Full record / 25-002623 Sever Def.pdf

25-002623 Sever Def.pdf

Sxm LLC, Petitioner V Township Of Hadley, Respondent · 25-002623-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 

SXM LLC, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

Petitioner, 

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION 

 

2D2M LLC, 

Petitioner, 

 

v 

 

MTT Docket Nos. 25-002623 

 

 

 

 

 & 25-002701 

 

Hadley Township, 

 

Presiding Judge 

Respondent. 

 

Patricia L. Halm 

 

ORDER SEVERING PARCEL NO 44-010-036-026-00 TO DOCKET NO 25-002701 

 

ORDER HOLDING PETITIONER IN DEFAULT IN DOCKET NO 25-002701 

 

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in this case and finds that a petition was filed on May 

27, 2025, initiating a valuation appeal for Parcel Nos. 44-010-036-032-00 and 44-010-

036-026-00. The petition indicates that the parcels are contiguous. The petition also 

includes attachments of the Board of Review decisions for both parcels. Those 

decisions indicate that each appealed parcel is owned by a different entity. 

 

The Tribunal finds that the parcels, while purportedly contiguous, cannot be filed in a 

single appeal because each party in interest, as Petitioner, is required to file a separate 

petition. Although the parties are commonly represented, each parcel has only one 

indicated party in interest eligible to file a petition as the property owner.1 “Party in 

interest” refers to a person or entity with a property interest in the property being 

assessed, and “property interest” is “a legal share in something and “all or part of a legal 

or equitable claim to or right in property.”2 Accordingly, the Tribunal shall sever Parcel 

No. 44-010-036-026-00 into a separate docket. A separate additional petition filing fee 

is due as a result of the severance.3 Therefore, 

 

IT IS ORDERED that Parcel No. 44-010-036-026-00 is SEVERED to Docket No. 

25-002701. 

 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner is held in DEFAULT in Docket No. 

25-002701. 

 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner shall cure the default in Docket No. 

 

1 See MCL 205.735a(6). 

2 See Spartan Stores Inc v City of Grand Rapids, 307 Mich App 565, 575-576 and fn 9 (2014). 

3 TTR 223(2). If not severed, the contiguous parcel would have been held in default for failure to pay the 

contiguous-parcel petition fee under TTR 223(2)(b).

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 25-002623 & 25-002701 

Page 2 of 2 

 

25-002701 by filing a severed petition and $125.00 petition filing fee within 14 days of 

the entry of this order.4 The petition shall note the docket number assigned by the 

Tribunal and, if filed utilizing the Tribunal’s e-filing system, must be filed on the assigned 

docket number as a “Severed Petition.” 

 

Failure to comply with this order will result in the dismissal of that case.5 

 

 

Entered: July 11, 2025 

 

 

 

By _____________________________ 

bw 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

 

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives. 

 

By: Tribunal Clerk 

 

4 See TTR 223(2)(a)(ii) and TTR 269(1). 

5 See TTR 237(1).

PDF reading copy

← View full record