25-003336.pdf
Leland Jeffrey Key, Julie Ruth Key, Petitioners Vs. Township Of Tyrone, Respondent · 25-003336-TT
Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.
Page 1
RECEIVED ER OCT 07 2025 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON 1. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Leland Jeffrey Key, Julie Ruth Key | MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, v MTT Docket No. 25-003336 Township of Tyrone Respondent. ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX ANSWER 1. X_ Admit ___ Deny. If denied, state the parcel number for the property identified on the Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition for the tax year or years at issue: 4704-32-100-018 (If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Answer Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 2. X Admit Deny. If denied, the property identified on the Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition is X__ real ___ personal. 3. X_ Admit __ Deny. If denied, identify the contiguous and non-contiguous parcels by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 4, X_ Admit __ Deny. lf denied, identify the parcel or parcels of personal property that are not located on a parcel of real property under appeal by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 5. X Admit __ Deny. a. If denied, state when the personal property statements were filed, if at all: b. On what date did the March Board of Review commence: - March 13, 2025 6. X Admit ___ Deny. If denied, state the classification of the property identified on the Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition for the tax year or years at issue:
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 25-003336 Page 2 of 4 7. 10. 11. 12. X Admit Deny. If denied, list the separate facts upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional page if necessary): Admit Deny X__ Neither Admit Nor Deny. If denied, list the separate facts upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional page if necessary): Admit Deny X__Neither Admit Nor Deny. If denied, state the facts upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional page if necessary): X Admit __ Deny. If denied, in what County are the property or properties located in and what is the address of the property or properties: X Admit __ Deny. If denied, what is the applicable local governmental unit: X__Admit Deny Neither Admit Nor Deny. If denied, list the separate facts upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional page if necessary):
Page 3
MTT Docket No. 25-003336 Page 3 of 4 14. X_ Admit Deny Neither Admit Nor Deny. If denied, list the separate facts upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional page if necessary): 15. Admit Deny X Neither Admit Nor Deny. If denied, list the separate facts upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional age if necessary): 16. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent's Board of Review are: Tax Year True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2025 1,090,000 545,000 470,032 17. Respondent contends that the values for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 2025 1,090,000 545,000 470,032 18. The values in dispute for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 2025 369,264 184,632 109,664
Page 4
MTT Docket No. 25-003336 Page 4 of 4 19. 20. 21. 22. Admit Deny X Neither Admit Nor Deny. If denied, list the separate facts upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional page if necessary): Leaving Petitioner to their own proofs. Admit Deny X Neither Admit Nor Deny. If denied, list the separate facts upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional age if necessary): Leaving Petitioner to their own proofs. List any separate and specific facts upon which Respondent relies to support every ground on which Respondent relies and also has the burden of proof (attach additional page if necessary): Respondent may rely on an appraisal prepared for appeal. List affirmative defenses and the separate and specific facts upon which Respondent relies in support of those affirmative defenses (attach additional page if necessary): Ro. ' Gespondents puthorized Representative or, if none, Respondent: Pp. — Printed Name of Respondent's Authorized Representative or, if none, Respondent: Alexa Nicholson Email Address: assessing@tyronetownship.us Mailing Address:
Page 5
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Leland Jeffrey Key, Julie Ruth Key, Petitioner, v MTT Docket No. 25-003336 Township of Tyrone Respondent, PROOF OF SERVICE Alexa Nicholson deposes and states that on September 30, 2025 she served a copy of Respondents Answer to Petition by United States Postage upon: Leland Jeffrey Key, Julie Ruth Key 6315 Shannon Glen Dr. Fenton, MI 48430 Al Nos ped 93025 Alexa Nicholson, Assessor
Page 6
Township Hall
ZZ
8420 Runyan Lake Road
Ww) (7
Sn)
Fenton, Michigan 48430-9439
In Garon
with nalr®
Michigan Tax Tribunal
PO Box 30232
Lansing, M1 48909
METROPLEX Mg 4;
<<
2 OCT 2025 pA
FIRST-
US POSTAGE
: (==
zeae
§ 0
{
0001333659
S
Fd tWaded
lt 10)