25-002079 Corrected Default et ans.pdf

Autozone Development Corp., Petitioner Vs. Township Of Grand Blanc, Respondent · 25-002079-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

STATE OF MICHIGAN

 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 

Autozone Development Corp, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

Petitioner, 

 

 

v 

 

MTT Docket No. 25-002079 

 

Grand Blanc Township, 

 

Presiding Judge 

Respondent. 

 

Patricia L. Halm 

 

CORRECTED ORDER HOLDING RESPONDENT IN DEFAULT 

 

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in this case and finds that Respondent was held in 

default on September 25, 2025, for failing to file an answer. Upon further review, it was 

discovered that the Tribunal erred in the entry of this order as Respondent was never 

properly served the Order of Default. Consequently, the Tribunal finds it is appropriate 

to reissue the September 25, 2025 Order of Default. 

 

Therefore, 

 

IT IS ORDERED that Respondent is held in DEFAULT. 

 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent must complete the following to cure the 

default: file an answer and proof the answer was served on Petitioner with the Tribunal. 

The foregoing must be filed with the Tribunal within 14 days of the entry of this Order.1 

 

Failure to comply with this order will result in Respondent being required to file a motion 

to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee). 

 

 

Entered: October 16, 2025 

 

 

By _____________________________ 

kac 

 

 

 

1 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service 

postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible 

postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by 

commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial 

service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the 

submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. 

A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on 

that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. 

on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a 

holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal 

act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5).

MTT Docket No. 25-002079 

Page 2 of 2 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

 

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives. 

 

By: Tribunal Clerk

← View full record