Full record / scpetition_valuation.pdf

scpetition_valuation.pdf

Evin Tas Petitioner V City Of East Lansing Respondent · 26-001272-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

1 of 3

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM

VALUATION / UNCAPPING APPEAL

MTT DOCKET NO. 

Petitioner’s Contact Information:

Filer Type:

Individual

Local Unit of Government:

First Name

Evin

M.I.

Last Name

Tas

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

336 Cowley Ave

City or Town

East Lansing

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48823

Telephone Number

5173037868

E-mail Address

evin.tas@gmail.com

Subject Property Information:

How many parcels are you appealing?

1

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining?

*If no, you must file separate appeals for each parcel

N/A 

Property Address (No., Street)

336 Cowley Ave

City or Town

East Lansing

County

Ingham

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48823

Taxing Authority (City or Township)

City Of East Lansing (INGHAM)

Check which of the following you are appealing: (check all that apply)

Taxable Value Only (calculation)

 

Please Explain the Reason for this Appeal:

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

2 of 3

am appealing the 2026 taxable value determination for my property located at 336 Cowley Avenue. The 2026 assessed value was increased from $156,600 to 

$168,200, and the taxable value was increased from $150,907 to $154,981.

The taxable value of my property is disproportionately high relative to comparable properties on Cowley Avenue. The difference between my property's assessed 

and taxable values is significantly smaller than the neighborhood pattern, resulting in a higher tax burden than similarly situated homes.

For 2026, the proposed assessed value is $168,200 and the proposed taxable value is $154,981, a difference of only $13,219. Based on my analysis of Cowley 

Avenue properties, the average difference between assessed and taxable values is approximately $34,550. This indicates that the taxable value of my property 

remains substantially closer to the assessed value than comparable neighborhood properties.

Comparable properties with similar or larger square footage have substantially lower taxable values. For example, 301 Cowley Avenue (1,776 sq ft) has a taxable 

value of $118,839, 314 Cowley Avenue (1,807 sq ft) has a taxable value of $106,261, and 236 Cowley Avenue (1,876 sq ft) has a taxable value of $114,116. These 

properties are comparable in size and characteristics yet carry significantly lower taxable values than my property.

My request is not that my property be treated differently, but that it be assessed uniformly and equitably with comparable Cowley Avenue properties in 

accordance with the principle of equalization. I respectfully request that the property values be adjusted to reflect uniformity and equalization with comparable 

Cowley Avenue properties, including a taxable value of approximately $134,600.

Jurisdictional Issues:

Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review? Yes

If Yes, check which Board of Review you attended: March

If No, please check the applicable reason(s):

Year(s) Under Appeal:

2026

 

Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal:

Parcel Number:

+33-20-01-13-115-015

Classification of Property: Real (check one)

Residential (check one)

Current Assessed Value as established by the Board of Review:

168200

Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review:

154981

What do you believe is the fair market value?

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

3 of 3

290000

Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value.

145000

If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.

 

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Petitioner’s Signature: 

/s/ Evin Tas

Attorney or Authorized Agent’s Signature:

/s/ 

Fee Information:

If you do not have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% at the time of the filing of this petition, you are required to pay a filing fee for 

the filing of this appeal.

The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel 

with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each 

additional parcel being appealed.

Property tax appeal: Residential** Non-Residential

SEV or TV in contention*

 

 Filing fee*** Filing Fee**

$100,000 or less...........................................................................................$ 125.00 $250.00

$100,000.01 to $500,000.00.........................................................................$ 200.00 N/A

More than $500,000…..................................................................................$ 300.00 N/A

Does the subject property have a principal residence exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition?

Yes

PDF reading copy

← View full record