Full record / 26-001208.pdf

26-001208.pdf

Charles Malik Petitioner V Township Of Richfield Respondent · 26-001208-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

THIS IS 

A CONTROL DOCUMENT BY CHARLES MALIK AND SHALL NOT BE COPY OR REPRODUCE. 

RECEIVED 

Date: July 22, 2026 

JUL 80:2026 

TO: Richfield Township 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

1410 N st Helen RD 

PO BOX 128 

Saint Helen, MI 48656 

FOR: Julie A. Tatro, - Richfield Township Assessor. 

Michigan Tax Tribunal Small Claims Division—Department of Licensing and Regulatory 

Affairs. 

TOPIC: 

Mailing address change and 

| requested an Appraisal 6-9-26 on Parcel # 010-511-010- 

0000. 

REF TO: - Michigan Tax Tribunal Small Claims Division 

: MTT Docket No. 26-001208 

FROM: Charles Malik owner of Parcel known as 1828 Lake ST, Saint Helen Ml 48656. 

...note: PROOF OF SERVICE 

: By U.S Mail. 

New mailing address change—request. Copy of current Appraisal. 

Copy sent to: Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs. 

I Remain, 

Charles Malik

Page 2

NoMi Appraisal 

Roscommon, MI 48653 

File No. 22612350 

Charles Malik 

PO Box 121 

Saint Helen, MI, 48656 

File Number: 

22612350 

In accordance with your request, 

| have appraised the real property at; 

1828 Lake St 

Saint Helen, M! 48656 

The purpose of this appraisal is to develop an opinion of the defined value of the subject property, as improved, 

The property rights appraised are the fee simple interest in the site and improvements. 

In my opinion, the defined value of the property as of 

June 22, 2026 

is: 

$45,000 

Forty-Five Thousand Dollars 

The attached report contains the description, analysis and supportive data for the conclusions, 

final opinion of value, descriptive photographs, assignment conditions and appropriate certifications. 

Sincerely, 

Choco Pes Porn 

Danielle Rose Patterson 

Licensed Residential Appraiser

Page 3

NoMi Appraisal 

) 

Residential Appraisal Report 

File No. 22612350 

The purpose of this appraisal report is to provide the client with a credible opinion of the defined value of the subject property, given the intended use of the appraisal. 

Client Namefintended User Charles Malik 

E-mail N/A 

Client Address 

PQ Box 121 

City Saint Helen 

. 

State MI 

Zip 48656 

Additional Intended User(s) This report is intended for the exclusive use of the named client and their assignees. 

Intended Use The intended use is to provide an Opinion of Market Value as of a specific date, This report is not intended for any other use, 

including but not limited to insurance, tax assessment purposes or lending purposes. 

Property Address 1828 Lake St 

City Saint Helen 

State Mi 

Zip 48656 

Owner of Public Record MALIK CHARLES 

County Roscommon 

Legal Description LOT 10 OAKWOOD 

Assessor's Parcel # 010-511-010-0000 

Tex Year 2025 

RE Taxes$ 575.07 

Neighborhood Name OAKWOOD 

Map Reference 44.3607245,-84.4201855 

Census Tract 9702.00 

Property Rights Appraised 

IX] Fee Simple 

[7] Leasehold 

[1 Other (describe) 

My research 1X] did 

| id not reveal any prior sales or transfers of the Subject property for the three years prior to the effective date of this appraisal, 

Prior Sale/Transfer: 

Date 01/09/2025 

Price $55,000 

Source(s) WarrDeed; Richfield Township Assessor 

Analysis of prior sale or transfer history of the subject property {and comparable sales, if applicable) 

The subject's property had one prior transfer in the past thirty 

six months, see grid. Prior sales of comparable properties if occurred less than 12 months prior to date of sale stated on the sales grid 

are listed above. All sales verified closed by local multi-list services. 

Offerings, options and contracts as of the effective date of the appraisal 

None Known 

Nelghborhood Characteristics 

One-Unit Housing Trends 

One-Unilt Housing 

Present Land Use 

3% 

Location 

Urban 

Suburban 

|X| Rural 

Property Values 

Increasing 

X | Stable 

Declining 

PRICE 

AGE 

| One-Unit 

50 % 

Built-Up 

Over 75% 

(X]25-75% 

Under 25% | Demand/Supply 

Shortage 

Xin Balance { ] Over Supply 

$(000) 

(yrs) 

2-4 Unit 

0% 

Growth 

Rapid 

X [Stable 

Slow 

Marketing Time 

Under 3 mths 

[X}3-6 mths 

Over 6 mths 

52 Low 

10 | Multi-Family 

0% 

Neighborhood Boundaries Refuge Rd to the North, Romancky Rd to the South, Meridian Rd to the 

295 High 

76 | Commercial 

3% 

East and Maple Valley Rd to the West. 

155 Pred. 

__ 54 | other Vacant 

47% 

Neighborhood Description 

See Attached Addendum 

NEIGHBORHOOD. 

Market Conditions (including support for the above conclusions) 

See Attached Addendum 

Dimensions 70x130.85x70x130.84 

Area 9158 sf 

Shape Rectangular 

View Res; 

Specific Zoning Classification R1;SingleFamilyRes 

Zoning Description Residential Use Permitted 

Zoning Compliance 

Legal 

[I] Legal Nenconforming (Grandfathered Use) 

[I Zoning 

1] legal {describe} 

Is the highest and best use of the subject property as improved {or as proposed per plans and specifications) the present use? 

Xx Yes [1] Ne 

If No, describe. See Attached 

Addendum 

Utilities 

Public 

Other (describe) 

Public 

_ Other (describe) 

Off-site Improvements—Type 

Public 

Private 

Electricity 

X 

Water 

X| 

Well-Private 

Street Asphalt 

X 

Gas 

X] 

_Propane-Private 

Sanitary Sewer 

X]_Septic-Private 

Alley 

None 

Site Comments 

Property is not mapped by FEMA, refer to flood certification for determination of flood zone. 

_No easement except typical 

utility easements. Well and septic systems are typical for this marketing area. 

GENERAL DESCRIPTION 

FOUNDATION 

EXTERIOR DESCRIPTION 

materials 

INTERIOR 

Sinateralst 

Units [X]one [Tone wince, wit 

7] 

X | Concrete Stab 

Crawl Space 

Foundation Walls 

P/Concrete/Avg 

Floors 

Carpet/Avg 

#0of Stories 

1 

Full Basement 

Partial Basement _| Exterior Walls 

Log/Avg 

Walls 

DW/Panel/Avg 

Type [XJost 

[Jat 

| |setiend Unt 

| Basement Ave 

0 sq. | Roof Surface 

Shgle/Avg 

Trin/Finish___Wood/Average 

X Existing 

1] Proposed 

[1 Under Const, | Basement Finish 

Q % | Gutters & Downspouts None 

Bath Floor 

Carpet/Average 

Design (Style) Ranch 

[Jouside Entry/Exit 

|) Sump Pump _| Window Type 

Wood, SP/Avg 

Bath Wainscot Vinyl/Average 

Year Built ~1970 

Storm Sash/insulated None 

Car Storage 

|_| None 

Effective Age (Yrs) ~25 

Screens 

Mesh/Avg 

Driveway 

#0of Cars 

2 

Attic 

None 

Heating [1] FWA ] HW 

| [] Radiant | Amenities 

WoodStove(s} #0 

| Driveway Surface Gravel/Grass 

Drop Stair 

Stairs 

[XJ other SpHtr 

| Fuel Gas 

Fireplaces) # 0 

fence None 

XiGarage 

 #ofCars 

1 

Floor 

X Scuttle 

Cooling 

[1] Centra} Air Conditioning 

Patio/Deck None 

Porch None 

Carport 

#ofCars 

OQ 

Finished 

Heated 

Individual 

[X]oter None 

£ool None 

Other None 

Xa 

[Toe 

[Jin 

Appliances 

| | Refrigerator 

| | Range/Oven 

Dishwasher 

| | Disposal 

| 

| Microwave 

[I] Washer/Dryer 

|_| 

Other {deseribe) Not Known-Drive By 

9 

Finished area above grade contains: 

5 Rooms 

2 Bedrooms 

1.0 Baths) 

675 Square Feet of Gross Living Area Above Grade 

Additional Features None Noted 

Comments on the Improvements 

Appraiser was requested to complete this a 

raiser has not entered the 

home at this time. This appraisal company 

has ins ected the interior of this 

property 

in the 

past (04/16/2025). This appraisal is based 

on the extraordinary assumption that the improvements are mostly unchanged from prior inspection, which is consistent with the 

exterior and with the information available. The Appraiser has collected recent information regarding the property from the township, 

county equalization and exterior view of the property. Above information regarding bedroom/bath count, heating and GLA are based on 

rior inspection. Effective age is estimated as the interior was not inspected at this time, 

Produced using AC! software, 800.234.8727 www.ockweb 

com 

‘This form Copyright © 2005-2010 ACI Division of 10 Claims Servives, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 

Page tof 4 

(gPAR™) General Pupose Apps 

on Smo

Page 4

NoMi Appraisal 

Residential Appraisal Report 

File No. 22612350 

FEATURE 

| 

SUBJECT 

COMPARABLE SALE NO. 1 

COMPARABLE SALE NO. 2 

COMPARABLE SALE NO. 3 

1828 Lake St 

7505 Riverside Dr 

9418 W Airport Rd 

1444 Saint Clair Ave 

Address Saint Helen, 

MI 48656 

Saint Hefen, M! 48656-8217 

Saint Helen, MI 48656 

Saint Helen, Mi 48656-9715 

Proximity lo Subject 

3.65 miles NW 

0.22 miles NW 

0.46 miles SW 

Sale Price 

3 

$ 

52,000 

8 

25,000 

$ 

55,000 

Sale Price/Gross 

Liv. Aca 

| § 

0.00sq.tt 

{s 

7879 sq.ft 

$ 

3726 sq 

$76.39 san 

: 

Data Source(s) 

WWBRMLS #201835845;D0M 28 | WWBRMLS #201833831,00M 90 

| WWBRMLS #201837431,00M 15 

Verification Source(s) 

WWBRMLS/Data Files 

WWBRMLS/Data Files 

WWBRMLS/Data Files 

VALUE ADJUSTMENTS 

DESCRIPTION 

DESCRIPTION 

+1 $ Adusiment 

DESCRIPTION 

+(1$ Adjostment 

DESCRIPTION 

+3$ Adjustment 

Sale or Financing 

ArmLth 

ArmlLth 

Armith 

Concessions 

Cash;0 

Cash;0 

Cash;0 

Date of Sale/Time 

08/08/2025 

06/23/2025 

10/03/2025 

Location 

Rural;Res 

Rural 

-7,800; Rural:Res 

Rural;Res 

Leasehold/Fee Simple 

| Fee Simple 

Fee Simple 

Fee Simple 

Fee Simple 

Site 

9159 sf 

16553 sf 

015400 sf 

08400 sf 

[1] 

View, 

Res; 

Res; Woods 

Res; 

Res;:Woods 

Fy Design (Style) 

Ranch 

Ranch 

Ranch 

Ranch 

859 Quality of Construction 

Ava/LogSiding 

Avg/Wood 

0 Avg/Wood 

0 Avg/Vinyl 

[1] 

21 Actual Age 

~56 

~66 

0168 

0{~66 

0 

= Condition 

Below Average 

[Below Average 

Poor 

12,100 | Average 

-13.000 

=2 Above Grade 

Total dems 

Baths 

Total_{Bdms, 

Baths 

Total 

)Bdrms) 

Bath 

Total 

[Bdrms| 

Baths 

1% Room Count 

5121 

10 

152] 

10 

512] 

10 

5121 

1.0 

ES Gross Living Area 18.00 

675 sq. 7. 

660 sq. ft 

g 

671 sq.ft 

0 

720 sg. 

Q 

< Basement & Finished 

Slab 

Craw! Space 

0] 

Slab 

Stab 

I Rooms Below Grade 

0 

0 

0 

[4] 

2 Functional Utility 

Average 

Average 

Average 

Average 

iy Heating/Cooling 

Sp Htr None 

Sp Htr None 

None 

1,000 | Sp Hir None 

Energy Efficient items 

None Noted 

None Noted 

None Noted 

None Noted 

Garage/Carport 

1 Att. Garage 

None 

5.000 | None 

5,000 | None 

5.000 

Porch/Patio/Deck 

None 

Porch 

-500 | Patio 

-1,000 | Covered Porch 

-1,000 

FP/Wood Stove 

| None 

None 

None 

None 

QutdoorAmenities | None 

Shed 

-2,000 | None 

None 

Net Adjustment (Total) 

[IF 

XI 

Ts 

5300) 

XJ+ 

[]. 

|g 

17,1000 

[Je 

IX] 

Is 

9.000 

Adjusted Sale Price 

NetAdj. 

-10.2% 

NetAd. 

68.4% 

NetAdi. 

-16.4% 

of Comparables 

GrossAdi, 

29.4% | $ 

46,700 | GrossAdi. 

76.4% 

3 

42,100] 

GrossAdi. 

34.5% 

13 

46,000 

fl 

count, GLA and foundation.Comparable 1 is most similar in Condition, however is located in a rural area that increases marketability. Comparable 2 is 

Poor Condition, however warrants equal weight due to its proximity to the Subject. Comparable 3 is superior in Condition, however warrants equal weight 

due to its proximity to the Subject and similar lot size. The subject property's appraised market value is supported by the compilation of these 

comparables as each provides bracketing for various value-added features of the subject property. 

COST APPROACH TO VALUE 

PY ESTIMATED 

[] REPRODUCTION OR 

1 REPLACEMENT COST NEW 

OPINION OF SITEVALUE oo 

ein = 

12,000 

g Source of cost data 

Dwelling 

675 So. FLes 

Q 

g 

Quality rating from cost service 

Effective date of cost data 

Se.Ft@$ 

z Comments on Cost Approach {gross living area calculations, depreciation, ete) 

The cost approach was not considered as Jt is traditionally 

Garage/Carport 213 

Sefte@s 

0 

J considered most reliable when the property being appraised is 

Total Estimate of Cost-New 

0 

newer, ie built within the last 10 years. The subject property is an | Less 

Physical 

| Functional | 

External 

older home. 

Depreciation 

0) 

Depreciated Cost of Improvements... 

0 

"Asis" Value of Site Improvements 

. .. 

INDICATED VALUE BY COSTAPPROACH 

=3 

[4] 

INCOME APPROACH TO VALUE 

: 

Estimated Monthly Market Rent § 

0.00 

X Gross Rent Multiplier 

=3 

Q 

Indicated Value by income Approach 

Summary of Income Approach (including support for market rent and GRM} 

There are not enough rental properties in this marketing area to make a 

determination of GRM, therefore the income approach was not deemed applicable. 

Indicated Value by: Sales Comparison Approachs 45,000 

Cost Approach (if developed) $ 0 

Income Approach 

(if developed) s 0 

See Attached Addendum 

z 

I] 

2 

p=] This appraisal is made 

"asis,” 

[I] Subject to completion per plans and specifications on the basis of a hypothetical condition that the improvements have been completed, 

g 

subject to the following repairs or alterations on the basis of a hypothetical condition that the repairs or alterations have been completed 

0 subject to the following: 

8 Personal property has no contributory value. 

No conditions. 

: 

[ 

Based on the scope of work, assumptions, limiting conditions and appraiser's certification, my (our) opinion ofthe defined value ofthe real property 

that is the subject of this reportis$ 

45,000 

as of 06/22/2026 

+ whichis the effective date of this appraisal, 

Proved using ACK salvar, 800.234.8727 wetw aciweh com 

Tis form Copyrght © 2005-2010 

ACI Divkion of SO Calms Serves, Int All Rights Reserved, 

PAR™) 

General 

Purpose. 

isat Re 

05/2010 

PeseZalé 

GPAR™ 

General 

urpos er 

es

Page 5

19°23 LaL¥ Xo 

savor Helow ah 48650 

Mewgrw 

6 

W. ot

Po Box 

Lansing 

MIT Doclked INO. 

ZB

PDF reading copy

← View full record