Answer to Petition.pdf
Statewide Kaufman LLC, Petitioner Vs. Township Of Chesterfield, Respondent · 25-001820-TT
Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER & INDUSTRY SERVICES MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL STATEWIDE KAUFMAN, LLC, Petitioner, -Vs- MOAHR Docket No. 25-001820 TOWNSHIP OF CHESTERFIELD, Respondent. / AARON M. FALES (P72864) CHRISTINE D. ANDERSON (P45141) Attorney for Petitioner SEIBERT AND DLOSKI, PLLC 330 Hamilton Row, Ste. 350 Attorney for Respondent Birmingham, MI 48009 19500 Hall Road, Suite 101 (248)767-9840 Clinton Township, Mi 48038 afaleslaw@amail.com (586) 469-3800 canderson@seibertanddloski.com CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF CHESTERFIELD’S ANSWER TO ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION The Charter Township of Chesterfield (“Respondent”), by and through its attorneys, SEIBERT AND DLOSKI, PLLC, for its answer to Petitioner's Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition states as follows: 1. Respondent neither admits nor denies the location of Petitioner's principle office for lack of sufficient information on which to do so but denies the Petitioner is a party in interest with respect to the 2025 property taxes on real property Tax Paracel ID No. 15- 09-08-100-020 at 27050 25 Mile Road in Chesterfield Township for the reason it is untrue.
Page 2
2. Respondent admits that Respondent assesses and collects property taxes on the subject parcel but denies that Petitioner is the owner of the subject parcel for the reason is untrue. 3. Respondent denies that Petitioner is currently the owner of the subject parcel for the reason it is untrue, but admits the remaining allegations contained in Paragraph 3. 4. Respondent denies that Petitioner is currently the owner of the subject parcel for the reason it is untrue, but admits the remaining allegations contained in Paragraph 4. 5s Respondent denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 5 for the reason they are untrue. 6. Respondent denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 6 for lack sufficient knowledge to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations contained therein. 7. Respondent denies the allegations contained in paragraph 7 for the reason they are untrue. WHEREFORE, the Respondent respectfully requests the Tax Tribunal dismiss the Petitioner's Petition as Petitioner is not a party in interest in this matter. Respectfully submitted, AWN DLOSKI, PLLC By: Christine D. Anderson (P45141) Attorney for Respondent 19500 Hall Road, Suite 101 Clinton Township, MI 48038 Dated: September 9, 2025 (586) 469-3800