25-002824 Answer.pdf
Neal Bloomfield, Petitioner V Township Of Chikaming, Respondent · 25-002824-TT
Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WHITMER
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS
MARLON I. BROWN, DPA
GOVERNOR
LANSING
DIRECTOR
PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM
VALUATION / UNCAPPING
MTT DOCKET NO. 25-002824
Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information
Unit of Government
Chikaming Township
Malling Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route):
13535 Red Arrow Hwy
City or Town:
State:
ZIP Code:
Harbert
Ml
[49115
569-469-1676
Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email):
Section 2: Respondent's Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information
)
First Name:
M.b:
Last Name:
Antoinette
Swisher
Firm Name (if any):
Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route):
135635 Red Arrow Hwy
City or Town:
State:
ZIP Code:
Harbert
HE
Telephone “mr 269-469- 1 676
Email Address {do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email):
tswisher@chikamingtownship.org
Section 3: Subject Property Information
Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining?
1 no, list al! parcels that are adjoining in separate groupings. Attacha
separate sheet if necessary.
ves
[J No
[J NotApplicable
Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of 50% or more for all tax years at issue?
O Yes
NoPage 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON |. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal Assessed value was developed utilizing the cost approach to value with per unit land value determined by land value analysis. Economic Condition Factors were also applied. Property owner petitioned March Board of Review for a value that reflects 50% of the purchase price. The March Board denied the request for a lower value. Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? Yes Od No If yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: March O July Oa December If the July or December BOR revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? [0] Yes [m] No If yes, cite the Board's authority. Was the assessment at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? [] Yes No If yes, explain Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? O Yes [No If so, what is the issue date? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE When was the Notice of Uncapping, if applicable, issued? Under what statutory section was the Taxable Value uncapped? Section 6: Valuation Information *use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. PareeINimBer 4 4.07-3050-0244-00-7 Classification of Property: ~~ Real Personal [J (check one) Agricultural (J Commercial J Industrial J Residential Timber-Cutover [J] ~~ Developmental [J Utility [J (check one) Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) established | Taxable Value established by the Board of Review: by the Board of Review: 70,200 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as true cash value)? 140,400 What do you believe is the assessed value? (multiply true cash What do you believe is the taxable value? (cannot exceed value by .5) 70,200 assessed value) 70,200 Signature required py: ~ Isl - Zl, Y.