Petition - POS.pdf

Nreg US Holdings Ltd Petitioner Vs. Township Of Scio Respondent · 26-001259-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

 

NREG US Holdings Ltd, 

 

Petitioner, 

 

vs. 

 

Scio Township, 

Respondent.

 

 

 

MTT Docket No. 26-001259 

_____________________________________________________________________________/ 

 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

(Property Tax Petition) 

 

On the date below I sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, a copy of the Petition to: 

 

Township Assessor 

Scio Township 

827 N Zeeb Rd 

Ann Arbor, MI 48103-1599 

Township Supervisor 

Scio Township 

827 N Zeeb Rd 

Ann Arbor, MI 48103-1599 

 

On the date below I sent by first class mail a copy of the Petition to: 

 

Equalization Director 

Washtenaw County 

200 N Main St, Suite 210 

PO Box 8645 

Ann Arbor, MI 48107-8645 

County Clerk 

Washtenaw County 

200 N Main St 

Ann Arbor, MI 48104 

Secretary, Board of Education 

Dexter Community Schools 

2704 Baker Rd 

Dexter, MI 48130 

State Treasurer 

Department of Treasury 

430 W Allegan Street 

Lansing, MI 48922 

 

I declare that the statements above are true to the best of my information, knowledge and belief. 

 

 

 

/s/ Laura M. Hallahan 

 

Dated: September 3, 2026

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

NREG US HOLDINGS LTD, 

Petitioner, 

v 

SCIO TOWNSHIP, 

Respondent.

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Docket No. 26-001259 

Parcel No. H-08-19-275-023 

_____________________________________________________________________________/ 

PROPERTY TAX PETITION 

(Entire Tribunal, 2026 Tax Year) 

Petitioner, by and through its attorneys, Hallahan & Associates, P.C., contends: 

1.

☒ The property that is the subject of this appeal is one real property parcel:

Parcel Number 

H-08-19-275-023

Address 

8225 Jackson Rd

Classification 

201-Commercial

Use 

Storage 

County 

Washtenaw

Sch Dist Dexter Comm School Dist

2.

☒ N/A. If the assessment at issue was protested, the protest was made to Respondent’s:

☐March, ☐ July, ☐ December Board of Review.

3.

Respondent, identified above, assesses and collects taxes on the subject property.

4.

Petitioner is a taxpayer/party-in-interest with respect to property taxes on the subject

property.

5.

The Petitioner’s principal office/legal residence address is: Hugo Noort, Unit 101-403 6th

Street, New Westminster, BC V3L 3B1.

6.

This appeal involves issues related to:

☒

the subject property’s true cash and taxable values

☐

the subject property’s taxable value only

there is a dispute as to the value of an addition or loss: ☐ Yes ☐ No

☐

uniformity of the subject property’s assessment

☐

the subject property’s exemption from ad valorem taxation under MCL ______

7.

The tax year at issue is 2026.

Petition 

2 

8. 

The values1 established by Respondent’s Board of Review for the subject property are: 

Parcel Number

TCV

SEV

TV

H-08-19-275-023

13,761,800

6,880,900

6,023,721

9.

Petitioner contends that the values1 for the subject property are:

Parcel Number

TCV

SEV

TV

H-08-19-275-023

9,500,000

4,750,000

4,750,000

10.

The values1 in dispute are.

Parcel Number

TCV

SEV

TV

H-08-19-275-023

4,261,800

2,130,900

1,273,721

11. 

Petitioner relies upon the following to support the relief requested: 

The 2026 values imposed on Petitioner’s property, and the taxes to be levied and collected 

thereon, are invalid and unlawful and operate as fraud upon the taxpayer for the reasons 

that: 

(a) 

The assessed, state equalized and/or taxable values exceed the amounts permitted 

by the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; 

(b) 

The assessed, state equalized and/or taxable values are at higher percentages of true 

cash value than permissible under the Michigan Constitution and applicable 

statutes; 

(c) 

The assessed, state equalized and/or taxable values are based upon an erroneous 

determination of the true cash value of that portion of Petitioner’s property that is 

taxable under Michigan law and are based upon the application of wrong principles; 

and 

(d) 

The assessed, state equalized and/or taxable values, and the mode of assessment 

adopted by Respondent, discriminate against Petitioner and deny Petitioner its 

constitutional rights of uniformity, equal protection and due process of law. 

Petitioner requests that the Tribunal enter an order reducing the 2026 values from those established 

by Respondent’s Board of Review to those contended by Petitioner, and order refunds attributable 

to the reductions, with interest, as provided by the Tax Tribunal Act. 

 

1TCV=true cash value, SEV=state equalized value, TV=taxable value.

Petition 

3 

 

HALLAHAN & ASSOCIATES, P.C. 

 

 

/s/ Laura M. Hallahan 

 

Laura M. Hallahan (P42101) 

Attorney for Petitioner 

1750 S. Telegraph Road, Suite 202 

Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302-0179 

(248) 731-3089 

Dated: May 22, 2026 

lhallahan@hallahanlaw.com 

 

Filing Fee: $600

← View full record