Full record / Burns.pdf

Burns.pdf

Nathan T Burns, Petitioner V City Of Detroit, Respondent · 24-003392-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

RECEIVED 

JUN 9 4 2094 

MICHIGAN Tax TRIBUNAL 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM 

VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL 

Do not use this form to appeal Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Special Assessment, or 

Non-Property tax disputes. 

Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal 

(e.g. Board of Review Decision or Notice of Uncapping) with this Small Claims Petition, if applicable. If you do not 

submit this document, you may be held in default. 

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information 

M.l 

Last Name/Company Name 

J) athan 

T Doehs 

mL 

Lodns 

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

216l9 

 Jores¢ 

City or Town’ 

” 

i 

State 

ZIP Code 

" 

Telephone Number 

Fax Number 

298-2540 

71L 

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) 

pose 

ndlhan th 953 

A 

gael. lpm 

Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information 

First Name 

M.I 

Last Name 

Firm Name (if any) 

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

City or Town 

State 

ZIP Code 

Telephone Number 

Fax Number 

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) 

Section 3: Subject Property Information 

How many 

If you are appe: 

ing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? 

parcels areyou | [] ves* 

No**

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 4: Issues Being Appealed (check ail that apply) 

[J True Cash and Taxable Value 

[J Poverty Exemption 

[OO Taxable Value Only (calculation) 

[J Disabled Veterans Exemption 

[PF Gnoapping of Taxable Value 

[OO Eligible Manufacturing Personal Property (ESA) 

[J Exemption from Taxation (other than the denial of a 

0 classification 

Principal Residence or Qualified Agricultural Exemption) 

Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal 

ki 

having 

Problem 5 wo Fe my Faxes 

now, 

Z receipe) frets 

From 

a non profi? Company. 

Fablessing! 

T jest dewivd 

LT conf 

gf ford 

for my Fakes 

Fo 50 co, 

Hig letter 

05/45] 

To ba Vs Ya plan now, 

EP Fogarty 15 no jncond, Fon Horihyt Tie 

Fig 5 

17 going Fo pe, Please sYop Them from 

po 17, PL Ahpe rm Aebtf. 

Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues 

Year(s) you are appealing: 

2024 

Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? [] Yes 

No 

First 

Yim [4] hegri 9 

Q bo oT Thy 

05a) ay 

If Yes, check which BOR you attended AND attach the BOR decision: O March 

O July 

O December 

/ 

If No, check the applicable reason(s): 

[| 

ot required to attend 

Assessment Change Notice was not received by Petitioner 

Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutual Mistake of Fact (if yes, include explanation in Section 5) 

Appealing within 35 days of State Tax Commission Order

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

f ANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 7: Valuation Information use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. 

“EIDE RORD 128 £ 16.5°F 107 Ebleny EsT5084856 pf JTF, WC) 

ar 59 toheun ave) 

901 36.5% 199 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

Industrial 

Suing) 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one) 

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR: 

fele-2 9, 600 

AFler 

39.600 

Current Taxabléd Value as established by the BOR: 

Bofors s 

2687 

AFter 

39,566 

What do you believe is tife fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 

Lh net 

cued 

my 

needs 

alst of work 

[tying 

to work's: Tsp 

Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value. 

27 syne 

If you "AT Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. 

I 

v5 

kK now 

ib 

There 

changing 

From 

2.682 to 39,400 

| 

Section 8: Classification Information *oniy the mi Dept of Treasury may appeal this issue to the Tribunal* 

Parcel Identification Number: 

Current Classification of Property as established by Board of Review: 

Real 

Personal 

(check one) 

a 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

Industrial Resp 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one) 

What do you believe is the property’s classification? 

Real 

Personal 

(check one) 

[m] 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

Industrial i 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one) 

If improved property, how is the property currently being used? 

ESF 

amt 1 

my 

primary Properly. 

they (Smy ho nse 

Ifimproved property, for what use was the property designed? 

TH my AL 

mary 

A ropirry 

This 

ts myhome, 

plus on sTeying here

Page 4

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Fee Information 

Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition? 

0 Yes 

fio 

Are you appealing ONLY the denial of a Poverty Exemption or Disabled Veterans Exemption? 

[7 

ves Be 

If you answered yes to either or both of the above questions, you are not required to pay any filing fees. 

The filing fee is based on the greater of the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. 

If you are appealing more than one 

parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus 

$25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed, not to exceed a total filing fee of $1,000. 

If your property is residential property (see MCL 205.762) and 

the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: 

Filing Fee is: 

$100,000.00 and under 

$125.00 

$100,000.01 to $500,000.00 

$200.00 

$Over $500,000.00 

$300.00 

If your property is 

NOT residential property (see MCL 205.762) and 

the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: 

Filing Fee is: 

$100,000.00 and under 

$250.00 

* plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, as indicated above. 

If your property is NOT residential property and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is $100,000.01 or greater the 

appeal does not qualify for Small Claims. Therefore, an Entire Tribunal petition must be filed. 

Signature *required 

Petitioner or 

Attorney/Authorized Represgntative’s Signature: 

Ist 

J 

A 

¥. 

Ap

Page 5

Coleman A. Young Municipal Center 

2 Woodward Avenue, Suite 105 

Detroit, Michigan 48226 

Phone: (313) 628-0722 

Fax: (313) 224-4576 

www.detroitmi.gov 

Fert Ameen 

Board of Review 

ares — 

DETROIT 

05/16/2024 

BURNS, NATHAN 

21623 MOROSS 

DETROIT MI 48228 

- 

RE: 

2024 

MARCH BOARD OF REVIEW PETITION NUMBER: 

M-65837 

The March Board of Review has considered the appeal on the 2024 assessment for the below described property 

and concluded that: 

FINDING OF FACTS; 

1. 

Parcel Number: 

21079044-5 

2. 

Property Address: 

21623 MOROSS 

3. 

District: 

4 

4. 

Property Classification: 

401 

(RESIDENTIAL-IMPROVED) 

Ad Valorem 

6. 

Principle Residence Exemption: 

% 

5. 

Property Legal Description: 

£ MOROSS ROAD 128 £ 16.5 FT 127 ROLAND EST SUB L56 P16 PLATS, WC R 21/901 36.5 X 100 

6. 

Petitioner timely filed an appeal to the March Board of Review. 

7. The March Board of Review considered 

(if any) petitioner's and/or duly authorized representative evidence 

and/or testimony. The March Board of Review considered facts presented as on the assessment roll and/or any 

recommendations offered by the Office of the Assessor. 

CONCLUSION; 

Taxable Value Uncapping due to Proposal A of 1994 

Before Appeal 

After Appeal 

2024 

Assessed Value 

38,600 

39,600 

2024 

Taxable Value 

8,687 

’ 

39,600 

If you are dissatisfied with the decision of the March Board of Review, submit this notice and complete the enclosed 

small claims form to appeal to: 

Michigan Tax Tribunal 

P.O. Box 30232 

Lansing 

MI 48909 

A Michigan Tax Tribunal appeal must 

be made 

by May 31st 

of the current year for properties classified 

as: 

Commercial 

Real, 

Industrial 

Real, 

Commercial 

Personal, 

Industrial 

Personal 

and 

Utility 

Personal 

Property.

Page 6

NThan 

T Bogs 

21619 morass 

Dero! 1, MT 48254 

Retail 

RHI 

= 

1587 

0710 

5270 

0°?13 

5007 

2k 

RDC 99 

MicHT Can Tax Tribunal 

| Po. Box 30232 

Lansing 

MT 45909 

TE NESE ATIN Ee 

= 

48808 

U.S. POSTAGE PAID 

FCM LETTER 

DETROIT, MI 48233 

MAY 28, 2024 

$8.73 

R2305K132591-12

PDF reading copy

← View full record