Eschaton LLC Motion to Set Aside Default.pdf
Eschaton LLC, Petitioner Vs. City Of Detroit, Respondent · 26-000046-TT
Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 _____________________________, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner(s) v MTT Docket No. _____________________________, Respondent(s) MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT 1. A default was entered against me on _________________ and, if applicable, the default was extended on _________________. 2. Good cause exists to set aside the default because: 3. I ask this Tribunal to set aside the default. _________________________________________ Party/Representative (sign here) _________________________________________ [Print/type name of person signing] I certify that on this date I served a copy of this Motion, and any additional documentation, on the opposing party or their representative. ___________________________ _______________________________________ Date (sign here) ESCHATON LLC 26-000046 CITY OF DETROIT FEBRUARY 13, 2026 MARCH 20, 2026 SEE ATTACHMENT. /s/ Darwyn P. Fair Darwyn P. Fair 3-24-26 /s/ Darwyn P. Fair
Page 2
ATTACHMENT #2 Good cause exists to set aside the Default because Petitioner timely responded to the Tribunal’s February 13, 2026, Order by filing an Amended Entire Tribunal Petition, a copy of the Wayne County Circuit Court Complaint (Case No. 25-015101-CB), and a written status statement. The Tribunal subsequently found that Petitioner’s response was incomplete due to failure to file proof of service on all parties-in-interest. This defect was procedural in nature and has now been fully corrected. Petitioner has served the Amended Petition on all required parties-in-interest and has filed a corrected Proof of Service in compliance with Tribunal Rules (TTR 227 and TTR 225). No prejudice will result to Respondent or any party-in-interest, and the Tribunal has already determined that jurisdiction is properly invoked with respect to the December 2025 Board of Review decision.