25-002678.pdf

Jim Martin, Petitioner V Township Of Chikaming, Respondent · 25-002678-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

RECEIVED 

5 

AUG 26 2025 

i 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON 1. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Jim Martin 

, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner(s) 

v 

MTT Docket No. 25-002678 

Township Of Chikaming, 

, 

Respondent(s) 

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 

1 

. 

] wish th is Trib una { to re consid © 

The Trbwnafs dismissal of our appeal becausa wa fail fo protest ie assassmant fo Respondent’ March Board of love. 

2. 

Good cause exists to grant reconsideration because: 

| request reconsideration as we have no record of receiving the valuation in time to 

appeal the valuation at the March meeting. As new part time Michigan residents, we get 

mail at two locations and our Michigan mail location stopped retaining our mail sometime 

after we returned to Kansas. And honestly, during our first year of ownership, we were 

unaware of when to expect notice of valuation and when to protest. 

3. 

| ask this Tribunal to grant my requesf/for reconsideration. 

Jim Martin 

[Print/type ndme of person signing] 

| certify that on this date 

| served a copy of this Motion, and any additional documentation, on the 

opposing party or their representative. 

J 

August16, 2025 

= 

in 

yA Ay

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Jim Martin, 

Petitioner, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION 

v 

MTT Docket No. 25-002678 

Chikaming Township, 

Respondent. 

NOTICE OF NO ACTION 

TAKE NOTICE that the Tribunal has received the response to the July 24, 2025 Notice 

of No Action. However, although the motion included the printed name of the individual 

submitting the motion and a signature attesting that the motion was served on the 

opposing party, the motion itself was not signed.! As such, the document is not 

properly pending and no action will be taken unless a signed motion is filed within 14 

days of the issuance of this notice. 

If the required signed motion is not filed within 14 

days, you will be required to re-file the motion with the appropriate filing fee and proof 

that the re-filed document was served on the opposing party. 

By: Tribunal Clerk 

Entered: August 12, 2025 

smm 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

| certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives. 

By: Tribunal Clerk

© 

The attached signed motion for reconsideration is intended to cure the defect noted in the 

included 8/12/2025 letter from the Tax Tribunal. 

<hr

(Bos Weshwaal 

reer 

KANSAS ¢ 

ex. 

' 

18 AUG 2025 PM 

3 

) 

Tes 

Rs aso 

Me chug “ax 

Trobene! 

oll 

Ww. Ota ST

← View full record