Full record / 25-003366.pdf

25-003366.pdf

Steven J White, Petitioner V Township Of Milford, Respondent · 25-003366-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

RECEIVED 

SEP 25 2025 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

’ 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON | BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM 

VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL 

MTT DOCKET NO. 25-003366 

Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information 

First Name 

ML 

Last Name 

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route} 

City or Town 

State 

ZIP Code 

Telephone Number 

Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email) 

Section 2: Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information 

] 

First Name 

Mi. 

Last Name 

Jenny 

Angle 

Firm Name (if any) 

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route} 

1100 Atlantic Street 

City or Town 

State 

ZIP Code 

Milford 

MI 

[48381 

Telephone MT DA8-32 1 -1 03 1 

Email Address {do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email) 

jangle@milfordtwpmi.gov 

Section 3: Subject Property Information 

Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of §0% or more? 

[A 

Yes 

[mn No 

Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? 

If not, list which parcels adjoin one another.

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

The subjects Assessed Value is correctly set at 50% True Cash Value 

Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES 

Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? 

Yes 

[No 

If yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: 

March 

[1 July 

0 December 

If no, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March BOR? [ves 

[Ono 

*Subniit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer. 

if the July or December BOR revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? [] Yes 

J No 

Hf yes, cite the Board’s authority. 

Was the assessment(s) at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? [i] Yes 

If yes, explain 

Ano 

Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? 

ves 

[No 

If so, what is the issue date?

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Did Petitioner request a Poverty Exemption at 

a BOR? O Yes 

a No 

If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: [| March 

[| July 

[] December 

List the date the BOR denied Petitioner's Poverty Exemption: 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF AN EXEMPTION 

OTHER THAN POVERTY, PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE, OR QUALIFIED AGRICULTURAL EXEMPTIONS 

Did Petitioner request the exemption ata BOR? [J Yes 

[] No 

If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: 1] March 

[| July 

a December 

Tax Year(s) denied: 

List the date the exemption was denied: 

What statutory section did Petitioner request the subject property be exempt? 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE CLASSIFICATION OF PROPERTY 

What do you believe the classification should be: 

Real 

Personal 

(check one) 

[m] 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

Industrial 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one) 

Section 6: Valuation Information use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. 

Parcel Identification Number: 

L 16-33-403-012 

Classification of Property: 

Real 

Personal 

(check one) 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

Industrial 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one) 

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR: 

$277,190 

Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR: 

$277,190 

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 

$554,380 

Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value. 

$277,190 

If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.

Page 4

Pr 

¢ 

pea / 

: 

"STATE OF MICHIGAN 

: 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON 

|. BROWN, DPA 

ge RHOR 

a 

LANSING 

] 

DIRECTOR 

StevenWhite 

© 

MICHIGAN 

TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner(s) 

: 

: 

. 

v 

MTT Docket No, 25-003366 

Township of Milford 

Respondent(s) 

PROOF 

OF SERVICE 

Jenny Angle 

states that on September15, 2025 

helshe 

[Name of person serving/mailing petition] 

[date of service] 

served a copy of the Answer Form 

- relative to the above-captioned matter upon: 

[Provide name and address of the party/people being served] 

Co 

BR 

Tm— White 

| 

j 

Michigan Tax Tribunal 

1641 Sunflower Lane, Milford, Ml 48381 

PO Box 30232 

Lansing, MI 48909 

CC 

fmm 

Se 

= 

iSiatfatfre of person who is serving/mailing copy] 

FLT 

[1 \y

Page 5

Co 

METROPLEX MI 480 

Township of Milford-Assessing 

1100 Atlantic Street 

17 SEP 2025 

PM 17 L 

Milford, MI 48381 

Michigan Tax Tribunal 

PO Box 30232 

Lansing, MI 48909

PDF reading copy

← View full record