Full record / 26-002751 Respondent Answer 10.8.26.pdf

26-002751 Respondent Answer 10.8.26.pdf

Sheena Teresa Kurien Petitioner V City Of Portage Respondent · 26-002751-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN; DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM 

VALUATION / UNCAPPING 

MTT DOCKET NO. 26-002751 

Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information 

Unit of Government 

City of Portage 

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route): 

7900 S Westnedge Ave 

City or Town: 

State: 

2IP Code: 

Portage 

. 

Ml 

149002 

Telephone Number: 269-329-4433 

Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email): 

assessingdept@portagemi.gov 

Section 2: Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information 

First Name: 

ML: 

Last Name: 

* 

Cathy 

B 

Weissert 

. 

Firm 

Name 

(if any}, 

A 

. 

“mTMWCA Assessing 

Malling Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route); 

7900 S Westnedge Ave 

City or Town: 

State: 

ZIP Code: 

Portage 

MI 

49002 

” 

Telephone ND 69-320-4433 

. 

Email. Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email): 

assessingdept@portagemi.gov 

Section 3: Subject Property information 

Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? 

If no, list all parcels that are adjoining in separate groupings. Attacha 

separate sheet If necessary. 

a Yes 

a No 

[7a] Not Applicable 

Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of 50% or more for all tax years atissue? 

ves 

[No

Page 2

AY 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON 1. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal 

The SEV and Taxable Value represents 50% of Fair Market Value and all values in the 

City of Portage have been uniformly assessed. 

Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES 

Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? 

Yes 

[Hl] No 

If yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: 

March 

O July 

O December 

if the July or December BOR revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? [Ml] Yes 

O No 

If yes, cite the Board's authority. 

Was the assessment at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? [Hl] Yes 

[4] No 

If yes, explain 

Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? 

1 ves 

No 

If so, what is the issue date? 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE 

When was the Notice of Uncapping, if applicable, issued? 

Under what statutory section was the Taxable Value uncapped? 

Section 6: Valuation Information +use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. 

Parcel Number 00035-095-C 

Classification of Property: 

Real 

Personal [J (check one) 

Agricuiturai [1 

Commercial] 

Industrial 0 

Residential 

Yimber-Cutover J 

Developmental 

Utility [J {check one) 

‘Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) established 

| Taxable Value established by the Board of Review: 

, by the Board of Review: 

a0 

619,600 

i 

f 

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as true cash value)? 

1,239,200 

What do you believe Is the assessed value? (multiply true cash 

What do you believe is the taxable value? (cannot exceed 

value by .5) 61 9,600 

assessed value) 61 9,600 

Signature <requires 

A 

. 

Respondent or Attorney/Authorized Re Ths ntative’s Si 

a; 

Ist 

U

PDF reading copy

← View full record