2026 Petition - Ann Arbor - 905 Eisenhower.pdf
Epr2 LLC Petitioner Vs. City Of Ann Arbor Respondent · 26-001496-TT
Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN
MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS SYSTEM
MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL
EPR2 LLC,
Petitioner,
vs.
CITY OF ANN ARBOR,
Respondent.
/
MTT Docket #26-
Parcel No. 09-12-06-401-010
PETITION
EPR2 LLC (“Petitioner”), through its attorneys, Law Office of Aaron M. Fales,
P.C., says:
1.
Petitioner's principal office address is 30201 Orchard Lake Rd., Suite
110, Farmington Hills, MI 48334. Petitioner is a party in interest with respect to
property taxes on real property tax parcel no. 09-12-06-401-010 ("Petitioner's
Property"), at 905 W Eisenhower, Ann Arbor, MI.
2.
Respondent, City of Ann Arbor assesses and collects property taxes
on Petitioner's Property.
3.
In 2026, Respondent determined the taxable value of Petitioner's
Property to be $718,900 and assessed Petitioner's Property at $891,700 resulting in
a state equalized value of the same amount based on the tenative equalization
factor.Page 2
4. Petitioner's Property is classified as Commercial Real Property. Petitioner's Property is commercial property. Petitioner believes that Petitioner's Property was designed to be used as a commercial purposes. 5. This matter involves issues relating to: (a) valuation, (b) assessment, (c) taxable value, and (d) uniformity. 6. At this time, Petitioner believes, as it relates to taxable value, that there is a dispute relative to the value of a loss. 7. The 2026 assessment, including state equalized value and taxable value, imposed on Petitioner's Property, and the taxes to be levied and collected thereon, are invalid and unlawful and operate as a fraud upon the taxpayer for the reasons that: (a) The assessment, including state equalized value and/or taxable value, exceeds the amount permitted by the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; (b) The assessment, including state equalized value and/or taxable value, are at higher percentages of true cash value than permissible under the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; (c) The assessment, including taxable value and/or state equalized value, are based upon an erroneous determination of the true cash value of that portion of Petitioner's Property that is taxable under Michigan law, and are based upon the application of wrong principles; and,
Page 3
(d) The assessment, including state equalized value and/or taxable value, and the mode of assessment adopted by Respondent, discriminate against Petitioner and deny Petitioner its constitutional rights to uniformity, equal protection and due process of law. WHEREFORE, Petitioner requests that the Tax Tribunal enter an Order reducing the 2026 taxable value of Petitioner's Property from $718,900 to $400,000, and reducing the 2026 assessed and state equalized values of Petitioner's Property from $891,700 to $400,000, and requiring Respondent to pay Petitioner the refunds attributable to such reductions, plus interest and costs. Dated: May 26, 2026 Respectfully submitted, LAW OFFICE OF AARON M. FALES, P.C. Attorney for Petitioner By: _________________________ Aaron M. Fales (P72864) 330 Hamilton Row, Ste. 350 Birmingham, MI 48009 (248) 767-9840