Full record / scpetition_valuation.pdf

scpetition_valuation.pdf

Angela Hagen Petitioner V City Of Battle Creek Respondent · 26-002285-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

1 of 3

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM

VALUATION / UNCAPPING APPEAL

MTT DOCKET NO. 

Petitioner’s Contact Information:

Filer Type:

Individual

Local Unit of Government:

First Name

Angela

M.I.

Last Name

Hagen

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

66 Oakely St

City or Town

Battle Creek

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

49037

Telephone Number

2696726228

E-mail Address

angelahagen6@gmail.com

Subject Property Information:

How many parcels are you appealing?

1

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining?

*If no, you must file separate appeals for each parcel

N/A 

Property Address (No., Street)

66 Oakley st

City or Town

Battle Creek

County

Calhoun

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

49037

Taxing Authority (City or Township)

Unknown

Check which of the following you are appealing: (check all that apply)

True Cash and Taxable Values

 

Please Explain the Reason for this Appeal:

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

2 of 3

Petitioner appeals the 2026 assessment of the subject property based on lack of uniformity and over evaluation. The current assessed value is inconsistent with 

the market value of comparable immediate neighborhood properties. specifically the property is assessed at $3,928 where as adjacent properties of similar 

condition and size a assessed significantly lower according to BS&A online information Under Michigan law, assessments must be uniform. Currently, my tax 

burden is nearly double

that of my neighbors. Below is a comparison of my tax liability against three nearby comparable

properties:

Per the BS&A

My Property: 66 Oakley st Battle Creek MI $3,928

Neighbor A: 64 Oakley st Battle Creek MI $2,085 year (next door)

Neighbor B: 70 Oakley st Battle Creek MI $1,970 year (other side next door)

Neighbor C: 71 Oakley st Battle Creek MI $ 1,861 year across the street

The local board of review denied the protest citing no proof however, the petitioner lacks the financial means to obtain a professional appraisal. This assessment 

increase creates an unsustainable financial burden. Petitioner asserts that the cities valuation is not uniform with surrounding properties. 

Under Michigan constitution assessments must be uniform for properties if similar classification and characteristics. The current assessment created an 

inequitable tax burden on the petitioner compared to other properties in the same neighborhood.

Jurisdictional Issues:

Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review? No

If Yes, check which Board of Review you attended: 

If No, please check the applicable reason(s):

Not required to attend

Year(s) Under Appeal:

1

 

Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal:

Parcel Number:

8070-00-35-0

Classification of Property: Real (check one)

Residential (check one)

Current Assessed Value as established by the Board of Review:

92600

Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review:

79235

What do you believe is the fair market value?

180000

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

3 of 3

Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value.

90000

If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.

 

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Petitioner’s Signature: 

/s/ Angela Hagen

Attorney or Authorized Agent’s Signature:

/s/ 

Fee Information:

If you do not have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% at the time of the filing of this petition, you are required to pay a filing fee for 

the filing of this appeal.

The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel 

with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each 

additional parcel being appealed.

Property tax appeal: Residential** Non-Residential

SEV or TV in contention*

 

 Filing fee*** Filing Fee**

$100,000 or less...........................................................................................$ 125.00 $250.00

$100,000.01 to $500,000.00.........................................................................$ 200.00 N/A

More than $500,000…..................................................................................$ 300.00 N/A

Does the subject property have a principal residence exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition?

Yes

PDF reading copy

← View full record