Full record / Respondent Answer.pdf

Respondent Answer.pdf

Robert McMaster Petitioner V City Of Portage Respondent · 26-002265-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

be] 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON 1. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM 

' 

VALUATION / UNCAPPING 

MTT DOCKET NO. 26-002265 

Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information 

Unit of Gavernment 

City of Portage 

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route): 

7900 S. Westnedge Ave 

City or Town: 

State: 

2IP Code: 

Faraos 

| 

MI 

149002 

Telephone 069-329-4433 

Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email): 

assessingdept@portagemi.gov 

Section 2: Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information 

I. 

First Name: 

M.L: 

Last Name: 

Cathy 

Weissert 

Firm Name (if any): 

. 

’ 

1 

WCA Assessing 

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route): 

’ 

i 

7900 S. Westnedge Ave 

City or Town: 

State: 

ZIP Code: 

' 

Portage 

Ml 

149002 

; 

Tepe Mer 069-329-4433 

| 

. 

| 

ia 

Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email): 

assessingdept@portagemi.gov 

. 

; 

Section 3: Subject Property Information 

] 

. 

' 

Are the parcels fisted by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? 

If no, [ist all parcels that are adjoining in separate groupings. Attacha 

separate sheet if necessary, 

a Yes 

a No 

Not Applicable 

Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of §0% or more for all tax years at issue? 

ves 

[1 No

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal 

The SEV and Taxable Value represents 50% of Fair Market Value and all values in the 

City of Portage have been uniformly assessed. 

Request that appeal for the uncapping of taxable value be denied due to MCL 211.27a 

subsection 3. 

Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES 

Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? ¥J Yes 

[No 

If yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: [#4 March 

[J yuly 

[J December 

If the July or December BOR revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? a Yes 

O0 No 

If yes, cite the Board's authority. 

Was the assessment at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? O Yes 

Vv No 

If yes, explain 

Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? 

ves 

WNo 

If so, what is the issue date? 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE 

When was the Notice of Uncapping, if applicable, issued? February 20720, Aasessment Netice 

Under what statutory section was the Taxable Value uncapped? 

MCL 211.27a (3) 

Section 6: Valuation Information use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. 

Parcel Number: 07320-002-O0 

Classification of Property: 

Real 

Personal [J (check one) 

Agricultural [J 

Commercial 

J 

Industrial (J 

Residential @ 

 Timber-Cutover (J 

Developmental [J 

Utility [J (check one) 

Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) established 

| Taxable Value established by the Board of Review: 

by the Board of Review: 

\ 63, 500 

163,500 

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as true cash value)? 

327,000 

What do you believe is the assessed value? (multiply true cash 

What do you believe is the taxable value? (cannot exceed 

value by .5) 163,500 

assessed value) 

1 63,500 

S ignature 

‘Required 

Respondent 

or 

Aftogney/Authoriz 

WHER 

ture: 

u 

MAO)

PDF reading copy

← View full record