25-002737.pdf
Richard C Cawthray, Petitioner V Township Of Fenton, Respondent · 25-002737-TT
Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.
Page 1
RECEIVED SEP 03 2025 F. JACK BELZER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW 3153 W. HILL ROAD ‘ FLINT, MICHIGAN 48507 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL F. JACK BELZER TELEPHONE lawyeriack@notmail.com (810) 234-3300 FAX (810) 234-3399 August 26, 2025 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL P.O. BOX 30232 LANSING, MI 48909 RE: CAWTHRAY, Richard C. vs. TOWNSHIP OF FENTON MTT DOCKET NO. 25-002737 Dear Tribunal Court: Enclosed herewith, please find for filing the following, relative to the above- referenced matter: * Response to Motion for Reconsideration. We would request that the enclosed copy of same be returned as true, stamped or whatever acknowledgment of receipt you provide upon filing of documents and have provided a self-addressed stamped envelope for your convenience. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office at your convenience. 7
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL RICHARD C. & RUTH J. CAWTHRAY, MTT DOCKET NO. 25-002737 Petitioner(s), vs. TOWNSHIP OF FENTON Respondent(s). F. Jack Belzer (P23306) F. JACK BELZER, P.C. Attorney for Plaintiff 3153 W. Hill Road Flint, MI 48507 (810) 234-3300 lawyerjack@hotmail.com RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION NOW COMES, attorney F. Jack Belzer, on behalf of the Charter Township of Fenton, and would advise this Tribunal as follows: 1. That Petitioner(s) request for reconsideration is not based upon any legal theory nor any justifiable basis for reconsideration. 2. That Petitioner(s) is not the owner(s) of record and has no interest in the subject property, nor any property within the Special Assessment District and is not a proper party to appeal this matter. 3. That the basis for the assessment is properly filed upon law and fair principles and Petitioner(s) has no proper basis to challenge the Special Assessment and the District.
Page 3
RECEIVED SEP 0:3 2025 STATE OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL RICHARD C. & RUTH J. CAWTHRAY, MTT DOCKET NO. 25-002737 Petitioner(s), VS. TOWNSHIP OF FENTON Respondent(s). F. Jack Belzer (P23306) F. JACK BELZER, P.C. Attorney for Plaintiff 3153 W. Hill Road Flint, MI 48507 (810) 234-3300 lawyerjack@hotmail.com RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION NOW COMES, attorney F. Jack Belzer, on behalf of the Charter Township of Fenton, and would advise this Tribunal as follows: 1. That Petitioner(s) request for reconsideration is not based upon any legal theory nor any justifiable basis for reconsideration. 2. That Petitioner(s) is not the owner(s) of record and has no interest in the subject property, nor any property within the Special Assessment District and is not a proper party to appeal this matter. 3. That the basis for the assessment is properly filed upon law and fair principles and Petitioner(s) has no proper basis to challenge the Special Assessment and the District.
Page 4
JACK. BELZ ER, P.C. METROPLEX MI 480 Attorney & Counsellor at Law 3153 v. HILL ROAD FLINT. MI #8507 » 28 AUG 2025 PM i4L MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL P.0. BOX 30232 LANSING, MI 48909 TLE fas a ra Te a FERRY UT CLE o0 VERY LJ RY EJ ERT FRET)
Page 5
F. JACK BELZER, P.C. Attorney & Counsellor at Law 3153 W. HILL ROAD FLINT, MI 48507 F. JACK BELZER 3153 W HILL ROAD CLINT, MI 48505