Kroger-Midland (7 Parcels).pdf
The Kroger Co Of Michigan, Petitioner Vs. City Of Midland, Respondent · 25-002061-TT
Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL MTT Docket No. 25-_________-TT _________________________________, Petitioner, v ________________________________, Respondent. ______________________________/ Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey (P69494) Alex Morse DuCharme, McMillen & Associates, Inc. Representatives for Petitioner 9229 Delegates Row, Suite 375 Indianapolis, IN 46240 (317) 689-6467-ofc (917) 488-7825-mobile msilvey@dmainc.com amorse@dmainc.com / ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION – MULTIPLE PARCEL PETITION 1. Property Parcel No.: 2. The property identified above is . 3. More than one parcel of real property is included in the subject of this appeal and the parcels are contiguous. THE KROGER CO. OF MICHIGAN CITY OF MIDLAND 11-33-40-100 real
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 25-_________-TT Page 2 of 5 4. Petitioner owns and/or otherwise holds an interest in the parcels of property that are the subject of this appeal. 5. The property identified above is classified as ______________________________. 6. The assessment(s) at issue were not protested to Respondent’s March, July, or December Board of Review as a protest was not required. 7. The property or properties at issue are in __________ County. 8. The property identified above’s address is: __________________________________________________. 9. The assessment(s) at issue were established by the: _________________________. 10. Petitioner’s legal residence or principal office address is: __________________________________________________. 11. This appeal involves issues relating to the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values and uniformity. 12. The tax year at issue is: 2025. 13. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s 2025 Board of Review are: Tax Year True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2025 14. Petitioner contends the values for tax year 2025 are no more than the following: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 2025 202 Commercial-Vacant Midland 315 Joe Mann Blvd, Midland, MI 48642 City of Midland 1014 Vine Street, Cincinnati, OH 45202 $2,073,200 $1,036,600 $921,244 $1,720,000 $860,000 $860,000
Page 3
MTT Docket No. 25-_________-TT Page 3 of 5 15. The values in contention for tax year 2025 are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 2025 16. The 2025 assessments imposed on the subject property and the taxes to be levied and collected are invalid because: (a) The assessment, including state equalized and/or taxable value, exceeds the amount permitted by the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; (b) The assessment, including state equalized and/or taxable value, is at a higher percentage of true cash value than permissible under the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; (c) The assessment is based on the misapplication of valuation principles, and (d) The assessment otherwise violates Petitioner’s rights. WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests this honorable Tribunal hear this case and enter an order reducing the 2025 true cash, state equalized and taxable values and direct Respondent to refund to Petitioner any excess taxes, fees, and penalties paid, plus interest and costs, and all other relief to which it is entitled under Michigan law and as is appropriate under the circumstances. Respectfully submitted, DuCharme, McMillen & Associates, Inc. Dated: May ___, 2025 By: ______________________________ Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey (P69494) Petitioner’s Representative $353,200 $176,600 $61,244 31
Page 4
MTT Docket No. 25-_________-TT MTT Docket No. 25-_________-TT Page 4 of 5 _______________________________, Petitioner, v ______________________________, Respondent. ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION MULTIPLE PARCEL PETITION FORM 1 OF 1 1. The classification of the property or properties identified herein as established by Respondent’s Board of Review is: Tax Year Parcel Number Real/Personal Classification 2025 2. The values for the property or properties identified herein as established by Respondent’s Board of Review are: Tax Year Parcel Number True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2025 THE KROGER CO. OF MICHIGAN CITY OF MIDLAND 11-33-40-001 Real 202 Commercial-Vacant 2025 11-33-40-800 Real 202 Commercial-Vacant 2025 11-33-40-810 Real 202 Commercial-Vacant 2025 11-33-40-820 Real 202 Commercial-Vacant 2025 11-33-40-830 Real 202 Commercial-Vacant 2025 11-33-40-840 Real 202 Commercial-Vacant 11-33-40-001 $122,400 $61,200 $61,200 2025 11-33-40-800 $153,200 $76,600 $76,600 2025 11-33-40-810 $122,400 $61,200 $61,200 2025 11-33-40-820 $63,200 $31,600 $31,600 2025 11-33-40-830 $73,200 $36,600 $36,600 2025 11-33-40-840 $90,000 $45,000 $45,000
Page 5
MTT Docket No. 25-_________-TT Page 5 of 5 3. Petitioner contends the values for the property or properties identified herein are: Tax Year Parcel Number True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 2025 4. The values in dispute for the property or properties identified herein are: Tax Year Parcel Number True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 2025 11-33-40-001 $100,000 $50,000 $50,000 2025 11-33-40-800 $120,000 $60,000 $60,000 2025 11-33-40-810 $100,000 $50,000 $50,000 2025 11-33-40-820 $50,000 $25,000 $25,000 2025 11-33-40-830 $60,000 $30,000 $30,000 2025 11-33-40-840 $70,000 $35,000 $35,000 11-33-40-001 $22,400 $11,200 $11,200 2025 11-33-40-800 $33,200 $16,600 $16,600 2025 11-33-40-810 $22,400 $11,200 $11,200 2025 11-33-40-820 $13,200 $6,600 $6,600 2025 11-33-40-830 $13,200 $6,600 $6,600 2025 11-33-40-840 $20,000 $10,000 $10,000