Johnsons - Mottville POS.pdf
Johnsons Surplus LLC Petitioner Vs. Township Of Mottville Respondent · 26-000962-TT
Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL JOHNSONS SURPLUS LLC, Petitioner, Vv. MTT Docket # 26-000962 TOWNSHIP OF MOTTVILLE, Respondent. PROOF OF SERVICE STATE OF MICHIGAN ) } ss. COUNTY OF OAKLAND} Aaron M. Fales, being duly sworn, deposes and says that on August b, 2026 he served a copy of Petitioner's Petition on the parties named on the attached list. Aaron M. Fales
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON |. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Johnsons Surplus LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No.: 26-000962 Township Of Mottville, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of the notice may result in the dismissal of this case. Under TTR 235(1), “[tlhe respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so will result in Respondent being placed in default. The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements or the Tribunal's rules. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: June 23, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE | certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing
Page 3
TT68Y IN “Sursue] 18 Ueda "M 0¢h Suipjmg Amses1], Kmseai], jo yuounredo(] WeSIyoTA I0INSEaI], 9Yels 66067 IN ‘109314 SYM "oAY ued H 01% pIeog [00YOS 2) JO AI1B)2I00S S[O0YDG AT[qnd Voda SNYM TE06Y DAL “S[Itaonu) 681 X0g O'd 1S WIEN "MW STI sype1) Kuno) ydesor 18 TE06Y TAL “ofjIaanus) ‘681 Xo "O'd "1S UIBIN “M SZ1 uonezirenbyg Ano) ydesor 1g STIVIAL SELV.LS @ALINA SSVI) LSU Ad ONV 660617 IAL ‘u0331d AIYM IS sewoy], 96589
Page 4
STATE OF MICHIGAN
MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS SYSTEM
MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL
JOHNSONS SURPLUS LLC,
Petitioner,
MTT Docket #26-000962
vs.
Parcel No. 75-011-004-015-00
MOTTVILLE TOWNSHIP,
Respondent.
PETITION
JOHNSONS SURPLUS LLC ("Petitioner"), through its attorneys, Law Office of
Aaron M, Fales, P.C., says:
1.
Petitioner's principal office address
is 12195 US HIGHWAY 12, White
Pigeon, MI 49099.
Petitioner is a party in interest with respect to property taxes
on real property tax parcel no(s). 75-011-004-015-00 ("Petitioner's Property"), at
12195 US 12, White Pigeon, MI, 49099.
2.
Respondent, Mottville Township assesses and collects property taxes
on Petitioner's Property.
3.
In 2026, Respondent determined the taxable value of Petitioner's
Parcel fo be $674,083 and assessed Petitioner's Property at $930,000 resulting in aPage 5
4,
Petitioner's
Property
is
classified
as
Commercial
Real
Property.
Petitioner's
Property
is
a
commercial
property.
Petitioner
believes
that
Petitioner's Property was designed to be used for commercial purposes.
5.
This matter involves issues relating to: (a) valuation, {b) assessment,
(c) taxable value, and (d) uniformity.
6.
At this time, Petitioner believes, as
it relates to taxable value, that
there is a dispute relative to the value of a loss.
7.
The 2026 assessment, including state equalized value and taxable
value,
imposed
on
Petitioner's
Property,
and
the
taxes
fo
be
levied
and
collected thereon, are invalid and unlawful and operate as a fraud upon the
taxpayer for the reasons that:
(a)
The
assessment,
including
state
equalized
value
and/or
taxable value, exceeds the amount permitted by the Michigan Constitution and
applicable statutes;
(b)
The
assessment,
including
state
equalized
value
and/or
taxable value, are af higher percentages of true cash value than permissible
under the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes;
(c}
The
assessment,
including
taxable
value
and/or
state
equalized value, are based upon an erroneous determination of the frue cashPage 6
(d) The assessment, including state equalized value and/or faxable value, and the mode of assessment adopted by Respondent, discriminate against Petitioner and deny Petitioner its constitutional rights fo uniformity, equal protection and due process of law. WHEREFORE, Petitioner requests that the Tax Tribunal enter an Order reducing the 2026 taxable value of Petitioner's Parcel from $674,083 to $200,000, and reducing the 2026 assessed and state equalized values of Petitioner's Property from $930,000 to $200,000, and requiring Respondent to pay Petitioner the refunds attributable to such reductions, plus interest and costs. Respectfully submitted, LAW OFFICE OF AARON M, FALES, P.C. Attorney for Petitioner PEAY 4 Aaron M. Fales (P72864) 330 Hamilton Row, Ste 350 Birmingham, MI 48009 (248) 767-9840 By: Dated: M12 go