Full record / Message.pdf

Message.pdf

Mohamed Mansour Petitioner Vs. Township Of Mt Morris Respondent · 26-001405-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

Subject

FW: [EXTERNAL]: Re: Site

Development - 3502 N

Linden Rd Flint

From

Ken Perry

<KPerry@rowepsc.com>

To:

drlovethefirst@yahoo.com

<drlovethefirst@yahoo.com>

Date

Dec 17, 2025 at 3:51 PM

Attached is a scope of work and

estimate.  Let me know if you

have any questions.

 

Ken Perry, PS |

Survey Project

Manager

ROWE Professional

Services Company

ENR Top 500 Design

Firm

O: (810) 341-7500 | C:

(248) 252-3005

540 S. Saginaw Street,

Ste. 200 | Flint, MI

48502

www.rowepsc.com

  

  

  

  

This electronic mail, including any

attachments may contain confidential

information protected by law and is intended

solely for use by the individual to whom or

entity to which it is addressed. If the reader

of this message is not the intended recipient,

or an employee or agent responsible for

Page 2

delivering this message, the reader is hereby

notified that any use, dissemination,

distribution or copying of the information is

strictly prohibited. If you have received this

communication in error, please notify me

immediately by phone or return electronic

mail. Thank you.

 

From: Ken Perry

Sent: Thursday, December 4,

2025 10:36 AM

To: drlovethefirst@yahoo.com

Subject: FW: [EXTERNAL]: Re:

Site Development - 3502 N

Linden Rd Flint

 

See our engineer’s comments in

the email immediately

below…………………………..

 

From: Dan Bartlett

<DBartlett@rowepsc.com>

Sent: Thursday, December 4,

2025 10:24 AM

To: Ken Perry

<KPerry@rowepsc.com>

Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL]: Re:

Site Development - 3502 N

Linden Rd Flint

 

Ken,

 

We wouldn’t really know how

much of the site is developable

until a wetlands assessment is

done. We have typically used

Marx Wetlands for those. After

that I recommend having an

Page 3

that I recommend having an

onsite pre-application meeting

with EGLE to discuss the project

and potential for wetlands

impacts. EGLE may waive

wetland mitigation requirements

for impacts under 1/3 of an

acre,  but that needs to be

discussed with and approved by

them.

 

The other thing to keep in mind

are the floodplain limits. The

floodplain map I sent from GIS is

approximate, the legal limits of

the floodplain are based on

elevation and will need to be

mapped based on a topo survey

we would need to perform.

Some work within the floodplain

may be permissible, but any fills

will need to be offset by a

compensating cut elsewhere.

EGLE may also require a

hydraulic analysis to prove no

adverse impacts to the

floodplain.

 

The presence of a floodway and

county drain easement will likely

mean that a drive across the

drain won’t be permitted. They

may be able to develop the SW

and NE corner, with separate

drives to the adjacent public

roads, but they likely won’t be

able to connect them together so

you could directly drive between

them.

Page 4

There are also setbacks to work

with. Looks Like for C-2 zoning

they are 50’ for front and rear,

and 15’ for side yard. No building

will be allowed within that.

Parking front yard setbacks

where the road is are 20’ from

the right of way line.

 

Daniel W. Bartlett,

PE, CFM | Associate

| Project Manager

ROWE Professional

Services Company

ENR Top 500 Design

Firm

O: (810) 341-7500 | C:

(810) 569-7982

540 S. Saginaw Street,

Ste. 200 | Flint, MI

48502

www.rowepsc.com

  

  

  

  

This electronic mail, including any

attachments may contain confidential

information protected by law and is intended

solely for use by the individual to whom or

entity to which it is addressed. If the reader

of this message is not the intended recipient,

or an employee or agent responsible for

delivering this message, the reader is hereby

notified that any use, dissemination,

distribution or copying of the information is

strictly prohibited. If you have received this

communication in error, please notify me

immediately by phone or return electronic

Page 5

immediately by phone or return electronic

mail. Thank you.

 

From: Ken Perry

<KPerry@rowepsc.com>

Sent: Wednesday, December 3,

2025 6:55 AM

To: Dan Bartlett

<DBartlett@rowepsc.com>

Subject: FW: [EXTERNAL]: Re:

Site Development - 3502 N

Linden Rd Flint

 

After I emailed your assessment

to the prospect, he did some

research and asked if

development is possible.  See

below highlighted in yellow

 

Ken Perry, PS | Survey Project

Manager

ROWE Professional Services

Company

ENR Top 500 Design Firm

O: (810) 341-7500 | C: (248) 252-

3005

540 S. Saginaw Street, Ste. 200 |

Flint, MI 48502

www.rowepsc.com

 

  

  

  

This electronic mail, including any

attachments may contain confidential

Page 6

attachments may contain confidential

information protected by law and is intended

solely for use by the individual to whom or

entity to which it is addressed. If the reader

of this message is not the intended recipient,

or an employee or agent responsible for

delivering this message, the reader is hereby

notified that any use, dissemination,

distribution or copying of the information is

strictly prohibited. If you have received this

communication in error, please notify me

immediately by phone or return electronic

mail. Thank you.

 

From:

drlovethefirst@yahoo.com

<drlovethefirst@yahoo.com>

Sent: Tuesday, December 2,

2025 11:51 PM

To: Ken Perry

<KPerry@rowepsc.com>

Subject: [EXTERNAL]: Re: Site

Development - 3502 N Linden

Rd Flint

 

CAUTION: This email

originated externally. Do not

click links or open

attachments unless you

recognize the sender and

know the content is safe.

Thank you very much for the

prompt reply

I stopped by the drain

commission and they told me

their easement is 40 feet from

the center on each side of the

drain

Page 7

drain.

According to the state

requirements we need a total

of 2100 sq feet 

 

 

Do you think we can make

this happen even if we had to

use the southwest corner for

the majority of the project and

what ever is left we can use

the northeast corner 

I’m not sure if that will work 

 

I would appreciate your input 

 

Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone

 

On Tuesday, December 2,

2025, 4:39 PM, Ken Perry

<KPerry@rowepsc.com>

wrote:

Our engineer did some initial

investigation of the site.  See

his comments in the email

below.

 

Let me know if you still need a

proposal and cost for a survey

and site plan.

 

Ken Perry, PS |

Page 8

Survey Project

Manager

ROWE Professional

Services Company

ENR Top 500 Design

Firm

O: (810) 341-7500 | C:

(248) 252-3005

540 S. Saginaw

Street, Ste. 200 | Flint,

MI 48502

www.rowepsc.com

 

  

  

  

This electronic mail, including any

attachments may contain confidential

information protected by law and is

intended solely for use by the individual to

whom or entity to which it is addressed. If

the reader of this message is not the

intended recipient, or an employee or

agent responsible for delivering this

message, the reader is hereby notified that

any use, dissemination, distribution or

copying of the information is strictly

prohibited. If you have received this

communication in error, please notify me

immediately by phone or return electronic

mail. Thank you.

 

From: Dan Bartlett

<DBartlett@rowepsc.com>

Page 9

p

Sent: Tuesday, December 2,

2025 1:27 PM

To: Ken Perry

<KPerry@rowepsc.com>;

Doug Scott

<DScott@rowepsc.com>

Subject: RE: Site

Development - 3502 N Linden

Rd Flint

 

Ken,

 

See attached floodplain

drawing from the county GIS

site. There is a county drain

crossing diagonally through the

site. The Drain Commissioner

will typically have an easement

centered on those which

restricts what can be done

within it. There is also a

floodway (red crosshatch), and

100 year floodplain (blue

shading) which is over half of

the site. A maximum of 300 cyd

of fill, which isn’t much, is

normally allowed before

compensating cut is required.

The southwest corner of the

site appears to be out of the

floodplain, but even that

buildable area will be reduced

by whatever the setbacks are.

 

There also may be wetlands on

Page 10

There also may be wetlands on

site. See attached wetlands

PDF I made of the site from the

county GIS. The orange

shading is possible wetlands,

which is most of the site. The

accuracy of the online wetlands

viewer is very hit or miss, they

would need a formal wetlands

assessment to get a wetlands

determination to determine

whether wetlands are present,

and if they are, what the

boundary is.

 

The presence of the drain with

a likely easement, a floodplain,

floodway, and possible

wetlands makes this a very

difficult site to develop. By the

time those factors are

considered, and the setbacks,

there may not much if any

buildable area.

 

Daniel W. Bartlett,

PE, CFM |

Associate | Project

Manager

ROWE Professional

Services Company

ENR Top 500 Design

Firm

Page 11

O: (810) 341-7500 | C:

(810) 569-7982

540 S. Saginaw

Street, Ste. 200 | Flint,

MI 48502

www.rowepsc.com

  

  

  

  

This electronic mail, including any

attachments may contain confidential

information protected by law and is

intended solely for use by the individual to

whom or entity to which it is addressed. If

the reader of this message is not the

intended recipient, or an employee or

agent responsible for delivering this

message, the reader is hereby notified that

any use, dissemination, distribution or

copying of the information is strictly

prohibited. If you have received this

communication in error, please notify me

immediately by phone or return electronic

mail. Thank you.

Hide trimmed content

2 Attachments

 Scope 2025-12-17 _35…

Page 12

This page is blank in the source PDF.

PDF reading copy

← View full record