Hotel Indigo Traverse City - City of Traverse City POS 26-001051.pdf
Hotel Indigo Traverse City Petitioner Vs. City Of Traverse City Respondent · 26-001051-TT
Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Hotel Indigo Traverse City , Petitioner, City of Traverse City , Respondent. MTT DOCKET NO: 26-001051-TT PROOF OF SERVICE Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey, being first duly sworn, deposes and says that on the 4!" day of August 2026 she served a copy of the Petition in an envelope properly addressed to each via Samuel Gedman Grand Traverse County Clerk 400 Boardman Ave., Ste. 101 Traverse City, MI 49684 James D. Baker Grand Traverse County Equalization Director 400 Boardman Ave., Ste. 103 Traverse City, MI 49684 upon the following persons by placing same USPS first class thereon: Traverse City School District Josey Ballenger. School Board Secretary 2075 Cass Road Traverse City, MI 49684 Michigan State Treasurer Department of Treasury Treasury Building 430 West Allegan Lansing, MI 48922 Iki SQ Cae ((Q 2) Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey (P69494) Authorized Agent
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Hotel Indigo Traverse City , Petitioner, MTT DOCKET NO: 26-001051-TT City of Traverse City , Respondent. PROOF OF SERVICE Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey, being first duly sworn, deposes and says that on the 4t" day of August 2026 she served a copy of the Petition upon the following persons by placing same in an envelope properly addressed to each via certified mail thereon: Amy Robbins City of Traverse City Assessor 400 Boardman Avenue Traverse City, MI 49684 Sarah Lutz City of Traverse City Clerk 400 Boardman Avenue Traverse City, MI 49684 id (0 & Mic ((0 ) Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey (P69494) Authorized Agent
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Hotel Indigo Traverse City . MTT Docket No. 26-001051 -TT Petitioner, v City of Traverse City Respondent. Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey (P69494) Alex Morse Cameron Beckner DuCharme, McMillen & Associates, Inc. Representatives for Petitioner 9229 Delegates Row, Suite 375 Indianapolis, IN 46240 (317) 596-3260 msilvey@dmainc.com amorse@dmainc.com cbeckner@dmainc.com ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 1. Property Parcel No.: 28-51-658-031-01 2. The property identified above is real 3. Only one parcel of property is the subject of this appeal. 4. Petitioner owns and/or otherwise holds an interest in the parcel of property that is the subject of this appeal. 5. The property identified above is classified as 201 Commercial-Improved
Page 4
MTT Docket No. 26-001051 TT Page 2 of 3 6. The assessment(s) at issue were nol protested to Respondent’s March, July, or December Board of Review as a protest was not required. 7. The property or properties at issue are in Grand Traverse county, 8. The property or properties’ address is: 263 W Grandview Pkwy, Traverse City, MI 49684 9. The assessment(s) at issue were established by the: City of Traverse City 10. Petitioner’s legal residence or principal office address is: 1140 Reservoir Ave, Cranston, RT 02920 11. This appeal involves issues relating to the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values and uniformity. 12. The tax year at issue is: 2026. 13. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s 2026 Board of Review are: Tax True Cash Assessed Taxable Year Value Value Value 2026 $35,525,400 $17,762,700 $12,333,408 14. Petitioner contends the values for tax year 2026 are no more than the following: Tax True Cash State Equalized Taxable Year Value Value Value 2026 $20,000,000 $10,000,000 $10,000,000 15. The values in contention for tax year 2026 are: Tax True Cash State Equalized Taxable Year Value Value Value 2026 $15,525,400 $7,762,700 $2,333,408
Page 5
MTT Docket No. 26-001051 TT Page 3 of 3 16. The 2026 assessments imposed on the subject property and the taxes to be levied and collected are invalid because: (a) The assessment, including state equalized and/or taxable value, exceeds the amount permitted by the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; (b) The assessment, including state equalized and/or taxable value, is at a higher percentage of true cash value than permissible under the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; (c) The assessment is based on the misapplication of valuation principles, and (d) The assessment otherwise violates Petitioner’s rights. WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests this honorable Tribunal hear this case and enter an order reducing the 2026 true cash, state equalized and taxable values and direct Respondent to refund to Petitioner any excess taxes, fees, and penalties paid, plus interest and costs, and all other relief to which it is entitled under Michigan law and as is appropriate under the circumstances. Respectfully submitted, DuCharme, McMillen & Associates, Inc. Mic (lo & > Dated: May 16 2026 By: Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey (P69494) Petitioner's Representative