FINAL Special assessment appeal.pdf

Aaron Shields, Petitioner V Township Of Chesterfield, Respondent · 24-003981-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

To: 

Michigan Tax Tribunal 

P.O. Box 30232 

Lansing, MI 48909 

 

From: 

Aaron and Nicole Shields 

48884 Salt River Drive 

Chesterfield, Michigan, 48047 

shieldsjaaron@gmail.com / nmadamic@gmail.com 

(586) 381 – 0752 / (586) 556 – 5215 

 

Date: November 10, 2025 

Re: Appeal of Special Assessment – 48884 Salt River Drive 

Dear Members of the Michigan Tax Tribunal, 

I am writing to formally appeal the special assessment imposed on my property located at 48884 Salt 

River Drive in Chesterfield Township. Document A attached shows the total amount of this special 

assessment is $7,689.05. This is payable upfront by 11/01/2025, or over 10 years with a 5% interest rate. 

I respectfully request that this assessment be reviewed and reconsidered, as I believe it fails to provide a 

sufficient "special benefit" to my property, as required under MCL 41.721–41.738 governing special 

assessments. Under Michigan law, a special assessment must be reasonably proportional to the increase 

in market value or benefit conferred to the property. In this case, that proportionality standard has not 

been met. 

1. Lack of a Sufficient Special Benefit to My Property 

Our road was already paved prior to the repavement project, albeit with some potholes typical of 

Michigan roads. It was entirely passable and safe to drive on (See Photos 1 and 2). Despite my wife’s and 

my objections, the repaving project proceeded due to a majority petition, though I fail to see how this 

improvement provides a benefit commensurate with the $7,689.05 assessment. 

I formally protested the special assessment in person at the hearing held on September 24, 2024, to 

confirm the special assessment roll. Since the road was already paved and functional, repavement has 

not provided any meaningful improvement that would increase the market value of my property. I have 

found no measurable evidence that the repaving has increased my home’s market value or utility in any 

way. Any alleged benefit, if present, is minimal at best and does not justify such a high financial burden.

Photo 2 

Photo 1 

48884 Salt River Drive 

Photo 1 

48896 Salt River Drive 

J 554 Sait River Drive

2. Misrepresentation of Road Status and Improper Signage 

When I purchased the property in 2021, the Salt River Drive street signs were green, which according to 

Chesterfield Township’s own website, denotes a public road maintained by Macomb County Department 

of Roads. Please refer to Document B attached. Two of the roads that intersect with Salt River Drive did 

indeed have blue street signs indicating a private road, but the signs for Salt River Drive were green at 

each of these crossroads. 

In fact, per attached Document C, the appraiser at the time of our purchase recorded our property as 

being on a public road made of asphalt. The appraiser also noted that the utilities and off-site 

improvements were typical for the market area, hence, not affecting the evaluation. 

It was only during the discussions surrounding this project that I learned we live on a private road. I 

raised this concern with the Chesterfield Township Engineer, who stated that only the portion of Salt 

River Drive from Jefferson Avenue to Lakeview Drive is a public road, and that the remainder of Salt River 

Drive from Lakeview Drive to Point Lakeview Drive did not meet the MCDR standards for a public road 

and was therefore considered private. 

Shortly thereafter, the Salt River Drive street signs were replaced with blue signs, indicating a private 

road. I later received a letter from a neighbor explaining that another resident on our street had 

personally paid for the sign replacement and would accept donations to cover the cost, which seems 

improper for an issue affecting the township. If the signage was incorrect, the responsibility for 

correcting it lies with the township, not a private resident. This indicates a lack of clarity from the 

township about road designations and confusion around road ownership, further complicating the 

justification of the special assessment. 

3. Partial Repaving of the Road Limits Any Benefit 

The repaving project only covered the portion of the Salt River Drive starting just before my neighbor’s 

house and continuing down the road for 37 properties. However, the section of Salt River Drive 

beginning at Jefferson Avenue—which all vehicles must use to enter and exit the area—remains public 

and was not repaved, leaving it in notably worse condition than the newly paved segment. Currently, this 

area is in far worse condition than what the newly paved segment was prior to the repaving. As a result, 

anyone driving to my property will still have to traverse a public road that is uneven and with significant 

potholes, passing only one property’s length of repaved road before reaching my driveway {See Photos 

3-9}. 

Because the section of Salt River Drive that remains public is the primary access route to all homes—

including mine—the practical and aesthetic benefit of the private road paving is effectively nullified. 

Given this, the limited scope of this project fails to provide any noticeable benefit to my property’s value. 

Prospective buyers would still have to drive over the deteriorating public portion of the road before 

reaching my driveway, which negates any supposed improvement from the private road project. The 

partial nature of this project only underscores the lack of meaningful enhancement to my property’s 

value.

Photo 3. View of Salt River Drive (public portion of road) when entering from Jefferson Ave 

Photo 3. View of Salt River Drive (public portion of road) when entering from Jefferson Ave

Photo 4. View of Salt River Drive (public portion of road) when approaching Jefferson Ave 

Photo 4. View of Salt River Drive (public portion of road) when approaching Jefferson Ave

Photo 5. View of Salt River Drive (public portion of road) when approaching Jefferson Ave 

Photo 5. View of Salt River Drive (public portion of road) when approaching Jefferson Ave

Photo 6. View of Salt River Drive (public portion of road) when approaching Jefferson Ave 

Photo 6. View of Salt River Drive (public portion of road) when approaching Jefferson Ave

Photo 7. View of Salt River Drive (public portion of road) headed away from Jefferson Ave 

Photo 7. View of Salt River Drive (public portion of road) headed away from Jefferson Ave

Photo 8. View of Salt River Drive and Pointe Lakeview St intersection. Photo includes public 

portion of Salt River Drive and private portion of Salt River Drive after re-paving. 

48884 Salt River Dr

Photo 9. View of Salt River Drive and Pointe Lakeview St intersection. Photo includes public 

portion of Salt River Drive and private portion of Salt River Drive after re-paving. 

Photo 9. View of Salt River Drive and Pointe Lakeview St intersection. Photo includes public 

portion of Salt River Drive and private portion of Salt River Drive after re-paving.

4. Property’s Assessed Value Increase for 2025 due to Market Adjustment 

According to attached Document D, 2025 Notice of Assessment issued by Chesterfield Township shows 

our property’s assessed value increased from $186,500 in 2024 to $196,900 in 2025, an increase of 

$10,400 (approximately 5.6%). The notice explicitly identifies the reason for this change as “Market 

Adjustment.” There is no indication that any property-specific improvements such as the road project 

was a factor in that valuation change. Therefore, the $7,689.05 special assessment does not appear to 

be reasonably proportional to any measurable increase in property value. 

Furthermore, the assessed value change for our property is consistent with typical year-over-year 

appreciation rates in Chesterfield Township. Attached Document E shows a summary from Zillow for 

Chesterfield, MI showing a typical 1-year value change of +5% through September 30, 2025. Similarly, 

attached Document F from Redfin shows home prices in Chesterfield, MI were up 7.1% compared to last 

year. This data supports that my property’s value change aligns with general market trends, not the road 

project. 

5. Conclusion 

In light of the above, I respectfully request that the Tribunal reconsider the justification for the special 

assessment for my property. The project has not provided a sufficient special benefit to my property, 

either in terms of value or usability, to justify the significant financial burden imposed by the $7,689.05 

assessment. Additionally, the confusion over the road’s ownership and the incomplete scope of the 

project further diminishes the rationale for the assessment. 

Accordingly, I respectfully request that the Tribunal remove the special assessment on my property, as 

the cost is not reasonably proportional to any demonstratable benefit received. 

Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to a fair and just resolution to this matter. 

Please feel free to contact either me or my wife using the contact information below if further 

information is needed. 

Sincerely, 

 

_______________________________ 

 

________________________________ 

Aaron Shields 

 

 

 

 

Nicole Shields 

shieldsjaaron@gmail.com 

 

 

 

nmadamic@gmail.com 

 

 

(586) 381 – 0752 

 

 

 

 

(586) 556 – 5215 

 

 

Attachments 

• 

Document A: Special Assessment Notice 

• 

Document B: Street Signage Evidence (Green vs. Blue) 

• 

Document C: 2021 Appraisal Report Excerpt 

• 

Document D: 2025 Notice of Assessment (Marked “Market Adjustment”) 

• 

Document E: Zillow – Chesterfield, MI 1-Year Value Change 

• 

Document F: Redfin/Local Market Data – Chesterfield Home Price Trend

Document A 

 

 

2025 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT BILL 

DUE DATE: 

11/01/2025 

y 

i 

Sp. Assessment: 

PAVING - SALT RIVER DR. 

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF CHESTERFIELD 

15-09-27-279-002 

CHESTERFIELD 

TOWNSHIP 

— EST. 1842 —— ANNUAL SPECIAL ASSESSMENT NOTICE 

There are three options on how to proceed. Payments must be received by November 1, 2025 

1. Take NO action by November 1, 2025, to have the Minimum Annual Installment Due applied to your 2025 Winter Tax 

Bill. You do not need to contact the Treasurer's office for this to apply. 

2. Pay the Minimum Annual Installment Due amount. 

3. Pay the Special Assessment Payoff amount. 

DESCRIPTION 

AMOUNT 

f 

Payment Options - 

CURRENT PRINCIPAL 

$765.72 

- Online at https://www.chesterfieldtwp.org via 

electronic check or credit card* 

CURRSTINTEREST 

$0.00; 

- In person via cash, check, or credit card* 

- Mail in payment. 

Check made payable to 

Chesterfield Township 

47275 Sugarbush Rd. 

Chesterfield, MI 48047 

Minimum Annual Installment Due 

$765.72 

Fees apply for credit & debit card transactions 

Special Assessment Payoff Amount 

$7,689.05 

Please return this portion with payment 

Sp. Assessment: 

PAVING - SALT RIVER DR. 

DUE DATE: 

11/01/2025 

15-09-27-279-002 

Check made payable to Chesterfield Township 

Minimum Annual Installment 

$765.72 

Payoff Amount 

$7,689.05 

9 

JO 0 ARAM 

SHIELDS, NICOLE & AARON 

150927279002/P 163%C 

48884 SALT RIVER DR 

CHESTERFIELD, MI 48047-3423 

4 

-Prop 

ddress- 

48884 SALT RIVER DR 

CHESTERFIELD, MI 48047-3423 

Document A

Document B 

~ PROJECT 

LOCATION 

Photos taken Feb 2024 

Text regarding Private vs Public street signs 

directly from Chesterfield Township website 

Roads 

Private Roads are maintained at the expense of the private individuals who requested the road. 

If the street sign 

is blue, the road is private. 

Public Roads are maintained by the Macomb County Department of Roads 

If this road sign is green, 

it is under the jurisdiction of Macomb County 

Michigan Department of Transportation - MDOT MiDrive 

Click on the link for current and upcoming MDOT road projects. 

~— CHARTER TOWNSHIP 

OF CHESTERFIELD 

MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN 

SALT RIVER DRIVE RESURFACING 

(PONT LAKEVEEW ST TO LAKEVEW ST) 

SD JOB No. CH24002 

HEE 

fort 

ee 

. 

= 

Bam 

x} 

Ee 

oa 

= 

ed 

Erm 

5 

TOWNSHP BOARD OF TRUSTEES 

! 

TREASURER: 

[i 

BRADLEY A. KERSTEN 

KATHY ELLIOT 

[| 

CLERK: 

TTT 

i 

CINDY BERRY 

at 

i 

TRUSTEES: 

x 

it 

HANK ANDERSON 

DAVD JOSEPH 

i oa 

BRIAN S. DEMUYNCK 

KATHY VOSBURG 

Document B

Document C 

28815124 

28815124 

Uniform Residential Appraisal Report 

Flo# 

0621/016-001 

The purpose of this summary apprasal report § to provide the lendericlient with an accurate, and adequately suppored, opinion 

of he market value of the subject property. 

Property Address 48864 Salt River Dr 

Cty Chesterfield 

State MI 

Zip Code 48047-3423 

 Borower Nicole & Aaron Shields 

Owner 

of Publ Record Dennis Lada/Marsha Ladd RV L 

County Macomb 

Legal Description _"BAYSHORE ACRES” LOT 2 

| 

Assessors Parcel # 

_15-09-27-279-002 

Tax Year 2020 

RE. Taxes $ 3,838 

| Negrbomood Name BAY SHORE ACRES 

Map Reference 47664 

Census Tract 2225.00 

Y Occupant 

(KJOwner 

[Tenant 

[Vacant 

Special Assessments $ 0 

[JPuD 

HOA O 

[J per year [ per month 

Property Rights A 

[Fee Simple [IL 

[Other (describe) 

Assignment Type 

_ [XiPurchase Transaction 

[Refinance Transacton 

[Other (desarbe) 

IC LenderCient Bank of America 

Address 7105 Corporate Dr Plano TX 75024 

Im Is the subject property aumently offered for sale or has it been offered 

for sale in the twelve mons prior to the effectve date 

of this appraisal? 

Yes (Iho 

Report data souroals) used, ofering prioafs), and dates). 

DOM 17.The subject is currently pending on the market and was listed for $409,900 since 5/31/2021. 

All information gathered was through Public Records & Realcomp 

MLS#58050039567. 

[156] 

dd [] dd not analyze the contact for sae for he subject purchase transadion. Explain the resus of the analyss of fe contact for sale or why fie analyss was nol performed. 

| 

Arms length sale; 

The subject is being purchased in the amount of $430,000 as an arms length transaction. 

Contract Price $ 430,000 

Date of Contract 05/27/2021 

Is the property seller the owner 

of public record? 

~~ [Yes [] No Data Sourcefs) Purchase Agreement 

Is there any financial assistance (loan charges, 

sale concessions, gift 

or downpayment assistance, etc.) to be pad by any party 

on behalf 

of the borrower? 

[J Yes I No 

If Yes, report the tal dolar amount 

and describe the tems fo be paid. 

| $0;:$0;:$0; After 

the purchase ag 

provided to the 

$0.00 in seller con 

for prepaid or any other assistance was provided to the borrower for this 

|T transaction. This information was gathered through the purchase agreement. 

Note: Race 

are not 

apprassal 

factors. 

Location [] Urban 

Suburban [] Rural 

Property Values 

[] Increasing 

Stable 

[Decining 

PRICE 

AGE 

Buit-Up [Over 75% []25-75% 

[1] Under25% 

| Demand/Suppy [XC] Shortage 

[J In Baiance [[JOverSupply | 

$(000) 

(yrs) 

|24 Unt 

% 

| Gowh 

[Rad 

[Swe 

[Sw 

gTime 

[Under 3mths []36mths 

[J Over 

6 mths 

125 

Low 

1 

Muit-Family 

5% 

Neghborhood Boundaries 

600 

High 

100 

|Commeraa 

10% 

* 

The subject is located North of Anchor Bay, South of Jefferson Avenue, East of the St. Clair River and West of Lakeview 

Street. 

340 

Pred 

40 

|Other 

% 

10 

Neghoomood Descrpton 

The subject neighborhood consists of single family homes, condominiums, and commercial property along the main roads and all intersections. Housing styles, age. size & utility are 

| consistent with the subjact. The subjactis close in proximity to major freeways and schools. 

D 

Market Conditions (including support for he above conclusions) 

See attached addenda. 

Dimensions 111x330 

Area 

36630 sf 

Shape 

Rectangular 

View 

N;Res; 

Specific Zoning Classi 

RIA 

Zoning Dx 

jon 

One Family Residential 

Zoning Compliance 

I]Legal 

[] Legal Nonarforming (Grandathered Use) 

[No Zoning 

[] Ihegal (describe) 

Is the highest 

and best use of subject property as improved (or as proposed per plans and specications) he presentuse? 

[3] Yes [No 

If No, describe. 

§ Utitiss 

Pubic Other (describe) 

Pubic 

Othe (describe) 

[| Becricty 

0 

Water 

[m] 

Gas 

[m] 

Santary Sewer 

[m] 

Alay 

None 

E 

FEMA Speda Flood Hazard Area 

[Yes IKINo 

FEMA Flood Zone X 

FEMAMap# 26099C0269) 

FEMA 

Map Dae 12/30/2020 

envionmenta conditions, land uses, etc)? 

[] Yes BK] Nolf Yes, desare 

— 

I 

Foundation 

lots 

One [Je with Accessory Unit 

| BC] Conaete Sib 

[] Craw Space 

[Foundation Walls 

Concrete/Avg 

Floors 

CptHwd/Avg 

| # of Stories 

1 

[J Ful Basement 

BC Partial Basement | Exterior Walls 

Brick/Avg 

Wals 

DW/Painted/Avg 

| Type 

Det. [J 

At. [] S-Det/End Unit 

Basement Area 

1,419 sq.ft. 

|Roof Surface 

Composition/Avg 

Trim Finish 

Wd/Painted/Avg 

 [X] Existing 

[J Proposed [] Under Const. 

| Basement Finish 

80 % 

[Gutters & Downspouts Aluminum/Avg 

Bath Floor 

Ceramic/Avg 

Design (Style) Ranch 

[J Ousside Entry/Exit 

Sump Pump [Window Type 

VinyliAvg 

Bath Wainscot 

_Ceramic/Avg 

| Yea Bult 1976 

Evdenceof 

 [Jinfestaton 

Storm Sashinsulaed Insulated/Avg 

Car Storage 

[None 

[1 Effective 

Ags (Yrs) 15 

[] Dampness 

[] Setlement 

Screens 

VinylAvg 

Driveway #ofCas 

2 

Attic 

J None 

Heating [XK] FWA [] HWBB [] Radiant 

|A 

Ow 

# 0 

Driveway Suface Concrete 

2 [1 Drop Stair 

[stars 

J Other 

[Fuel Gas 

Frepiacels)# 

1 

[Fence None 

|i Garage 

#ofCas 

2 

0 [7 Foor 

Scuttle 

Cooing 

BC Central 

Air Conditioning 

[IX] Patio/Deck Both 

Pach 

Covered 

|] Capot 

#of Cars 

0 

¢ [1 Fnshed 

[J Heawd 

[J hdvdua 

| [J Other 

Poo 

In-GPool 

[omer Shed 

Att 

[J Det 

[JBuitin 

Appliances 

|] Refrigerator 

[] RangelOven [x] Dishwasher 

Disposal 

_[] Microwave [[] Washer/Dryer 

[KK] Otier (describe) Fan/Hood 

E 

Finished area above grade contains: 

7 Rooms 

4 Bedrooms 

3.0 Bah(s) 

2,112 Square Feet 

of Gross Living Avea Above Grade 

. Additional fealures (special energy efficent tems, etc.) 

There are no energy efficient items. 

"| 

Describe the condition of the property (including needed repairs, deterioration, renovations, remodeling, etc.) 

| CaKitchen-upd 

to five years ago! 

one to five years ago; The subject propery has been adequately maintained. The subject has newer windows (2 

years), a newer roof 

(3 years), newer driveway (3 years), a newer 

(3 years), newer 

i 

i 

and 

(5 years). 

Ave there any physical deficiencies 

or adverse conditions 

thal affect the ivabilty, soundness, or structural integrty of he property? 

[J Yes [XI No 

If Yes, describe 

Does 

the property 

generally conform to the 

uty, style, condition, use, construction, etc)? 

Yes [No 

If No, desaribe 

Freade MocFam 70 Moxh 2005 

UAD Version 9/2011 

Fc 

Fann 

Mae Form 1004 March 2006 

Document C

Document D 

i [pte 

Tram, 

THIS 

IS NOT A TAX BILL 

L-4400 

1019 (Rev, 10-24) 

Notice of Assessment, Taxable Valuation, and Property Classification 

El 

This form 

is issued under the authority of P.A. 206 of 1893, 

Sec. 211.24 (c) and Sec.211.34c, 

as amended. This is 

a model 

nt notice to be used by the local 

CHESTERFIELD TOWNSHIP 

RARCELIDENTIFICATION 

ASSESSING DEPARTMENT. 

PARCEL NUMBER: 

15-09-27-279-002 

47275 SUGARBUSH RD 

ECF NEIGHBORHOOD: AB11 

 S.P. OF BAKERS, #3, #4, #9, ETC 

CHESTERFIELD, MI 48047-5156 

PROPERTY ADDRESS: 

48884 SALT RIVER DR 

CHESTERFIELD, MI 48047-3423 

OWNER'S NAME & ADDRESS/PERSON NAMED ON ASSESSMENT ROLL: 

PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE EXEMPTION 

sername AUTO5.DIGIT 48047 

% Exempt 

As "Homeowners Principal Reside 

100.00% 

SHIEL 56. NICOLE & AARON 

et 

y 

00% 

A 

ae 

. 

48884 SALT RIVER DR 

% Exempt 

As "MBT Industrial Personal": 

09% 

CHESTERFIELD, MI 48047-3423 

% Exempt 

As "MBT Commercial Personal": 

00% 

OE CLT Le ee 

A 

A 

ATA TT 

Ee 

ET I 

Exempt 

As "Qualified Forest Property”: 

[7] Yes 

No 

Exempt As "Development Property”: 

[J Yes 

[X] No 

LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 

"BAYSHORE ACRES" LOT 2 

ACCORDING TO MCL 211.34c THIS PROPERTY IS CLASSIFIED AS: 

401 

Residential 

PRIOR YEAR'S CLASSIFICATION: 

401 

Residential 

The change in taxable value will increase/decrease your tax bill for the 

2025] 

PRIOR AMOUNT 

CURRENT TENTATIVE 

CHANGE FROM 

year by approximately: 

$205 

YEAR: 

5024 

ANCONA" 

Ss 

pj 

Ne 

1. TAXABLE VALUE: 

177,392 

182,891 

2. ASSESSED VALUE: 

186,500 

196,900 

3. TENTATIVE EQUALIZATION FACTOR: 

1.000 

4. STATE EQUALIZED VALUE (SEV): 

186,500 

5. There WAS or WAS NOT a transfer of ownership on this property in 2024 

WAS NOT 

6. Assessor Change Reason(s): 

Market Adjustment 

The 2025 Inflation rate Multiplier is: 1.031 

Questions regarding the Notice of Assessment, Taxable Valuation, and Property Classification may be directed to the Following: 

Name 

Phone: 

Email Address: 

KERRY L. BEAUVAIS, ASSESSOR 

(586) 949-0400 

ASSESSING@CHESTERFIELDTWP.ORG 

March Board of Review Appeal Information. The Board of Review will meet at the following dates and times: 

2025 MARCH BOARD OF REVIEW * DUE TO ONGOING CONSTRUCTION * THE BOARD OF REVIEW SHALL MEET IN THE 

SENIOR CENTER LOCATED 

AT THE SOUTH END OF THE MUNICIPAL BUILDING- TOWNSHIP HALL OFFICES LOCATED AT 47275 

SUGARBUSH RD, CHESTERFIELD, MI 48047. 

2025 MARCH BOARD OF REVIEW MEETING DATES: 

MONDAY, MARCH 10, 2025, FROM 9:00 AM TO 12:00 PM AND 

1:00 PM TO 4:00 PM. 

TUESDAY, MARCH 11, 2025, FROM 1:00 PM TO 4:00 PM AND 6:00 PM TO 9:00 PM. 

APPEALS ARE BY APPOINTMENT, THE ASSESSING DEPARTMENT WILL BEGIN TAKING APPOINTMENTS ON 

FEBRUARY 20, 2025. PLEASE CONTACT THE ASSESSORS OFFICE AT (586) 949-0400 EXT 2232. 

Document D

Document E 

= 

2 Zillow 

Signin 

Enteracityorzipcode 

Q 

United States > Michigan 

> Macomb County, > Chesterfield 

~~ 

Chesterfield, MI Housing Market 

h 

$324,325 

15.0% 1-yr 

The average Chesterfield, MI home value is $324,325, up 

5.0% over the past year and goes to pending in around 

17 days. 

What is the Zillow Home Values Index 

Zillow Home Value Index (ZHVI), built from the ground up by measuring monthly changes in property level Zestimates, captures both the 

level and home values across a wide variety of geographies and housing types. 

re 

it the 

Zillow 

Hol 

Ray 

Chesterfield Key 

Takeaways 

comb 

Visldenburg 

Typical Home Values: $324,325 

——) 

- 

dor 

1-year Value Change: +5.0% 

GUAR oA 

cLevens Park 

Mt Cermeny 

a through 

September 30, 

Chesterfield Housing Market 

= 

Zillow Home Val. 

~~ 

Allhomes 

voor 

Sy 

Max 

Overview 

= Chesterfield 

® = 1-year Market Forecast 

150 For sale inventory 

(September 

30, 

202 

65 New 

listings 

ber 

C 

0.999 Median sale to list ratio 

(A. 

$334,167 Median sale price 

(Azust 

2 

$323,700 Median list price 

42.6% Percent of sales over lst price (Az. 

2024-11 

2025-01 

2025-03 

2025-05 

2025-07 

Chesterfield 

Compare 

Submi 

39.7% Percent of sales under list price 

(4 

17 Median 

days to pending 

(Septemb 

(Metric avalaily is based on market coverage and data) 

How does this data help me? 

Zillow's metrics provide valuable 

market data by tracking market 

Document E

Document F 

Chesterfield, New Haven Housing Market: House Prices & Trends | Redfin 

(p] 

ty, 

A 

f 

F 

a ] 

Buy 

+ 

Rent 

» 

Sell 

+ 

Mortgage 

+ 

Real Estate Agents 

+ 

Feed 

Chesterfield, Ml Housing Market 

Homes 

for ssle 

The Chesterfield housing market is very competitive. The median sale price of a home in Chesterfield was $332K last 

month, up 7.1% since last year. The median sale price per square foot in Chesterfield is $185, up 6.3% since last year. 

Trends 

Demand 

Market Insights 

Schools 

Climate 

Chesterfield Housing Market Trends 

What 

is the housing market like in Chesterfield today? 

In September 2025, Chesterfield home prices were up 7.1% compared to last year, selling for a median price of 

$332K. On average, homes in Chesterfield sell after 21 days on the market compared to 15 days last year. There were 

178 homes sold in September this year, down from 201 last year. 

Median Sale Price 

= 

Single Family Homes 

Median Sale Price (Single Family Homes) 

$385,000 

+10.0% YoY 

| Sep 2025 

ly 

3y 

Sy 

Based on Redfin calculations of home data from MLS and/or public records. 

Data 

Growth 

Soman 

Sep 2025 

% Yor 

@ Chesterfield, MI 

$385,000 

“100% 

United States 

® 

Q 

# 

t 

Compare 

To compare other locations to the Chesterfield and U.S. housing market, enter a city, neighborhood, state, or zip code into the search 

bar. Learn which home features in New Haven 

add value to a home. 

How much is your home worth? Track your home's value and compare it to nearby sales. 

[54 

See my estimate 

% 

https: ww. redfin.com/neighborhood/767572/MI/New-Haven/Chesterfield/housing-market#agent-insights 

Document F

← View full record