Full record / Boshart.pdf

Boshart.pdf

Scott A Boshart, Petitioner V Township Of Lincoln, Respondent · 24-003791-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

RECEIVED 

AUG 06 2024 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

| 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON 1. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM 

VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL 

Do not use this form to appeal Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Speciat Assessment, or 

Non-Property tax disputes. 

Pursuant 

to Michigan Tex Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving riee to the appeal 

(e.g. Board of Review Decision or Notice of Uncapping) with this Small Claims Petition, if applicable. if you do not 

submit this document, you may be held in default. 

Section 1: Petitioner's Contact Information 

First Name 

ML 

Last NamefCompany Name 

Scott 

A 

Boshart 

Malling Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

1020 Cross Rd 

City or Town 

State 

ZIP Code 

Kinde 

MI 

148445 

Telephone Number 

Fax Number 

089-582-0045 

na 

E-mail Address {do not enter unlass you want MTT to send all correzpondence via e-mail) 

sboshart0045@gmail.com 

Section 2: Petitioner's Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information 

Firet Name 

M.A 

Last Name 

Firm Name (if any) 

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

City or Town 

State 

ZIP Code 

Telephone Number 

Fax Number 

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondenca via e-mail) 

Section 3: Subject Property Information 

How many 

if you are appeaiing more than one parce), are they contiguous or adjoining? 

parcels are you 

Yos* 

No** 

appealing? 

* yes, use a multiple parcel form for information regarding any contiguous parcels, 

*if no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel or you will be defaulted.

Page 2

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

Trig 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 4: Issues Being Appealed (check al that apply) 

True Cash and Taxable Value 

O Poverty Exemption 

[OJ Taxable Value Only (calculation) 

[J Disabled Veterans Exemption 

a Uncapping of Taxable Value 

[J Eligible Manufacturing Personal Property (ESA) 

[J Exemption from Taxation (other than the denlal of a 

[J Classification 

Principal Residence or Qualified Agricultural Exemption) 

Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal 

For the previous three years 

| have petitioned the BOR to not increase the SEV due to the "blight" 

condition of the property directly across the road, which developed about 2021 with a new owner with a 

long history of such activity. The first year they actually reduced the SEV slightly (even though 

| did not 

request that). The second year they left it as requested. The third year (2024) they denied the petition 

and increased the SEV $33,702. The blight condition has not improved at all. 

| have been dealing with 

Huron County Building and Zoning about enforcing the applicable ordinance(s)/code(s). The property 

owner has been cited/fined and told by the magistrate that he could be cited/fined daily. It has been a 

slow frustrating process with the County that 

| continue to work thru. The Twp Board has done nothing. 

The Township does not have any of its own ordinances. 

| tried to get an explanation from the BOR at their 

July 15th meeting which they chose to adjurn before 

| arrived although 

| had set up that 

| would attend 

before 10AM (| arrived at 9:45AM)with the Twp Supervisor (he is at their meetings) who informed me the 

meeting would go at least to 10AM due to the amount of work they had. They did not/do not schedule an 

ending time. 

| asked for an explanation, as they were all still there discussing their "assessing issues". 

The only answer they reluctantly offered was "they can't keep giving me a break forever". 2024 would 

have been the first year the taxable value would have had to be adjusted. They also have the 

opinion/attitude that the condition of surrounding property has no affect on a given property's value. 

Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues 

Year(s) you are appealing: 

2024 

Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? [4] Yes 

|] 

No 

If Yes, check which BOR you attended AND attach the BOR decision: 

March 

[J July 

[J December 

If No, check the applicable reason(s): 

O Not required to attend 

Assessment Change Notice was not received by Petitioner 

0 Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutual Mistake of Fact (if yes, include explanation in Section 6) 

(m} Appealing within 36 days of State Tax Commission Order 

0 Appealing within 35 days of receipt 

of Notice of Unoapping

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON |. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 7: Valuation Information *use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. 

Parcel Identification Number: 

14-008-006-00 

Classification of Property: 

Real 

Personal 

(check one) 

Agricultural 

Compare! 

Industrial 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover 

Davelopmantal 

‘QD 

{chack one) 

Current A 

d Value (also k 

n as State Equ 

Value) as 

biished by the BOR: 

$87,000 

Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR: 

$53,298 

What do you balieve is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 

$106,000 

Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. Thia ls your contention of Assessed Value. 

$53,000 

if you belleve the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. 

Section 8: Classification Information only the mi Dep't 

of Treasury may appeal this issue to the Tribunal 

Parcel identification Number: 

Current Classification of Property as established by Board of Review: 

Real 

Personal 

 {oheck one} 

O 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

Industrial 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one) 

What do you beliave Is the property's classification? 

Real 

Personal 

{check one) 

O 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

nagaet Rosaria 

Timber-Cutover 

Devegimentat 

uy 

{check one} 

H improved property, how Is tho property currently being usad? 

fimproved property, for what use was the property designed?

Page 4

Mig 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Fee Information 

Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition? 

Yes 

Oa No 

Are you appealing ONLY the denial of a Poverty Exemption or Disabled Veterans Exemption? 

[| Yes 

No 

If you answered yes to either or both of the above questions, you are not required to pay any filing fees. 

The filing fee is based on the greater of the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. 

If you are appealing more than one 

parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus 

$25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed, not to exceed a total filing fee of $1,000. 

If your property is residential property (see MCL 205.762) and 

the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: 

Filing Fee is: 

$100,000.00 and under 

$125.00 

$100,000.01 to $500,000.00 

$200.00 

$Over $600,000.00 

$300.00 

If your property is 

NOT residential property (see MCL 205.762) and 

the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: 

Filing Fee is: 

$100,000.00 and under 

$250.00 

* Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, as indicated above. 

If your property is 

NOT residential property and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is $100,000.01 or greater the 

appeal does not qualify for Small Claims. Therefore, an Entire Tribunal petition must be filed. 

Signaturg’ requires 

/ 

or 

Signature: 

Isl 

7 

v 

4

Page 5

Lincoln Township Assessor 

PO Box 539, Port Austin, MI 48467 

Julia Fletcher assessorjulia@gmail.com Cell: (586) 944-8907 

Home: (989) 874-3084 

Hope Bedford Deputy Assessor assessorhope@gmail.com Cell: (989) 930-8434 

Office Hours: By appointment only 

Scott Boshart 

1020 Cross Rd 

Kinde, MI 48445 

June 24, 2024 

Re.: Petition to March Board of Review; parcel number 14-008-006-00, commonly 

known as 1020 Cross Rd. 

To Whom it May Concern, 

As of June 4, 2024, Fletcher Assessing Services has contracted with Lincoln Township, 

Huron County Michigan to provide assessing services for all matters within the 

Township. 

The March Board of Review has made the following determination: 

For Parcel Number 14-008-006-00 

2024 Original Assessed Value $87,000 

2024 “Board of Review” Assessed Value $87,000 

2024 Original Taxable Value $53,298 

2024 “Board of Review” Taxable Value $53,298 

The Board has reviewed your petition to reduce the assessed and taxable values 

due to blight across the street and decided that no changes should be made. 

The action of the MBOR may be appealed to the Michigan Tax Tribunal (MTT) within 35 

days of this notice. To appeal, file a petition with the MTT, which can be obtained on 

their website htps://www.michigan.gov/taxtrib (517) 335-9760. 

Please contact me with any further questions. 

Respectfully, 

V/s Herds

Page 6

— 

a 

5. DostALT 

REL 

JDZO Sr re 

ll 

| 

| 

sec ho) 

7021 2720 0000 9542 

Wrtre 

n

77 0 Box 

Lawsuits

PDF reading copy

← View full record