3930 Baldwin LLC.pdf

3930 Baldwin LLC Petitioner Vs. City Of Auburn Hills Respondent · 26-002508-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

ZJ 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

24 2026 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY ArrAffiSg, 

| 

N14 

X TR 

\. 

3930 Baldwin, LLC, 

18Up, 

Petitioner, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

v 

Docket No. 26- 

City of Auburn Hills, 

Parcel No. 

02-14-05-176-011 

Respondent. 

PROPERTY TAX PETITION 

"0 

(Entire Tribunal, 2026 Tax Year) 

Petitioner, by and through its representative, Dante Bacall, contends: 

1. 

BJ The property that is the subject of this appeal is one real property parcel: 

Parcel Number | 02-14-05-176-011 

Address 

3930 Baldwin Rd 

Classification 

| 201 Commercial 

[ Use 

Vacant restauarant 

County 

Oakland 

[ Sch Dist | Pontiac City School District 

2. 

XI N/A. 

If the assessment at issue was protested, the protest was made to Respondent’s: 

[OJ March, 

[J July, 

(J December 

Board of Review. 

3. 

Respondent, identified above, assesses and collects taxes on the subject property. 

4. 

Petitioner 

is 

a taxpayer/party-in-interest 

with respect 

to property 

taxes on the subject 

property. 

5. 

The Petitioner’s 

principal 

office/legal residence address 

is: 

390 Park St, Suite 201, 

Birmingham, MI 48009-3400. 

6. 

This appeal involves issues related to: 

X 

the subject property’s true cash and taxable values 

| 

the subject property’s taxable value only

Petition 

8. 

The values! established by Respondent’s Board of Review for the subject property are: 

Parcel Number 

TCV 

SEV 

TV 

02-14-05-176-011 

2,575,060 

1,287,530 

1,287,530 

9. 

Petitioner contends that the values! for the subject property are: 

Parcel Number 

TCV 

SEV 

TV 

02-14-05-176-011 

1,440,000 

720,000 

720,000 

10. 

The values! in dispute are. 

Parcel Number 

TCV 

SEV 

TV 

02-14-05-176-011 

1,135,060 

567,530 

567,530 

11. 

Petitioner relies upon the following to support the relief requested: 

The 2026 values imposed on Petitioner’s property, and the taxes to be levied and collected 

thereon, are invalid and unlawful and operate as fraud upon the taxpayer for the reasons 

that: 

(a) 

The assessed, state equalized and/or taxable values exceed the amounts permitted 

by the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; 

(b) 

The assessed, state equalized and/or taxable values are at higher percentages of true 

cash value 

than permissible 

under the Michigan 

Constitution and applicable 

statutes; 

(c) 

The assessed, state equalized and/or taxable values are based upon an erroneous 

determination of the true cash value of that portion of Petitioner’s property that is 

taxable under Michigan law and are based upon the application of wrong principles; 

and 

(d) 

The assessed, state equalized and/or taxable values, and the mode of assessment 

adopted by Respondent, discriminate 

against Petitioner and deny Petitioner its 

constitutional rights of uniformity, equal protection and due process of law. 

Petitioner requests that the Tribunal enter an order reducing the 2026 values from those established 

by Respondent’s Board of Review to those contended by Petitioner, and order refunds attributable 

to the reductions, with interest, as provided by the Tax Tribunal Act.

Petition 

Respectfully submitted, 

ye Pee 

Dante Bacall 

No 

Representative for Petitioner 

390 Park St., Suite 201 

Birmingham, MI 48009-3400 

(248) 755-2922 

Dated: March 24, 2026 

dantebacall@yahoo.com 

Filing Fee: $600

← View full record