Full record / Mahdi.pdf

Mahdi.pdf

Haider Mahdi, Petitioner V Township Of Commerce, Respondent · 26-000356-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

MAR 0 4 20E0 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

MICHIGAN TAK TRIBUNAL 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON |. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

~ 

DIRECTOR 

AK APPEAL PETITION FORM 

 UATION 

| UNCAPPING 

PROPERT 

co 

UA 

sification, principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Other 

Non-Property tax disputes. 

Do not use this form to appeal Clas: 

Exemptions, special Assessments, or 

ard of 

held in 

submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (i.e. Bo: 

\f you do not submit this document, you may be 

Pursuant to Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 279, you Must 

ther notice) with this petition, if applicabl e. 

Review Decision or © 

default. 

section 1: petitioner’s 

First Name 

Haidet 

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

2135 Boldt street 

City or Town 

Last Name 

Mahdi 

B 

SEE 

nce via email) 

o send all corresponde 

Street, P.O: Box or Ru! 

Mailing Address (No., 

City or Town 

Telephone Number 

Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all Correspondence via email) 

rcels. 

cel form for additional, contiguous pal 

erty \nformation syse the multiple par 

none parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? 

if you are appealing more tha 

rv} Yes* 

[] No** 

must file separate app 

— 

section 3 Subject Pro 

How many parcels are you 

appealing? 

eals for each parcel 

*x|f No, you 

Property Address (Now Street) 

401 W commerce road (Parcel #E-17-1 

City or Town 

 Townshi

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON 1, BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 4: Check which of the followin 

ealing 

(check ali that apply) 

True Cash and Taxable Value 

#4 Taxable Value Only (calculation) 

J Uncapping of Taxable Value 

Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal 

[we received the tax! finormation for 2026. 

These are two lands recently bought in 2025. The assessed value is higher that its true 

value 

i 

The two lands were recently bought together for 250,000.00 in open market sale. The 

sale was reflective of true market value 

We proposed to change the true cash value and assessed value to be consistent with 

the sale price which reflect the current market value 

L 

| 

Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues 

Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? [ME] Yes 

No 

ee 

if Yes, check which BOR you attended: [] March 

[0] July 

[8] December 

if No, please Check the applicable reason(s): 

Cl Not required to attend 

0 Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutual Mistake of Fact (if yes, include explanation in Section 5) 

[I] Appealing within 36 days of State Tax Commission Order 

0 Appealing within 36 days of receipt of Notice of Uncapping 

Other 

ee]

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 7: Valuation Information «Use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels, 

[ Foret Number: 401 W commerce road (Parcel #E-17-10-434-012) and Parcel# E-17-10-434-013) 

BR 

Classification of Property: 

Real 

Personal L1 (check one} 

Agricuttural 

1 

Commercial 

Industrial 

1 

Residential 0 

Timber-Cutover CJ 

Developmental O 

utility 

J (check one) 

‘Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value} established | Taxable Value established by the Board of Review: 

by the Board of Review: 154,100 and 104,480 

154,100 and 104,480 

What do you believe is the Tair market value (also known as true cash value)? 

250,000 for both combined 

What do you believe is the assessed value? (multiply true cash 

value 

by 5) 75,000.00/50,000.0 

What do you believe is the Taxable value? (cannot exceed 

assessed value) 75,000.00/50,000.00 maximum 

Fee Information 

Does the property have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition for ali tax years at 

issue? 

1 Yes 

No 

If you answered yes to the above question, you are not required to pay any filing fees. 

Tt the property does not have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition for ail tax years at 

issue, the filing fee is based on the greater of the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute. 

If you are appealing more than one 

parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 

wiil be added for each additional parcel being appealed, not to exceed a total filing fee of $1,000.00 

if your property is residential property (see MCL 205.762) and 

the State Equalized Value or “Taxable Value in contention is: 

Filing Fee is: 

$100,000.00 and under 

$125.00 

$100,000.01 to $500,000.00 

$200.00 

$Over $600,000.00 

- 

$300.00 

if the property is NOT residential property (see MCL 205.762) and 

the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: 

Filing Fee is: 

$100,000.00 and under 

$250.00 

* plus $26.00 for each additional parcel, as indicated above. 

If the property is NOT residential property and the State Equalized Value or Taxabte Value in dispute is $100,000.01 or greater the 

appeal does not qualify for Smal Claims. Therefore, an Entire Tribunal petition must be filed. 

Signature ‘required 

Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: 

. 

. 

) 

4. 

Haider Mahdi 

Hi L 

7 

Ist

Page 4

5= METROPLEX MI 480 

27 FEB 2026 PM 14 L 

Nichign Tok Trt 

Gl 

W. Ottawa 

SE 

Lang, 

ML 

HET 33 

WIN EWE 

L0H SH HE BUIUB 

TR

PDF reading copy

← View full record