2026 211.53 Petition Final.pdf
Method Mj LLC Petitioner Vs. City Of Detroit Respondent · 26-001399-TT
Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN
MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS SYSTEMS
MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL
METHOD MJ LLC,
Petitioner,
MTT Docket #26-
VS.
Parcel No.
23002015.025N
CITY OF DETROIT,
Respondent.
/
PETITION
METHOD MJ LLC (“Petitioner”), through its attorneys, Law Office of Aaron
M. Fales, P.C., says:
1.
Petitioner's principal office address
is 1510 Surria Ct., Bloomfield Hills,
MI 48304.
Petitioner is a party in interest with respect to real property taxes on
real property tax parcel nos. 23002015.025N ("Petitioner's Property"), at 6540 St.
Antoine, Detroit, Ml.
2.
Respondent, City of Detroit, assesses and collects property taxes on
Petitioner's Property.
3.
This matter involves an appeal of excessive taxes paid by Petitioner
within the last three years as a result of mutual mistakes of fact and/or clerical
errors which were committed by the assessing officer(s) and Petitioner.
4.
Pursuant to MCL 211.53a and Michigan case law, Petitioner and
Respondent's assessor's errors entitle Petitioner to seek a refund of the erroneousPage 2
taxes Petitioner paid for the current and two prior years or within the last three years from the date taxes were paid (faxes were paid on 3/29/24), including interest and penalties, and therefore the Tribunal has jurisdiction over this matter. 5. Respondent determined the Assessed, Taxable, and State Equalized values for the 2020 Tax Year was as follows: Original Values AV/SEV TV 23002015.025N 1,091,600 1,060,880 6. Petitioner's Property was classified as Commercial Real Property in all tax years under appeal. 7. This matter involves issues relating to: (a) valuation, (b) assessment, (c) taxable value, (d) clerical errors, (e) mutual mistakes of fact, and (d) uniformity. 8. At this time, Petitioner believes, as it relates to taxable value, that there is a dispute relative to the value of a loss. 9. Petitioner contends that the 2020 assessments imposed, including state equalized value and taxable value, imposed on Petitioner's Property, and the taxes to be levied and collected thereon, are invalid and unlawful and operate as a fraud upon the taxpayer for the reasons that: (a) The assessment, including state equalized value and/or taxable value, exceeds the amount permitted by the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes;
Page 3
(bo) The assessment, including state equalized value and/or taxable value, are overstated as a result of mutual mistakes of fact and/or clerical errors under MCL 211.53a; (c) The assessment, including taxable value and/or state equalized value, are based upon an erroneous determination of the true cash value of that portion of Petitioner's Property that is taxable under Michigan law, and are based upon the application of wrong principles; (d) The assessment, including state equalized value and/or taxable value, and the mode of assessment adopted by Respondent, discriminate against Petitioner and deny Petitioner its constitutional rights to uniformity, equal protection and due process of law; and (e) The increased taxation imposed on Petitioner's Property is arbitrary and without any factual or legal basis. WHEREFORE, Petitioner requests that the Tax Tribunal enter an Order (1) reducing the original 2020 state equalized, assessed and taxable values of Petitioner's Property as follows: Original Values AV/SEV TV 23002015.025N 0 0
Page 4
and (2) ordering a refund to Petitioner of all excessive taxes paid by Petitioner (including interest and penalties paid), and (3) awarding Petitioner any further relief the Tribunal deems necessary and just. Dated: May 26, 2026 Respectfully submitted, LAW OFFICE OF AARON M. FALES, P.C. Attorney for Petitioner yd Aaron M. Fales (P72864) 330 Hamilton Row, Ste. 350 Birmingham, MI 48009 (248) 767-9840 By: