Full record / scpetition_valuation.pdf

scpetition_valuation.pdf

Susan Solomon Petitioner V City Of Southfield Respondent · 26-002839-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

 GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR



 PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM

 VALUATION / UNCAPPING APPEAL



 MTT DOCKET NO.



 Petitioner’s Contact Information:

 Filer Type: Local Unit of Government:

 Individual



 First Name M.I. Last Name

 Susan Solomon



 Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

 25635 Grand Concourse St.



 City or Town State ZIP Code

 Southfield Michigan 48075



 Telephone Number

 248-557-1157



 E-mail Address

 solomons@comcast.net



 Subject Property Information:

 How many parcels are you appealing? If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining?

 1 *If no, you must file separate appeals for each parcel



 N/A

 Property Address (No., Street)

 Meadowood Road (unimproved right-of-way)



 City or Town County State ZIP Code

 Southfield Oakland Michigan 48076



 Taxing Authority (City or Township)

 City Of Southfield (OAKLAND)



 Check which of the following you are appealing: (check all that apply)



 True Cash and Taxable Values

 Taxable Value Only (calculation)



 Please Explain the Reason for this Appeal:



 1 of 3

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

 GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR



 See attached document titled "REASONS FOR APPEAL OF 2026 ASSESSED VALUE INCREASE", including associated exhibits:



 Summary of issues:



 Rebuttal of impartiality of taxing authority and accuracy of assessed value, based on each of the following:

 + Bad faith and conflicts of interest by taxing authority

 + Failure to recognize uniquessness of subject propery by excluding, misrepresenting, and/or over trivializing value-reducing factors

 + Contrary to prior independent qualified property appraisal that found, due to uniqueness and restrictive nature of subject property:

 - Highest and best use is indeterminable

 - Market approach is unreliable

 - No comparables available or applicable

 - Zero ($0) market value

 + Flawed methodologies

 + Invalid comparables

 + Unequal and non-uniform taxation

 + Other documented facts



 Jurisdictional Issues:

 Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review? Yes



 If Yes, check which Board of Review you attended: March



 If No, please check the applicable reason(s):



 Year(s) Under Appeal:

 2026



 Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal:

 Parcel Number:

 76-24-24-176-008



 Classification of Property: Real (check one)



 Residential (check one)



 Current Assessed Value as established by the Board of Review:

 10800



 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review:

 973



 What do you believe is the fair market value?

 0



 2 of 3

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

 GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR



 Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value.

 0



 If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.

 0



 Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

 Petitioner’s Signature:



 /s/ Susan Solomon



 Attorney or Authorized Agent’s Signature:



 /s/



 Fee Information:



 If you do not have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% at the time of the filing of this petition, you are required to pay a filing fee for

 the filing of this appeal.



 The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel

 with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each

 additional parcel being appealed.



 Property tax appeal: Residential** Non-Residential

 SEV or TV in contention* Filing fee*** Filing Fee**

 $100,000 or less...........................................................................................$ 125.00 $250.00

 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00.........................................................................$ 200.00 N/A

 More than $500,000…..................................................................................$ 300.00 N/A



 Does the subject property have a principal residence exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition?

 No



 3 of 3

PDF reading copy

← View full record