FINAL Special assessment appeal #2.pdf

Aaron Shields, Petitioner V Township Of Chesterfield, Respondent · 24-003981-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

To: 

Michigan Tax Tribunal 

P.O. Box 30232 

Lansing, MI 48909 

 

From: 

Aaron and Nicole Shields 

48884 Salt River Drive 

Chesterfield, Michigan, 48047 

shieldsjaaron@gmail.com / nmadamic@gmail.com 

(586) 381 – 0752 / (586) 556 – 5215 

 

Date: November 10, 2025 

Re: Appeal of Special Assessment – 48884 Salt River Drive 

Dear Members of the Michigan Tax Tribunal, 

I am writing to formally appeal the special assessment imposed on my property located at 48884 Salt 

River Drive in Chesterfield Township. Document A attached shows the total amount of this special 

assessment is $7,689.05. This is payable upfront by 11/01/2025, or over 10 years with a 5% interest rate. 

I respectfully request that this assessment be reviewed and reconsidered, as I believe it fails to provide a 

sufficient "special benefit" to my property, as required under MCL 41.721–41.738 governing special 

assessments. Under Michigan law, a special assessment must be reasonably proportional to the increase 

in market value or benefit conferred to the property. In this case, that proportionality standard has not 

been met. 

1. Lack of a Sufficient Special Benefit to My Property 

Our road was already paved prior to the repavement project, albeit with some potholes typical of 

Michigan roads. It was entirely passable and safe to drive on (See Photos 1 and 2). Despite my wife’s and 

my objections, the repaving project proceeded due to a majority petition, though I fail to see how this 

improvement provides a benefit commensurate with the $7,689.05 assessment. 

I formally protested the special assessment in person at the hearing held on September 24, 2024, to 

confirm the special assessment roll. Since the road was already paved and functional, repavement has 

not provided any meaningful improvement that would increase the market value of my property. I have 

found no measurable evidence that the repaving has increased my home’s market value or utility in any 

way. Any alleged benefit, if present, is minimal at best and does not justify such a high financial burden.

Photo 2 

Photo 1 

Photo 1 

48896 Salt River Drive 

J 554 Sait River Drive

2. Misrepresentation of Road Status and Improper Signage 

When I purchased the property in 2021, the Salt River Drive street signs were green, which according to 

Chesterfield Township’s own website, denotes a public road maintained by Macomb County Department 

of Roads. Please refer to Document B attached. Two of the roads that intersect with Salt River Drive did 

indeed have blue street signs indicating a private road, but the signs for Salt River Drive were green at 

each of these crossroads. 

In fact, per attached Document C, the appraiser at the time of our purchase recorded our property as 

being on a public road made of asphalt. The appraiser also noted that the utilities and off-site 

improvements were typical for the market area, hence, not affecting the evaluation. 

It was only during the discussions surrounding this project that I learned we live on a private road. I 

raised this concern with the Chesterfield Township Engineer, who stated that only the portion of Salt 

River Drive from Jefferson Avenue to Lakeview Drive is a public road, and that the remainder of Salt River 

Drive from Lakeview Drive to Point Lakeview Drive did not meet the MCDR standards for a public road 

and was therefore considered private. 

Shortly thereafter, the Salt River Drive street signs were replaced with blue signs, indicating a private 

road. I later received a letter from a neighbor explaining that another resident on our street had 

personally paid for the sign replacement and would accept donations to cover the cost, which seems 

improper for an issue affecting the township. If the signage was incorrect, the responsibility for 

correcting it lies with the township, not a private resident. This indicates a lack of clarity from the 

township about road designations and confusion around road ownership, further complicating the 

justification of the special assessment. 

3. Partial Repaving of the Road Limits Any Benefit 

The repaving project only covered the portion of the Salt River Drive starting just before my neighbor’s 

house and continuing down the road for 37 properties. However, the section of Salt River Drive 

beginning at Jefferson Avenue—which all vehicles must use to enter and exit the area—remains public 

and was not repaved, leaving it in notably worse condition than the newly paved segment. Currently, this 

area is in far worse condition than what the newly paved segment was prior to the repaving. As a result, 

anyone driving to my property will still have to traverse a public road that is uneven and with significant 

potholes, passing only one property’s length of repaved road before reaching my driveway (See Photos 

3-9). 

Because the section of Salt River Drive that remains public is the primary access route to all homes—

including mine—the practical and aesthetic benefit of the private road paving is effectively nullified. 

Given this, the limited scope of this project fails to provide any noticeable benefit to my property’s value. 

Prospective buyers would still have to drive over the deteriorating public portion of the road before 

reaching my driveway, which negates any supposed improvement from the private road project. The 

partial nature of this project only underscores the lack of meaningful enhancement to my property’s 

value.

Photo 3. View of Salt River Drive (public portion of road) when entering from Jefferson Ave 

Photo 3. View of Salt River Drive (public portion of road) when entering from Jefferson Ave

Photo 4. View of Salt River Drive (public portion of road) when approaching Jefferson Ave 

Photo 4. View of Salt River Drive (public portion of road) when approaching Jefferson Ave

Photo 5. View of Salt River Drive (public portion of road) when approaching Jefferson Ave 

Photo 5. View of Salt River Drive (public portion of road) when approaching Jefferson Ave

Photo 6. View of Salt River Drive (public portion of road) when approaching Jefferson Ave 

Photo 6. View of Salt River Drive (public portion of road) when approaching Jefferson Ave

Photo 7. View of Salt River Drive (public portion of road) headed away from Jefferson Ave 

Photo 7. View of Salt River Drive (public portion of road) headed away from Jefferson Ave

Photo 8. View of Salt River Drive and Pointe Lakeview St intersection. Photo includes public 

portion of Salt River Drive and private portion of Salt River Drive after re-paving. 

48884 Salt River Dr

Photo 9. View of Salt River Drive and Pointe Lakeview St intersection. Photo includes public 

portion of Salt River Drive and private portion of Salt River Drive after re-paving. 

 

 

Photo 9. View of Salt River Drive and Pointe Lakeview St intersection. Photo includes public 

portion of Salt River Drive and private portion of Salt River Drive after re-paving.

4. Property’s Assessed Value Increase for 2025 due to Market Adjustment 

According to attached Document D, 2025 Notice of Assessment issued by Chesterfield Township shows 

our property’s assessed value increased from $186,500 in 2024 to $196,900 in 2025, an increase of 

$10,400 (approximately 5.6%). The notice explicitly identifies the reason for this change as “Market 

Adjustment.” There is no indication that any property-specific improvements such as the road project 

was a factor in that valuation change. Therefore, the $7,689.05 special assessment does not appear to 

be reasonably proportional to any measurable increase in property value. 

Furthermore, the assessed value change for our property is consistent with typical year-over-year 

appreciation rates in Chesterfield Township. Attached Document E shows a summary from Zillow for 

Chesterfield, MI showing a typical 1-year value change of +5% through September 30, 2025. Similarly, 

attached Document F from Redfin shows home prices in Chesterfield, MI were up 7.1% compared to last 

year. This data supports that my property’s value change aligns with general market trends, not the road 

project. 

5. Lack of Demonstrated Increase in Value Across the Special Assessment District 

I understand that the Township asserts the cost was “spread to each parcel according to the benefit 

received.” However, this appears to refer to the method of cost distribution—for example, dividing the 

total expense among the 37 properties based on road frontage. While that may satisfy the procedural 

requirement of Act 188, it does not demonstrate that each parcel’s actual increase in market value is 

reasonably proportional to the cost assessed. 

As already noted above in Section 4, there is no clear evidence showing that the value of my property 

increased as a result of the paving. the 2025 Notice of Assessment attributes the change solely to 

“Market Adjustment.” Chart 1 below includes a review of five properties along Salt River Drive that were 

included in the paving project. The 2024-2025 assessed value changes range from +0.26% to +5.6%. 

Three of these parcels share the same ECF neighborhood and zoning as mine, while two others differ 

slightly in ECF but have the same zoning classification. The patterns across these parcels indicate that the 

repaving project did not produce any exceptional increase in market value. 

Chart 1. Source: Chesterfield Township BS&A Online Property and Assessment Database 

 

Address 

ECF Neighborhood 

Zoning Code 2024 AV 

2025 AV 

% Change 

Notes 

48884 Salt River Dr 

S.P. OF BAKERS #3, #4, #9, ETC 

R1A RES 

$186,500 $196,900 +5.6% 

MY PROPERTY 

48800 Salt River Dr 

S.P. OF BAKERS #3, #4, #9, ETC 

R1A RES 

$153,300 $153,700 +0.26% 

Same ECF & Zoning 

48850 Salt River Dr 

S.P. OF BAKERS #3, #4, #9, ETC 

R1A RES 

$185,500 $189,800 +2.37% 

Same ECF & Zoning 

48896 Salt River Dr 

S.P. OF BAKERS #3, #4, #9, ETC 

R1A RES 

$157,600 $166,000 +5.33% 

Same ECF & Zoning 

48855 Salt River Dr 

SUTTON & SALT RIVER CANAL PROP R1A RES 

$204,100 $206,600 +1.22% 

Different ECF, Same Zoning 

48790 Salt River Dr 

MAIN ROAD NEWER HOMES 

R1A RES 

$158,700 $162,400 +2.33% 

Different ECF, Same Zoning

6. Conclusion 

In light of the above, I respectfully request that the Tribunal reconsider the justification for the special 

assessment for my property. I have seen no evidence that the project has not provided a sufficient 

“special benefit” to my property, either in terms of value or usability, to justify the significant financial 

burden imposed by the $7,689.05 assessment. Neighboring properties with the same zoning and ECF 

designation show assessed value changes from +0.26% to +5.6%, suggesting the project did not confer a 

distinct or proportional increase in value. Additionally, the confusion over the road’s ownership and the 

incomplete scope of the project further diminishes the rationale for the assessment. 

Accordingly, I respectfully request that the Tribunal remove the special assessment on my property, as 

the assessment does not satisfy Act 188’s special benefit requirement. 

Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to a fair and just resolution to this matter. 

Please feel free to contact either me or my wife using the contact information below if further 

information is needed. 

Sincerely, 

 

_______________________________ 

 

________________________________ 

Aaron Shields 

 

 

 

 

Nicole Shields 

shieldsjaaron@gmail.com 

 

 

 

nmadamic@gmail.com 

 

 

(586) 381 – 0752 

 

 

 

 

(586) 556 – 5215 

 

 

Attachments 

• 

Document A: Special Assessment Notice 

• 

Document B: Street Signage Evidence (Green vs. Blue) 

• 

Document C: 2021 Appraisal Report Excerpt 

• 

Document D: 2025 Notice of Assessment (Marked “Market Adjustment”) 

• 

Document E: Zillow – Chesterfield, MI 1-Year Value Change 

• 

Document F: Redfin/Local Market Data – Chesterfield Home Price Trend

Document A 

 

 

 

 

 

2025 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT BILL 

DUE DATE: 

11/01/2025 

Sp. Assessment: 

PAVING - SALT RIVER DR. 

? 

dail 

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF CHESTERFIELD 

15-09-27-279-002 

CHESTERFIELD 

TOWNSHIP 

— EST. 1842 = ANNUAL SPECIAL ASSESSMENT NOTICE 

There are three options on how to proceed. Payments must be received by November 1, 2025 

1. Take NO action by November 1, 2025, to have the Minimum Annual Installment Due applied to your 2025 Winter Tax 

Bill. You do not need to contact the Treasurer's office for this to apply. 

2. Pay the Minimum Annual Installment Due amount. 

3. Pay the Special Assessment Payoff amount. 

DESCRIPTION 

AMOUNT 

Payment Options - 

CURRENT PRINCIPAL 

$765.72 

- Online at https://www.chesterfieldtwp.org via 

lelectronic check or credit card* 

CURE INTEREST 

$0.00 

- In person via cash, check, or credit card* 

- Mail in payment. 

Check made payable to 

Chesterfield Township 

47275 Sugarbush Rd. 

Chesterfield, MI 48047 

Minimum Annual Installment Due 

$765.72 

[*Fees apply for credit & debit card transactions 

Special Assessment Payoff Amount 

$7,689.05 

Please return this portion with payment 

Sp. Assessment: 

PAVING - SALT RIVER DR. 

DUE DATE: 

11/01/2025 

15-09-27-279-002 

Check made payable to Chesterfield Township 

Minimum Annual Installment 

$765.72 

Payoff Amount 

$7,689.05 

io 

JO 

A 

RA 

SHIELDS, NICOLE & AARON 

150927279002/P 163%C 

48884 SALT RIVER DR 

CHESTERFIELD, MI 48047-3423 

\ WY 

-Prop 

ddress- 

48884 SALT RIVER DR 

CHESTERFIELD, MI 48047-3423 

Document A

Document B 

~ PROJECT 

LOCATION 

Photos taken Feb 2024 

Text regarding Private vs Public street signs 

directly from Chesterfield Township website 

Roads 

Private Roads are maintained at the expense of the private individuals who requested the road. 

If the street sign is blue, the road is private. 

Public Roads 

are maintained by the Macomb County Department of Roads 

If this road sign is green, it is under the jurisdiction of Macomb County 

Michigan Department 

of Transportation - 

MDOT MiDrive Click on the link for current and upcoming MDOT road projects 

~—1 

CHARTER TOWNSHIP 

OF CHESTERFIELD 

MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN 

, 

A 

SALT RIVER DRIVE RESURFACING 

2 

3 

a 

sD pris 

™ 

/) 

BE 

EEes 

cl. 

CORN aK 

me 

Emm 

ss = 

P 

Pr 

enf aagl 

pe — 

LOCATION 

oes 

LE 

i 

SPALDING 

| 

f= 

son 

i 

== 

i 

TOWNSHP BOARD OF TRUSTEES 

or 

mar 

pi 

SUPERVISOR: 

TREASURER: 

BRADLEY A. KERSTEN 

KATHY ELLIOT 

re 

[i 

CLERK: 

bras 

=z 

i 

CINDY BERRY 

7 

ROS AC PETS 

i 

TRUSTEES: 

a 

En "nN" 

Document B

Document C 

28815124 

28815124 

Uniform Residential Appraisal Report 

Flo# 

0621/016-001 

The 

of hs summa 

Sa report § (0 

provide he lndedcient 

wih an accurate, and 

ad: 

6d opinion of fe marke vaue of ihe subject 

Property Address 48884 Salt River Dr 

Cty Chesterfield 

State 

MI 

Zip Code 48047-3423 

~ Boower Nicole & Aaron Shields 

Owner 

of Public Record Dennis Ladd/Marsha Ladd RV L 

County Macomb 

B Legal Description "BAYSHORE ACRES” LOT 2 

Assessors Parcel # 

_15-09-27-279-002 

Tax Year 2020 

RE. Taxes § 3,838 

| Neighborhood Name BAY SHORE ACRES 

Map Reference 47664 

Census Tract 2225.00 

® Occupant 

[X]Owner 

[Tenant 

[Vacant 

Special Assessments § 0 

CJ PUD 

 HOAS © 

[J per year [1 per month 

Brgy Rights Appraised 

[X] Fee Simple 

[ JLeasehod 

[Other (describe) 

Type 

[Purchase Transaction 

[Re 

Tr: 

[CJother (describe) 

LenderCient Bank of America 

Address 7105 Corporate Dr Plano TX 75024 

¥ Is the subject property urrenty offered for sale or has t been offered for sale in fe twelve mons prior to the effectve date ofthis 

appraisa? 

Yes [J No 

Report data source(s) used, ofering price(s), and date(s). 

~ 

DOM 17:The subject is currently pending on the market and was listed for $409,900 since 5/31/2021. All information gathered was through Public Records & Realcomp 

MLS#58050039567. 

1 [3 dd [] didnot analyze 

the contract 

for sale for the subject purchase 

Explain 

the resul's of the analysis of the contract for sale or why the analyss was not performed. 

Contract Price § 430,000 

Date of Contract 05/27/2021 

Is the property seller the owner of public record? 

[Yes [] No 

Data Sourcefs) Purchase Agreement 

Is there any finanGal 

asistance 

(loa charges, sale 

ons. 

git or downpayment 

ec.) 

to be pad 

by any party 

on behalf 

of the 

7 

[Ves XI No 

If Yes, report the total dollar amount and describe 

the items to be pad. 

$0,:30,,50;Aftor Reviewing the purchase agreement provided to the appraiser $0.00 in seller concessions for prepaid or any other assistance was provided to the borrower for this 

transaction. This information was gathered through the purchase agreement. 

To: sae Gee Boy pvchaeed re esied o A000 scare 

gh Ka maion: 

Suburban [1 Rural 

Property Values 

[Increasing 

table 

[]Decining 

PRICE 

AGE 

Buit-Up [3 Over 75% [125-75% 

[1] Under25% | Demand/Suppy 

B€lShortage 

[In Baance []OverSupply | 

$(000) 

(ys) 

[24 Unt 

% 

| Gown 

[JRad 

 BKSwbe 

[]Sow 

Marketing 

Time BC] Under 3mths [136mths 

[JOver6mtns | 

125 

Low 

1 

| Mus-Famiy 

5% 

| Neghborhood Boundaries 

600 

High 

100 

|Commeraa 

10 %) 

' 

The subject is located North of Anchor Bay, South of Jefferson Avenue, East 

of the St. Clair River and West of L: 

Street. 

340 

Pred 

40 

|Other 

% 

The subject neighborhood consists of single family homes, condominiums, and commercial property along the main roads and all intersections. Housing styles, age, size & utility are 

consistent with the subject. The subject is clase in proximily to major freeways and schools. 

Market Conditions (including support for he above conclusions) 

See attached addenda. 

| Dimensions 111x330 

Area 36630 ST 

Shape Rectangular 

Vew 

NiRes; 

Specific Zoning Ck 

RIA 

Zoning Description One Family Residential 

| Zoning Cx 

Legal 

[] Legal Nonaonforming (Grandfathered Use) 

[1 

No Zoning 

[] Ifegal (describe) 

 Isthe 

highest and best use of subiect property as improved (or as proposed per plans and specications) he presentuse? 

 [X]Yes [No 

If No, describe. 

g 

Utiites 

Pubic Other (desaibe) 

Public_Oer (describe) 

|| Bectioty 

0 

Water 

[m] 

Gas 

[mn] 

Santry Sewer 

[mn] 

Alley 

None 

FEMA Spec Flood Hazard Aes 

[1 Yes 

BKINo 

FEMA Flood Zone X 

FEMA Map # 26099C0269J 

FEMA Map Date 12/30/2020 

| Are there any adverse site conditions or external factors (easements, encroachments, environmental conditions, land uses, etc)? 

[] Yes [BK] No If Yes, describe. 

—Genwra 

Description 

Sl 

— 

Unis [5] One L10ne with Accessory Unit 

Conaete Slab 

[] Crawl Space 

Foundaton Walls 

Concrete/Avg 

Floors. 

CptHwdiAvg 

| # of Stories 

1 

[J Full Basement 

Partial Basement 

_|Exierior Walls 

Brick/Avg 

Wals 

DWiPainted/Avg 

| Type 

(Det [JAt []SDet/EndUnt 

| 

Basement Area 

1,419 sq.ft. 

[Roof Surface 

Composition/Avg 

TomfFinsh 

 WdiPainted/Avg 

[9] Exstng 

[J Proposed [] Under Const. | Basement Finish 

80 % 

|Gutters 

& Downspouts Aluminum/Avg 

BahFoor 

 Ceramic/Avg 

Design (Style) Ranch 

[J Ousside Entry/Exit 

Sump Pump [Window Type 

VinyliAvg 

Bath Wainscot 

Ceramic/Avg 

| Year Bult 1976 

Evdenceof 

 [infestaton 

Storm Sashinsuaed Insulated/Avg 

Car Storage 

[None 

Effective 

Age (Yrs) 15 

[J Dampness 

[J Settlement 

Screens 

Vinyl/Avg 

Driveway #ofCars 

2 

Atic 

[J None 

Healing 

FWA [] HWBB [] Radiant 

|A 

[WoodStove(s) # 0 

| Driveway Suface Concrete 

[1 Drop Star 

stars 

J other 

[Fuel Gas 

6] Firepiacals)# 

1 

[Fence None 

|x Game 

#oicas 

2 

) [1] Floor 

Sauttie 

Caoing 

Cental 

Ar Condtoring 

|B] PatoiDeck Both 

[]Pocn Covered 

|] Capot 

 #oiCas 

0 

: [1 Finshed 

[1 Heated 

[1 ndvidua 

|] Other 

K| Poo 

In-G Pool 

[X]Other Shed 

Att 

[7 Det 

[7] Buitin 

d Aopiances 

[| Refrigerator 

[] Range/Oven _[] Distwasher 

Disposal 

_[] Microwave [] Washer/Dryer 

[KK] Other (describe) Fan/Hood 

E Finished area abowe grade contains: 

7 Rooms. 

4 Bedrooms 

3.0 Bat(s) 

2,112 Square 

Feet of Gross Living Area Abowe Grade 

| Additional features (special energy efficent tems, ec) 

There are no energy efficient items. 

Describe 

the condition of the property (including needed repairs, deterioration, renovations, remodeling, etc.) 

~ 

 C3Kitchen-upd: 

to five years at 

ne to five years ago; The subject property has been adequately maintained. The subject has newer windows (2 

years), a newer roof (3 years), newer tveway (3 years), a newer generator (3 years), newer premium cabinets and counters (5 years). 

| Ave there any physical deficiencies 

or adverse conditions 

that affect the ivabiity, soundness, or structural integrity of the property? 

[J Yes 

[I No If Yes, describe 

Does 

the property generally conform to fe neighborhood 

(functional ust. style, condition, use, construction, etc)? 

Yes [No 

I No, describe 

Freddie 

Mac Fam 70 Mach 2005 

UAD Version 9/2011 

THRLES 

Fannie 

Mae Form 1004 March 2006 

Document C

Document D 

Michigan Department of Treasury, 

1019 (Rev, 10-24) 

THIS 

IS NOT A TAX BILL 

Notice of Assessment, Taxable Valuation, and Property Classification 

This form is issued under the authority of P.A. 206 of 1893, 

Sec. 211.24 (c) and Sec.211.34c, 

as amended. This 

is a model 

notice to be used by the local assessor. 

L-4400 

7861 

FROM 

CHESTERFIELD TOWNSHIP 

ASSESSING DEPARTMENT 

47275 SUGARBUSH RD 

CHESTERFIELD, MI 48047-5156 

PARCEL IDENTIFICATION 

48884 SALT RIVER DR 

CHESTERFIELD, MI 48047-3423 

PARCEL NUMBER: 

15-09-27-279-002 

ECF NEIGHBORHOOD: AB11 

SP. OF BAKERS, #3, #4, #9, ETC 

PROPERTY ADDRESS: 

OWNER'S NAME & ADDRESS/PERSON NAMED ON ASSESSMENT ROLL: 

PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE EXEMPTION 

erst AUTO**5-DIGIT 48047 

% Exempt As "Homeowners Principal Reside 

100.00% 

15-09-27-279-002 

% Exempt As "Qualified Agricultural Property 

00% 

SHIELDS, NICOLE & AARON 

9% Exempt As "MBT Industrial Personal": 

00% 

48884 SALT RIVER DR 

7 

? 

CHESTERFIELD, 

MI 48047-3423 

% Exempt As "MBT Commercial Personal”: 

00% 

[01 Of LLL CTL 

Cee 

eve FTL 

(PLL 

| {FE 

Er 

re 

fi 

Exempt 

As "Qualified Forest Property": 

[] Yes 

[X] No 

Exempt 

As "Development Property: 

~~ [] Yes 

[X] No 

LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 

"BAYSHORE ACRES" LOT 2 

ACCORDING TO MCL 211.34c THIS PROPERTY IS CLASSIFIED AS: 

401 

Residential 

PRIOR YEAR'S CLASSIFICATION: 

401 

Residential 

The change in taxable value will increase/decrease your tax bill for the 2025| 

PRIOR AMOUNT 

CURRENT TENTATIVE 

CHANGE FROM 

year by approximately: 

$205 

YEAR: 

2024 

id 

| 

CURRENT YEAR 

1. TAXABLE VALUE: 

177,392 

182,891 

5,499 

2. ASSESSED VALUE: 

186,500 

196,900 

10,400 

3. TENTATIVE EQUALIZATION FACTOR: 

4. STATE EQUALIZED VALUE (SEV): 

1.000 

186,500 

5. There WAS or WAS NOT a transfer of ownership on this property in 2024 

WAS NOT 

6. Assessor Change Reason(s): 

Market Adjustment 

The 2025 Inflation rate Multiplier is: 1.031 

Questions regarding the Notice of Assessment, Taxable Valuation, and Property Classification may be directed to the Following: 

Phone: 

(586) 949-0400 

Name: 

KERRY L. BEAUVAIS, ASSESSOR 

Email Address: 

ASSESSING@CHESTERFIELDTWP.ORG 

SUGARBUSH RD, CHESTERFIELD, MI 48047. 

2025 MARCH BOARD OF REVIEW MEETING DATES: 

March Board of Review Appeal Information. The Board of Review will meet at the following dates and times: 

2025 MARCH BOARD OF REVIEW * DUE TO ONGOING CONSTRUCTION * THE BOARD OF REVIEW SHALL MEET IN THE 

SENIOR CENTER LOCATED AT THE SOUTH END OF THE MUNICIPAL BUILDING- TOWNSHIP HALL OFFICES LOCATED AT 47275 

MONDAY, MARCH 10, 2025, FROM 9:00 AM TO 12:00 PM AND 1:00 PM TO 4:00 PM. 

TUESDAY, MARCH 11, 2025, FROM 1:00 PM TO 4:00 PM AND 6:00 PM TO 9:00 PM. 

APPEALS ARE BY APPOINTMENT, THE ASSESSING DEPARTMENT WILL BEGIN TAKING APPOINTMENTS ON 

FEBRUARY 20, 2025. PLEASE CONTACT THE ASSESSORS OFFICE AT (586) 949-0400 EXT 2232. 

Document D

Document E 

= 

2 Zillow 

signin 

Enteracityorzipcode 

Q 

United States > Michigan 

> Macomb County > Chesterfield 

Chesterfield, Ml Housing Market 

h 

$324,325 

45.0% 1-yr 

The average Chesterfield, MI home value is $324,325, up 

5.0% over the past year and goes to pending in around 

17 days. 

What is the Zillow Home Values Index? 

Zillow Home Value Index (ZHVI), built from the ground up by measuring monthly changes in property level Zestimates, captures both the 

level and home values across a wide variety of geographies and housing types. 

Learn more 

about t| 

Jow Home 

Value 

[nd 

Ray 

Chesterfield Key 

Takeaways 

comb 

Woldenburg 

Typical Home Values: $324,325 

1-year Value Change: +5.0% 

cLeMens Fark 

Mi Clemens 

Sunn run 

Chesterfield Housing Market 

Overview 

Zillow Home Val. 

v 

All homes. 

v 

Tyr 

Syr 

Max 

Chesterfield 

@® = 1-year Market Forecast 

150 For sale inventory 

ber 

30, 

2025) 

65 New listings 

ber 

30, 

2¢ 

0.999 Median sale to ist ratio 

(AL 

$334,167 Median sale price 

(August 

25) 

$323,700 Median list price 

42.6% Percent of sales over list price 

(Augu: 

2024-11 

202501 

2025-03 

2025-05 

202507 

39.7% Percent of sales under list price 

ii 

Sores 

17 Median days to pending 

(Metric valli is based on market coverage and data) 

How does this data help me? 

Zillow's metrics provide valuable 

market data hy tracking market 

Document E

Document F 

Chesterfield, New Haven Housing Market: House Prices & Trends | Redfin 

(p] 

en 

F 

8 

Buy 

* 

Rent 

Sel 

+ 

Mortgage 

+ 

Real Estate Agents 

+ 

Feed 

Chesterfield, Ml Housing Market 

Homes 

for sale 

The Chesterfield housing market is very competitive. The median sale price of a home in Chesterfield was $332K last 

month, up 7.1% since last year. The median sale price per square foot in Chesterfield is $185, up 6.3% since last year. 

Trends 

Demand 

Market Insights 

Schools 

Climate 

Chesterfield Housing Market Trends 

What is the housing market like in Chesterfield today? 

In September 2025, Chesterfield home prices were up 7.1% compared to last year, selling for a median price of 

$332K. On average, homes in Chesterfield sell after 21 days on the market compared to 15 days last year. There were 

178 homes sold in September 

this year, down from 201 last year. 

Median Sale Price 

. 

Single Family Homes 

- 

Median Sale Price (Single Family Homes) 

$385,000 

+10.0% YoY 

| Sep 2025 

ly 

3y 

Sy 

224 

Doc 

2024 

Mar 

202 

un 202 

Sop 202 

Based on Redfin calculations of home data from MLS and/or public records. 

Data 

Growth 

po 

Sep 2025 

% Yor 

® Chesterfield, Mi 

$385,000 

+100% 

United States 

® 

Q 

A 

atior 

Compare 

To compare other locations to the Chesterfield and U.S. housing market, enter a city, neighborhood, state, or zip code into the search 

bar. Learn which home features in New Haven 

add value to a home. 

How much is your home worth? Track your home's value and compare it to nearby sales. 

See my estimate 

https: ww. redfin.com/neighborhood/767572/MI/New-Haven/Chesterfield/housing-market#agent-insights 

Document F

← View full record