05._Property_Tax_Appeal_Answer_Form_Valuation_Poverty_Classification.47d688c8-d93b-41d1-814f-4a1b1727a990.pdf
Devine Investment Properties LLC, Petitioner V City Of Potterville, Respondent · 25-002328-TT
Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL MOAHR DOCKET NO. 25-002328 Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information Filer Type: Local Unit of Government City Of Potterville (EATON) First Name M.I. Last Name/Company Name/Unit of Government Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State Michigan ZIP Code Telephone Number Fax Number E-mail Address Section 2: Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Tom M.I. Last Name Dillon Firm Name (if any) Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 1700 E Beltline NE, Ste 200 City or Town Grand Rapids State Michigan ZIP Code 49525 Telephone Number 616-726-2258 Fax Number E-mail Address tdillon@fosterswift.com Section 3: Subject Property Information Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of 50% or more? No Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? If not, list which parcels adjoin one another. Yes Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (e.g. Board of Review Decision, Notice of Uncapping, or Assessment Change Notice) with this Small Claims Answer, if applicable. If you do not submit this document, you may be held in default.
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR Respondent contends that the Subject Properties were properly assessed according to lawful principles and application of Michigan law. To the extent that the Petition contains any allegations of fact to which a response is required, Respondent neither admits nor denies the allegations as it lacks sufficient knowledge to form a belief as to the truth of the allegation(s). Respondent leaves Petitioner to its proofs. Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? No If yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: If no, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March BOR? *Submit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer. If the July or December BOR revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? If yes, cite the Board’s authority. Was the assessment(s) at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? No If yes, explain. Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? If so, what is the issue date? No IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE When was the Notice of Uncapping, if applicable, issued? Under what statutory section was the Taxable Value uncapped? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF A POVERTY EXEMPTION Did Petitioner request a Poverty Exemption at a BOR? If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: List the date the BOR denied Petitioner’s Poverty Exemption: IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF AN EXEMPTION OTHER THAN POVERTY, PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE, OR QUALIFIED AGRICULTURAL EXEMPTIONS Did Petitioner request the exemption at the BOR?
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: Tax Year(s) denied: List the date the exemption was denied: What statutory section did Petitioner request the subject property be exempt? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE CLASSIFICATION OF PROPERTY What do you believe the classification should be: Section 6: Valuation Information *Use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. Parcel Identification Number: 700-000-617-020-00 Classification of Property: Real Commercial Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR: $165,100 Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR: $165,100 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? $330,200 Multiply the True Cash Value by. 5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value. $165,100 If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. $165,100 Parcel Identification Number: 700-000-617-010-00 Classification of Property: Real Commercial Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR: $3,500 Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR: $3,500 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? $7,000 Multiply the True Cash Value by. 5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value. $3,500 If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. $3,500 Parcel Identification Number: 700-026-200-701-00 Classification of Property: Real Commercial
Page 4
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR: $8,000 Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR: $8,000 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? $16,000 Multiply the True Cash Value by. 5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value. $8,000 If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. $8,000 Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Respondent or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: /s/ Thomas K. Dillon