25-003046.pdf

Meredith Ellen Krupic, Petitioner V Township Of Milford, Respondent · 25-003046-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

RECEIVED 

0CT 1.3 2025 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

*GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON 

| BROWN. DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM 

VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL 

MTT DOCKET NO. 25-003046 

Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information 

First Name 

M.E 

Last Name 

Malling Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

City or Town 

State 

ZIP Code 

Telephone Number 

Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email} 

Section 2: Respondent's Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact information 

First Name 

M.L 

Last Name 

Jenny 

Angle 

Firm Name (if any) 

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route} 

1100 Atlantic Street 

City or Town 

State 

ZIP Code 

Milford 

mi 

45301 

Telephone “048-32 1 = 1 03 1 

Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email) 

jangle@milfordtwpmi.gov 

Section 3: Subject Property Information 

Does the subject properly have a Principal Residence Exemption of 50% or more? 

[ves 

[No 

Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? 

if not, list which parcels adjoin one another, 

] Yes 

[| No 

[rv] Not Applicable

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

*GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON 1. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal 

The Subject Assessed Value is correctly set at 50% True Cash Value. 

Petitioner did not attend the 2024 March Board of Review. 

Petitioner did attend the 2025 March Board of Review 

Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues 

IF PETITIONER 1S APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES 

Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? [|] Yes 

[Hm] No 

If yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: 

March 

[| July 

[m] December 

if no, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March BOR? [] Yes 

[I] No 

*Submit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer. 

If the July or December BOR revised the assessmeni(s) at issue, did it have authority? ] Yes 

[] No 

If yes, cite the Board's authority. 

Was the assessment(s) at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? [| Yes 

No 

if yes, explain 

Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? 

[ml] Yes 

1%; No 

If s0, what is the issue date?

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

*GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Did Petitioner request a Poverty Exemption ata BOR? [| Yes 

[] No 

If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: O March 

O 

July 

(| December 

List the date the BOR denied Petitioner’s Poverty Exemption: 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF AN EXEMPTION 

OTHER THAN POVERTY, PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE, OR QUALIFIED AGRICULTURAL EXEMPTIONS 

Did Petitioner request the exemption at a BOR? [m] Yes 

[0] No 

If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: [| March 

[J uly 

[] December 

Tax Year(s) denied: 

List the date the exemption was denied: 

What statutory section did Petitioner request the subject property be exempt? 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE CLASSIFICATION OF PROPERTY 

What do you believe the classification should be: 

Real 

Personal 

(check one) 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

Industrial 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one) 

Section 6: Valuation Information suse the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. 

Parcel Identification Number: 

LM 16-03-479-080 

Classification of Property: 

Real 

Personal 

(check one) 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

Industrial 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one) 

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR: 

$123,570 

Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR: 

$123,570 

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 

$247,140 

Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value. 

$123,570 

If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.

Pry - 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

 _- 

: 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON |. BROWN, DPA 

. 

GOVERNOR 

: 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

| 

Meredith Ellen Krupic 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

_ Petitioner(s) 

v 

© 

MTT Docket No.25-003046 

“Township of Milford 

) 

Respondent(s) 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

Jenny Angle 

: 

states that on 10/7/25 

he/she 

[Name of person serving/mailing petition] 

[date of service] 

served a copy of the Respondent's Answer 

relative to the above-captioned matter upon: 

[Provide name and address of the party/people being served] 

Meredith Krupic 

Michigan Tax Tribunal 

670 Village Ln 

| PO Pox 30232 

Milford, MI 48390-1294 

+ Lansing, M 48909 

co 

/ 

LL 

Tr of person who is, serving/mailing copy] 

Jeng 

Foe le 

[Print/type name of person serving/mailing copy]

Milford Twp-Assessing 

1100 Atlantic St 

Milford, M1 48381 

METROPLEX ML 480 

8 OCT 2025 

PM 17h 

Michigan Tax Tribunal 

PO Box 30232 

Lansing, MI 48909

← View full record