Full record / Respondent Answer to Petition Signed.pdf

Respondent Answer to Petition Signed.pdf

Marshall T Versteeg Petitioner V City Of Portage Respondent · 26-000733-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

- 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON [. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

. 

DIRECTOR 

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM 

VALUATION / UNCAPPING 

MTT DOCKET NO. 26-000733 

Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information 

Unit of Government 

. 

|City of Portage 

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box ar Rural Route): 

7900 S. Westnedge Avenue 

City or Town: 

B 

State: 

2IP Code: 

Portage 

MI 

#9002 

Telephans To 

60- 329-4433 

Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all 

I 

correspondance via email): 

welsserc@portagemi, gov 

Section 2: Respondent’s AttorneylAuthorized Representative’ s Contact Information 

i 

First Name: 

; 

Last Name: 

Cathy 

. 

B 

. |Weissert 

Firm Name (if any): 

. 

B 

B 

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route): 

7900 S. Westnedge Avenue 

City or Town: 

i 

State: 

ZIP Code: 

Portage 

. 

~~ 

_ 

[Mi 149002 

A 

5 320-4433 

Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email): 

weisserc@portagemi.gov 

Section 3: Subject Property Information 

Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? 

If no, list all parcels that are adjoining in separate groupings. Attach a 

separate sheet if necessary.. 

mj Yes 

a No 

7} Not Applicable 

Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of oR or more for all tax years at issue? 

ves 

Ono

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal 

The SEV and Taxable Value represents 50% of Fair Market Value and all values in the 

City of Portage have been uniformly assessed. 

Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES 

Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? [7%] Yes 

[0] No 

If yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: 

March 

O July 

O December 

If the July or December BOR revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? O Yes 

[0] No 

If yes, cite the Board's authority. 

Was the assessment at issue established as the result 

of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? [J ves 

Ce 

If yes, explain 

Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? 

Od Yes 

WINo 

If so, what is the issue date? 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE 

When was the Notice of Uncapping, if applicable, issued? 

Under what statutory section was the Taxable Value uncapped? 

Section 6: Valuation Information use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. 

Parcel Numeer 

0035-1 05-P 

Classification of Property: 

Real[d 

Personal [J (check one) 

Agricultural [) 

Commercial (J 

Industrial (] 

Residential @ 

 Timber-Cutover [J 

Developmental O 

utility 

0 

(check one) 

Assessed Value (also known as State Tool Value) established 

| Taxable Value established by the Board of Review: 

by the Board of Review: 

27, 

376,200 

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as true cash value)? 

752,400 

What do you believe is the assessed value? (multiply true cash 

What do you believe is the taxable value? (cannot exceed 

value by .5) 376,200 

assessed value) 376,200 

Signature 

‘required 

"i dent 

or. Eien ja 

Isl

PDF reading copy

← View full record