Full record / 26-000635.pdf

26-000635.pdf

Pinconning Partners LLC Petitioner Vs. Township Of Pinconning Respondent · 26-000635-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

RECEIVED 

JUN 1 8 2026 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

» GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Pinconning Partners LLC 

Petitioner, 

v 

MTT Docket No. 26000635 

City of Pinconning 

, 

Respondent. 

ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX ANSWER 

1. 

x 

Admit __ Deny. 

If denied, state the parcel number for the property identified 

on the Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition for the tax year or years at issue: 

180 P10 003 001 00 

(If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Answer 

Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 

2. 

x 

Admit 

Deny. 

If denied, the property identified on the Entire Tribunal 

Property Tax Petitionis x__real ___ personal. 

3. 

x 

Admit __ Deny. 

If denied, identify the contiguous and non-contiguous 

parcels by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 

4. 

___Admit ___ Deny. 

If denied, identify the parcel or parcels of personal property 

that are not located on a parcel of real property under appeal by parcel number 

(attach additional page if necessary): 

5. 

Admit ___ Deny. 

a. 

If denied, state when the personal property statements were filed, if at all: 

b. 

On what date did the March Board of Review commence: 

March 10, 2026

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 26 000635 

Page 2 of 4 

7. 

8. 

10. 

11. 

12. 

x 

Admit Deny. 

If denied, list the separate facts upon which Respondent 

relies in support of the denial (attach additional page if necessary): 

Admit 

Deny x__Neither Admit Nor Deny. 

If denied, list the separate 

facts upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional 

age if necessary): 

Admit 

Deny 

x__ 

Neither Admit Nor Deny. 

If denied, state the facts upon 

which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional page if 

necessary). 

x 

Admit Deny. 

If denied, in what County are the property or properties 

located in and what is the address of the property or properties: 

x Admit ___Deny. 

If denied, what is the applicable local governmental unit: 

Admit 

Deny * 

Neither Admit Nor Deny. 

If denied, list the separate facts 

upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional page if 

necessary):

Page 3

MTT Docket No. 26 000635 

Page 3 of 4 

© 

14. 

Admit 

Deny 

Neither Admit Nor Deny. 

If denied, list the separate 

facts upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional 

age if necessary): 

15. 

Admit 

Deny 

Neither Admit Nor Deny. 

If denied, list the separate 

facts upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional 

page if necessary): 

16. 

The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent's 

Board of Review are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

Assessed Value 

Taxable Value 

2026 

4,530,000 

2,265,000 

2,265,000 

17. 

Respondent contends that the values for the property identified above are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

State Equalized Value 

Taxable Value 

2026 

2,000,000 

1,000,000 

1,000,000 

18. 

The values in dispute for the property identified above are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

State Equalized Value 

Taxable Value 

2026 

2,530,000 

1,265,000 

1,265,000

Page 4

MTT Docket No. 26000635 

Page 4 of 4 

- 19. 

Admit 

Deny 

Neither Admit Nor Deny. 

If denied, list the separate 

facts upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional 

page if necessary): 

We accept the reduction of true cash value to 2,000,000 as well as the reduction 

in assessed and taxable value to 1,000,000. 

20. 

Admit 

Deny x__Neither Admit Nor Deny. 

If denied, list the separate 

facts upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional 

page if necessary): 

21. 

List any separate and specific facts upon which Respondent relies to support 

every ground on which Respondent relies and also has the burden of proof 

(attach additional page if necessary): 

22. 

List affirmative defenses and the separate and specific facts upon which 

Respondent relies in support of those affirmative defenses (attach additional 

page if necessary): 

Signaturg of Respondents Authorized Representative or, if none, Respondent: 

nyo NY” 

1 

Printed Name of Respondent's Authorized Representative or, if none, Respondent: 

Byondon 

Morphy 

Email Address: Bm.assessing@ictoud.com

Page 5

hb 

{ 

’ 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

DIRECTOR 

Pinconning Partners LLC 

, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner(s) 

v 

MTT Docket No. 26 000635 

City of Pinconning 

i 

Respondent(s) 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

Brandon Murphy 

states that on 6/12/2026 

he/she 

[Name of person serving/mailing petition] 

[date of service] 

served a copy of the Respdondent Answer 

relative to the above-captioned matter upon: 

[Provide name and address of the party/people being served] 

Jeff Tracy 

6615 Brotherhood Way 

Fort Wayne, IN 46625 

Fodor 

hp hovy” 

[Signature of person who is dérving/mailing copy]

Page 6

City of Pinconning 

208 S Monitou St 

P.O. Box 628 

pinconning. Mi 48650-0628 

Michigan 

Tex 

Tes puna 

Po 

Rex 

209232 

Lansinoy 

MT 

4g a0

Page 7

| 

PRIO RI TY® 

FLAT RATE ENVELOPE 

Retail 

US.

-ONE'RATE ®' ANY WEIGHT 

PIN

M A 

i 

L 

APPLY PRIORITY MAIL POSTAGE HERE 

= 

JUN

umTeD saTEs 

POSTAL SERVICE ® 

e4

PI

RDC 03 

0 Lb 1.30 Oz 

R23

© 

EXPECTED DELIVERY DAY: 

06/15/26 

USPS TRACKING® # 

4 

EP14H February 2024 Ou

9505 5115 9676 6163 3454 90

PDF reading copy

← View full record