Full record / Answer, Affirmative Defenses & POS - Gibson Dr LLC (ID 114565).pdf

Answer, Affirmative Defenses & POS - Gibson Dr LLC (ID 114565).pdf

Gibson Dr LLC, Petitioner Vs. City Of Warren, Respondent · 25-002158-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

GIBSON DR LLC, 

 

 

 

 

MTT Docket No. 25-002158 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Parcel ID Nos. 12-13-26-151-016 

 

 

Petitioner, 

 

 

 

 

-v- 

 

CITY OF WARREN, 

 

Respondent. 

___________________________________/ 

MICHIGAN TAX APPEAL 

STEVE JOHNSON 

Representative for Petitioner 

436 N. Center St. 

Northville, Michigan 48167 

(248) 392-4342 

info@mitaxappeal.com 

 

WARREN CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE 

MARY MICHAELS (P44601) 

CANDICE M. MAYER (P85421) 

Attorneys for Respondent 

One City Square, Suite 400 

Warren, Michigan 48093 

(586) 574-4671 

cmayer@cityofwarren.org 

______________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE CITY’S RESPONSE TO PETITION 

 

 

Respondent, CITY OF WARREN (the “CITY”), by and through its attorneys, MARY 

MICHAELS, Acting City Attorney, and CANDICE M. MAYER, Assistant City Attorney, and 

in response to the Petition states as follows: 

1. 

The CITY admits the allegation set forth in ¶ 1. 

2. 

The CITY admits the allegation set forth in ¶ 2. 

3. 

No response to ¶ 3 is necessary. 

4. 

No response to ¶ 4 is necessary. 

5. 

No response to ¶ 5 is necessary.

Page 2

6. 

The CITY denies the allegation set forth in ¶ 6, as the assessing records 

classify the property as “Industrial – Improved.” 

7. 

No response to ¶ 7 is necessary. 

8. 

No response to ¶ 8 is necessary. 

9. 

No response to ¶ 9 is necessary. 

10. 

The CITY admits the allegation set forth in ¶ 10, but in further clarifies that the 

correct zip code is “48089,” not 48069. 

11. 

The CITY admits the allegation set forth in ¶ 11. 

12. 

The CITY lacks sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the 

truth of the allegation set forth in ¶ 12 and therefore, leaves Petitioner to its 

proofs. 

13. 

The CITY lacks sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the 

truth of the allegations set forth in ¶ 13 and therefore, leaves Petitioner to its 

proofs. 

14. 

The CITY admits the allegation set forth in ¶ 14. 

15. 

No response to ¶ 15 is necessary. 

16. 

The CITY denies the allegation set forth in ¶ 16, as the True Cash Value for 

parcel no. 12-13-26-151-016 is $535,123. 

17. 

The CITY lacks sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the 

truth of the allegation set forth in ¶ 17 and therefore, leaves Petitioner to its 

proofs. 

18. 

The CITY lacks sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the 

truth of the allegations set forth in ¶ 18 and therefore, leaves Petitioner to its 

proofs.

Page 3

19. 

The CITY lacks sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the 

truth of the allegations set forth in ¶ 19 and therefore, leaves Petitioner to its 

proofs. 

20. 

The CITY lacks sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the 

truth of the allegations set forth in ¶ 20 and therefore, leaves Petitioner to its 

proofs. 

WHEREFORE, Respondent, CITY OF WARREN, requests the Tribunal deny the 

requested relief, dismiss the Petition with prejudice, and award costs incurred by having 

to defend against this matter. 

Respectfully submitted, 

 

 ____________________________ 

CANDICE M. MAYER (P85421) 

Assistant City Attorney 

Attorney for Respondent 

 

Dated: August 26, 2025 

ID 114508 

 

 

Candice M. Mayer

Page 4

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

GIBSON DR LLC, 

 

 

 

 

MTT Docket No. 25-002158 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Parcel ID Nos. 12-13-26-151-016 

 

 

Petitioner, 

 

 

 

 

-v- 

 

CITY OF WARREN, 

 

Respondent. 

___________________________________/ 

MICHIGAN TAX APPEAL 

STEVE JOHNSON 

Representative for Petitioner 

436 N. Center St. 

Northville, Michigan 48167 

(248) 392-4342 

info@mitaxappeal.com 

 

WARREN CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE 

MARY MICHAELS (P44601) 

CANDICE M. MAYER (P85421) 

Attorneys for Respondent 

One City Square, Suite 400 

Warren, Michigan 48093 

(586) 574-4671 

cmayer@cityofwarren.org 

______________________________________________________________________ 

 

AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES 

 

Respondent, CITY OF WARREN (the “CITY”), by and through its attorneys, MARY 

MICHAELS, Acting City Attorney, and CANDICE MAYER, Assistant City Attorney, submit 

the following Affirmative Defenses: 

 

1. 

Petitioner failed to state any facts that would warrant relief from the 

assessment. 

2. 

This Petition is barred by laches and principles of equity. 

3. 

Petitioner failed to allege specific and sufficient facts to establish fraud, error 

of law, discrimination, application of wrong principles, or illegality on the part

Page 5

of the CITY or its agents. 

4. 

The CITY reserves the right to challenge the Petition, should taxes not be 

timely paid. 

5. 

Petitioner failed to allege that the mode and method of assessing the subject 

property fails to conform to the mode and method applied in the case of all 

other properties in the CITY’S taxing unit for the year in question. 

6. 

Petitioner failed to plead facts and law establishing jurisdiction of the Tribunal. 

7. 

Petitioner failed to show that any factor other than fifty percent (50%) was 

applied to the true cash value of Petitioner’s property, as well as all others, to 

arrive at the respective assessments appearing on the roll and also failed to 

allege specific and sufficient facts to support its allegations that the property’s 

taxable value is improper. 

8. 

Petitioner, in essence, seeks by petition to challenge the process of county 

and state equalization to which it has no legal standing and cannot maintain 

as cause of action. 

9. 

The CITY reserves the right to raise additional defenses as may become 

known during the course of these proceedings. 

 

 

 

 

 

Respectfully submitted, 

 

 ____________________________ 

CANDICE M. MAYER (P85421) 

Assistant City Attorney 

Attorney for Respondent 

Dated: August 26, 2025 

ID 114508 

 

 

 

Candice M. Mayer

Page 6

Candice M. Mayer 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

GIBSON DR LLC, 

 

 

 

 

MTT Docket No. 25-002158 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Parcel ID Nos. 12-13-26-151-016 

 

 

Petitioner, 

 

 

 

 

-v- 

 

CITY OF WARREN, 

 

Respondent. 

___________________________________/ 

MICHIGAN TAX APPEAL 

STEVE JOHNSON 

Representative for Petitioner 

436 N. Center St. 

Northville, Michigan 48167 

(248) 392-4342 

info@mitaxappeal.com 

 

WARREN CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE 

MARY MICHAELS (P44601) 

CANDICE M. MAYER (P85421) 

Attorneys for Respondent 

One City Square, Suite 400 

Warren, Michigan 48093 

(586) 574-4671 

cmayer@cityofwarren.org 

______________________________________________________________________ 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

) 

 

 

 

 

) ss. 

COUNTY OF MACOMB 

) 

 

On the date below, I sent via email a copy of Respondent, City of Warren’s, Response 

to Petition, Affirmative Defenses and Proof of Service to: Steve Johnson at 

info@mitaxappeal.com. 

 

I declare that the statements above are true to the best of my information, knowledge, 

and belief. 

 

 ____________________________ 

CANDICE M. MAYER (P85421) 

Assistant City Attorney 

 

Dated: August 26, 2025

PDF reading copy

← View full record