Full record / 2026 Petition per Sever Order - Wal-Mart Clinton (26-002477).pdf

2026 Petition per Sever Order - Wal-Mart Clinton (26-002477).pdf

Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust Petitioner Vs. Township Of Clinton Respondent · 26-002477-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

25-0013 

76111651.1 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

Clinton Twp., 

Respondent. 

MTT Docket No. 26-002477 

Parcel No. 16-11-05-226-006 

Michael B. Shapiro (P20282) 

Jackie J. Cook (P68781) 

Honigman LLP 

Attorneys for Petitioner 

2290 First National Building 

660 Woodward Avenue 

Detroit, MI 48226 

(313) 465-7622 

mshapiro@honigman.com

jcook@honigman.com

Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition 

Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust (“Petitioner”), through its attorneys, Honigman LLP, 

says: 

1.

Petitioner hereby files this Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition pursuant to and as 

required by Michigan Tax Tribunal Order Severing 2026 Tax Year and Assigning it to Docket No. 

26-002477, dated June 26, 2026. 

2.

Petitioner's principal office address is Property Tax Department, 2608 SE J Street, 

Suite 2, Bentonville, AR 72716-0555. 

3.

Petitioner is a party in interest with respect to property taxes on tax parcel number 

16-11-05-226-006 ("Petitioner's Property"), with an address of 18400 Hall Road, Clinton Twp.,

Page 2

2 

76111651.1 

MI, located in Macomb County. 

4.

Respondent, Clinton Twp. - Macomb, assesses and collects property taxes on 

Petitioner's Property. 

5.

Respondent’s March board of review set the 2026 taxable value of Petitioner's 

Property at $5,310,780 and set the 2026 assessed value Petitioner's Property at $7,900,400, which 

will result in a state equalized value in the same amount based upon the tentative equalization 

factor. 

6.

Petitioner's Property is classified as commercial real. 

7.

Petitioner's Property is presently used or available for use for retail purposes. 

8.

Petitioner believes that Petitioner's Property was originally designed to be used for 

retail purposes. 

9.

This matter involves issues relating to: (a) valuation, (b) assessment, (c) taxable 

value, and (d) uniformity. 

10.

At this time, Petitioner believes, as it relates to taxable value, that there is a dispute 

relative to the value of a loss. 

11.

A Board of Review protest was not required for Petitioner’s Property. 

12.

The 2026 assessment, including state equalized value and taxable value, imposed 

on Petitioner's Property, and the taxes to be levied and collected thereon, are invalid and unlawful 

and operate as a fraud upon the taxpayer for the reasons that: 

(a)

The 2026 assessment, including state equalized value and/or taxable value, 

exceeds the amount permitted by the Michigan Constitution and applicable 

statutes; 

(b)

The 2026 assessment, including state equalized value and/or taxable value,

Page 3

3 

76111651.1 

is at a higher percentage of true cash value than permissible under the 

Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; 

(c)

The 2026 assessment, including taxable value and/or state equalized value, 

is based upon an erroneous determination of the true cash value of that 

portion of Petitioner's Property that is taxable under Michigan law, and is 

based upon the application of wrong principles; and 

(d)

The 2026 assessment, including state equalized value and/or taxable value, 

and the mode of assessment adopted by Respondent, discriminate against 

Petitioner and deny Petitioner its constitutional rights to uniformity, equal 

protection, and due process of law. 

 WHEREFORE, Petitioner requests that the Tax Tribunal enter an Order: (i) reducing the 

2026 taxable value of Petitioner's Property from $5,310,780 to $3,300,000; (ii) reducing the 2026 

assessed and state equalized value of Petitioner's Property from $7,900,400 to $3,300,000; 

(iii) requiring payment to Petitioner of the refunds attributable to such reductions, plus interest and 

costs; and (iv) awarding Petitioner any other relief to which it is entitled. 

Dated: June 29, 2026 

Respectfully submitted, 

HONIGMAN LLP 

Attorneys for Petitioner 

By: _______________________________________ 

Michael B. Shapiro (P20282) 

2290 First National Building 

660 Woodward Avenue 

Detroit, MI 48226 

(313) 465-7622 

mshapiro@honigman.com

Page 4

4 

76111651.1 

Dated: June 29, 2026

HONIGMAN LLP 

Attorneys for Petitioner 

By: _______________________________________ 

Jackie J. Cook (P68781) 

2290 First National Building 

660 Woodward Avenue 

Detroit, MI 48226 

(313) 465-7270 

jcook@honigman.com

PDF reading copy

← View full record