Full record / RFT Group - 38880 Garfield - Clinton Twp - 2026 ET Petition.pdf

RFT Group - 38880 Garfield - Clinton Twp - 2026 ET Petition.pdf

Rft Group, LLC Petitioner Vs. Township Of Clinton Respondent · 26-000993-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

RFT GROUP, LLC, 

 

Petitioner, 

v 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MTT Dkt. No. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CLINTON TOWNSHIP, 

 

 

 

 

Parcel No. 16 11 20 101 200 

Respondent. 

 

 

 

 

 

______________________________________/ 

 

 

 

 

 

PETER ELLENSON (P 47383) 

 

 

 

 

LAW OFFICE OF PETER ELLENSON, P.C. 

 

 

Attorney for Petitioner 

 

 

 

 

 

30500 Northwestern Highway, Suite 500 

Farmington Hills, MI 48334 

248 406 4443 

peter@ellensonlaw.com 

______________________________________/ 

 

ENTIRE TRIBUNAL TAX PETITION – TY 2026 

 

 

NOW COMES Petitioner, RFT GROUP, LLC, through its attorney, PETER 

ELLENSON, and states as follows in support of this Petition: 

1. 

Petitioner is a party in interest with respect to the property taxes for the following 

parcel number: 16 11 20 101 200, located at 38880 Garfield Road, Clinton Township, MI 

48038. 

2. 

Petitioner’s principal office address is 65 Macomb Place, Suite F, Mt Clemens, 

MI 48043. 

3. 

Respondent Clinton Township assesses and collects the ad valorem property taxes 

associated with the subject parcel. 

4. 

The subject property is classified as commercial improved (201). 

5. 

The subject property is located in Macomb County. 

6. 

This appeal involves the property’s true cash and taxable values.

Page 2

7. 

The tax year at issue is 2026. 

8. 

No Board of Review protest was required or filed for the property. 

9. 

The 2026 values for the subject property as established by the Respondent at its 

March 2026 Board of Review are: 

True Cash Value 

 

Assessed Value 

 

Taxable Value 

3,562,000 

 

 

1,781,000 

 

 

1,601,503 

 

10. 

Petitioner contends that the values for the subject property are: 

True Cash Value 

 

Assessed Value 

 

Taxable Value 

1,200,000 

 

 

600,000 

 

 

600,000 

 

11. 

The values in dispute for the subject property are: 

True Cash Value 

 

Assessed Value 

 

Taxable Value 

2,362,000 

 

 

1,181,000 

 

 

1,001,503 

 

12. 

Petitioner requests that this Honorable Tribunal order the assessing entity to 

correct its tax rolls to reflect taxable, assessed and state equalized values as indicated above (or 

on the attached supplement) to issue refunds as appropriate, and to pay interest and costs. 

13. 

The basis for the requested relief is that the assessed and taxable values exceed 

50% of the true cash value of the subject property. 

 

Respectfully submitted, 

 

/s/ Peter Ellenson 

_______________________________ 

 

Date: May 14, 2026 

PETER ELLENSON (P 47383) 

Attorney for Petitioner 

248 406 4443 

peter@ellensonlaw.com

PDF reading copy

← View full record