Full record / 26-000513.pdf

26-000513.pdf

Mark R Hazen, Petitioner V City Of Frankenmuth, Respondent · 26-000513-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

RECEIVED 

APR 2 0 2026 

MICHIGAN Tax TRIBUNAL 

) 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Mark R Hazen, 

i 

Petitioner, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION 

v 

. 

MTT Docket No. 26-000513 

City Of Frankenmuth, 

Respondent. 

ORDER OF DEFAULT 

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that; 

Petitioner did not submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (i.e., notice of 

action taken by Board of Review, uncapping notice, PRE denial notice, final assessment 

notice, etc.), as required by TTR 279. As such, Petitioner must submit the notice within 

14 days of the entry of this order. 

Therefore, 

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner is HELD IN DEFAULT. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated 

above, within 14 days of the entry of this order. 

Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a 

motion tasgetaside the default (with appropriate filing fee). 

Ce 

Entered: April 7, 2026 

Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

| certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives,

Page 2

2/1% 2026 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON |. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM 

VALUATION / UNCAPPING 

Do not use this form to appeal Classification, Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Other 

Exemptions, Special Assessments, or Non-Property tax disputes. 

Pursuant to Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 279, you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (i.e., Board of 

Review Decision or other notice) with this petition, if appticable. 

If you do not submit this document, you may be held in 

default. 

Section 1: Petitioner's Contact Information 

First Name 

ML 

Last Name/Company Name 

Mark 

R 

Hazen 

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

1130 S Pine St 

City or Town 

State 

ZIP Code 

Frankenmuth 

MI 

48734 

Telephone Mm 

(989)295-8777 

Email Address (do not enter uniess you want MTT to send ali correspondence via email} 

Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information 

First Name 

MA. 

Last Name 

Firm Name (if any) 

Maiting Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rurai Route) 

City or Town 

State 

ZiP Code 

Telephone Number 

Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email) 

Section 3: Subject Property Information *use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. 

How many parcels are you 

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? 

appealing? 

1 

Yes* 

No** 

**If No, you must file separate appeals for each parcel 

Property Address {(No., Street) 

1130 S Pine St 

City or Town 

County 

. 

State 

ZIP Code 

Frankenmuth 

Saginaw 

Mi 

48734

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 4: Check which of the following you are appealing (check al that apply) 

True Cash and Taxable Value 

[J Taxable Value Only (calculation) 

O Uncapping of Taxable Value 

Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal 

My wife and | purchased 1130 S. Pine St, Frankenmuth, ML 48734 on November 13, 2025 for $360,000. The home was an MLS and Zillow fisting by real estate agent Coleen 

Hetzner of Century21 for over three weeks (approximately 24 days). The Frankenmuth housing market was highly competitive at the time of the sale. My wife and | had lost out 

on the purchase of multiple other homes in Frankenmuth before securing this one, We purchased the home at a higher price than we desired in order to not lose out on another 

ale. This overvaluation is not unusual in highly competitive markets where there is fimited inventory and high demand. New employment necessitated the move fo Frankenmuth, 

As 

| was reviewing my Tex Assessment, | noticed that the Taxable Value and Stale Equalized Value had assessed the value of my frome at an even higher rate than the true 

cash value established by the November sale. We purchased the home at $360,000. The Taxable Value and SEV was sel at $203,900, thereby establishing the value of our 

home at $407,800. My wife and | are confident that we could not sell the home at the level of the Taxable valuation. As we anticipate that the property tax will increase annually, 

we desire that the appropriate baseline be established by the true cash value. 

The home was not sold under any duress. My wife and 

1 have no prior, or ongoing relationship with either the listing agent or the prior home owners. Thera ware no special 

considerations or benefits received from the purchase of this property. As stated above, it was an active public listing, 

While the home is listed as a 3-bedroom home, the prior owners “Improvements” on the home have functionally turned the home into a 2-bedroom home, thereby limiting the 

pool of potential buyers and further diminishing its value from other similar sized homes in the neighbarfiood. 

No improvements have been made on the home since the date of purchase to tne present. 

We are submitting this petition because the taxable value placed on our home is inflated from the true cash value, We would like the correction to be made. 

Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues 

Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? 

Yes 

[H] No 

if Yes, check which BOR you attended: 

March 

O July 

i] December 

If No, please check the appticabie reason(s): 

[] Not required to attend 

[] Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutual Mistake of Fact (if yes, include explanation in Section 5) 

Cl Appealing within 35 days of State Tax Commission Order 

5 Appealing within 35 days of receipt of Notice of Uncapping 

Other 

If you checked “other” above, explain:

Page 4

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON |. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 7: Valuation Information «use the multipte parcet form for additional, contiguous parcels, 

Parcel Number 2303-11-6-34-0313-000 

Ctassification of Property: 

Real {J 

Personal L] (check one) 

Agricultural [1 

Commercial 0 

Industrial [1 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover [J] 

Developmental 

J 

Utility [J (check one) 

Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) established 

| Taxable Value established by the Board of Review: 

by; 

8 

ew: 

y the 

Board of Review: 

203,900 

203,900 

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as true cash value)? 

360,000 

What do you believe is the assessed value? (multiply true cash 

What do you believe is the taxable value? {cannot exceed 

value by .5) 

1 80,000 

assessed value) 

1 80,000 

Fee Information 

Does the property have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition for all tax years at 

issue? 

ves 

[] No 

if you answered yes to the above question, you are not required to pay any filing fees. 

If the property does not have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 80% as of the date of the filing of this petition for all tax years at 

issue, the filing fee is based on the greater of the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute. 

If you are appealing more than one 

parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 

will be added for each additional parcel being appealed, not to exceed a total filing fee of $1,000.00 

If your property is residential property (see MCL 205.762) and 

the State Equalized Value or Taxable Vaiue in contention is: 

Filing Fee is: 

$100,000.00 and under 

$125.00 

$100,000.01 to $500,000.00 

$200.00 

$Over $500,000.00 

$300.00 

If the property is 

NOT residential property {see MCL 205.762) and 

the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: 

Filing Fee is: 

$100,000.00 and under 

$250.00 

* Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, as indicated above. 

if the property is 

NOT residential property and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Vatue In dispute is $100,000.01 or greater the 

appeal does not qualify for Small Claims. Therefore, an Entire Tribunal petition must be filed. 

S ig nature *Required 

Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: Mark R. Hazen

Page 5

02/25/2026 01:59 

PM 

2026 BOARD OF REVIEW DECISION 

FROM 

CITY OF FRANKENMUTH 

240 W GENESEE 

FRANKENMUTH, MI 48734 

NAME AND ADDRESS OF OWNER OR PERSON NAMED ON ASSESSMENT ROLL: 

PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION: (Parcel Code required. Property address 

and legal description optional): 

7303-11-6-34-0313-000 

1130 S PINE 

HAZEN, MARK & LYNN 

1130 S PINE ST 

FRANKENMUTH MI 48734 

COM AT C/L OF JEFFERSON & PINE ST & S 297 FT THIS IS 

THE POB TH W 153 FT TH S 344 FT THE 153 FT TH N 344 FT 

TO POB EXC N 256 FT THEREOF BEING PART OF LOT 45 

SOUTH OF RIVER CITY OF FRANKENMUTH SEC 34 TIIN 

R6E 

THIS PROPERTY IS CLASSIFIED 

401 

(RESIDENTIAL-IMPROVED) 

Thank you for attending this years March Board of Review. The Board has reviewed the information you supplied and the data necessary 

to compute your assessment and taxable value. 

The Board has completed their review of parcel number 

7303-11-6-34-0313-000 

They have made the following determination based on the information you supplied. 

Board of Review Comments 

IN LINE WITH MARKET VALUE 

[2026 ORIGINAL ASSESSED VALUE 

203,900 

| 

[2026 "BOARD OF REVIEW" ASSESSED VALUE 

203,900 

| 

(If the above amounts are the same, no revisions have occured) 

2026 ORIGINAL TAXABLE VALUE 

203,900 

2026 "BOARD OF REVIEW" TAXABLE VALUE 

203,900 

2026 PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE EXEMPTION/QUALIFIED AG 

100.0000 

oo 

Please feel free to contact the assessor at the address listed above or call if you have any questions. 

“Effective March 

1, 2013, the Tribunal is no longer able to accept Small Claims letter appeals. 

Rather, you are required to file a petition to 

initiate a new Small Claims appeal. Petition forms are available on this website.” 

Iittp://www.michigan.gov/taxtrib/0,4677,7-187-38254---,00.htm]

Page 6

pare Hazen 

(30 PRE 

gem 

SY, 

METROPLEX MI 480 

Vaz 

LE I7Y¥ 

15.APR 2026 PM 14L 

FOREVER - USA,

Ydavl 

] 

eign 

Tae TreifBudal 

0 1 4d 

C1 wl OTFAMA 51 

panIgoay 

LHS mg 

h AT Jr 

AESEE-1 OTOL 

spbiffpgp fede ffl 

ppp 

gifs) jlppd

PDF reading copy

← View full record