Full record / 1400 Woodbridge Ventures LLC MTT# 26-001352 answer.pdf

1400 Woodbridge Ventures LLC MTT# 26-001352 answer.pdf

1400 Woodbridge Ventures LLC Petitioner Vs. City Of Detroit Respondent · 26-001352-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

1 

 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

 

1400 WOODBRIDGE VENTURES, LLC, 

 

Petitioner, 

v. 

Docket No. 26-001352 

 

CITY OF DETROIT, 

 

Respondent. 

 

/ 

 

ANSWER 

 

RESPONDENT, CITY OF DETROIT, for its Answer to the Petition filed in this matter 

states as follows: 

1. Respondent denies as untrue that that the listed Petitioner is a party in interest. Upon 

information and belief, the property is owned by 1551 West Lafayette LLC. 

2. Respondent admits that it assesses and collects taxes on the subject property. However, 

denies as untrue that the subject property is “Petitioner’s Property”. 

3. Respondent admits as to the values alleged, however, denies as untrue the characterization 

the subject property is “Petitioner’s Property”. 

4. Respondent admits as to classification only, however, denies as untrue the 

characterization the subject property is “Petitioner’s Property”. 

5. Respondent admits only that Petitioner’s instant Tax Tribunal appeal alleges issues 

involving valuation, assessment, taxable value and uniformity, however, Respondent 

denies that any such allegations have merit or that Petitioner has standing to bring such 

allegations.

Page 2

2 

 

6. Respondent neither admits nor denies the allegation, there being an insufficient basis 

at this time upon which to form a belief as to the truth of the allegation. 

7. Respondent denies as untrue. 

 

AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES 

Respondent further asserts that Petitioner’s claims are barred, in whole or in part, by: 

 

1. Petitioner’s claims are barred by the applicable statute of limitations. 

2. Petitioner has failed to state a claim for which relief may be granted. 

 

3. Petitioner lacks standing. 

 

4. This Honorable Tribunal lacks jurisdiction. 

 

WHEREFORE, Respondent City of Detroit respectfully requests that this Honorable 

Tribunal dismiss the petition in this matter and award costs and attorney fees. 

Respectfully Submitted, 

 

/s/ Kevin C. Richard 

Kevin C. Richard (P43417) 

Mary Beth Cobbs (P40080) 

City of Detroit Law Department 

Coleman A. Young Municipal Center 

2 Woodward Avenue, Suite 500 

Detroit, Michigan 48226 

(313) 237-3061 

Dated: October 22, 2026

Page 3

3 

 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

 

1400 WOODBRIDGE VENTURES, LLC, 

 

Petitioner, 

v. 

Docket No. 26-001352 

08000059 

 

CITY OF DETROIT, 

 

Respondent. 

 

/ 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

 

 

On October 22, 2026, I mailed by first class mail a copy of Respondent’s Answer with 

Affirmative Defenses in the instant matter to: 

 

Aaron Fales 

Law Offices of Aaron Fales, P.C. 

330 Hamilton Row, Suite 350 

Birmingham, Michigan 48226 

 

 

I declare that the statement above is true to the best of my information, knowledge, and 

belief. 

 

 

/s/ Kevin C. Richard 

Kevin C. Richard (P43417) 

Senior Assistant Corporation Counsel 

City of Detroit Law Department 

Coleman A. Young Municipal Center 

2 Woodward Avenue, Suite 500 

Dated: October 22, 2026 

Detroit, Michigan 48226

PDF reading copy

← View full record