Full record / 24-003695.pdf

24-003695.pdf

Drf5 Qozb LLC, Petitioner V City Of Detroit, Respondent · 24-003695-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

RECEIVED 

DEC 17.2025 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON |. BROWN, DPA 

: 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

DRF5 QOZB, LLC 

, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner(s) 

v 

MTT Docket No.24-003695 

City of Detroit 

, 

Respondent(s) 

STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT 

(VALUATION) 

1. The subject property is in Wayne 

County. 

2. 

Parcel Number: 22085095. 

C. 

(If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Stipulation 

Form addressing ali other parcels at issue.) 

3. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent's Board 

of Review are: 

Tax year 

Assessed Value (AV) 

| Taxable Value (TV) 

2024 

24,100 

23,415 

2025 

32,800 

24,140 

4. 

The values for the property identified above as stipulated by the parties for 

settlement purposes are: 

Tax year 

True Cash Value 

AV 

Tv 

2024 

44,600 

22,300 

22,300 

2025 

44,600 

22,300 

22,991 

5. 

If the stipulated TV does not equal the prior year TV multiplied by the applicable 

inflation rate multiplier, explain why (e.g., transfer of ownership, additions, losses, 

omitted property etc.)

Page 2

Page 2 of 2 

NQTE: The Stipulation MUST include ALL parcels and ALL tax years included in the 

appeal (including subsequent tax years on or after April 1 of each year for appeals 

pending in the Small Claims Division). The parties may agree, however, to withdraw the 

appeal of specific parcels and/or tax year(s). 

IF APPLICABLE, complete the following section(s). Otherwise, LEAVE BLANK. 

7. 

The parties agree to the withdrawal of parcel number: 

(If more than one parcel is being withdrawn, attach a separate page addressing 

all other parcels being withdrawn.) 

8. The parties agree to the withdrawal of tax year(s) 

Signature of Petitioner's Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: 

Printed Name: 

OST MNS 

Date: 

uf Weer 

sl 

Signature of Respondent's authorized representative: 

A 

Ma Lev 

> 

3 

Printed Name: 

D¢ uti, f 

Man liy 

Date: 12/10/25

Page 3

CITY OF DETROIT 

OFFICE OF THE ASSESSOR 

< 

[w] 

« 

pu 7 

4 

< 

fa) 

< 

= a 

o 

o 

2 

«~N 

48226 

T, Ml. 

DETROI

Page 4

CITY OF DETROIT 

OFFICE OF THE ASSESSOR 

2 WOODWARD AVE. STE. 804 

DETROIT, MI. 48226

Page 5

Sa 

CITY OF DETROIT 

OFFICE OF THE ASSESSOR 

2 WOODWARD AVE. STE. 804 

DETROIT, MI. 48226 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

P.O. BOX 30232 

LANSING, MICHIGAN 48909

Page 6

SRR 

= 

) 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

© 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM 

VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL 

MTT DOCKET NO. 24-003695 

Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information 

First Name: 

Ml: 

Last Name/Company Name/Unit of Government: 

Dorothy 

Manley 

Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route): 

County: 

2 Woodward Ave. Ste. 804 

Wayne 

City or Town: 

State: 

ZIP Code: 

Detroit 

MI 

48226 

Telephone Number: 

Fax Number: 

313-775-0872 

E-mall Address {do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via emait): 

taxtribunal@detroitmi.gov 

Section 2: Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information 

First Name: 

Last Name: 

Firm Name {if any): 

Address (No., Strest, P.O. Box or Rural Route): 

City or Town: 

State: 

ZIP Code: 

Telephone Number: 

Fax Number: 

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email): 

Section 3: Subject Property Information 

Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of 50% or mare? 

[| Yes 

No 

Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? 

If not, list which parcels adjoin one another. 

0 Yes 

[mn] Neo 

Not Applicable

Page 7

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

. 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal 

The Parties agreed to do a stipulation for settlement purposes. Please see attached 

sipulation. 

Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES 

Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? 

Yes 

[i] No 

If yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: 

March 

0 July 

0 December 

tf no, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March BOR? O Yes 

[I] No 

*Submit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer, 

If the July or December BOR revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? [mn] Yes 

O No 

If yes, cite the Board's authority, 

Was the assessment(s) at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? [I] Yes 

No 

if yes, explain 

Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? 

O ves 

[Ano 

if so, what is the issue date?

Page 8

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

B 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Did Petitioner request a Poverty Exemption at a BOR? 0 Yes 

(} No 

If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: Od March 

[m] July 

[] December 

List the date the BOR denied Petitioner’s Poverty Exemption: 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF AN EXEMPTION 

OTHER THAN POVERTY, PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE, OR QUALIFIED AGRICULTURAL EXEMPTIONS 

Did Petitioner request the exemption at a BOR? [ml] Yes 

[I] No 

If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: (} March 

O July 

O December 

Tax Year(s} denied: 

List the date the exemption was denied: 

What statutory section did Petitioner request the subject property be exempt? 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE CLASSIFICATION OF PROPERTY 

What do you believe the classification should be: 

Real 

Personal 

(check one) 

1] 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

industrial 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one) 

Section 6: Valuation Information ‘use the muitipte parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. 

Parcel Identification Number: 

22065095. 

Classification of Property: 

Real 

Personal 

(check one) 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

Industrial 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one) 

Current Assessed Value {also known as State Equalized Value) as established hy the BOR: 

24,100 

Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR: 

23,415 

What do you believe is the fair market value {also known as True Cash Value)? 

44,600 

Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value, 

22,300 

if you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. 

N/A

Page 9

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

DRFS5 QOZB, LLC 

Petitioner, 

v. 

MTT Docket No: 24-003695 

City Of Detroit, 

Respondent, 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

On December 11, 2025, 1 Dorothy Manley mailed the Stipulation relative to the above captioned 

matter to: 

DRF5 QOZB, LLC 

Michigan Tax Tribunal 

23875 Michigan Ave. Ste. 539 

P.O. Box 30232 

Dearborn, MI. 48124 

Lansing, Michigan 48909 

Dheeraj Mathew 

4430 Tilly Mill Rd., Unit 307 

Dunwoody, GA 30360 

I declare that the statement above is true to the best of my information, knowledge and belief.

Page 10

CITY OF DETROIT 

OFFICE OF THE ASSESSOR 

2 WOODWARD AVE. STE. 804 

DETROIT, MI. 48226 

MICH

P.O. 

LANS

PDF reading copy

← View full record