Full record / 24-004251.pdf

24-004251.pdf

Id Capital LLC, Petitioner Vs. City Of Detroit, Respondent · 24-004251-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

RECEIVED 

0CT1 7 2025 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

ID Capital LLC 

, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner(s) 

v 

rd 

MTT Docket No.24-00 

42511 

City of Detroit 

, 

Respondent(s) 

ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 

1. 

Property Parcel No: 22016636-41 

(If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition 

Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 

2. 

The property identified above is 

x 

real personal. 

3. 

If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties 

contiguous? __ Yes ___ No. 

(If no, separate Petitions are required for each non- 

contiguous parcel.) 

4, 

Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property 

under appeal? ___ Yes ___ No. 

(If no, separate Petitions are required for each 

parcel of personal property not located on a parcel of real property under 

appeal.) 

5. 

If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal 

property statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 

6. 

The property identified above is classified as 201Ccomm

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 24-00 425] 

Page 2 of 4 

8. 

10. 

11. 

12. 

13. 

If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific 

facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal's authority over the 

assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 

If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the 

classification or classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 

of the tax year involved), list the separate and specific facts upon which 

Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal's authority over the assessment or 

assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 

The property or properties at issue are located in Wayne 

County. The 

property or properties’ address is: 

21455 W 7 Mi Rd. 

Detroit MI 

The assessment or assessments at issue were established by the (applicable 

local governmental unit): Det 

Petitioner's legal residence or principal office address is: 

This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): 

X 

the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values 

the property or properties’ taxable value only 

If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a 

dispute as to the value of an addition or loss? __ Yes __ No

Page 3

MTT Docket No. 24-0025) 

Page 3 of 4 

15. 

If more than the current tax year is being appealed, list the separate and specific 

facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal's authority over the prior 

tax year or vears (attach additional page if necessary): 

16. 

The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent's 

Board of Review are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

Assessed Value 

Taxable Value 

2024 

4,177,200 

2,088,600 

173,790 

17. 

Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified above are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

State Equalized Value 

Taxable Value 

2024 

3,000,000 

1,500,000 

173,790 

18. 

The values in dispute for the property identified above are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

State Equalized Value 

Taxable Value 

2024 

1,177,200 

588,600 

0 

19. 

Petitioner requests the following relief (attach additional page if necessary): 

Reduction of SEV accordingly

Page 4

MTT Docket No. 24-004251 

Page 4 of 4 

Signature 

of Petitioner's Authori 

oe Representa pon, LiF lion: 

pig 

2 

[| 

7 

Printed Name of Petitioner's Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: 

Stephen Polter I 

Email Address: spolter@polterlaw.com 

Mailing Address: 

2600 W Big Beaver, Ste L100, Troy, MI 48084 

Telephone Number: 248-213-6800 

Date: Aug 28, 2025

Page 5

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

ID CAPITAL LLC, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

Docket No. 24-004251 

CITY OF DETROIT, 

Respondent. 

/ 

ANSWER 

RESPONDENT, CITY OF DETROIT, for its Answer to the Petition filed in this matter 

states as follows: 

1. 

Respondent admits. 

2. 

Respondent admits. 

3. 

No response necessary 

4. 

No response necessary. 

5. 

No response necessary. 

6. 

Respondent admits. 

7. 

No response required. 

8. 

No response required. 

9. 

No response required.

Page 6

13. Respondent admits only that Petitioner’s instant Tax Tribunal appeal alleges issues 

involving true cash and taxable values, however, Respondent denies that any such 

allegations have merit. 

14. Respondent admits. 

15. No response necessary. 

16. Respondent admits. 

17. Respondent neither admits nor denies as Respondent lacks sufficient knowledge or 

information to form a belief as to the truth of the allegation. 

18. Based solely upon Petitioner’s unsubstantiated value contentions Respondent admits. 

19. Prayer for relief. No response required. 

20. No response necessary. 

AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES 

Respondent further asserts that Petitioner’s claims are barred, in whole or in part, by: 

1. 

Petitioner’s claims are barred by the applicable statute of limitations. 

2. 

Petitioner has failed to state a claim for which relief may be granted. 

3. 

Petitioner lacks standing. 

WHEREFORE, Respondent City of Detroit respectfully requests that this Honorable 

Tribunal dismiss the petition in this matter and award costs and attorney fees. 

Respectfully Submitted, 

[s/ Kevin C. Richard

Page 7

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

ID CAPITAL LLC, 

Petitioner, 

\2 

Docket No. 24-004251 

CITY OF DETROIT, 

Respondent. 

i 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

On October 7, 2025, I mailed by email a copy of Respondent’s Answer with Affirmative Defenses 

in the instant matter to: 

Steven Polter 

spolter@polterlaw.com 

I declare that the statement above is true to the best of my information, knowledge, and belief. 

[s/ Kevin C. Richard 

Kevin C. Richard] 

| | | 

Senior Assistant Corporation Counsel 

City of Detroit Law Department 

Coleman A. Young Municipal Center 

2 Woodward Avenue, Suite 500 

Dated: October 7, 2025 

Detroit, Michigan 48226

Page 8

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

ORLENE HAWKS 

DIRECTOR 

Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Respondent 

MOAHR DOCKET NO. 24-004251 

Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information 

Filer Type: Local Unit of Government 

City of Detroit (Wayne) 

Local Unit of Govemment/First Name 

MIL 

Last Name 

Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

City or Town 

State 

ZIP Code 

Michigan 

Telephone Number 

Fax Number 

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) 

Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information 

First Name 

MIL 

Last Name 

Kevin 

[od 

Richard 

Firm Name (if any) 

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

2 Woodward Avenue, Suite 500 

City of Detroit Law Department 

City or Town 

State 

ZIP Code 

Detroit 

Michigan 

48226 

Telephone Number 

313-237-3061 

Fax Number 

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) 

richke@detroitmi 

gov 

Electronic Signature Typing your name below will serve as your signature 

Respondent or Authorized Attorney/Representative’s Signature: 

Kevin C Richard 

Is

Page 9

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

DIRECTOR 

ID Capital LLC 

i 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner(s) 

v 

MTT Docket No.24-004251 

Respondent(s) 

PROOF OF SERVICE FOR PROPERTY TAX PETITION 

*To be filed after the Tribunal issues the Notice of Docket Number* 

Stephen Polter 

states that on Oct 10, 2025 

he/she 

[Name of person serving/mailing petition] 

[date of service] 

served a copy of the Petition relative to the above-captioned matter upon: 

[Provide name and address of the following entities] 

1. Assessor (via certified mail): 

City of Detroit CAYMC Bldg. 

2 Woodward Ave., Ste 130, Det. MI 48226 

2. 

City Clerk or Township Supervisor/Clerk (via certified mail): 

CAYMC Bldg. 

2 Woodward Ave., Ste 200, Det., MI 48226 

3. 

County Equalization Director (via first class mail or personal service): 

400 Monroe 3. 

Det, MI 

4 K22( 

4. 

County Clerk (via first class mail or personal service): 

CAYMC Bldg. 

2 Woodward Ave., Ste 502, Det., MI 48226 

5. 

Secretary of the local school board (via first class mail or personal service): 

3011 W Grand Blvd. 

Detroit, MI 48202 

6. 

State Treasurer (via first class mail):

Page 10

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

ID Capital LLC, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner, 

v 

MTT Docket No. 24-004251 

City of Detroit, 

Presiding Judge 

Respondent. 

Jason C. Grinnell 

ORDER DENYING JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT 

The Tribunal has reviewed the case file and the stipulation filed on September 24, 2025, 

and finds denial appropriate for the following reasons: 

1. 

Petitioner has not paid the appropriate filing fee as required by TTR 223; 

2. 

Petitioner has not served the proper parties as required by TTR 227; and 

3. 

Respondent has not filed an answer as required by TTR 235. 

Therefore, 

IT IS ORDERED that the Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment is DENIED. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case will be placed on a Prehearing General Call 

in the normal course of scheduling. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that because this Stipulation for Entry of Consent 

Judgment is no longer pending before the Tribunal, a new stipulation, and filing fee is 

required for any future settlement. 

By 

ET ———— 

— 

/ 

- 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

Entered: October 3, 2025 

jeg

Page 11

POLTER LAW GROUP 

2600 W. BIG BEAVER, SUITE L100 

| TROY, MI 48084 

J am 3 

REL 

Ra 

Ji 

Us POS’ 

g 

US 

" FIRST-CLAS* 

0635000226835. 

N53

FROM 480c- 

YN MTT 

A. VT 104 

EET 

shodpfedlfygebe gba fio 

fobsdygla flap d 

pe JT

PDF reading copy

← View full record