Full record / Michael and Sue Konkel.pdf

Michael and Sue Konkel.pdf

Michael Konkel, Sue Konkel, Petitioners Vs. Township Of Case, Respondent · 25-003098-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

RECEIVED 

JUL 2.92025 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

- GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Nidiel 7.5500 

fo 

Lanta. / 

, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner(s) 

MTT Docket No. 

Case Tom 

Lpanttie Vi PY 

i 

Respondent(s) 

ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 

1. 

Property Parcel No: 

O57 ~J24 - Jo¢ 

~ ded - J0 

(if more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition 

Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 

2. 

The property identified above is __ real 

___ personal. 

3. 

If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties 

contiguous? ___Yes __ 

No. 

(If no, separate Petitions are required for each non- 

contiguous parcel.) 

4. 

Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property 

under appeal? ___ Yes ___No. 

(if no, separate Petitions are required for each 

parce! of personal property not located on a parcel of real property under 

appeal.) 

5. 

If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal 

property statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 

Bobi! Lo 

dial 

J Vg pots 

6. 

The property identified above is classified as 

Fsadln fod frei?”

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 

Page 2 of 4 

8. 

If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific 

facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the 

assessment or rb 

at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 

- 2772 

iy ings pes art fers 

oo 

ed Cope 

a “er “an 2 cect 

Lo 

“AL ne 

7% 

afre, ie) 

7 

or 105 Lox 

or PP 

eye SA, 7 

eged AH, 

“a 

nt, “ = eo 

2th Sette 

70 

>A 

dd 2 mre 

9. 

If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the 

classification or classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 

of the tax year involved), list the separate and specific facts upon which 

Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunals authority over the assessment or 

assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 

10. 

The property or properties at issue are located in isu 

Zose County. The 

property or properties’ address is: 

Ped # 57-0 

24 - 00 - 006-0 

11. 

The assessment or assessments at issue were established by 

lerp] icable 

local governmental unit): 

bone 

Larfal 

fH55e 

isn 

SO 

2 

5? 

A 

7 

12. 

Petitioner's legal residence or principal office address is: 

2775 Sot vod A Bp 

4 

13. 

Thig 

appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): 

% 

the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values 

the property or properties’ taxable value only 

If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a 

dispute as to the value of an addition or loss? ___ Yes __ No 

uniformity of the property or properties’ assessment

Page 3

MTT Docket No. 

Page 3 of 4 

15. 

If more than the current tax year is being appealed, list the separate and specific 

facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal's authority over the prior 

tax year or years (attach additional page if necessary): 

= “gor 

7 

ewes EX 

yap 

Jeri 

7.55 

Vis I 

ent 2 

ZY 94 Asrersans 

sty #2 

bo srl @ yrs Ho Co 2h 

2 Aus. 

16. 

The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent's 

Board of Review are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

Assessed Value 

Taxable Value 

Zo2 2. 

wee 

EZ vo 

[5575 

Lo 25 

TT 

eee LL 

Seve 

28: Fo0 

wd 

Zed 

RPT 

EA 

PE 

2715 

Ly 

17. 

Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified above are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

State Equalized Value 

Taxable Value 

RI22- 

W225 00 App. 

ry 

(1.555 

2003 

¥ a2 gu0 7 

RF Jaz 

2 SEF 

Pot 

Fa25000 

35 zou 

2 305 

2025 

L2uN 

7 

35 200 

E77 

18. 

The values in dispute for the property identified above are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

State Equalized Value 

Taxable Value 

ROAZ— 

v, 

v 

f 

2047 

VA 

Vv, 

v) 

2924 

Jj 

J/ 

v/ 

2.025 

7 

N 

v 

19. 

Petitioner requests the following relief (attach additional page if necessary): 

7A 

7 

ya “a 

(7% 

TA wl 7c 

0 Gals AD 0 

sry [Az 

Love yz ul, 

re sh 

4 = oi 

SA Doe 20

Page 4

MTT Docket No. 

Page 4 of 4 

Signa AY 

AD: 

Re 

resen 

tive or, rare Petitioner: 

Kindy 

Pri 

of Fee 

uthg, zed 

p 

ti ye or, if none, Petitioner: 

Dera) anlel 

Shue 

Role) 

Email PA) 

ons, sue foskel 19 av cons 

Maili 

: 

ailing ASS, 

ry Tend Mine, Lotto 

1) 

Telephone Number: Fe) 723 SZ 

SFP F570 

— 

Date: Ji zd ZoZs”

Page 5

EB rE EAE 

SE mmo 

ST 

0 CE 

a 

Ey Rime 

Wa Re Waa Bn 

A ne 

hE] 

. 

Tw 

2S 

| 

METROPLEX MI 480 

| 

E 

4) 

< 

Michael Konkel 

d 

2779 Scottwood PI. 

Brighton, MI 48114-9458 

26 JUL 2025 

PM 161 

© 

BY 

HH so J 7x x co) 

PY, [gs Toriz 

canig Hl LF 50 

Ly

ENED ET BREE 

RUE 

RL 

TEE TT 

LT Be 

UE 

BY UR E

PDF reading copy

← View full record