Efiled Lineage v. Novi MI 2026 ET Petition Prop Fillable 5.28.26.pdf
Lineage Logistics, LLC Petitioner Vs. City Of Novi Respondent · 26-001672-TT
Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 _____________________________, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner(s) v MTT Docket No. _____________________________, Respondent(s) ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 1. Property Parcel No: _____________________________________________ (If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 2. The property identified above is ___real ___personal. 3. If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties contiguous? ___Yes ___No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each non- contiguous parcel.) 4. Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property under appeal? ___Yes ___No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each parcel of personal property not located on a parcel of real property under appeal.) 5. If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal property statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 6. The property identified above is classified as _________________________ 7. If the assessment or assessments at issue were protested, the protest was made ___ March ___ July ___December Board of Review. Lineage Logistics, LLC City of Novi 50-22-09-176-019 X X N/A 201 (COMMERCIAL-IMPROVED)
Page 2
MTT Docket No. _________________ Page 2 of 4 8. If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 9. If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the classification or classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 of the tax year involved), list the separate and specific facts upon which assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 10. The property or properties at issue are located in _______________County. The property or properties 11. The assessment or assessments at issue were established by the (applicable local governmental unit): ________________________________________ 12. 13. This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): ________the property axable values ________the property or properties only If the property or properties is at issue, is there a dispute as to the value of an addition or loss? ___ Yes ___No ________uniformity of the property or properties ________the property or the properties under MCL ______ 14. The tax year(s) at issue are: _______________________________________ The subject property assessment is excessive and does not reflect what similar properties in the area have sold for. The subject property assessment is excessive and does not reflect what similar properties in the area have sold for. Oakland 46500 Humboldt Dr., Novi, MI 48375 City of Novi Lineage Logistics, LLC ATTN: Tax Department 46500 Humboldt Dr., Novi, MI 48375 X 2026
Page 3
MTT Docket No. _________________ Page 3 of 4 15. If more than the current tax year is being appealed, list the separate and specific prior tax year or years (attach additional page if necessary): 16. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent Board of Review are: Tax Year True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 17. Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 18. The values in dispute for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 19. Petitioner requests the following relief (attach additional page if necessary): 20. List the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to support the relief requested (attach additional page if necessary): N/A 2026 5,947,900 2,973,950 2,812,810 2026 4,000,000 4,000,000 2,000,000 2026 1,947,900 973,950 812,810 The subject property assessment is excessive and does not reflect what similar properties in the area have sold for. Petitioner is requested a market value not exceeding $4,000,000. Market data shows a true market value not exceeding $4,000,000 in true cash value
Page 4
MTT Docket No. _________________ Page 4 of 4 if none, Petitioner: ______________________________________________________________________ Printed Name if none, Petitioner: ______________________________________________________________________ Email Address: _________________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ Telephone Number: _____________________________________________________ Date: _________________________________________________________________ /s/ Steven Nagengast Steven Nagengast steven.nagengast@ey.com Ernst & Young, LLP c/o Steven Nagengast 121 River Street Hoboken, NJ 07030 201-551-5103 5/28/2026