Full record / 25-003029 recon 2.pdf

25-003029 recon 2.pdf

Midwest Patagonia LLC, Petitioner V City Of Detroit, Respondent · 25-003029-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 

Midwest Patagonia LLC, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

Petitioner, 

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION 

 

v 

 

MTT Docket No. 25-003029 

 

City of Detroit, 

 

Presiding Judge 

Respondent. 

 

Jason C. Grinnell 

 

ORDER DENYING RESPONDENT’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 

 

On February 4, 2026, Respondent filed a motion requesting that the Tribunal reconsider 

the Order for Default Hearing entered in this case on December 29, 2025.1 

 

The Tribunal has considered the motion and the case file and finds that it “may order a 

rehearing or reconsideration of any decision or order upon its own initiative or motion 

filed within 21 days after the entry of the decision or order sought to be reheard or 

reconsidered.”2 Respondent’s motion was filed beyond this 21-day deadline, and as a 

result, is not properly pending before the Tribunal.3 

 

Therefore, 

 

IT IS ORDERED that Respondent’s Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED. 

 

 

 

Entered: February 6, 2026 

 

By _______________________________ 

ejg/jcg 

 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

 

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives. 

 

By: Tribunal Clerk 

 

1 Respondent filed a Motion to Set Aside Default but was required to file a Motion for Reconsideration due 

to the entry of the Order for Default Hearing. The filed motion was construed accordingly. 

2 TTR 261(1). 

3 See also Pars Ice Cream Co, Inc v Dep’t of Treasury, unpublished per curiam opinion of the Court of 

Appeals, issued August 14, 2012 (Docket No. 305148).

PDF reading copy

← View full record