26-002508.pdf

3930 Baldwin LLC Petitioner Vs. City Of Auburn Hills Respondent · 26-002508-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

3930 Baldwin, LLC, 

Petitioner, 

vs. 

MTT Docket No. 26-002508 

City of Auburn Hills, 

Respondent. 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

(Property Tax Petition) 

On the date below I sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, a copy of the Petition to: 

City Assessor 

City Clerk 

City of Auburn Hills 

City of Auburn Hills 

1827 N. Squirrel Road 

1827 N. Squirrel Road 

Auburn Hills, MI 48326 

Auburn Hills, MI 48326 

On the date below I sent by first class mail a copy of the Petition to: 

Equalization Director 

County Clerk 

Oakland County 

Oakland County 

250 Elizabeth Lake Road, Suite [000W 

1200 N. Telegraph Rd, Bldg 12E 

Pontiac, MI 48341 

Pontiac, MI 48341 

Secretary, Board of Education 

State Treasurer 

School District of the City of Pontiac 

Department of Treasury 

47200 Woodward Avenue 

430 W. Allegan Street 

Pontiac, MI 48342 

Lansing, MI 48922 

I declare that the statements above are true to the best of my information, knowledge and belief.

pay, 

STATEOF MICHIGAN 

~ 

_ 

3d agp 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY arraliisng, Wry 

‘ Ol 

: 

XR 

A 

3930 Baldwin, LLC,’ 

. 

CTH \ 

Petitioner, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

v 

Docket No. 26- 002508 

City of Auburn Hills, 

Parcel No. 

02-14-05-176-011 

Respondent. 

/ 

PROPERTY TAX PETITION 

{Entire Tribunal, 2026 Tax Year) 

Petitioner, by and through its representative, Dante Bacall, contends: 

1. 

The property that is the subject of this appeal is one real property parcel: 

Parcel Number | 02-14-05-176-011 

- Address 

3930 Baldwin Rd 

Classification. 

*| 201 Commercial 

Use 

Vacant restauarant 

County 

Oakland 

: 

:] 

Sch Dist | Pontiac City School District 

2. 

N/A. 

If the assessment at issue was protested, the protest was made to Respondent's: 

[J March, 

[J July, 

[J December ' Board of Review. 

3. 

Respondent, identified above, assesses and collects taxes on the subject property. 

4, 

Petitioner 

is 

a taxpayer/party-in-interest 

with respect 

to property taxes on the subject 

property. 

5. 

The Petitioner's principal office/iegal residence address 

is: 

390 Park St; Suite 201, 

Birmingham, MI 48009-3400. 

6. 

This appeal involves issues related to: 

BX 

the subject property’s true cash and taxable values 

0 

the subject property’s taxable value only

Petition 

10. 

i. 

“The values! established by,Respondsnt’s Board of Review for.the subject property are; i 

Parcel Number 

: 

TCV 

© SEV 

Tv 

02-14-05-176-011 

2,575,060 

1,287,530 

1,287,530 

Petitioner contends that the values! for the subject property are; 

Parcel Number 

cv 

SEV 

Tv 

02-14-05-176-011 

1,440,000 

720,000 

720,000 

The values' in dispute are. 

Parcel Number 

. 

TCV 

: 

SEV 

. 

Tv 

02-14-05-176-011 

; 

+ 

1,135,060 

567,530 

567,530 

Petitioner relies upon the following to support the relief requested: 

The 2026 values imposed on Petitioner’s property, and the taxes to be levied and collected 

thereon, are invalid and unlawful and operate as fraud upon the taxpayer for the reasons 

that: 

: 

@) 

The assessed; state equalized and/or taxable values exceed the amounts permittéd 

». by the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; 

: 

(b) 

The assessed, state equalized and/or taxable values are at higher percentages of true. 

- 

cash value than permissible under the Michigan Constitution and applicable’; 

. 

statutes; 

: 

' 

: 

(c) 

The assessed, state equalized and/or taxable values are based upon an erroneous 

determination of the true cash value of that portion of Petitioner's property that is 

_ 

taxable under Michigan law and are based upon the application of wrong principles; 

and 

(d) 

The assessed, state equalized and/or taxable values, and the mode of assessment 

adopted by Respondent, discriminate against Petitioner and deny Petitioner its 

constitutional rights of uniformity, equal protection and due process of law, 

"Petitioner requests that the Tribunal enter an order reducing the 2026 values from those established 

by Respondent’s Board of Review to those contended by Petitioner, and order refunds attributable 

to the reductions, with interest, as provided by the Tax Tribunal Act.

Petition 

. 

Dated: March 24, 2026 

Filing Fee: $600 

© Résp&atfully submitted, 

’ 

cond 

Bafite Bacall 

Representative for Petitioner 

390 Park St., Suite 201 

Birmingham, MI 48009-3400 

(248) 755-2922 

dantebacall@yahoo.com

3930 Baldwin, LLC 

390 Park Street Suite 201, 

Birmingham, MI 48009 

Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs 

Michigan Tax Tribunal 

PO Box 30232 

Lansing, MI 48909 

Received 

AUG 14 

2025 

LARA 

wa 

SEES 

TPHERR 

TR CTE TET AR BE 

A 

TT 

TAO 

| ER

← View full record