Full record / Deny_Stip-Wease.2026-03-06_14-01-51.0000.pdf

Deny_Stip-Wease.2026-03-06_14-01-51.0000.pdf

Daniel Zuckerbrod, Petitioner Vs. City Of Southfield, Respondent · 24-004053-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Daniel Zuckerbrod, 

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 ENTIRE TRIBUNAL

v

MTT Docket No. 24-004053

City Of Southfield,

Respondent.

ORDER DENYING JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT

The Tribunal has reviewed the case file and the stipulation, filed on March 3, 2026, and 

finds that the parties have stipulated to a taxable value(s) which does not appear to be 

in compliance with MCL 211.27a and the parties have failed to provide any justification 

for the proposed value(s). Specifically, the stipulated taxable value decreased below 

the state equalized value without legal justification. Moreover, the stipulation is not on a 

form made available by the Tribunal or in a form that is in substantial compliance with 

the Tribunal’s form, as required by TTR 283. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the Parties’ Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment is 

DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case shall remain on the previously-scheduled 

Prehearing General Call and a Prehearing Conference will be scheduled accordingly.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that because this Stipulation for Entry of Consent 

Judgment is no longer pending before the Tribunal, a new stipulation is required for any 

future settlement. However, if the new stipulation is filed within 14 days of the issuance 

of this order, no additional filing fee is required.

By _____________________________

 Joshua M. Wease, Tribunal Member 

Entered: March 6, 2026

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 24-004053

Page 2 of 10

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Daniel Zuckerbrod, 

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 ENTIRE TRIBUNAL

v

MTT Docket No. 24-004053

City Of Southfield,

Respondent.

ORDER DENYING JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT

The Tribunal has reviewed the case file and the stipulation, filed on March 3, 2026, and 

finds that the parties have stipulated to a taxable value(s) which does not appear to be 

in compliance with MCL 211.27a and the parties have failed to provide any justification 

for the proposed value(s). Specifically, the stipulated taxable value decreased below 

the state equalized value without legal justification. Moreover, the stipulation is not on a 

form made available by the Tribunal or in a form that is in substantial compliance with 

the Tribunal’s form, as required by TTR 283. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the Parties’ Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment is 

DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case shall remain on the previously-scheduled 

Prehearing General Call and a Prehearing Conference will be scheduled accordingly.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that because this Stipulation for Entry of Consent 

Judgment is no longer pending before the Tribunal, a new stipulation is required for any 

future settlement. However, if the new stipulation is filed within 14 days of the issuance 

of this order, no additional filing fee is required.

By _____________________________

 Joshua M. Wease, Tribunal Member 

Entered: March 6, 2026

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

Page 4

MTT Docket No. 24-004053

Page 4 of 10

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 5

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Daniel Zuckerbrod, 

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 ENTIRE TRIBUNAL

v

MTT Docket No. 24-004053

City Of Southfield,

Respondent.

ORDER DENYING JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT

The Tribunal has reviewed the case file and the stipulation, filed on March 3, 2026, and 

finds that the parties have stipulated to a taxable value(s) which does not appear to be 

in compliance with MCL 211.27a and the parties have failed to provide any justification 

for the proposed value(s). Specifically, the stipulated taxable value decreased below 

the state equalized value without legal justification. Moreover, the stipulation is not on a 

form made available by the Tribunal or in a form that is in substantial compliance with 

the Tribunal’s form, as required by TTR 283. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the Parties’ Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment is 

DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case shall remain on the previously-scheduled 

Prehearing General Call and a Prehearing Conference will be scheduled accordingly.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that because this Stipulation for Entry of Consent 

Judgment is no longer pending before the Tribunal, a new stipulation is required for any 

future settlement. However, if the new stipulation is filed within 14 days of the issuance 

of this order, no additional filing fee is required.

By _____________________________

 Joshua M. Wease, Tribunal Member 

Entered: March 6, 2026

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

Page 6

MTT Docket No. 24-004053

Page 6 of 10

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 7

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Daniel Zuckerbrod, 

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 ENTIRE TRIBUNAL

v

MTT Docket No. 24-004053

City Of Southfield,

Respondent.

ORDER DENYING JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT

The Tribunal has reviewed the case file and the stipulation, filed on March 3, 2026, and 

finds that the parties have stipulated to a taxable value(s) which does not appear to be 

in compliance with MCL 211.27a and the parties have failed to provide any justification 

for the proposed value(s). Specifically, the stipulated taxable value decreased below 

the state equalized value without legal justification. Moreover, the stipulation is not on a 

form made available by the Tribunal or in a form that is in substantial compliance with 

the Tribunal’s form, as required by TTR 283. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the Parties’ Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment is 

DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case shall remain on the previously-scheduled 

Prehearing General Call and a Prehearing Conference will be scheduled accordingly.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that because this Stipulation for Entry of Consent 

Judgment is no longer pending before the Tribunal, a new stipulation is required for any 

future settlement. However, if the new stipulation is filed within 14 days of the issuance 

of this order, no additional filing fee is required.

By _____________________________

 Joshua M. Wease, Tribunal Member 

Entered: March 6, 2026

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

Page 8

MTT Docket No. 24-004053

Page 8 of 10

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 9

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Daniel Zuckerbrod, 

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 ENTIRE TRIBUNAL

v

MTT Docket No. 24-004053

City Of Southfield,

Respondent.

ORDER DENYING JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT

The Tribunal has reviewed the case file and the stipulation, filed on March 3, 2026, and 

finds that the parties have stipulated to a taxable value(s) which does not appear to be 

in compliance with MCL 211.27a and the parties have failed to provide any justification 

for the proposed value(s). Specifically, the stipulated taxable value decreased below 

the state equalized value without legal justification. Moreover, the stipulation is not on a 

form made available by the Tribunal or in a form that is in substantial compliance with 

the Tribunal’s form, as required by TTR 283. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the Parties’ Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment is 

DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case shall remain on the previously-scheduled 

Prehearing General Call and a Prehearing Conference will be scheduled accordingly.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that because this Stipulation for Entry of Consent 

Judgment is no longer pending before the Tribunal, a new stipulation is required for any 

future settlement. However, if the new stipulation is filed within 14 days of the issuance 

of this order, no additional filing fee is required.

By _____________________________

 Joshua M. Wease, Tribunal Member 

Entered: March 6, 2026

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

Page 10

MTT Docket No. 24-004053

Page 10 of 10

By: Tribunal Clerk

PDF reading copy

← View full record