Rsvl Holding - 2111 Answer & POS.pdf
Roseville Holding 1 Inc, Petitioner Vs. City Of Roseville, Respondent · 25-002111-TT
Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL ROSEVILLE HOLDING 1 INC, Petitioner, vs. MTT Docket No. 25-002111 CITY OF ROSEVILLE, Respondent. JAY A. SCHWARTZ TIMOTHY D. TOMLINSON (P48519) PROPERTY TAX REDUCTION SERV LLC YORK, DOLAN & TOMLINSON, P.C. 37887 West Twelve Mile Road Attorneys for Respondent Suite B 22600 Hall Road, Ste. 205 Farmington Hills, MI 4331 Clinton Twp., MI 48036 (248) 672-1922 (586) 263-5050 ischwartz(@propertytaxreductionservices.org ttomlinson@yorkdolanlaw.com RESPONDENT'S ANSWER TO PETITION (Entire Tribunal, 2025 Tax Year) NOW COMES Respondent, City of Roseville, by and through its attorneys, York, Dolan & Tomlinson, P.C., and in answer to Petitioner's Petition, states as follows: 1. Respondent admits paragraph 1. 2. Respondent admits paragraph 2. 3. Respondent neither admits nor denies paragraph 3 being without sufficient information to form a reasonable belief thereto. 4. Respondent neither admits nor denies paragraph 4 being without sufficient information to form a reasonable belief thereto. wi Respondent neither admits nor denies paragraph 5 being without sufficient information to form a reasonable belief thereto.
Page 2
6. Respondent admits paragraph 6. 7. Respondent neither admits nor denies paragraph 7 being without sufficient information to form a reasonable belief thereto. 8. Respondent neither admits nor denies paragraph 8 being without sufficient information to form a reasonable belief thereto. 9. Respondent neither admits nor denies paragraph 9 being without sufficient information to form a reasonable belief thereto. 10. Respondent admits paragraph 10. 11. Respondent admits paragraph 11. 12. Respondent neither admits nor denies paragraph 12 being without sufficient information to form a reasonable belief thereto. 13. Respondent denies paragraph 13 because it is untrue, leaving Petitioner to its proofs. 14. Respondent admits paragraph 14. 15. Respondent neither admits nor denies paragraph 15 being without sufficient information to form a reasonable belief thereto. 16. Respondent admits paragraph 16. 17. Respondent denies paragraph 17 because it is untrue, leaving Petitioner to its proofs. 18. Respondent denies paragraph 18 because it is untrue, leaving Petitioner to its proofs. 19. Respondent denies paragraph 19 because it is untrue, leaving Petitioner to its proofs. 20. Respondent denies paragraph 20 because it is untrue, leaving Petitioner to its proofs. WHEREFORE, Respondent respectfully requests that this Honorable Tribunal dismiss the Petition, affirm the values as determined by Respondent, and award costs and attorney fees
Page 3
wrongfully incurred in having to defend this matter. Respectfully submitted, YORK, DOLAN & TOMLINSON, P.C. Av TIMOTHY D. TOMLINSON (P48519) Attorneys for Respondent 22600 Hall Road, Ste. 205 Clinton Twp., MI 48036 (586) 263-5050 ttomlinson@yorkdolanlaw.com Dated: August 25, 2025 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Tho undersigned certifies that the foregoing instrument was r on all parties to the above cause to each ofthe aticimeys d lerein at thelr i es disclosed cr Picadings on 9, Bs d ” pl