24-003695.pdf
Drf5 Qozb LLC, Petitioner V City Of Detroit, Respondent · 24-003695-TT
Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN RECEIVED DEC 17.2025 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON |. BROWN, DPA : GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR DRF5 QOZB, LLC , MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner(s) v MTT Docket No.24-003695 City of Detroit , Respondent(s) STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT (VALUATION) 1. The subject property is in Wayne County. 2. Parcel Number: 22085095. C. (If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Stipulation Form addressing ali other parcels at issue.) 3. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent's Board of Review are: Tax year Assessed Value (AV) | Taxable Value (TV) 2024 24,100 23,415 2025 32,800 24,140 4. The values for the property identified above as stipulated by the parties for settlement purposes are: Tax year True Cash Value AV Tv 2024 44,600 22,300 22,300 2025 44,600 22,300 22,991 5. If the stipulated TV does not equal the prior year TV multiplied by the applicable inflation rate multiplier, explain why (e.g., transfer of ownership, additions, losses, omitted property etc.)
Page 2
Page 2 of 2 NQTE: The Stipulation MUST include ALL parcels and ALL tax years included in the appeal (including subsequent tax years on or after April 1 of each year for appeals pending in the Small Claims Division). The parties may agree, however, to withdraw the appeal of specific parcels and/or tax year(s). IF APPLICABLE, complete the following section(s). Otherwise, LEAVE BLANK. 7. The parties agree to the withdrawal of parcel number: (If more than one parcel is being withdrawn, attach a separate page addressing all other parcels being withdrawn.) 8. The parties agree to the withdrawal of tax year(s) Signature of Petitioner's Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: Printed Name: OST MNS Date: uf Weer sl Signature of Respondent's authorized representative: A Ma Lev > 3 Printed Name: D¢ uti, f Man liy Date: 12/10/25
Page 3
CITY OF DETROIT OFFICE OF THE ASSESSOR < [w] « pu 7 4 < fa) < = a o o 2 «~N 48226 T, Ml. DETROI
Page 4
CITY OF DETROIT OFFICE OF THE ASSESSOR 2 WOODWARD AVE. STE. 804 DETROIT, MI. 48226
Page 5
Sa CITY OF DETROIT OFFICE OF THE ASSESSOR 2 WOODWARD AVE. STE. 804 DETROIT, MI. 48226 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL P.O. BOX 30232 LANSING, MICHIGAN 48909
Page 6
SRR
=
)
STATE OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WHITMER
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS
MARLON I. BROWN, DPA
©
GOVERNOR
LANSING
DIRECTOR
PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM
VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL
MTT DOCKET NO. 24-003695
Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information
First Name:
Ml:
Last Name/Company Name/Unit of Government:
Dorothy
Manley
Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route):
County:
2 Woodward Ave. Ste. 804
Wayne
City or Town:
State:
ZIP Code:
Detroit
MI
48226
Telephone Number:
Fax Number:
313-775-0872
E-mall Address {do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via emait):
taxtribunal@detroitmi.gov
Section 2: Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Firm Name {if any):
Address (No., Strest, P.O. Box or Rural Route):
City or Town:
State:
ZIP Code:
Telephone Number:
Fax Number:
E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email):
Section 3: Subject Property Information
Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of 50% or mare?
[| Yes
No
Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining?
If not, list which parcels adjoin one another.
0 Yes
[mn] Neo
Not ApplicablePage 7
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA . GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal The Parties agreed to do a stipulation for settlement purposes. Please see attached sipulation. Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? Yes [i] No If yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: March 0 July 0 December tf no, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March BOR? O Yes [I] No *Submit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer, If the July or December BOR revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? [mn] Yes O No If yes, cite the Board's authority, Was the assessment(s) at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? [I] Yes No if yes, explain Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? O ves [Ano if so, what is the issue date?
Page 8
STATE OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WHITMER
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS
MARLON I. BROWN, DPA
B
GOVERNOR
LANSING
DIRECTOR
Did Petitioner request a Poverty Exemption at a BOR? 0 Yes
(} No
If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: Od March
[m] July
[] December
List the date the BOR denied Petitioner’s Poverty Exemption:
IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF AN EXEMPTION
OTHER THAN POVERTY, PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE, OR QUALIFIED AGRICULTURAL EXEMPTIONS
Did Petitioner request the exemption at a BOR? [ml] Yes
[I] No
If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: (} March
O July
O December
Tax Year(s} denied:
List the date the exemption was denied:
What statutory section did Petitioner request the subject property be exempt?
IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE CLASSIFICATION OF PROPERTY
What do you believe the classification should be:
Real
Personal
(check one)
1]
Agricultural
Commercial
industrial
Residential
Timber-Cutover
Developmental
Utility
(check one)
Section 6: Valuation Information ‘use the muitipte parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels.
Parcel Identification Number:
22065095.
Classification of Property:
Real
Personal
(check one)
Agricultural
Commercial
Industrial
Residential
Timber-Cutover
Developmental
Utility
(check one)
Current Assessed Value {also known as State Equalized Value) as established hy the BOR:
24,100
Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR:
23,415
What do you believe is the fair market value {also known as True Cash Value)?
44,600
Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value,
22,300
if you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.
N/APage 9
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL DRFS5 QOZB, LLC Petitioner, v. MTT Docket No: 24-003695 City Of Detroit, Respondent, PROOF OF SERVICE On December 11, 2025, 1 Dorothy Manley mailed the Stipulation relative to the above captioned matter to: DRF5 QOZB, LLC Michigan Tax Tribunal 23875 Michigan Ave. Ste. 539 P.O. Box 30232 Dearborn, MI. 48124 Lansing, Michigan 48909 Dheeraj Mathew 4430 Tilly Mill Rd., Unit 307 Dunwoody, GA 30360 I declare that the statement above is true to the best of my information, knowledge and belief.
Page 10
CITY OF DETROIT OFFICE OF THE ASSESSOR 2 WOODWARD AVE. STE. 804 DETROIT, MI. 48226 MICH P.O. LANS