL Certified General Real Estate Appralser, since 1991 Relfable & Experienced « Serving Grand Traverse Area & Northwest Lower Michigan Phone (231) #35-4869 www.CarboneliAppralsal.com Carbonell Appraisal, Inc. 119 Monroe St, Suite #101 Traverse City, Mi 49684 (231) 935-4869 www. CarbonsliAppraisal.com 07/04/2025 Bemard T. Rocca IV 1414 Forest Ave. Evanston, iL 06/02/2001 Re: Property: E Seth Rd, "Parcel 1 : Northport, Ml 49670 N/A Owner of Record: Opinion of Value: $700,000 Effective Date: 12/31/2024 In accordance with your request, 1 have appraised the above referenced property. The report of that appraisal Is attached. The purpose of the appraisal is fo develop an opinion of market value for the property described in this appraisal report, as improved, In unencumbered fee simple tle of ownsship. This report is based on a physical analysis of the site and improvements, a locational analysis of the neighborhood and city, and an economic analysis of the market for properties such as the subject. The appraisal was developed and the report was prepared in accordance with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. The opinion of value reported above is as of the stated effective date and is contingent upon the certification and limiting conditions attached. it has been a pleasure to assist you. Please do not hesitate to contact me if [ can be of additiona! service to you. Sincerely, loll)
Page 21
Cliant
Bernard 1. Rocca IV
Fllz to. 225045
Property Address
E Sel Rd, "Parcel 17
City
Northport
County {gelanau
State)
Zp Code
49670
Owner
Benard T. Rocca IV
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cover Page
Letter of Transmittal
Additonal Comparables 4-6 ....
GP Land Certifications Addendum .
UBPAP Identification
Land Subject Photos
Land Comparable Images 1
Land Comparable mage 4 ....
Location Map «...umwon
Appratser's Qualifications - Page 1
Appralser's Qualifications - Page 2Page 22
Carbonell Appraisal; bac.
LAND APPRAISAL REPORT
Pleo: 925045
E Seth Rd, “Parcel 1*
Clly: Northport
Stato: Mi
Zip Code: 49670
Legal Description:
“Parcel 1" see attached survey
In
Assessor's Parcel #1
45-008-232-014-00
Tax Year: 2025
RE. Taxes: § ToBeDetrm.
Special Assessments: $
None Known
1D Marko! Area Nano:
Leelanau County
Map Reference:
Leelanau Twp,
Consus Track
9701.00
4
Cusrent Owner of Record:
Bernard T. Rocca IV
Borower (if applicable):
N/A Owner of Record:
@
[Project Type (If applicable):
[1 PUD
[ ] De Mintmis PUD
Other (describe)
Metes and Bounds pargel,
HOA: $ None Known [| peryear
[1 per month
Are there any existing Improvements to Ihe property?
Dqno
[Ives
IVs, Indicate current oscupancy:
[) Owner
[] Tenant
[J Vacant
[_] Nothabllabls
t Yes, give a brief description:
|
The purpose of this appraisal Is lo develop an opinlen of:
DB) Market Value {as defined), or
|] other type of value {describe
his repost rollects the following value {if not Current, ses comments):
[] Current (the Inspection Date Is the Effective Date)
IX Retrospective
[ ] Prospective
operty Rights Appraised:
DG Fee Simple
[7] Leasshold
|
J Leased Foe
[| Other (describe)
L [intended Use:
~ To provida the owner client with a professional non-blasad estimate of the True Cash Value of Ihe sublet property for use In a property tax
i
| assessment appeal, The elfoctive date of the appraisal is 12/31/2024,
r4
2 Intended User(s) (by name or type):
~~ Cliont, local and state Assessment officials.
<
| Cllent:
Bernard T. Rocea IV
Address:
1414 Forest Ave,, Evanston,
{. 06/02/2001
~ | Appraiser.
Juan Garbongli
Address:
119 Monroe St, Sulls #101, Traverse City, Mi 43684
.
Characteristics
Predominant
One-Unit Housing
Present Land Use
Change In Land Use
|
Location:
[J tiban
7} Subusban
[3 Rural
Qceupansy
- | pyge
AGE
| One-Urit
65 %1 DG Not Likely
:
[7] Over 75%
26-75%
[] Undor2%
|B] Owner
95% [
$0000)
os)
[zum
1%{[J thely*
[Tn Proves *
[7 Rapi¢
Slate
[7] Slow
{1 vonant
85
Low
0
Multi-Unit
1%
To
:
[increasing
HG Stable
[3 Declining
3K vacant (0-5%) |
5,000
High
170
{Comm
5%
smandfsupply:
[J Shortage
D4 in Balance
[] Over Supply
{ [J Vacant (>5%)
560
Pred
3D
|AqWds
28%
arkellng eno:
[7] Under 3 Sos.
[GJ 3-6 Mos.
[TT] Over 6 Mos.
%
Factors Affecting Masketablity
lem
Good
Average
Far
Poor
MA
Hem
Good
Average
Far
Poor
NA
mployment Stabilly
[0
[3
[J
Adsquacy of Utlies
[|
Oo
oOo
oO
onvenience lo Employment
O
BK
[J
[OO
[3
property Compatbiiy
0
O00
OO
onvenience lo Shopping
OO
BB
[0
[OO
[3
Protection from Detrimental Condiions
oO
8
OO
OO
O
onvenionce to Schools
OO
B®
[0
[3
{3
Ppolicsand Fire Protection
0
Oo
oO
0
Adequacy of Public Transportation
0
B®
OO
[0
LJ
corer Appearance of Properties
OO
®
OO
OO
0
Recrealional Fagililles
0
RO
[1
Appoat to Market
0
®K
0
0
0
[]
Market Area Comments:
Leelanau County is a mostly rural peninistta projecting north into Lake Michigan to form the western boundary of Grand Traverse Bay, It
has a National Lake Shore Park, several small waterfront communilies, fruit orchards, gentleman farming, farge infand fakes and generations of recreational use and Is
an American Viticuftural Area. Private waterfront & larue acreage properties are the high end of the price range.
Subject is located about 2 miles west of the village of Northport with private high wooded bluff frontage on Lake Michigan.
NGLR MLS 5 county area ¢ family url stats: Jan-Dec'2310°24, MedlanPrice -4% AvaPrice +1%, Jan'25 136 salgs -7% from Jan'25, avq DaysOnMarket 105, As of
02/24/2025: 759 Active listings ~ 6 month supply. Home prices focally appear to be stable currently following steadily increasing median sale prices since 2009.
Realtor Magazine 02/18/25 “With rates and prices stabilizing, home sales will continue the upward trajgetory that started in the final months of 2024."
g
E
2
z
5
2Page 23
LAND APPRAISAL REPORT
lst: 205045
“| Dimensions:
445.78" High Bluff
*~ 200above Lake Mich, Frontage x Irregular
10.00 Actes
Site Area:
ASBIALINYI0.002¢
| Zoning Classification:
~~ R-1
Description:
Low Danslty Residential
Da present improvements comply with esting zoning requirements?
[Jes [TT No
DX) Nolmprovements
#{ Uses allowed under curront zoning:
Residonlial
Aro CC&Rs applicable?
X) Yes [| No
|] Unknown
Have he documents been reviswed?
’
BQ Yes
[J No
Ground Rent {f applicable)
§
/
amimenls:
A conservation easement over the wes! 6.92 acres from bluff edge to Lake Mich prevents any buitding thers except a shared walkway & staliway to reach ihe Take front.
ighest & Best Use as improved:
Prasent use, or
Other use {explain
clual Use os of Effective Date:
Agricultural, Recrealional, Future Residential
Usa as appralsed In this report:
Agriculiural, Recreational, Future Resldenlal
ummary of Highest & Best Use:
The use ag appraised - Is legally pesrissible, physically nossible, financially feasible, and results in the highest value, The CC&Rs
noted above stands for Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions. The appraiser Is unaware of any CC&Rs for the sublect properly, a tills search is beyond the
scope of this appraisal - $60 altached STATEMENT OF ASSUMPTIONS & LIMITING CONDITIONS.
8
Utifitios
Public
Other
Provider/Descripion
| Ofi-site Improvements
Type
Public
Private | Frontage
Adequate
alCecticty
[KC]
Typical
Strat
Seth Road is a Public Road
B80
[0
{Topography
200" down wooded bluff to Lake MI
gos
XO Twi
wih
Typical
Stee
Typical for Area
ih [Water
[1
B28
RequirbsPriWellTyp
Suface
Gravel
Shape
lcegular
O Sanitary ower
[J
3%
RequlresPriSeplic/Typ | Cub/Gutter
~ None, Typloal
LJ
[1
|Drirage
Appears Adequate
E[sumSover
[7
[]
None, Tyolcal
Sidowalk
Nong, Typical
0
CO
[view
Lake
& Islands View
Clemons
[J
0
Typleal
Streo! Lights
Nong, Typical
ao
ulimeda_
[7]
0%
Typical
Aley
Nong, Typical
(|
ther sito eloments:
D4 Inside Lot
[| Comer Lot
{| Cul de Sac] Underground Ulliles
|] Other (describe)
EMA Spool Flood Hazard Area
[J Yes
[DG No FEMA Food Zone
X
FEMA Map # 2608900118E
FEMA Map Date
6/7/2023
ile Gomments:
My work does not Include researching land records for easements, encroachments of environmental issues.
| am not an envira dnspectorexpert. Unless noted
therwise n my report, to apparent adverse ensements, encroachments or environmental problems were observed & appraisal assumes none exist,
you require any certainty In these regards, vou must hire an expen.
} noted no agricultural activity on the property.
XTRAORDINARY ASSUMPTIONS might have affected the assignment results: The sublect site is assumed buildable east of the conservation easement area &
| environmentally sound ~ | recommend any user of this appralsal confirm same for ther selves with the proper authorities.
{On the Data Source(s) line In he following orld DOM Is shott for Days Gn Market,
B
FEATURE
[SUBJECT PROPERTY.
COMPARABLE NO. {
COMPARABLE NO. 2
COMPARABLE NO. 3
Address E Seth Rd, "Parcel 1
E Seth Rd, "Parcel
1&3"
E Seth Rd, "Parcel 4"
E Seth Rd
Northport, Mi 49670
Hotour, Mi 49670
Northport, Mi 49570
Northport, MI 49670
7:
Proximity to Subjact
:
as
1.
4 Sale Price
3
al
yr | Price
$
3
20.22
66,3900
12.5
2 | 0ata Source(s)
Client & inspected
NGLRMLS#191465485;D0M 344
NGLRMLS#1927091,00M 230
NGLRMLS#1893678,00M 149
QO | erlieallon Source(s)
{Assessing Dala
Assessing, Listing Realtor & Buyer
{Listing Realtor & Buyer
Assessing Data "Arm's Length"
|
VALUE ADJUSTMENT
DESCRIPTION
DESCRIPTION
+633 Adiust
DESCRIPTION
+1) § Adjus
DESCRIPTION
+ $ Adjust
_|
2 Sats or Financing
NA
Armlih
AmmLth
Amith
Z 1 Concessions
NA
Cash
Casli:0
Cash
g Dale of Sale/Time
12/31/2024
07/23/2004
0}05/01/2025
0]03/02/2022
+60,000;
| Rights Appralsod
Fee Simple
Fee Simpls
Fea Simple
Fee Simple
Z |Locallon
Lk Mich /LeelanauTwp. {Lk Mich./LeelanauTwp.
Lk Mich A eefanauTwp,
Lk.Mich/LoglanauTwp.
Q | Sito Area
445° Bluff kMI/10.00ac 1445 BluILkMY13.054¢
-200,000]4.82 ac
+200.0001900'BlufiLkii/28.00ac
-500,000
4g Topo/ View
HighBluft/L kiich&lsles |HighBluff/l kiich&stes]
:.
Rolling/Countryside
-+175,000HighBluff/Lkhieh&isles|Page 24
LAND APPRAISAL REPORT
Filo: 225045
Summary of Salos Comparison Approach
The ually ang quantlly of data avanable and amazed ere 15 SUTIEIBNL for Credle fesuls i Ths approach 10 vas. AT
S|
of the comparables analyzed are comparable properties in the sublest's markeling area and are the most current, proximate and simitar to the sublect thal | could find
|
to bracket the sublect's important value adding chy
. All of the adjustments are derived ro
sensitivity Analysis
| have completed In
the Sales Grld(s).
2
The rangs of the Adjusted Sale Price of Comparabls
0,
the
A
700,000,
the Mean is $700,000.
ndard deviatic
9: percentage of the Mean Is 1%., Equal welghl is given to ai of the Comparables, the Median indication (if necessary rounded to the nearest_$1,000) becomes the
=| Indicated Value by Sales Comparison Approach,
=
&
——
Q
3
;
BO
—
IMyresearch
did
{did not reveal any prior sales or transfers of ihe subject prem for the threo years pilor to the ofeclue date of thls appraisal.
be
Source(s):
Norther Great Lakes Realiors (NGLR) MLS & Assessing Data online.
+
S
15! Prior Subjoct Safe/Transter
Analysis of saleftransfer history andfor any current agresmant of saleflisting:
The prior sale Included more than justthe
uate:
03/02/2022
|
subject property. Itis com;
0 Salas comparison approach herein. Basag
on af
MLS and publle
= Pic:
$1,125,000
i
ve been an arm's-lenolh transaction and was not impacted by any.
1 { Sowrce(s): NGLR MLS & Assessing Data
-
2
2nd Prior Subjoct Sale/Transfer
SR
2 Date:
Co
ings of the sublect property
-
=] Pte:
.
appralsal,
-
=f
Source(s):
PROJECT INFORMATION FOR PUD (if applicable)
|_| The Subject Is part of a Planned Unit Development,
Legal Name of Project:
Describe common elements and recreational facies:
IN
=
a
Indicated Value by: Sales Comparison Approach $
700,000
Final Recancliaion
The Gost and Incoms Appreachas to Value are not necessary for credible assignment results and/or not applicable or relevant to the subject
property. Full consideration in the final reconciliation is given to the Market Approach.
It Is applicable, relovant and the most reliable vatue Indicator in this sechion of the
market.
his appraisal
Is made DG “ass”, or
|} subject to the folowing conditions:
Ses
addendum regarding. assumptions, Limiting Conditions
&
Appraisar's Certification.
A
TRAORDINARY ASSUMPTIONS
-
=~ might have affected the assignment
results: Subject
is assumed to be
=
buildable & environmentally sound,
i
| This
report
Is
also subject
lo
ofher Hypolhalloal Conditions andfor Extraoedinary Assumptions
as specified
In
the allached addenda.
Based upon an inspection
of the subject properly, defined Scope
of Work, Statement
of Assumptions and Limiting Conditions, and Appraiser's Certifications,
my {our} Opinlon
of
the
Market
Value or otter
specified
value type), as
defined
hereln,
of the
real property
that
Is
the
subject
of
this
report
ls:
"12/31/2024
, which
is the effactive dale
of this appralsal,
i
700,600
If Indicated above, this Opinion of Value
is oy fo Hypothetical Canifions and/or Extraordinary Assumptions included
In {his report,
See altached addenda,
A lug and complofe copy
of this report contalls
19
pages,
including
exhiblis which are: consldored
an integral part of the
report, This appraisal feport may not be
“RECONCILIATION -
.
3
oropedy understood without reference
to
the
Information contained
In the complete roporl,
witch contains
the following attached
exhibits:
+ Scope of Work
E|
Limiling cond,/Cenltications
: Narralive Addendum
3X Location Map(s)
|__] Flood Addendum
LJ Additional Sales
|
5 Pholo Addenda
(County GIS Map
{1 Hypothetical Conditions
1 Exraordinary Assumptions
DC Appralser's Qualifications
7
Client Contact:
oo
To
oo
Cent Namo:
Bemad T. Rocca IV
|
E-Mail
_bernard.rocea@gmall,
Address:
1414 Forest Ava. Evanston, IL 06/02/2001
APPRAISER
SUPERVISORY APPRAISER (if required)
:
Gl)
or CO-APPRAISER (if applicable)
a
Supervisory or
iz | Appralser tame,
Juan Carbonell
~~
oo
Co-Appraiser Name;
2 | Company:
Carbonell Appraisal, Ing.
.
Company:
~
Slroone: (231) 936-4889 __
Fax; Nong
phone:Page 25
ADDITIONAL COMPARABLE SALES
FibNo: 295045
i
FEATURE
|
SUBJECT PROPERTY
COMPARABLE ND. 4
COMPARABLE NO. §
COMPARABLE NO. 6
ddress
E Seth Rd, "Parcel 1*
12063 N Foxview Dr
Northport,
MI
49670
Northport, Mi 49670
|
Proximity
to Subject
ER
27
miles
NE
| Sato Pico
§
NA:
Price/
3S
$
255.50
{|
Data Sourco(s)
Client & Inspected ~~ |NGLRMLS#1897463;00M 54
+f Vesitication Source(s}
Assessing Data
Assessing Data "Arm's Lengfh®
“o]
VALUE ADJUSTMENT
DESCRIPTION
DESCRIPTION
+{ § Adjust
DESCRIPTION
+1) 8 Adiust
DESCRIPTION
+{) § Adst
Sales or Financing
N/A
ArmLth
>
+f Concessions
N/A
Cashi0
Date of Sale/Time
12/31/2024
04/03/2022
+30.000;
Rights Appraised
Fee Simple
Fee Simple
Location
Lk Mich./t eelanauTwp. | Lk Mich. /LeelanauTwp.
Siig Area
44,510.00
174 BluifLkMI/1.69ac
+225,000)
Topo / View
HighBluff/LkMich&lsles [HighBluffLiMich&]sles
Improvements
FuurgSharedStaliTol
skebl | SharedStalrTol. akeMt
0]
Other.
Conservation Esmnt.
[None
0;
3
C+
(1-18
|
Net Adjustment
(Total, In $)
+
Cl-1g
255.000] d+
O-
Adjusted Sale Price (in §)
i;
#8
700,000
Suamiary of Sales Comparison Approach
See Summary of Sales Comparison Approach comment at the top of the previous page.
=. SALES'COMPARISON: APPROACH»...Page 26
Assumptions & Limiting Conditions
FleNo: 225045
Property Address:
E Seth Rd, Parcel 1*
Clty: Nogthport
State: Mi
2p Code: 49670
| Cleat:
Bernard T. Rogca IV
Address:
1414 Forest Ava., Evanston, il. 06/02/2001
“| Appraiser:
Juan Carbonell
Address:
119 Monroa St, Suite #101, Traverse Clty, MI 49684
| STATEMENT OF ASSUMPTIONS & LIMITING CONDITIONS
.
|
- The appraiser will not be responsible for matters of a legal nature that affect either the property being appraised er the title to it, The appraiser assumes
+
| that the title Is good and marketable and, therefore, will not render any opinions about the tlle. The property Is appraised on the basis
| of it being under responsible ownership.
4
- The appraiser may have provided a plat and/or parcel map in the appraisal report to assist the reader In visualizing the lot size, shape, and/or orientation.
The appraiser has not mads a survey of the subject property.
- If so indicated, the appraiser has examined the avallable flood maps that are provided by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (or
other data sources) and has noted in the appraisal report whether the subject site Is located In an identified Special Flood Hazard Area. Because
the appraiser is not a surveyor, he or she makes no guarantass, express or impfied, regarding this determination.
“|
- The appraiser wil not give testimony or appear in court because he or she mada an appraisal of the property in question, unless specific arrangements to
{ do so have been made beforehand.
|
- The appralser has noted In the appraisal report any adverse conditions {Including but not fimited to, the presence of hazardous wastes, toxic substances,
{| ete.) observed during the inspection of the subject property, or that he or she became aware of during the normal research Involved
+1
in performing the appraisal. Unless otherwise stated in the appraisal report, the appraiser has no knowledge of any hidden or unapparent
*"j condilions of ths property, or adverse environmental conditions (including, but not fimited to, ihe presence of hazardous wastes, toxic substances, etc.) that
1
would make the praperty more or less valuable, and has assumed that there are no such conditions and makes no guarantees or
-| warranties, express or implied, regarding the condition of the property. The appraiser will not be responstbts for any such conditions that do exist
+=]
or for any engineering or testing that might be required to discover whether such conditions exist. Because the appraiser is not an expert in the
fisld of environmental hazards, the appraisal report must not be considered as an environmental assessmant of the property.
- The appraiser obtained the information, estimates, and apinions that were expressed in the appraisal report from sources that he or she
considers to be reliable and believs therm to be true and correct. The appraiser dogs not assume responsibility for the accuracy of such itams
that were furnished by other parties.
- The appraiser will not disclose the contents of the appraisal report except as provided for in the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice, and
any applicable federal, state or local laws,
.
- An appraiser's client is the party (or parlies) who engage an appraiser-in a specific assignment. Any other party acquiring this report from the
client does not become a party fo the appraiser-client refalionship. Any persons receiving this appraisal report because of disclosure requirements
applicable to the appraiser's client do not become intendsd users of this report unless specifically Identified by the client at the time of the
“|
assignment.
:
"|
- The appraiser's written consent and approval must be obtained before this appralsal report can be conveyad by anyone to the public, through advertising,
public relations, news, sales, or by means of any other media, or by its inclusion in a private or public database. Possession of this
seport or any copy thereof does not carry with It the right of publication.
- Forecasts of effective demand for the highest and best use or the best fitting and most appropriate use were based on the best avallable data concerning
"i the market and are subject to conditions of sconamic uncertainty about the future,
“I The Scope of Work is the type and extent of research and analyses performed in an appraisal assignment that Is required to produce credible assignment
.} results, given the nature of the appraisal problem, the specific requirements of the intended user(s) and the Intended uss of the appraisal report. Rellance
-
"| upon this report, regardless of how acquired, by any party or for any use, other than those specified in this report by
| the Appraiser, is prohibited. The Opinion of Value that is the conclusion of this report Is credible only within the context of the Scope of Work, Effective
“1 Date, the Date of Repori, the Intended User(s), the Intended Use, the stated Assumptions and Limiting Conditions, any Hypothetical Conditions and/or
| Extraordinary Assumptions, and the Type of Value, as defined hereln. The appraiser, appraisal firm, and related parties
| assume no obligation, liability, or accountability, and wili not be responsible for any unauthorized use of this report or its conclusions.
g Additional Comments {Scope of Work, Extraordinary Assumptions, Hypothetical Conditions, efe.):
*
| Assumptions:
=] The appraiser is not a building or environmental inspector, The appraiser provides an opinion of value that assumes that the property Is environmental,
mechanically and structurally sound, unless otherwise noted fn the appraisal, The value could be considerably less if these assumptions are found fo be
untrue. A detarmination of this is beyond the scope of the appraisal. The appraisal doss not guarantee that the property Is free of defects or environmental
problems. The appraiser performs an Inspection of visible and accessible areas only and does not walk the entire property. Environmental problems may
be present in areas the appraiser cannot or does not see. A professional home inspection or environmental inspection is recommended. Appraiser cannot
“|
guarantee that property Is free of encroachments or easements, and recommends further investigation and survey.Page 27
Definitions & Scope of Work
ito: 325045
“|
Property Address: _E Seth Rd, "Parcel
1°
Clty: Northport
State: Mi
Zip Code: 49670
Gilet;
Beard T. Roca [V.
Audross:
1414 Forest Ave., Evanston,
IL. 6/02/2001
Appralser.
Juan Carbone!
Address:
119 Monvoe SY, Suite #101, Traverse City, Mi 49684
DEFINITION OF MARKET VALUE In this report Is "True Cash Value":
| "True cash value” means the usual selling price at the place where the property 10 which the term is applied is at the time of assessment,
-.7|
being the price that could be obtained for the property at private sale, and not at auction sale except as otherwise provided In this section,
or at forced sale. The usual selling price may include sales at public auction held by a nongovernmental agency or person If those sales
have become a common method of acquisition In the jurisdiction for the class of property being valued, The usual selling price does not
include sales at public auction if the sale is part of a liquidation of the soller's assets In a bankruptey proceeding or if the seller is unable to
+f use common marketing techniques to obtain the usual selling price for the property. A sale or other disposition by this state or an agency or
|
political subdivision of this state of land acquired for delinquent taxes or an appraisal made In connection with the sale or other disposition
~{
or the value attributed to the property of regulated public utilities by a govemmental regufatory agency for rate-miaking purposes Is not
‘| controlling evidence of true cash value for assessment purposes. In determining the true cash value, the assessor shall also consider the
-| advantages and disadvantages of location; quality of soil; zoning; existing use; present economic income of structures, Including farm
i stuctures, present economic income of fand If the fand Is being farmed or otherwise put to income producing use; quantity and value of
:| standing timber; water power and privilsges; minerals, quarries, or.other valuable deposits not otherwise exempt under this act known to be
avalatle I hi fang and thair valus, The source of this definition Is from Michigan's: THE GENERAL PROPERTY TAX ACT (EXCERPT) Act
ol
21.
i Additional Comments (Scope of Work, Extraordinary Assumptions, Hypothetical Conditions, etc.):
=i) The Scope of Work is the type and extent of research and analyses performed in an appraisal assignment that Is required to produce
~ credible assignment results, given the nature of the appraisal problem, the specific requirements of the intended user(s) and the intended
B use of the sopraisl report, Reliance upon this report, regardless of how acquired, by any party or for any use, other than those specified in
this report
by
{ the Appraiser, is prohibited. The Opinion of Value that is the conclusion of this report is credible only within the context of the Scope of
=: | Work, Effective Date, the Date of Report, the Intended User(s), the Intended Use, the stated Assumptions and Limiting Conditions, any
BE Hypothetical Conditions and/or Extraordinary Assumptions, and the Type of Valus, as defined hersin, The appraiser, appraisal firm, and
“| related parties
+{ assume no obligation, liability, or accountability, and will not be responsible for any unauthorized use of this report or its conclusions.
+{ Scops of the Appraisal:
1. Unfess otherwise noted in the report a walk through Inspection of the sublect site and an exterior and Interior walk through Inspection of the subject
Improvements, if any, was made by the appraiser. Tho age of the improvements, tax information and zoning are confirmed with the owner or client or local
government when possible and are the appraiser's estimates if not confirmed,
2, Sales and listing Information Is gathered and confirmed primarity through area Multiple Listing Services and / or appraiser's files, local Realtor's and
| Assessment Administrator's files if necessary. Typically the search for sales Is limited to the subject's neighborhood and the six months to one year period
|
prior to the effective appraisal date. IF the initial market data search proves inadequate then the geographic area and / or the time perlod of the search is
extended.
|
3. This report is an Appraisal Report per the Uniform Standards of Professional Appralsat Practice In effect on the effective appraisal date or the date the
“|
appraisal was signed.
J
General Sales Comments:
)
The sales prasented were selacted from an extensive search of recent closed sales in the appraiser's and the area Board of Realtors MLS files. These are
he best sales for comparison to the subject that my ressarch revealed. In this relatively rural Norihern Michigan community, suburban to Traverse Git, it
“1
is common for the comparable sales to be further than one mile from the subject, over six months ofd, have high land to value ratios, high adjustment
=| ratios and to have high single lin adjustments. These are afl conditions that cannot always bs avolded In this market and should not be considered
negatives regarding the subject's markstabllity. The market has been relatively stable over this period, if any adjustments for time are necessary, they are
"|
made.Page 28
Certifications
_
Filo No.t
Property Address:
F Seth Rd, "Parcel 1°
Rk
CL
}
Cly: Nothport.
State: MI
2p Code: 49670
Client:
Berard T. Rocca IV
on. hotress:
1414 Forest Ave., Evanston, IL 06/02/2001
-{ Appraiser:
Juan Carbonlt
Address:
119 Monros St, Site #101, Traverse Clty, M1 49684
| See attached USPAP Identification & Certification page.
| Gilent Contact:
Besnard T, Rocca IV
Ciont Name:
EMail: _bernard.rocca@gmall
1414 Forest Ave, Evanston, IL 06/02/2001
i APPRAISER
SUPERVISORY APPRAISER
(if required)
fl
or CO-APPRAISER (if applicable)
|
(bl)
&
* | supervisory or
| Appraiser Name\,
Juan Carbonell
Co-Appralstr Name:
2 Company:
Carbonell Appraisal, Inc.
.
Company:
2 Phone: (231) 936-4889
Fac Nong
Phono:
»Page 29
Clien!
Bemard
T. Rogea lV
B
rr
.
PR
....
Fis No. 226045
Property Address
E Seth Rd, "Parcel 1
Gily
Northport
Quer
Benard T. Rocca iV
USPAP (Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice) APPRAISAL & REPORT IDENTIFICATION
This Report 18 one of the following types:
!
1 Appraisal Report
(A writlen report prepared under Standards Rule
2.2(a) , pursuant lo the Scope of Work, as disclosed elsewhere In this report)
pid Restricted
{A written report preparad under Standards Rule
2-2¢s)
, pursuant lo the Scope of Work, as disclosed elsewhere In 1his report,
Appraisal Report
restricted lo he stated Intended use only by he specified client and any other named Intended user(s).
.
Comments on Standards Rule 2-3
Feertify that, fo the best of my kaowledge and belief:
- The statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct.
- The reported analysss, opinions, and conchislons are limited only by the reporiad assumptions and Himiting conditions and are my personal, impartial, and unblased professional
analyses, opinions, and conclusions.
~ Unless otherwise Indicated,
1 have no present or prospective interest In the property that is the subject of this raport and no personal interast wilh respect to the parties favolved.
- Unless otherwise Indicated,
1 have performed no Services, as an appraiser or In any olher capacity, regarding he property that Is the subject of this report within the three-year
period immediately preceding acceptance of this assignment.
-
| have no bias with respect to the property that Is the subject of this report of the pales involved with tis assignment.
- My engagement In this assignment was not contingeat upon developing or reporting predetermined results,
- My compensation for completing this assignment Is not coniingent upon the development of reporting of a predetenined valus or direction in value that favors he cause of the
client, the amount of the value opinion, the attainment of a stipulated resull, or the occurrence of a subsequent vent directly refated to the intended use of thls apprasal.
- My analysos, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report hias been prepared, it conformily with the Uniforms Standards of Professional Appralsal Practice that were
in effect al the time this report was prepared.
- Unisss otherwiss indicated,
| havo made & personal inspection of the properly that is the subject of this report.
~ Unless otherwise Indicated, no one provided significant reat property appraisal assistance to the persons} signing this certification {If there are exceptions, the name of each
individual providing significant real property appralsal assistance is stated elsewhere in this report).
Reasonable Exposure Time
(USPAP defines Exposure Time as the estimated langth of time that the property Interest boing
appraised would have been offered on the market prior 10 the hypothetical cansummation of a sale at markot value on the effective date of the appraisal.)
My Opinion of Reasonable Exposure Time for the subject property at tie market value stated in this report is:
180Days.
Exposure fime Is a retrospective opinion based on an analysts of past events assuming a competitive and open marke!, Reasonable exposure ime inherent in the
market value concept is always presumed to precede the effective date of he appraisal,
Comments on Appraisal and Report Identification
Note any USPAP related issues requiring disclosure and any State mandated requirements:
~The
use of this Restricted Appraisal Report
| is limited
to the cfient and the named intended user(s) In the report, The report may not
upporting. rationale for all of tho opinions and conclusions set
rth in the report,
.
aguiated by the Michigan Dep
"In Michigan Appraisers are required to be licensed an
Aftairs, P.0. Box 30670, Lansing, MI 48900
APPRAISER:
:
SUPERVISORY or GO-APPRAISER (if applicable):
Signature:
"
Slgaatore;
Name:
Juan Carbonsil
JE
LLPage 30
ond/or described on
bean complied with.
of sach corner is within the limils occepted by the peastice of professional
by:
surveying, ond that
oll the requirements of P.A.
132,
1970 os amended have
Survey
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
ES
N-S 144 line
a]
NOO'35'25"W
NOU'38'25'W
Pr
. 5
—
{0 Seth Row
bo A287 UT sas
;
CY
T
19
=) 5,
SE.
|e
Alls
[|
aid
ar
9
ld
I]
LEER]
if
|
[
|
fe
$38
go
32
oa
£58
2
|
8g
12
adh
®
EE
Hy.
w
A¥0.28308
poy
ol!
|
3
i
2
are
e
HN
bil
§
~
k
BENE
Bs
1
WEL
s
2
geipliely)
|¥ 0
5,
Eh ARR
8
b
.
HARARE ES
2
Yu
22
Boll
o
oe
Fe
1 hr
od
ar
1
ey
By
Zf
Tan
|8
spy
Subject
/
A
geld
E Soth Rd, "Parcel 1"
.
/
.
2h
yz
iN
wo
-§
p
Ig
O<
fs
BaF
1s
: a5.
8
£2
§
568
1h
EE 3
E101
8
1H
2
Fl8
2
P
GEE!
I
SO
+
PNR
LI
558
BIB
me
[22%
ETE
58
[zgR
ig
of
nfs
CR
8
|=
833
=
Er
|aafy
akaz
28%
LEGEND
SBad
gobz
oO
= IRON (SET)
268
®
IRON (FND)
.
|
3
HED
R
= RECORD
SCALE:
1"=200
oN
g ~gvd 8
Mow MEASURED
0
100
200
20%
C
= COMPUTED
OX
| hereby centity thal
| hove surveyed ond mapped the fond above platted
5/26/13
and that the relative posilional precision
Uc.
§ 4001040158
Beorlng.«8ustima, Pravious survey by Leelanau Land Surveying, Job #20041,
4
LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR
REVS
ONARE:
Part
of Gov't
Lot
4,
Section
32, T32N,
LEELANAU LAND SLI
P.0. BOX 701
RVEYINGPage 31
County GIS Map - Aerial View E Seth Rd, "Parcel 1". ; BE : Ouenbireattize,
Page 32
Subject Land Photo Page Cllent Bernard 7. Rocca V Property Address E Seth Rd, "Parcel 1° City Northport County Leelanau State MI Zip Code 49670 Owner Berard T. Rocca IV Subject Front E Sath Rd, "Parcel 1" Sales Price NA Dale of Sale 12/31/2024 Sits Area 446'BIuftLkhI10.002¢ Location Lk Mich.ALeelanauTwp. Topo / View HighBluf/LkMich&lslos Improvements FururoShargdStatrToLakeMt Other Conservation Esmal. Subject Rear Subject Street
Page 33
Land Comparable Images 1-3 Client Bernard 1. Rogea IV Property Address E Seth Rd, "Parcel 1° | City Nothport County _ Leelanau State MI Zip Code 49670 Owner Bernard T. Rocca IY Comparable #1 E Seth Rd, "Parcel 1 & 8 three" VAS Comparable #3 E Seth Rd Comparable 1 E Seth Rd, "Parcel 1 & 3" Prox, to Subj. Less than 0.01 miles Sales Price 900,000 Dats of Sale 07/23/2004 Site Area 445'BlUALKVY13.052¢ Location Lk Mich/LeelanauTwp. Topo / View HighBluff/LkMich&dsles Improvements FutvigSharedStakToLaket Other Conservation Esmnt. Comparable 2 E Seth Rd, "Parcel 4° Prox. fo Subj. 0.12 miles SE Sales Price 320,000 Date of Sale 05/01/2025 Site Area 4.8280 Location Lk Mich/LeetanauTwp. Togo / View Rolling/Countryside Improvements FutureSharedStalToLakaM Other Conservation Esmnt. Comparable 3 E Seth Rd Prox. lo Subj. Less than 0.01 miles Salos Price 1,125,000 Date of Sale 43/02/2022 Site Area S00°BluftLkMY28.00ac Location LkMich./LeelanauTwp. Topo / View HighBiufi/LkMich&lsles Improvements None Other None
Page 34
Land Comparable image 4 Cllont Bernard T. Rocca I. Popary adds E Soll Rd, “Parcel 1* H Bi Ca Norlpos| Sent | gelanat - Sue | Zool 49670 Qviner Benard T. Rocca iV Comparable #4 [ET Comparatle 4 12063 N Foxview Dr : 12083 N Foxviow Di C Prox. to Subjest 2.27 miles NE Sata Price 445,000 Gross Living Area Total Rooms Total Bedrooms Tolal Bathrooms Locator Lk Mich /LeetonauTep. Site 174BIUILKMY1.6920
Page 35
Location Map Client Bemard T. Rocca |V Properly Address _E Seth Rd, "Parcel 1° City Northport County | gelanau Stats Ml Zip Code 49670 Owner Bomard T. Rocca IV a la mode, In £ Bath Rd Lass than.0.01 mnlles COMPARABLE No, 1 sath jel, "Pareat 1.8 2° Less than 0.01 miles UE Seth Rd, “Parcal 1" E Seth Rd, "Parcel 4" 6:12 milds &
Page 36
Appraiser’s Qualifications
- Page
1
CARBONELL AFFRIASAL, INC,
REAL ESTATE APPRAISER / OWNER
JuaN CARBONELL
MICHIGAN CERTIFIED GENERAL APPRAISER #
| 205000841
- SINCE 1991
CARBONELL APPRAISAL, INC,
| 19 MONROE ST, SUITE 10
TRAVERSE CITY, MI 40684
PHONE (23 1) 935-4889
EMAL
je@carbonellappaisal.c
Wes Pace
www.Catbonell Appraisal.com
QUALIFICATIONS OF THE APPRAISER
Juan Carbonell
Michigan Certified General Real Estate Appraiser #1205000841 (since 1991)
APPRAISAL EXPERIENCE
N
Appraiser & Owner Carbonell Aopralisl ne. 1995’; Prasanit
Appraiser Associated with Michael Tamow, MAL Ri
.1991 - 1985
Garfigld Charter Township Board of Review Mombst 1995 - 1999
Garflald Charter Township Deputy Assessor, 1989 ~ 1991
Garfleld Charter Township Residential Apprslsor, 1987 - 1989
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
Traverse Ares Assocation of Realtors mls Committee Member 1936)
Northern Great Lakes Regional MLS
Aspire North Realtors {fka. Treverse Area Association of Realtors)
Michigan & Nationa! Associations of Reallors
MICHIGAN STATE LICENSE / CERTIFICATIONS
Certified General Real Estate Appralser, #1205000841, November 1991 - Present
Advanced Assessing Officer (Level 3) #R-5683, August 1988-2017
State Assessors Board Level Il Certification, September 1987
State Assessers Board Level | Certification, Apri! 1987
GENERAL EDUCATION
Northwestern Michigan Collegs, 1978 & 1983Page 37
Appraiser’s Qualifications - Page 2
APPRAISAL EDUCATION
State Assessors Board, Level { Course
- 1986-87
AAO, Course 2 Income Approach to Value
- 1987
pao, Course 301 Mass Appraisal
Residential Property
198:
Michigan Assessors Assoc. Property Tax Law & Exemptions i+
1988
Michigen Assessors Assoc., Income Approach If - 1989
Michigan Assessors Assos., Commerclal/industrial Manual
-
1989
Michigan Township Assoc., Michigan Tax Tribunal - 1989
Michigan
Assessors
Assoc.,
Hewlsil-Packerd
Financial
Calculalor « 1990
Slate Assessors Bosrd, Compulers In Assessing (Instructar) -
1990
State
Assessors
Boerd,
Economic
Condition
Factors
(instructor) - 1991
Michigan Assessors Assoc., Narrative Appraisal - 1991
Appraisal lnstitute, Basic Income Capitalization - 1993
Appralsaf Institute, Appraisal Principles — 1994 {Successful
challenge)
Appraisal Institute, Standards of Professional Practice, Part A
-
1994
Appraisal institute, Appraisal Procedures ~ 1994 (Successful
chaltenge)
National Assoc. of Realtors, USPAP & Environmental Issues, -
1995
Slate Assessors Board, timplamentation of Propossi ‘A”~ 1995
PARTIAL CLIENT LIST
Appreisal Enhancement Services
Dwellworks, LLC
First American Business Solullons
LandSafe Appraisal Service, Inc.
NOVO Appraisal Management Co.
PCV Mursor, Inc.
Safeguard Prapertiss, Inc.
Solidlfi Appraise! Management Co.
Strestlinks Appraisal Management Go.
HomeStretch Nonprofit Housing Comoration
Alden Slale Bank
Central State Bank
Chemis! Bank
Citfzens Bank
Fifth-Third Bank
First Communily Benk
Honor Bank
Huntington National Bank
Independent Bank
PNC Bank
Stale Savings Bank
Wes! Shore 8ank
4Front Credit Unfon
TBA Education Credit Union
MSU Fedoral Credit Union
Navy Federal Credit {nfon
Traverse Caihollc Federal Credit Union
ADMIREE, The Appraiser & the Law - 1697
ADMIREE, Surveying, Planning & Zoning ~ 1999
Northem Mich, University, USPAP ~ 1999
McKissock, Fectory Built Housing - 2003
MoRissock, information Technology & the Appraiser - 2003
MoKissock, FHA Appraising Today - 2003
Mich Assessors Assoo, Advanced Income Approachi&li- 2003
Worldwide ERC,Relocatlon Appraisal Training Program — 2008
McKissock, Appraising FHA Today — 2009
McKissock, FHA Appraiser Inspection Checklist Course — 2009
McKissock, income Properly Analysis and Valuation - 2011
MoKissock, Uniform Appraisal Dataset - 2011
McKissock, Ad Valorem Tax Consultation » 2011
McKissock, Groen Building for Appraisers — 2011
McKissack, Disclosures and Disclaimers — 2011
McKissock, Expert Witness for Commercial Appraisers — 2013
MoKissack, 2014-15 National USPAP Update ~ 2014
McKissack, Applications of Appraise! Analysise ~ 2014
McKissock, 12 Steps to USPAP Compliant Appraisals —~ 2015
McKissock, The New FHA Handbook 4000.1 - 2015
MichAssessore Assoc, Mich. Tax Tribunal Appesls - 2016
McKissack, 2016-17 Natlonal USPAP Update ~ 2016
OREP, How to Support & Prove Adjustments - 2017
McKissock, Michigan Appralsal Law — 2019
MoKissock, 2020-21 Nallonal USPAP Update — 2020
Continuing Education Courses from 2020 - Present date
NEI Relocation Service
Homa Equily Relocation Company
PHH Relocation Company
ReMax Relocation Company
Welchert Relocation Resources
Joseph E, Quand!, Attorney
* Yery C. Rogers, Attomey
Jarites R. Wiitiams, Attomay
Amy M. Swogger, Attomay
Stephen ©. Chambers, Attomey
Cunningham Davison Rogers & Award, Altomeys
Robert Guyot Hf, Attomey
Read & Shaip, Altornays
Smith Haughey Rice & Roegge, Attorneys
Young, Graham, Elsengslner & Wendling PC Altornsys
Groganteaw, PC
Rosi & Gardner, P.C,
Leelanau Land Conservancy
Grand Traverse Raglonal Lend Conservancy
Grand Traverse Band of Oftawa & Chippewa Indians
Privats individuals, Partnerships, LLC's, Eslafes & TrustsPage 38
PEZZETTL, VERMETTEN, POPOVITS & UMULIS, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW MICHELLE 1. SCHUBERT 600 E. FRONT STREET, STE. 102 E-mail: mschuben@uich-legat.com TRAVERSE CITY, MI 49686 (231) 929-3450 Facsimile (231) 941-9568 July 30, 2025 VIA FEDERAL FIRST-CLASS MAIL State of Michigan Michigan Tax Tribunal 2" Floor MOAHR 2407 N. Grand River Avenue Lansing, MI 48906 Re: Bernard T. Rocca and Rebecca Rocca v Leelanau Township Dear Sir or Madam: Enclosed please find Petitioners Property Tax Petition with exhibits to be filed. Also enclosed please find a check in the amount of $400.00 for the filing fee. Upon receipt of a Docket Number Petitioner will serve the Petition upon all parties and file a Proof of Service of same with the Tribunal. Sincerely, eC Michelle L. Schubett MLS Encls. 15988.0001
Page 39
9068 IN Buse IMTIAY IAD] PURID 'N L0PT WHY OJ 400] Pug feanqu xe] weSmony we] JO 318IG 9896% TIN "A310 9s3oA®IL, ... T012unS Ions WoL4 F009 3°d ‘STRu() B SHAodog UPI ‘BIZZY
Page 40
PEZZETTI, VERMETTEN, POPOVITS & UMULIS, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW MICHELLE L. SCHUBERT 600 E. FRONT STREET, STE. 102 E-mail: mschubert@mich-legal.com TRAVERSE CITY, MI 49686 (231) 929-3450 Facsimile (231) 941-9568 August 15,2025 VIA FEDERAL FIRST-CLASS MAIL State of Michigan Michigan Tax Tribunal 2" Floor MOAHR 2407 N. Grand River Avenue Lansing, MI 48906 Re: Bernard T. Rocca and Rebecca Rocca v Leelanau Township Docket No. 25-03150 Dear Sir or Madam: Enclosed please find Petitioner’s Motion for Reconsideration and certificate of service to be filed. Also enclosed please find a check in the amount of $50.00 for the filing fee. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, N= Michelle L. Schubert MLS Encls. 15988.0001
Page 41
PEZZETTI VERMETTEN POPOVITS & UMULIS, P.C. CLIENT EXPENSE STATE OF MICHIGAN 8/18/2025 50.00 CLIENT EXPENSE A SME/MLS - 15988.0001 - 26 50.00
Page 42
i pT Hh Pezzetti, Vermetten, 600 E. Front Traverse C State Michigan 2nd Flo 2407 N. Gra Lansing