24-003364 Answer Attachments.pdf

Pamela Star Teunissen, Petitioner V Township Of Rose Lake, Respondent · 25-002912-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

CL 

THIS IS NOT A TAX BILL 

L400 

Notice of Assessment, Taxable Valuation, and Property Classification 

This form is issued under the authority of Public Act 208 of 1833, Sec. 211.24 c and Sec.211.34c, as amended. This is 

a model assessment notice to be used by the local 

FROM: ROSE LAKE ASSESSOR 

PARCEL IDENTIFICATION 

ROSELAKEASSESSOR@YAHOO.COM 

: 

5671 REILLY RD 

PARCEL NUMBER: 

67 14 550 024 00 

HOUGHTON LAKE, MI 48629 

PROPERTY ADDRESS: 

SHORES DR 

LEROY, MI 49655 

OWNER'S NAME & ADDRESS/PERSON NAMED ON ASSESSMENT ROLL: 

TEUNISSEN ANTHONY & PAMELA 

PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE EXEMPTION 

% Exempt As "Homeowners Principal Residence": 

.00% 

534 WOODLAND DR 

% Exempt As "Qualified Agricultural Property": 

00% 

HOLLAND MI 49424-1610 

% Exempt As "MBT Industrial Personal": 

00% 

% Exempt As "MBT Commercial Personal”: 

-00% 

Exempt As "Qualified Forest Property": 

O Yes 

[X] No 

Exempt As "Development Property": 

O Yes 

Xx 

No 

LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 

RL-535-20 LOT 24 ROSE LAKE FOREST SHORES SUBD 

ACCORDING TO MCL 211.34c THIS PROPERTY IS CLASSIFIED AS: 

402 

(RESIDENTIAL 

PRIOR YEAR'S CLASSIFICATION: 

402 

(RESIDENTIAL- 

The change in taxable value will increase/decrease your tax bill for the 2024 

PRIOR AMOUNT 

CURRENT 

CHANGE FROM 

year by approximately: 

$4 

YEAR: 

2023 

eA Sl 

CRN 

YEAR 

1. TAXABLE VALUE: 

1,652 

1,734 

82 

2. ASSESSED VALUE: 

2,200 

2,200 

3. TENTATIVE EQUALIZATION FACTOR: 

1.000 

aie 

ERT 

: 

4. STATE EQUALIZED VALUE (SEV): 

2,200 

2,200 

0 

5. There WAS or WAS NOT a transfer of ownership on this property in2023 

WAS NOT 

6. ASSESSOR CHANGE REASON: Market Adjustment 

The 2024 Inflation rate Multiplier is: 1.05 

TAXABLE VALUE 

x 

Voted Millage 

Rate 

= 

Tax 

Bill 

QUESTIONS/CONCERNS? 

Please EMAIL TODAY. 

If you have questions 

or concerns about anything on this 

form, 

including mailing address, 

names (s), 

exemptions, 

valuation, 

or estimated tax change, 

please send an email 

to 

the email address below. 

You 

will get 

a reply within 

24 hours and most items can be taken care 

of 

the same-day. 

Questions regarding the Notice of Assessment, Taxable Valuation, and Property Classification may be directed to: 

Name: 

Phone: 

Email Address: 

JAMIE HOUSERMAN 

(989) 205-0599 

ROSELAKEASSESSOR@YAHOO.COM 

March Board of Review Appeal Information. The board of review will meet at the following dates and times: 

BOARD OF REVIEW WILL MEET AT THE ROSE LAKE TWP HALL, 15953 16 MILE RD, MONDAY MARCH 11 FROM 3:00PM TO 

9:00PM AND TUESDAY MARCH 12 FROM 9:00AM TO 3:00PM. TO APPEAL BY MAIL: 5671 REILLY RD, HOUGHTON LAKE, MI 

48629, OR EMAIL: ROSELAKEASSESSOR@YAHOO.COM. APPEALS MUST BE RECEIVED BY MARCH 12, 2024 BEFORE 

12:00PM TO BE CONSIDERED. 

MOST QUESTIONS/CONCERNS CAN BE ADDRESSED ANYTIME. PLEASE EMAIL: ROSELAKEASSESSOR@YAHOO.COM OR 

CALL (989)205-0599 

NOTICE: BY STATE TAX COMMISSION ORDER YOUR ASSESSING OFFICE WILL EXTERIOR SITE INSPECT 20% OF 

PROPERTIES EACH YEAR

SR 

THIS IS NOT A TAX BILL 

L440 

Notice of Assessment, Taxable Valuation, and Property Classification 

This form is issued under the authority of Public Act 208 of 1893, Sec. 211.24 ¢ and Sec.211.34c, as amended. This is a model assessment notice to be used by the local assessor. 

FROM: ROSE LAKE ASSESSOR 

PARCEL IDENTIFICATION 

ROSELAKEASSESSOR@YAHOO.COM 

. 

5671 REILLY RD 

PARCEL NUMBER: 

67 14 550 025 00 

HOUGHTON LAKE, MI 48629 

PROPERTY ADDRESS: 

124 SHORES DR 

LEROY, MI 49655 

OWNER'S NAME & ADDRESS/PERSON NAMED ON ASSESSMENT ROLL: 

PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE EXEMPTION 

TEUNISSEN ANTHONY & PAMELA 

534 WOODLAND DR 

- ni As Homeawiers Principal E— 

pions 

xempt As 

"Qualified Agricultural Property": 

00% 

HOLLAND 

MI 49424-1610 

% Exempt As "MBT Industrial Personal": 

00% 

% Exempt As "MBT Commercial Personal”: 

00% 

Exempt As "Qualified Forest Property": 

O Yes 

[X] No 

Exempt As "Development Property": 

ii Yes 

Xx 

No 

LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 

RL-535-21 

LOT 25 ROSE LAKE FOREST SHORES SUBD 

ACCORDING TO MCL 211.34c THIS PROPERTY IS CLASSIFIED AS: 

401 

(RESIDENTIAL 

PRIOR YEAR'S CLASSIFICATION: 

401 

(RESIDENTIAL! 

The change in taxable value will increase/decrease your tax bill for the 2024 

PRIOR AMOUNT 

CURRENT 

CHANGE FROM 

re 

am 

mare 

| Temesons | OER 

1. TAXABLE VALUE: 

5,565 

5,843 

278 

2. ASSESSED VALUE: 

6,300 

2,900 

3. TENTATIVE EQUALIZATION FACTOR: 

1.000 

FEET 

dR 

4. STATE EQUALIZED VALUE (SEV): 

6,300 

2,900 

5. There WAS or WAS NOT a transfer of ownership on this property in2023 

WAS NOT 

6. ASSESSOR CHANGE REASON: Market Adjustment 

The 2024 Inflation rate Multiplier 

is: 1.05 

TAXARIE VALDE.% Voted Millsgs Rete 

= Tax Bill 

QUESTIONS/CONCERNS? 

Please EMAIL TODAY. 

If you have questions 

or concerns about anything on this 

form, 

including mailing address, 

names(s), 

exemptions, valuation, 

or estimated tax change, 

please send an email 

to the email address below. 

You 

will get 

a reply within 

24 hours 

and most items can be taken care 

of 

the same-day. 

Questions regarding the Notice of Assessment, Taxable Valuation, and Property Classification may be directed to: 

Name: 

Phone: 

Email Address: 

JAMIE HOUSERMAN 

(989) 205-0599 

ROSELAKEASSESSOR@YAHOO.COM 

March Board of Review Appeal Information. The board of review will meet at the following dates and times: 

BOARD OF REVIEW WILL MEET AT THE ROSE LAKE TWP HALL, 15953 16 MILE RD, MONDAY MARCH 11 FROM 3:00PM TO 

9:00PM AND TUESDAY MARCH 12 FROM 9:00AM TO 3:00PM. TO APPEAL BY MAIL: 5671 REILLY RD, HOUGHTON LAKE, MI 

48629, OR EMAIL: ROSELAKEASSESSOR@YAHOO.COM. APPEALS MUST BE RECEIVED BY MARCH 12, 2024 BEFORE 

12:00PM TO BE CONSIDERED. 

MOST QUESTIONS/CONCERNS CAN BE ADDRESSED ANYTIME. PLEASE EMAIL: ROSELAKEASSESSOR@YAHOO.COM OR 

CALL (989)205-0599 

NOTICE: BY STATE TAX COMMISSION ORDER YOUR ASSESSING OFFICE WILL EXTERIOR SITE INSPECT 20% OF 

PROPERTIES EACH YEAR

2024 

JULY BOARD OF REVIEW 

Change Notice 

Jul 16, 2024 

TEUNISSEN ANTHONY 

& PAMELA 

534 WOODLAND DR 

HOLLAND MI 49424-1610 

Re: July Board of Review Change Notice 

14 550 024 00 

126 SHORES DR 

Dear Property Owner: 

On Jul 16,2024 

, the July Board of Review made the following correction to the assessed, capped and 

taxable values or to the Principal Residence Exemption for the above referenced parcel. 

Original 

Corrected 

Year 

Assessed 

Capped 

Taxabl 

Year 

Assessed 

Capped 

Taxable 

2024 

2,200< 

1,734 < 

1.734 < 

2024 

18.400 < 

14,734 < 

14,734 < 

Principal Residence Exemption 0.0000 

Principal Residence Exemption 0.0000 

Reason: 

Adjustment Type: 

Other/Unauthorized 

The action of the July Board of Review may be appealed to the Michigan Tax Tribunal within 35 days after 

the final decision, ruling or determination. To appeal to the Michigan Tax Tribunal, file a petition with the 

MTT that can be obtained from their website: 

http://www.michigan.gov/taxtrib 

If you have any questions regarding the above changes, please do not hesitate to contact us at (989) 205-0599 

Sincerely 

ROSE LAKE TOWNSHIP 

Board of Review 

JBOR CHG NOTICE (GENERIC) 

(Rev. 01-07)

Michigan Department of Treasury 

4031 (Rev. 09-22) 

July/December Board of Review Affidavit 

Issued under authority of PLA. 206 of 1892 Filing 18 mandator 

July/December Board of Review to take action. 

i 

Assessment Year: 

Petition/Docket #: 

The authority 

for July/December board of review action is stated in the General Property Tax Act, MCL 211 53b. The July/December 

regarding qualified errors verified by the assessor (MCL 211 530{1). 

(8). 

The July/December Board of Review can also take action ui 

poverty exemption for the current year under MCL 211 7u: 

a qualified agricultural property exemption under MCL 211 se for the current! 

by the assessor, a qualified agricultural property exemption under MCL 211 ee that was not on the assessment roli for the current year al 

qualified forest property exemption under MCL 211. 7jj(1) that was not on the assessment roll for the current year and one prior year. 

In addition, other statutes, such 

as MCP 211 7b related fo the disabled veterans exarnption, and MCL 211.753 related to the eligible development property exemption. provide authority for the 

2024 

07/16/2024 

07:32 

AM 

can take action 

.53b regarding a 

has been denied 

prior year. or a 

Form 3128 {L-4035a) must be completed by the Board of Review and made a part of the Board of Review records whenever a change is made fo an individual 

parcel of property which causes a change in Taxable 

PART A: IDENTIFICATION 

Value 

Owner Name 

TEUNISSEN ANTHONY & PAMELA 

[OWT STEErAGATESS 

City 

State 

ZIP Code 

534 WOODLAND DR 

HOLLAND 

MI 

| 49424-1610 

Parcel Number 

Property 

1 District 

Property Classification 

67 14 550 024 00 

PINE RIVER AREA SCHOOLS 

401 

Property Street Address 

City 

State 

ZIP Code 

126 SHORES DR 

LEROY 

MI 

49655 

PART B: ADJUSTMENTS 

item or Taxing Authority 

Note or Millage 

Qriginal 

Adiusted 

Difference 

ROSE LAKE TOWNSHIP 

Assessed Value 

JBOR 

2,200 

18,400 

16,200 

Taxable Value 

07/16/2024 

1,734 

14,734 

13,000 

P.R.E. 

0.00 % 

0.00 % 

0.00 %| 

Property Class 

402 

School District 

67055 

Classification 

Ad Valorem 

TOTALS 

Reason for change (see instructions on page 2): 

Ed Poverty Exemption 

[Caualified Agricultural Exemption 

ET Disabled Veterans Exemption 

EE Qualified Forest Exemption 

[Ceigible Development Poperty 

Qualified Error 

Exemption 

Tut builds, pn thorn pre! # 

PART C: CERTIFICATION, BOARD OF REVIEW MEMBERS 

We, the undersigned members of ROSE LAKE TOWNSHIP 

Board of Review. swear of affirm the above information is, to the best of our knowledge, true. 

ature 

Date 

Signature 

Date 

; 

A212 

ignature 

Date 

7 

Signature 

Date’ 

ORT 

Signa 

¢ 

7 Fg 

Date 

Signature 

Date 

Gd hel 

fit f2y 

The Board of Review is required to file an affidavit within 30 days with the proper officials to have all affected official records corrected 

If the qualified error results in 

ing any interest paid, must be made to the taxpayer or the taxpayer must be notified and payment made within 

an overpayment or underpayment, the rebate, includi 

30 days of the notice. (MCL 211.53b (1)) 

Distribute copies of this form to the property owner, the Cou 

authorities. 

Retain a copy on file at the local unit 

inty Treasurer. the County Equalization Department, and the treasurers of all other affected taxing

Michigan Department of Treasury 

L-4035a 

3128 (Rev. 11-13) 

2024 Taxable Value Calculations Worksheet 

Parosiflo. 14800001 

Issued under authority of P.A, 206 of 1893. Filing is mandatory. 

Petition No. 

_3 

This form must be completed by the Board of Review (B of R} and made part of the Board of Review Record 

whenever a change is made to an individual parcel of property which causes Taxable Value to change. 

Complete Section 

1 

if the B of R changes Capped Value. 

SECTION 1 

By Assessor 

ByBofR 

2024 Final Taxable Value as set by Assessor, Board of Review or Michigan 

Tax Tribunal (Enter number into column labeled "By Assessor.").................= 

13,308 

308 

0 

[1] 

amount of Addons. 

0 CE 

Le RT 

Sh 

ad 

ches = 

0 

0 

(See pages 6-11 of STC Bulletin # 3 of 1995 for formulas. IMPORTANT: See STC Bulletin No. 3 of 1997 for 

change to formula for Replacement Construction) 

2024 Capped Value 

= (2023 Taxable Value - Losses) 

XCPI 

+ Additions 

= 

( 

12.675 

5 

0 

yX__ 

1.080 

+ 

0 

ge 

G09 

By B of R 

2024 Capped Value 

= 

308 

Complete Section 2 if the B of R changes Assessed Value. 

SECTION 2 

dopdiascessedNalie 

ol 

ns 

i ee = 

18,100 

1,900 

2024 Tentative SEV 

= 2024 Assessed Value X 2024 Tentative Equalization Factor 

= 

1,900 

xX 

1.000 

= 

1,900 

By BofR 

2024 Tentative SEV = 

1,900 

2024 Tentative Taxable Value is the lesser of the 2024 Capped Value or the 2024 Tentative SEV. 

2024 Tentative Taxable Value = 

308 

Signature of Fi Board of Review 

Date 

8 

; 

7-6-2 

A

Oy, 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Pamela Star Teunissen, 

Petitioner, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION 

v 

MTT Docket No. 24-003364 

Township Of Rose Lake, 

Respondent. 

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER 

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket 

number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does 

not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies 

with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents 

submitted in this case. 

Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a 

copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our 

website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer 

form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the 

placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 279. Further, an electronic 

copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the 

Tribunal's website. 

By: __ Tribunal Clerk 

Entered: October 30, 2024 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives. 

By: Tribunal Clerk 

DUE 

1/27[24 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

+ 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 

- 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 

- Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Teunissen Anthony & Pamela 

1 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner(s) 

y 

MTT Docket No.24-003364 

Township of Rose Lake 

! 

Respondent(s) 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

Jamie Houserman 

states that on 11/26/2024 

he/she 

[Name of person serving/mailing petition] 

[date of service] 

served a copy of the Appeal Answer fom & Attachments 

relative to the above-captioned matter upon: 

[Provide name and address of the party/people being served] 

Teunissen Anthony & Pamela 

534 Woodland Dr 

Holland, MI 49424 

Ypustas 

[Signagdre of person who is serving/mailing copy] 

JamieHouserman,MMAO, Assessor 

[Print/type name of person serving/mailing copy] 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

- 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 

- 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 

- Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

ORLENE HAWKS 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

GOVERNOR 

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM 

VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL 

MOAHR DOCKET NO. 

Do not use this form to appeal Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Special Assessment, or Non-Property tax 

disputes. 

Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (e.g. Board of Review 

Decision or Notice of Uncapping) with this Small Claims Petition. if applicable. If you do not submit this document. you may be held in default. 

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information 

Filer Type: Individual 

First Name 

M.1. 

Last Name/Company Name 

Pamela 

Star 

Teunissen 

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

534 woodland Dr 

City or Town 

State 

ZIP Code 

Holland 

Michigan 

49424 

Telephone Number 

Fax Number 

231-429-0099 

E-mail Address 

Starpam49(iyahoo.com 

Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information 

M.L 

First Name 

Last Name 

Firm Name (if any) 

Address (No, Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

City or Town 

State 

ZIP Code 

Michigan 

Telephone Number 

Fax Number 

E-mail Address 

Section 3: Subject Property Information 

parcels are you appealing? 

Tf you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoming? Yes 

*1f no, you must file separate appeals for cach non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel. 

Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [1 multiple, list first property's address) 

124 Shores Dr

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

ORLENE HAWKS 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Michigan 

49655 

Taxing Authority (City or Township) 

County 

Township Of Rose Lake (OSCEOLA) 

Osceola 

Section 4: Issues Being Appealed (check ail that apply) 

Truc Cash and Taxable Value 

Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal 

Plz see attached 

Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues 

Year(s) you arc appealing: 

2024 

Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? No 

1f Yes, check which BOR you attended AND upload the BOR decision: 

If No, check the applicable reason(s): 

Assessment Change Notice was not sent to Petitioner 

Did you request a Poverty Exemption at the BOR? 

If Yes, check which BOR considered your application AND upload the BOR decision: 

© March 

© July 

© December 

If No, explain why: 

Section 7: Valuation Information *use te multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. 

Parcel Identification Number: 6718809000 

Classification of Property: 

Real 

Residential

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

ORLENE HAWKS 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR: 

1734.00 

Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR: 

2200.00 

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value )? 

18000.00 

Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value). 

9000.00 

If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value, 

117.00 

Parcel Identification Number: 671455002500 

Classification of Property: 

Real 

Residential 

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR: 

1734.00 

Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR: 

2200.00 

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as Truc Cash Value)? 

12000.00 

Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also Known as Stale Equalized Value). 

6000.00 

If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. 

78.00 

Section 8: Classification Information ony te Mt bep't of Treasury may appeal this issue to the Tribunal® 

Parcel Identification Number: 

Current Classification of Property as established by Board of Review: 

What do you believe is the property's classification” 

If improved property, how is the property curently being used? 

If improved property, for what use was the property designed?

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

ORLENE HAWKS 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Fee Information 

Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition? 

No 

Are you appealing ONLY the denial of a Poverty Exemption? 

No 

If you answered yes to either or both of these questions, you are not required to pay any filing fees. 

The filing fec is based on the greater of the State Equalized Valve or Taxable Value in contention. 

If you arc appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the 

highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being 

appealed, not to exceed a total filing fee of $1,000, 

If your property is residential property (sce MCL 205.762) and 

the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: 

Filing Fee is: 

$100,000.00 and under 

$125.00 

$100,000.01 to $500,000.00 

$200.00 

SOver $500,000.00 

$300.00 

1f your property is NOT residential property (sec MCL 205.762) and 

the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: 

Filing Fee is: 

$100,000.00 and under 

5250.00 

* Plus $25.00 for cach additional parcel. as indicated above. 

If your property is NOT residential property and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is $100,000.01 or greater the appeal does not qualify for 

Small Claims. Therefore, an Entire Tribunal petition must be filed. 

Electronic Signature typing your name below will serve as your signature 

Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative's Signature: 

/s/ Pamela S Teunissen

Of l1L4, LL] FM 

Yahoo Mall - Re: 550-024-00 Fw: Teumissen 

Re: 550-024-00 Fw: Teumissen 

From: Jamie Houserman (roselakeassessor@yahoo.com) 

LS 

To: 

starpam49@yahoo.com 

Date: 

Thursday, August 1, 2024 at 02:21 PM EDT 

Good afternoon Pam, 

Attached are the 2024 assessments. As stated, they were incorrect, thus the building value was 

moved from lot 23 to lot 24. Being that you did not get a permit, rather than send me a copy of a 

similar sample building, please email me a copy of the invoices for the building, site prep, and 

electrical work. 

Also, your appeal rights were explained in the postal mailed statement. 

At this point, 

| have not 

received notice that you have exercised this option. Based on the facts you stated below, it 

seems likely you will want to file an appeal. 

Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns. 

Sincerely, 

Jamie 

Jamie Houserman, MMAO 

Rose Lake Township Assessor 

On Wednesday, July 31, 2024 at 12:18:31 PM EDT, Pam Star <starpam49 @yahoo.com> wrote: 

Jamie, 

Thank you for your response. We are glad this will be reviewed. Can you please email us copies of the current 

assessment cards on lots 24 and 25? 

Thank you, 

Tony and Pam 

Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPad 

On Monday, July 29, 2024, 2:17 PM, Rose Lake Assessor <roselakeassessor@yahoo.com> wrote: 

Thank you. 

| will review and reply by Friday. 

Sincerely, 

Jamie 

about:blank 

115

8/1/24, 2:21 PM 

Yahoo Mail - Re: 550-024-00 Fw: Teumissen 

Jamie Houserman, MMAO 

Rose Lake Assessor 

————eee Original message -------- 

From: Pam Star <starpam49 @yahoo.com> 

Date: 7/26/24 6:28 PM (GMT-05:00) 

To: Jamie Houserman <roselakeassessor @yahoo.com>, Osceola Building Dept 

<building @osceolacountymi.com>, Osceola.Health @flhealth.gov 

Subject: Re: 550-024-00 Fw: Teumissen 

Greetings, 

Thank you for taking the time to speak with us regarding this confusing situation. 

The gray building on the concrete slab on lot 24 is a temporary building on a cement slab, not on a permanent 

foundation. 

As mentioned in our conversation with you, we have no trailers on lot 24 or lot 25. We have never had trailers on 

those lots. 

| spoke with the Osceola County building department today to make them aware that we had not gotten a permit 

when we moved our building onto lot 24 and to ask what we needed to do to rectify the situation. 

| was informed 

that although we were negligent in not pulling a permit when the building was placed, 5 years have elapsed and so 

not to worry about it. 

There is no water or septic on lots 24 or 25 and there never has been. The temporary building on lot 24 is not 

heated. 

We are attaching a copy of the electric permit, inspection and approval for lot 24. 

it our understanding that we have to pay the revised tax bill for $181.54 sent to us. Since we have no 

revised assessment to go with that we are concerned and a bit confused on how a revised tax bill can be sent out 

with no new assessment. 

about:blank 

2/115

ol 114, £12 FM 

i 

Yahoo Mail - Re: 550-024-00 Fw: Teumissen 

If we were to purchase a brand new 14x28 storage building the cost Would be under $10,000.00 

8:24 PM 

Fri Jul 26 

ser 

FEI% MT 

EI RLFPOA 

| (2 portagemi.gov 

BestBarns Pinewood 14%2¢ 

X 

+ 

[3 

< 

>» 

mM 

 O shednationcom 

a 

& 

eee 

Goshed 

My Account | WI Cart (0) | Checkout 

| 888-881-3718 

Free Shipping 

Found 

a lower price? 

H 

Cob 

un 

doe 

dips 

On ererytivng 

oll an Ve 

wi¥ Dat 

re J— 

Best Barns Pinewood 14X28 Wood Shed 

| ER 

® 

| 

(MPN: Pinewacd1428] 

1 

Relea Maoudnsticer 

| 

| Seer 

a Width 

bi 

List Price: $13650,00 

i 

Selma 

& Langin 

LR 

Our Price: $1-0460:00 

om 

$9400.00 

AVAILABLE OPTIONS: 

| 

Could you please provide a copy of the new assessment on lot 24 | this revised tax bill is based on. If you are 

not the person who provides this information, please direct us to the place where we can obtain it. 

From speaking with you and looking at the picture you sent of a 5th wheel that is on lot 26, which is not owned by 

us, 

it appears we have been taxed incorrectly for several years on lot 25. 

We trust after further research and an on-site visit to the properties mentioned in this letter, we will receive new 

information and a new assessment on this vacant lot as well as the lot that has the gray building on it, ( lots 24 and 

25) along with a refund for any taxes we have over paid. 

Meanwhile, could you please provide us with a copy of the new assessment that the revised taxes are based on. 

If 

you are not the person/ department that provides this information, please direct us to the proper place to find it. 

We are unclear as to why these issues cannot be resolved before the end of 2024. Could you please explain that? 

Thank you for your assistance in this matter 

If you have further questions please feel free to contact us. 

Thank you, 

Tony and Pam 

if 

Mail for 

i 

On Friday, July 26, 2024, 1:56 PM, Jamie Houserman <roselakeassessor@yahoo.coms wrote: 

Good afternoon Building and Health Departments, 

about:blank 

3/15

8/1/24, 2:21 PM 

Yahoo Mail - Re: 550-024-00 Fw: Teumissen 

Please forward a copy of all permits (Elect, Plumb, Mech, and Building) for lots 24 and 25 

550-024-00 & 550-025-00 that have been issued since 1992. Thank you 

Well/Septic too, please 

Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns. 

Sincerely, 

Jamie 

Jamie Houserman, MMAO 

Rose Lake Township Assessor 

----- Forwarded Message ----- 

From: Jamie Houserman <roselakeassessor @yahoo.com> 

To: Pam Star <starpam49 @yahoo.com> 

Sent: Friday, July 26, 2024 at 12:03:57 PM EDT 

Subject: Re: 550-024-00 Fw: Teumissen 

Looks like we lost the phone connection. 

The plan: 

| will have the measure crew come visit. This is the picture 

| have for LOT 25 

that is vacant. Do you know who owns this? What lot it might be on? 

about:blank 

4/15

8/1/24, 2:21 PM 

Yahoo Mail - Re: 550-024-00 Fw: Teumissen 

Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns. 

Sincerely, 

Jamie 

Jamie Houserman, MMAO 

Rose Lake Township Assessor 

On Thursday, July 25, 2024 at 07:18:03 PM EDT, Pam Star <starpam49@yahoo.com> wrote: 

This is pretty mixed up. We will call you on Friday afternoon. Thanks 

Sel 

00 

Mail 

iPa 

On Thursday, July 25, 2024, 7:02 PM, Jamie Houserman <roselakeassessor@yahoo.com> 

wrote: 

Hi Pam, 

LOT 25 has utilities and a wood deck, LOT 24 has the gray building, utilities, and a 

concrete pad that was being assessed to LOT 23, correct? 

Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns. 

Sincerely, 

Jamie 

Jamie Houserman, MMAO 

Rose Lake Township Assessor 

On Wednesday, July 24, 2024 at 07:38:46 PM EDT, Pam Star <starpam49 @yahoo.com> wrote: 

Jamie, 

Thank you for checking into this. There is still a misunderstanding. We have only one building. It appears that 

we are being taxed now for 1 building on each lot. 

Previous tax bills reflect the difference in taxes for a vacant lot and a lot with a building on it. 

We look forward to a revised tax bill that shows only one lot with a building. 

| 

I hope this will clear up the misunderstanding 

. 

| 

If it doesn't resolve the issue please call us at 

| 

231 429 0099 

i 

i 

i 

| | 

Respectfully, Tony and Pam Teunissen 

about:blank 

6/15

about:blank 

1alLL VII - XE; DDU-ULZ4-UU FW: |eumissen 

Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPad 

On Wednesday, July 24, 2024, 5:55 PM, Jamie Houserman <roselakeassessor@yahoo.com> 

wrote: 

Good afternoon Pam 

Anthony inquired about the tax increase. 

Lot 24 has historically been assessed as 

vacant, when in fact it contains a building that was inadvertently being assessed to Lot 

23. We were contacted by the owner of Lot 23 and the value has now been assigned 

to this lot. 

Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns. 

Sincerely, 

Jamie 

Jamie Houserman, MMAO 

Rose Lake Township Assessor 

----- Forwarded Message ----- 

From: Lovells Township Assessor <lovells.assessor@yahoo.com> 

To: "roselakeassessor @yahoo.com" <roselakeassessor@yahoo,com> 

Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2024 at 05:15:55 PM EDT 

Subject: Teumissen 

Lot 24 and 25 

starpam49@yahoo.com 

241-429-0099 

Thank you. Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns. 

Sincerely, 

Jamie 

Jamie Houserman, MMAO 

Lovells Township Assessor 

14/15

8/1/24, 2:21 PM 

by =) 

[> 

about:blank 

20240726145453863.pdf 

60.1kB 

LOT 25.pdf 

91.5kB 

LOT 24 pdf 

47.2k8 

LOT 23.pdf 

91.6kB 

Yahoo Mail - Re: 550-024-00 Fw: Teumissen

sxxPO93URIENS JOU INQ STYETTSI PSWSIP UTSISY UOTIBWIOIUTL 

xxx 

orLS’T 

¥000'2 

0002 

0 

000°2 

2202 

# 

a 

; 

pe3oedsul ZT0Z/L2/80 

>¥juebTyUoTW 

‘UOUMIOOSO¥ FO AjunoD 

:0] PasusdT1 

02691 

00z 

2 

9 

00e’e 

£202] 

psqyoadsur 

z20z/80/%¥0 

ID} -600Z 

- 

666T 

(°) 

IubtiAdop 

-z9zTTenbd aul 

JFEL ‘VL 

£007 ‘8T 

00z’‘z 

0 

00z'z 

pz0z| 

Pe3oadsul £20Z/TE/L0 

VY 

= 

a 

aAT3R3UdL 

| 

aATIRIUSTL 

SATIRIUD] 

SATIRJUI] 

6202 

IBUYM 

uaym 

oum! 

anTea 

Izet20 

MaTARY 

anTeA 

enyea 

antea 

sTqexRL 

|/Teunqraz 

{30 paeog 

passassy 

purpT ING 

pueT 

ET) 

uterd pooTd 

pueTIaM 

sutaRy 

JuoxyIelem 

puogd 

papoom 

duremg 

padeospueT 

ybTH| 

X 

MoT | 

futTrod| 

| 

12A8T 

2311s 

30 Aydeabodor 

*sTT3IN punoxbaspupn 

S9TITITIN PIBPURIS 

§3YPTT 39313 

qand 

» 

— 

seg! 

| 

hy 

51a1309Td 

206 

= anTeA Yse) onl sjusweAordul pueT PIlewTISE TBIOL 

ToMBS 

206 

SL 

881 

0%°9 

939I0U0D GE :d/M/Q | 

To7eM| 

| 

onTeA Used 

Poon 

§ 

°8ZTS 

e3ey 

uot3drIosaq 

{TEMPTS 

| 

u 

PT 

S85UaNTIUT /SIUSUWOD 

s9jeWTISH 3SOD JuSWA0IdWI puet 

| 

somes wrong] 

are 

pe 

me 

i 

ST 

se 

PPO DOARA| 

| gmyops ISENOS EVI ESOY 

pz LOT 

0Z-SES-T| 

05€‘y 

= onTep pul 

"3SE TEIOL 

~~ SOIOY TRIOL 8E'0 

3I9SJ JUOAI TeNIdV L8 

PROLTS0RSDL. 

| 

FE — 

05€‘v 

00T 

0S 

0000°T 0000°T 00°06T 00°L8 

06 S201 90S 

PEOM, ITH 

= 

anTeA 

uosesy 

-[pvi 

93g 

uy3zdeg 

3uoxg 

uyideq 

obejuoad 

uotT3dTIosad 

s3jusawaaoxdurr 

| 

i 

x 

SI030®ed 

« 

o2TTaNd 

/IVEYIEY/ISTEOTIIH/ISAH0S Td 

00% S00p 2TGRL PUBT I0J S33BWTISH dnTeA Puet 

Jueoea| 

| 

pesozdurl 

x 

SEAL ENED oi 

| 

SAT3EJUSL ADL 

ISH 

5202 

VIANYd 

2 ANOHINV NASSINAZL 

| 

. 

| 

24 den 

SSOIPPY/3WeN 

S, I9UMO! 

Ee 

a 

30 

hc 

- a- 

i 

STOOHOS WEYY ¥IAIY 

3NId 

:TOOUSS 

¥d 

STYOHS 92T 

sn3e3s| 

TaquinN 

a3ed 

(s)3Twaag burprrng 

:butuoz| OHdWI-TVIINICISHY 

:SSETD 

ssaappy A3zedoag 

0°0 

ada 

209:L8S 

HIONAT 

S.,W8¥-€0 

aMi 

266T/T10/0T 

{0 

ssuexy, 

Ag 

abeg 

=» 

adAg 

ajeq 

20Tad 

-quoId 

PATITISA 

13911 

ares 

JO SWIa] 

*3sul 

a1eg 

ates 

@93uRIn 

F03URID 

eT09080 

:A3unod 

JIHSNMOL EM¥T 

HSOY¥ 

:UOT30TpSTINg 

00 

¥Z0 

0SS 

PT 

LS 

:ISquMN Td2IBd 

¥202/92/L0 

uc pa3jutag

sxxPo93URIEND 30U ING STURT POWSSP UTSISY UOTIPWIOIUL xxx 

TANG 

TITUS 

:swe31 ung 

dumT 

:ua7 pajzoddnsun 

jo1Ig :Keuwrypy 

:§3STOD 

3x0ddng x00Td 

(OT) 

STbuTys 3TeYdsy| 

X 

oT13des 

189 0002 

{¥) 

£3004 

NOY [eM] 

otades Ted 000T| 

TI} 

 ;q 

20014 ON 

pays 

301d 

TToM I338Mf 

T| 

(0) 

100g 3noxyTeM 

pIesuer 

dtH 

Iemag OTTand 

as 

BUTATT 

ToIqUEed 

21qed; 

X 

ZOI0R DFTANG 

ds 

uotjesIosy 

7004 

(€) 

TOMSGS/T030H: 

(VT) 

ysTtutd juswesedg 

(6) 

SUSSIDS 

¥ SWIOIS 

ued usp 

I00Td ©39I0UOD 

si00q OT3ed 

®AO0DTY qn] 

JdTWeis) 

pooM Pe3eaIL 

Sser9 a1gnog 

SuTeM STL OTweisp 

auols 

Juswese) 

I00Td STTL OTWeI)| 

-ouo0py painog 

SPTIS 

°"ZTIOH 

aemoys ojeaedag 

300TE 

‘oud 

puny aTqnOQ 

HUTS BIIXRI 

uses TAUTA] 

39TTOL BIIXT 

Juswesed 

(8) 

yses TeIsW 

butqunig 

ON 

ow 

5 

yses poop 

1€T'SC 

fADL <= 92870 

(TIVIINIAISHY TWNN¥ £007) 

IDF 

Jesy I23eM IBTOS 

0°0 

:s3stor 03 

3IYBTSH 

:S930N | 

 Tenuel 

‘IoUe3FOS 

d's 

0 ides 

lois 

Ee 

975°0€ 

166 '€E 

:sTRR0 

ony ‘Isusizos 

WN 

en 

JR 

6vE’'T 

019°2 

1 

3993 05 

‘TToM I3eM 

yled 9In3xTd 

7, 

£8 

Jp faupwoned |. PIR 

od 

8zL’E 

[4 A582 

T 

ot3des Te 000T 

yledg 2In3xTd 

€ 

T 

uotjeseoxy 

(L) 

SMOPUTM 

(2) 

I9MBS/IIIBM | (s)aIN3XTI obeISAY 

a 

S3UBWISNLPY/SUOTITPPY IYO 

FE 

uoT3IeTnsuI| 

X 

3s0p 

"adsq 

MeN 3IS0D 

?z1§ 

uotidrrosaq 

. 

$oTIg 

seoxy burprrng | mea 

| -eav| x 

| Aue] 

SAGA Rpt 

TY] 

06/00T/00T/00T/06=P09 

& °quop/uodd/ound/Aud-qy/Aud 

$39T3NQ 

"03TE JO 

"ON 

©THUTYS 

/POO, 

74 

“3S Z6€ 

= ©OTV I00TI 

JS Z6E 

= ©BIY PUNoIn 

WE 

SBUTTTaD 

(9) 

THUTUS/POOM 

193e9y ooeds 

:we3sAs BuriesH 

(IT) 

UTH 

PIO] 

xq 

X 

ph 

F0TI93%F 

(T 

GL6T 

3T€ 

D2 

STO 

AWVEd 

UTQeD uoTjeaaosy 

[ 

:DBpTd 

"s9Y I0F 

"ISH ISO) 

S9IN3XTJ 

JO "Tend/° 

ON 

bast 

suooxpag 

we3shs A3Tanoes 

20TAIDS 

sduvy|g 

:uayO3I TH 

I007d 

puz 

:Jood 

wnnoep TeIJUD. 

I00Td 

IST 

reaxy 3r0dIR) 

TE2’SZ FA°D°L PRIBWIISH| 

anos users 

0T1309Td 

(21) 

s200Td_(S) 

Jusweseg 

928°0 

X 

9¥G‘0€ 

:3s0D xdsg 

Te3IOL 

euneg 

aoeuINg POOM 

“ae 

I 

| 

:afexen juwsg| 

-z-5-g 

1€6'€5 

© MeN oseg Te30L 

SBR URED TEs 

EREeTEuSS 

2 TT 

em] 

~ 

3ISTT wooy 

26€ 

:ea21y J0OTA 

- 

[3 

170073 

"2UOD 

Of 

. 

" 

abuey piepuels 

TRUS 

PIOi 

X| 

BT 

gies 

Se 

5 

0T 

:36v 

"03333 

SABMOIOTH 

Buytooo/oupiRen 

ion 

abeaaay :UOTITPUOD 

:eaIY 

3s 

J issed 

F 

dung jesH 

§3950TD JO 82TS 

:poon 

§ 

UsaD 

7000 

3 3E8H PedIod 

[ 

I 

| 

0 

SL6T 

reaxy 

BH PIJUSA-3O3ITQ 

qng 

dex tzznoep 

soeuIng 700T3/TTEM 

UTR 

PIO| 

X | X¥ 

poTopowsy| 

3TTNE IX 

$§300Q 

‘YOM 

24035 poopy 

qn: TZZOOEQ 

193eey 20edsg| 

X 

uoT}BIO0OSQ 

3 WTIL 

TAIT 

1sx00Q 

‘03NY| 

YITBSH PISTEM 

EODAPIIT 

JESH TTeM OTI300TH 

- 

:a7A3s burpTIng 

PRUSTUT 

I03eTNOITD JB3H 

POOH. pojuUBA 

(I00TF-UT) 

3JueTPRY 

93L POOM 

paTaued 

= 

— 

‘uoTjiepunog 

Az035 

7 qegead 

POOH pajuaauf 

Juetpey 

"TTY 

"097d 

193seTd 

TTemiIq 

:1TeM uouwwod 

Az03s 

1 qegeag 

ang 30H 

pieogaseg OTIIOATH 

Zorxequr 

(bp) 

swe 

pooM| 

X 

usp 2u03S 

A103s 

Zz I0TI9IXI 

ueg 

juap 

I93BM 30H PaoIod 

. 

sweri-y 

usp YoTIg 

Ax03s 

T F0TI®IXF 

19389 yjed 

sjong 

/m ITY PeOIOd 

7 

:I0TIVIXE 

PSPTS om 

Tesodstg °6eqIed 

s30onQ O/M ITY PedIod 

Fa HEY 0 

eI 

HEE 

6) 

joe3s suweg/puz 

I9YSEMYSTA 

YISAQ 

UCIT | 0 

SWOH uMOJ, 

:A3toeden IBD) 

£1035 

7 IOTISIUT 

dog, 3000 

wes3g|{ 

{Teo0d| 

|poom 

HOTIETRENT 

SHOE. ST TAO 

:3TTNg TEX 

adAg|eaay | Az03g 

T TOTISIUT 

“MOTTY @oueTTddy! 

"09TH 

110 

ses| 

X 

ybnorysasey 

Atrwes abuts 

obexen 

(LT) 

| s3yoea/ssysrxod 

(9T) 

sooeTdaxTd 

(GT) 

sut-371Tng 

(GT) 

butToo)/butiesy 

(TT) 

(*3uo0d) 

Jooy 

(g) 

2dAy butprrng 

¥202/92/L0 

uo pajuTIg 

00 

20 

0SS 

PT 

L9 

:I3qUMN To0IBd 

T3071 HuTpTTINg TeTIUSpPTSaY

¥202/92/L0 

uo pajuTId 

35 881 ROU) 

82 

5 0'26E 

qers/pausfiged 

32y 

Fx pesjuezend Jou ING STYRTTSI PIWSSP UTSISY UOTIPWIOFUL 

xxx 

1 ButpTTNg TRTIUSPTSY 

RG 

Hady QU 

‘00 

720 

06S 

PT 

L9 

:xaquUMN T90Ied

08/01/2024 

Valuation Report 

02:16 

PM 

DE: 

Roselake-2024 

67 

14 

550 

025 

00 

2024 

Est. 

T.C.V. 

TEUNISSEN ANTHONY 

& 

PAMELA 

Property Class: 

401 

124 SHORES 

DR 

Map 

#: 

ROSE 

LAKE TOWNSHIP 

LEROY, 

MI 

49655 

RL-535-21 

LOT 

25 ROSE 

LAKE 

FOREST SHORES SUBD 

Land Value Estimates 

for Land Table 4005.4005 

RL FOREST/HILLCREST/RETREAT/ 

* Factors 

* 

Description 

Frontage 

Depth 

Front 

Depth 

Rate %Adj. 

Reason 

Value 

SUB LOTS 

50 

87.00 150.00 

1.0000 

1.0000 

50 

100 

4,350 

87 Actual Front 

Feet, 

0.30 Total Acres 

Total 

Est. 

Land Value 

= 

4,350 

Cost 

Est. 

for Res. 

Bldg: 

1 

Single Family 

OUTBUILDING(S) 

Cls 

C 

Blt 

1975 

(11) 

Heating System: 

No Heating/Cooling 

Ground Area 

= 

0 

SF 

Floor Area 

= 

0 

SF. 

Phy/Ab.Phy/Func/Econ/Comb. 

% Good=90/100/100/100/90 

Building Areas 

Stories 

Exterior 

Foundation 

Size 

Cost. New 

Other Additions/Adjustments 

Water/Sewer 

1000 Gal Septic 

1) 

Water Well, 

200 Feet 

1 

Deck 

Treated Wood 

160 

Totals: 

17,019 

Notes: 

i 

ECF 

(4003.RURAL RESIDENT 

) 

TCV: 

14,058 

2024 

Est. 

T.C.V. 

14 

550 

025 

00 

Ld 

18,408 

Est. 

TCV/Total Floor Area 

= 

0.00 

y 

2023 Assessed 

MBOR 

S.E.V. 

ase 

fi 

ap 

C.P.I. 

6,300 

6,300 

6,300 

565 

5.00 

2024 

New 

Eq. Adjustment 

Los 

ions 

Tax Adjustment 

Losses 

0 

2,900 

0 

278 

0 

2024 Assessed 

MBOR 

Ba 

Capped 

 ->Taxable<- 

PRE/MBT 

9,200 

9,200 

9,200 

© 

5,843 

5,843 

0

08,01/2024 

Valuation Report 

02:16 

PM 

DB: 

Roselake-2024 

Parcel 

Number: 

67 

14 

550 

025 

00, 

Residential Building 

1 

160.051 

CAMPER TRAILER NV 

Schb, 

doer Surh 

**x 

Information herein deemed reliable 

but mot guaranteed***

08/01/2024 

Valuation Report 

02:15 

PM 

DB: 

Roselake-2024 

67 

14 

550 

024 

00 

2024 

Est. 

T.C.V. 

TEUNISSEN ANTHONY 

& PAMELA 

Property Class: 

402 

SHORES 

DR 

Map 

#: 

ROSE 

LAKE TOWNSHIP 

LEROY, 

MI 

49655 

RL-535-20 

LOT 

24 

ROSE LAKE FOREST SHORES SUBD 

Land Value Estimates 

for Land Table 4005.4005 RL FOREST/HILLCREST/RETREAT/ 

* Factors 

* 

Description 

Frontage 

Depth 

Front 

Depth 

Rate %Adj. 

Reason 

Value 

SUB LOTS 

50 

87.00 190.00 

1.0000 1.0000 

50 

100 

4,350 

87 Actual Front Feet, 

0.38 Total Acres 

Total Est. 

Land Value 

= 

4,350 

2024 Est. 

T.C.V. 

14 

550 

024 

00 

= 

4,350 

Est. 

TCV/Total Floor Area 

= 

0.00 

2023 Assessed 

MBOR 

S.B.V. 

Base 

for Cap 

{of 

1% 

2,200 

2,200 

2,200 

1,652 

5.00 

2024 

New 

Eq. Adjustment 

Loss 

Additions 

Tax Adjustment 

Losses 

0 

0 

0 

0 

82 

0 

2024 Assessed 

MBOR 

5.E.V. 

Capped 

 ->Taxable<- 

PRE/MBT 

2,200 

2,200 

2,200 

1,734 

1,734 

[J 

K 

NN 

& 

gs

08/01/2024 

Valuation Report 

02:15 

PM 

DE: 

PRoselake-2024 

67 

14 

550 

023 

01 

2024 

Est. 

T.C.V. 

PRTC TRUST 

Property Class: 

401 

130 

SHORES 

DR 

Map 

#: 

ROSE LAKE TOWNSHIP 

LEROY, 

MI 

49655 

RL-535-19 

LOT 

23 

ROSE 

LAKE 

FOREST SHORES 

SUBD 

SPLIT 550-022-00 ON 1/1/2023 

INTO 550-022-01 

& 550-023-01 

Land Value Estimates 

for Land Table 4005.4005 

RL FOREST/HILLCREST/RETREAT/ 

* Factors 

* 

Description 

Frontage 

Depth 

Front 

Depth 

Rate 

%Adj. 

Reason 

Value 

SUB LOTS 

50 

75.00 

179.00 

1.0000 

1.0000 

50 

100 

179' 

Depth vs 

3,750 

75 Actual 

Front 

Feet, 

0.31 

Total Acres 

Total 

Est. 

Land value 

= 

3,750 

Land Improvement Cost Estimates 

Description 

Rate 

Size 

% Good 

Cash Value 

D/W/P: 

3.5 Concrete 

6.49 

188 

15 

915 

Total Estimated Land Improvements True Cash Value 

= 

815 

Cost Est. 

for Res. 

Bldg: 

1 

Recreation Cabin 

FRAME 

(11) 

Heating System: 

Space Heater 

Ground Area 

= 392 

SF 

Floor Area 

= 392 

SF. 

Phy/Ab.Phy/Func/Econ/Comb. 

% Good=90/100/100/100/90 

Building Areas 

Description 

Other Additions/Adjustments 

Water/Sewer 

1000 Gal Septic 

3,783 

Water Well, 

200 

Feet 

9,531 

38,135 

Notes: 

ECF 

(4003.RURAL RESIDE 

31,500 

2024 

Est. 

T.C.V. 

14 

550 

023 

01 

= 

36,165 

Est. 

TCV/Total Floor Area 

= 92.26% 

0 

sale 03/03/2021 

for 

11,000 

2023 Assessed 

MBOR 

Base 

for Cap 

C.P.1. 

13,200 

13,200 

5 

12,675 

5.00 

2024 

New 

Eg. 

Adjustment 

% 

Additions 

Tax Adjustment 

Losses 

0 

4,900 

0 

633 

e 

2024 Assessed 

MBOR 

Capped 

->Taxable<- 

PRE/MBT 

18,100 

18,100 

13,308 

13,308 

0

08/01/2024 

Valuation Report 

02:15 

PM 

DB: 

Roselake-2024 

Parcel Number: 

67 

14 

550 

022 

01, 

Residential Building 

1 

[3 

Fc CabaShed/slab 

362.0 5 

& 

Concrete 108 st 

Becht 

doen tavish 

*»=* 

Information herein deemsd reliable but not guaranteed 

**

PE21-0112 

22054 Professional Dr. Suite A 

Reed City, Michigan 49677 

Phone: 

(231)832-6117 

Fax; 

Osceola County Building Department 

(231) 832-7345 

Email: building@osceolacountymi.com 

Website: www.osceola-county.org/ 

; 

This permit conveys no right to 

Issued: 

04/05/21 

p 

occupy any STRELT, ALLEY, or 

Expires: 

10/19/21 

Electrical 

SIDEWALK, or any part thereof 

either temporarily or permanently. 

Edition of Code: 

2014 MI ELECTRICAL CODE 

LOCATION 

OWNER 

APPLICANT 

ROSE LAKE 

TEUNISSEN ANTHONY & PAMELA 

| JAYS ELECTRIC SERVICE 

124 SHORE DR 

534 WOODLAND DR 

8390 W COUNTY LINE RD 

14 550 025 00 

Lot: 

HOLLAND MI 49424-1610 

MARION MI 49665 

Sectlon 

Ph. 

(231) 429 0099 

Ph. 

(231) 8252507 

Plat/Sub: 

Mobile: 

Mobile: 

‘Work Description: 

STORAGE BLDG 

GREAT LAKES ENERGY 

Stipulations: 

155TH AVE N OFF 16 MILE S END OF ROSE LAKE FOREST TAKE A LEFT ON OAK RIDGE 

DR TO DEER RUN LEFT ON DEER RUN TO SHORES DR 

Permit Item 

Work Type 

Fee Basis 

Item Total 

01, Application Fee 

Standard Item 

1.00 

$75.00 

02. Electrical Service 200 -1200 AMP 

STANDARD ITEM 

1.00 

$10.00 

04. Circuits 

Standard Item 

1.00 

$5.00 

13. Feeders, Bus Ducts, Etc, (Per 50") 

Standard Item 

1.00 

$6.00 

23. Final Inspection 

Standard Item 

1.00 

$75.00 

Fee Total: 

$171.00 

Amount Paid: 

$171.00 

Balance Due: 

$0.00 

INSPECTIONS TO BE MADE 

1) Service 

2) Rough-In (Prior to covering walls) 

3) Final Inspection prior to occupancy 

EXPIRATION OF PERMIT: A permit remains valid as long as work is progressing and inspections are requested and conducted, A 

permit shall become invalid if the authorized work is not commenced within six months after issuance of the permit or if the 

authorized work is suspended or abandoned for a periods of six months after the time of commencing the work. A PERMIT WILL 

BE CLOSED WHEN NO INSPECTIONS ARE REQUESTED AND CONDUCTED WITHIN 180 DAYS OF THE DATE OF 

ISSUANCE OR THE DATE OF A PREVIOUS INSPECTION. CLOSED PERMITS CANNOT BE REFUNDED. THE CHARGE 

TO RE-OPEN A CLOSED PERMIT TS $75.00

Electrical Permit 

| PE21-0112 

Property Information 

14 550 025 00 

124 SHORE DR 

Subdivision: 

ROSE LAKE FOREST SHORES SUBD 

ROSE LAKE 

LEROY MI, 49655 

Lot: 

25 

Section: 

5 

Name Information 

Owner: 

TEUNISSEN ANTHONY & PAMELA 

Phone: 

(231) 429 0099 

Occupant: 

Phone: 

Applicant: 

JAYS ELECTRIC SERVICE 

Phone: 

(231) 825 2507 

Contractor: 

JAYS ELECTRIC SERVICE 

Cellphone: (231) 633 8251 

Licensee: 

PLUGER LARRY 

License Issued: 

01/03/2022 

License Expires: 

12/31/2024 

Permit Information 

Date Issued: 

04/05/2021 

Date Expires: 

10/19/2021 

Status: 

FINALED 

Work Description: 

STORAGE BLDG 

GREAT LAKES ENERGY 

Stipulations: 

155TH AVE N OFF 16 MILE S END OF ROSE LAKE FOREST TAKE A LEFT ON OAK RIDGE DR TO DEER RUN LEFT ON DEER RUN TO SHORES DR 

Comment: 

Fee Information 

Standard Item 

01. Application Fee 

1.00 

75.00 

STANDARD ITEM 

02, Electrical Service 200 -1200 AMP 

1.00 

10.00 

Standard Item 

04, Clreuits 

1.00 

5.00 

Standard Item 

13. Feeders, Bus Ducts, Etc. (Per 50") 

1.00 

6.00 

Standard Item 

23, Final Inspection 

1.00 

75.00 

Service Inspection 

| TIM TAYLOR 

Status; 

Completed 

Result: 

Approved 

Scheduled: 

04/22/2021 12:14 AM 

Completed: 

04/22/2021 02:23 PM 

Address: 

124 SHORE DR 

Permit Number: 

PE21-0112 

Comments: 

GREAT LAKES ENERGY 

RELEASED TO POWER CO

9/9/24, 11:08 AM 

Yahoo Mail 

- Fwd: Appeal process 

Fwd: Appeal process 

From: Vicky Schaefer (rltclerk@gmail.com) 

To: 

roselakeassessor@yahoo.com 

Date: 

Thursday, September 5, 2024 at 09:20 AM EDT 

Date: Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 5:48 PM 

Subject: Appeal process 

To: rliclerk 

@ gmail.com <rltclerk@ gmail.com> 

Vicki, 

We realize you are swamped with election stuff 

, so just set this aside until after the election. 

We are sad to keep contacting you regarding the incorrect assessments on lots 24 and 25. 

It is difficult to understand the whole process of how to go about handling the errors that are in our current tax 

assessments from Jamie. 

| wish she was easier to communicate with. As mentioned earlier we are trying to respond to 

her and not react. We are trying to not take her actions as bullying and threatening. 

It is getting more and more difficult. 

Our understanding of what happens when we don’t agree with a property tax assessment is as follows. 

| took this off of 

a Ml law office legal site. 

after reviewing the changes to the assessed and taxable values and 

the related property tax if you believe that there was an error, a 

property tax appeal may be filed with your local municipality. The 

appeal is essentially a request 

to correct any assessment errors for 

the current tax year. Any assessment errors discovered in prior tax 

years cannot be appealed. As noted, all property taxes due must be 

paid while the appeal is pending. 

March Board of Review — Local Appeal 

The first step before filing a formal appeal to the board of review is to 

contact the local tax assessor. In many circumstances, an informal call 

to the assessor to discuss identifiable errors in the assessment will be 

enough to fix the problem without the need for an actual appeal. 

When the dispute cannot be informally resolved, the second step is to 

file a petition to appeal the property tax with the board of review for the 

about:blank 

1/4

9/9/24, 11:08 AM 

Yahoo Mail - Fwd: Appeal process 

township or city where the property is located. The deadline to file an 

appeal petition will be included in the Notice of Assessment. The 

appeal petition will include documentation describing the assessment 

error. This documentation should support the correct values to be used 

to compute the appropriate property tax. 

After receiving an assessment appeal, the board of review will hold a 

hearing to consider the information provided. If the board of review 

agrees that a mistake was made, it will be corrected at the hearing. 

However, 

if the board denies the appeal, in whole or in part, and the 

owner remains dissatisfied with the assessment and resulting property 

tax, the board of review is not the last stop. 

The Michigan Tax Tribunal is a state agency with the authority to 

interpret laws and make decisions similar to those made by judges in 

the courts. The tribunal has the authority to overrule a local board of 

review. 

An appeal petition to the tax tribunal will include the petitioner's name 

and contact information, the classification of the property, the location 

of the property and the reasons for the appeal. 

The hearing for the appeal is typically scheduled for early the following 

It may be heard sooner depending on the schedule of the tax tribunal. 

After hearing and considering the appeal, the tribunal will render a final 

determination. This will effectively end the property tax appeal for that 

tax year. However, the tribunal's decision is not necessarily the end of 

the appeal process. 

A dissatisfied property owner can also appeal to the Michigan Court of 

Appeals, albeit on a limited basis. Michigan law states that the tax 

tribunal “...is the final agency for the administration of property tax 

laws.” Thus, an appeal to the court of appeals is rare because the court 

will only consider legal errors in applying the law or in the exercise of 

the tribunal's legal procedures. 

about:blank 

2/4

9/9/24, 11:08 AM 

Yahoo Mail - Fwd: Appeal process 

We have a huge question here, since the assessment of our lots was 

done in 2023 and we never received a revised assessment to go with 

the revised tax bill, will it be too late to appeal them at the March 2024 

board of review meeting? If that is the case, can we write something 

for the Board of Appeal to look at and consider in the December 2024 

meeting, or can we request to be present at that meeting to present 

our situation as to why we feel the assessment is incorrect if Jamie 

does not change it and keeps insisting there is a well and septic on our 

property. 

The email Jamie sent to you today (Aug 2,2024) and copied us in on, 

gave us the impression that the only option we had if we decide we 

need to appeal her assessment that she presents to the Board of 

review in December of 2023, was the MTT, when infact that is the last 

step in the process. 

Of course we are hoping the errors on the current assessment cards, 

which she has said 

are wrong will be corrected by her and we won't 

need to appeal at all. 

One other thing that confuses us is this. 

She states that our building was assessed as being on lot 23 in error, 

so she moved that assessment over to lot 24. We were then sent a 

revised tax bill for lot 24, which was triple what we had previously 

paid. 

However when we called her with questions and told her that the trailer 

she has assessed us for on lot 25, was actually on lot 26, which 

belongs to the Kurt's, she told us that couldn’t be changed until 

December. 

It does appear that we are singled out here. Why can she 

change info for lot 23 and request a revised tax bill be sent to us, yet 

not change it for lot 25 and request that a revised tax bill be sent to the 

owners of lot 26? 

about:blank 

3/4

9/9/24, 11:08 AM 

Yahoo Mail - Fwd: Appeal process 

We don’t dare ask her why it was done that way, because each time 

we ask her questions it appears that she goes after us more or in a 

different way. it is all very disturbing and of course, you cannot be 

expected to answer the questions of why she does things like this, yet 

we have no one else to try and help us make sense of it all. 

Thank you for your patience in all of this. Please feel free to call us if 

you have questions. 

Thanks,Pam and Tony 

f 

il for iPad 

about:blank 

4/4

9/9/24, 11:08 AM 

Yahoo Mail - Re: Fw: Auto Response: Re: 550-024-00 Fw: Teumissen 

Re: Fw: Auto Response: Re: 550-024-00 Fw: Teumissen 

From: Vicky Schaefer (rltclerk@gmail.com) 

To: 

roselakeassessor@yahoo.com 

Ce: 

starpam49@yahoo.com 

Date: 

Thursday, September 5, 2024 at 09:41 AM EDT 

Jamie, 

| do not have any written emails, we had some verbal communications, which may have been misunderstood. 

| do not 

give out any legal advice on this process and refer them to you since this is not my job. 

Vicky Schaefer 

Rose Lake Twp Clerk 

| on Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 7:35 PM Jamie Houserman <foselakeassessor@yahoo.com> wrote: 

: Vicky, 

Please forward the emails you have had with Pam that explain what she has provided 

below. 

| will need them for the MTT hearing. They were postal mailed a copy of the BOR 

| action that informed them about their MTT appeal rights. 

T 

| Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns. 

| Sincerely, 

| Jamie 

~ Jamie Houserman, MMAO 

Rose Lake Township Assessor 

a Forwarded Message ----- 

{ From: Pam Star <starpam49 @yahoo.com> 

To: Jamie Houserman <roselakeassessor @ yahoo.coms 

Sent: Wednesday, September 4, 2024 at 07:01:30 PM EDT 

Subject: Re: Auto Response: Re: 550-024-00 Fw: Teumissen 

| Jamie, 

Tony and 

| were thinking about this and discussing it. Vicki told us the following; 

1. The Rose Lake township tax review board meets privately in December, and you have until then to go to our 

properties and check to see if the revised tax cards are correct. If you see they aren't you can correct any errors 

on assessments at that time if you so choose. 

2. 

If we disagreed with the assessment after that, we could appeal it. 

Are both of those things correct? 

3. We are also wondering how the error of our building being assessed to lot 23 could be corrected by a phone 

call, without a MTT hearing and yet the errors on our lots can't be corrected without a MTT hearing? That is 

puzzling to us. 

Our purpose here is not to be difficult, ornery 

or to criticize you or how the process works, but simply to have a 

clear understanding of it. We feel that a clear understanding of these things is important, especially since we 

about:blank 

13

9/9/24, 11:08 AM 

Yahoo Mail - Re: Fw: Auto Response: Re: 550-024-00 Fw: Teumissen 

- apparently can only resolve this through a hearing before MTT. 

I hope that as our tax assessor you can answer these questions for us, please. 

| 

Sincerely, 

Tony and Pam Teunissen 

Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPad 

| On Wednesday, September 4, 2024, 8:41 AM, Pam Star <starpam49 @yahoo.com> wrote: 

Received, thank you. 

Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPad 

On Tuesday, September 3, 2024, 7:27 PM, Jamie Houserman 

<roselakeassessor @yahoo.com> wrote: 

Hi Pam, 

I sent you all that 

| have. The only jurisdiction at this point is the MTT for 2024. 

| can 

only make changes for 2025. 

Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns. 

Sincerely, 

Jamie 

Jamie Houserman, MMAO 

Rose Lake Township Assessor 

On Tuesday, September 3, 2024 at 03:03:55 PM EDT, Pam Star <slarpam49@yahoo.com> wrote: 

Jamie, 

| received a copy of our assessment from you, which 

| already had, but not the letter you keep referring 

to. 

Still hoping this can be resolved without the Michigan Tax Tribunal. 

Sincerely, 

Tony and Pam Teunissen 

Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPad 

On Friday, August 23, 2024, 5:08 PM, Jamie Houserman <roselakeassessor@yahoo.com> 

wrote: 

Good afternoon, 

about:blank 

2/3

9/9/24, 11:08 AM 

Yahoo Mail - Re: Fw: Auto Response: Re: 550-024-00 Fw: Teumissen 

I will reply when 

| return to the office after 9/2/2024. 

Sincerely, 

Jamie 

Jamie Houserman, MMAO 

Assessor 

about:blank 

3/3

9/3/24, 7:27 PM 

Yahoo Mail - Re: 550-024-00 Fw: Teumissen 

Re: 550-024-00 Fw: Teumissen 

From: Pam Star (starpam49@yahoo.com) 

To: 

roselakeassessor@yahoo.com; rlttreasurer@gmail.com; rltclerk@gmail.com; rkaksuper@gmail.com; 

rlttrustee@gmail.com; carole1866@gmail.com 

Date: 

Thursday, August 29, 2024 at 12:28 PM EDT 

about:blank 

1/23

9/3/24, 7:27 PM 

Yahoo Mail - Re: 550-024-00 Fw: Teumissen 

about:blank

9/3/24, 7:27 PM 

Yahoo Mail - Re: 550-024-00 Fw: Teumissen

9/3/24, 7:27 PM 

Yahoo Mail - Re: 550-024-00 Fw: Teumissen 

Hi Jamie, 

Hope you are having a good vacation. 

Since we have exchanged so many emails and 

| see that the township board is now copied in on the emails, my attempt 

in this email here is to sort of stitch things together, as we understand them, 

in one email. Hopefully that will make 

resolving this matter easier for all. 

about:blank

9/3/24, 7:27 PM 

Yahoo Mail - Re: 550-024-00 Fw: Teumissen 

We just paid our revised taxes on lots 24 and 25 and are working on understanding and hopefully clarifying things so the 

revised assessment cards you sent us can be corrected and the lots can be properly assessed. 

We checked with the health department in Reed City and they show no septic or well on either of these lots. They show 

there has never been a septic or well on either property. Today we met Franke's septic at our property and had them do 

a search/ inspection of lots 24 and 25 for septic and well. They did not find them on either property. 

| am attaching our 

receipt for this inspection to this email, along with pictures of nonfunctional electric meter on lot 25. 

On the revised property tax cards you sent us, we noticed that the well and septic you list on lot 25 matches the 

description of the septic and well we had on a home we previously owned at 15872 Deer Run Rd. LeRoy MI 49655. This 

property is separated by a green belt that runs between Rose Lake in the Woods and Rose Lake in the Forrest. That 

green belt is right next to lot 25 Rose Lake Forrest. The lots in Rose Lake Forrest and Rose Lake in the Woods are not 

always easy to locate and identify. Since there are no indications of a well or septic on lots 24 and 25 in Roselake 

Forrest we are wondering if this may be where the confusion on the current assessment card of having a septic and well 

on lot 25 Rose Lake Forrest comes in. 

It appears that there has been quite a bit of confusion in regards to lots 23, 24,25, and 26. We realize that lots in this area 

are not always clearly marked so this is understandable. 

Our understanding of what has occurred 

is that our building was assessed to lot 23. When the owner of lot 283 realized 

this they contacted you and you made the correction and assessed the building to lot 24, which is where it sits on a 

cement slab. This unheated, temporary storage 

building that sits on a cement slab does have electricity, it does not have 

a septic or well. 

The picture you emailed us showing a trailer on what you thought was lot 25 is actually on lot 26, which belongs to Robert 

and Jen Kurt's. 

There is an old non functioning and disconnected electric meter from GLE on lot 25. 

It was there when we purchased 

that property 30 years ago. We have never had it inspected by GLE to see if the underground lines are still viable for 

electric use. 

It has not been in use since we purchased this property. 

As mentioned earlier neither of our lots have a driveway. Occasionally and with permission, we sometimes use our 

neighbors driveway on lot 26. Other times we park on the side of Shores 

. 

When you come to our properties to do your own assessment, as you mentioned you have until December of 2024 to 

do, you will find the corners of our property corners marked by green metal fence posts, that should make lot identification 

boundaries easier for you. These are next to wooden corner lot markers that are present from having our corner lot 

markers located a few years ago by Weatherall Surveying. 

. Hopefully once you come and see our properties for 

yourself, these errors/ misunderstandings will be corrected and no appeal from us will be necessary. 

To clarify what your process is in making corrections, here is our understanding of it. You have until December 2024 to 

submit revisions/ corrections to the tax board of Rose Lake Township. Is this correct? 

If at that time we disagree with the 

assessments on our property, then we can file an appeal with our local tax appeal board. However, you are telling us that 

our only appeal here would be the Michigan Tax Tribunal and are telling us that our local township board cannot assist us 

with this and that we should stop asking for their assistance. 

This is where our confusion comes in. Can you or our local township board please explain to us why we would not have 

an opportunity to make an appeal to our township tax appeal board? From what we have found on line the MTT will only 

hear cases that have already appeared before a local township board of appeal. 

We are not trying to be difficult or give you a hard time here, 

if we have offended you in someway, please accept our 

apologies. We are trying to clarify misunderstandings and understand the process of getting corrections on our property 

tax assessments made on lots 24 and 25. 

If we can't get answers from you or our local township board, where can we 

get answers? You have referred to a letter that was sent to us in regards to the appeal process, but we don't recall 

getting such a letter or perhaps we misplaced it. We requested a copy of that 

letter just before you were out of the office 

for vacation. 

| hope itis clear on why, if we disagree with the tax assessment that is in place after Dec 2024, we cannot 

appeal to our local tax appeal board. 

Thank you for taking the time to read this and taking the time to answer our questions. Please feel free to contact us if 

you have further questions. 

Sincerely, 

Tony and Pam Teunissen 

about:blank 

5/23

9/3/24, 7:27 PM 

Yahoo Mail - Re: 550-024-00 Fw: Teumissen 

Sent 

Mail for 

On Friday, August 23, 2024, 5:14 PM, Rose Lake Assessor <roselakeassessor@ yahoo.com: wrote: 

about:blank 

I will try to get another copy when 

| return next week. 

Sincerely, 

Jamie 

Jamie Houserman, MMAO 

Rose Lake Assessor 

Et] Original message -------- 

From: Pam Star <starpam49 @yahoo.com> 

Date: 8/23/24 5:08 PM (GMT-05:00) 

To: Jamie Houserman <roselakeassessor@yahoo.coms, Patty Gregory <rlttreasurer@ gmail.com>, Vicky 

Schaefer <rltclerk@gmail.com>, Roy Kissinger <rkaksuper 

@ gmail.com>, Kevin Draper 

<rittrustee @gmail.com>, Carole Edstrom <carole1866@gmail.com> 

Subject: Re: 550-024-00 Fw: Teumissen 

Thank you for letting us know. 

We do not have a clear picture of this. We have further questions 

, but due to the statements you made to 

us saying that “this would not well for us,” we don't feel safe asking you these questions, which is why we 

got in touch with Vickie who serves on the township board. We now understand that they cannot assist us 

with this. 

We seem to have misplaced the 

letter you mentioned, could you please send us another one, so we are 

clear on what our proceed on this? 

Thank you 

Tony and Pam 

In} 

Yah 

for iPhone 

On Friday, August 23, 2024, 4:33 PM, Jamie Houserman <roselakeassessor@yahoo.com> 

wrote: 

Good afternoon Pam, 

Itis my understanding that you may still be unsure how to move 

forward. Pam, to be clear: your only legal appeal process at this point, for 

2024, is the MTT, as explained in the letter you were postal mailed. The 

Township Board Members do not have any authority to assist you with this 

concern. 

As such, please stop requesting their assistance and use the legal 

channel provided by your legislature. 

6/23

9/3/24, 7:27 PM 

about:blank 

Yahoo Mail - Re: 550-024-00 Fw: Teumissen 

Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns. 

Sincerely, 

Jamie 

Jamie Houserman, MMAO 

Rose Lake Township Assessor 

----- Forwarded Message ----- 

From: Jamie Houserman <roselakeassessor@yahoo.com> 

To: starpam49@yahoo.com <starpam49 @yahoo.com>; Vicky Schaefer 

<rltclerk @ gmail.com> 

Sent: Friday, August 2, 2024 at 11:40:27 AM EDT 

Subject: Fw: 550-024-00 Fw: Teumissen 

Good afternoon Vicky, 

Please provide the section of the law that allows for what you told Pam, as 

| 

disagree: "Based on that information, we are waiting to see what the revised 

assessment cards and amounts will be to determine whether or not we will 

be appealing in January. 

| have spoken with Rose Lake Township on how 

to go about that, if we decide that is needed. 

* 

Pam, to be clear: your only legal appeal process at this point, for 2024, is 

the MTT, as explained in the letter you were postal mailed. 

Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns. 

Sincerely, 

Jamie 

Jamie Houserman, MMAQO 

Rose Lake Township Assessor 

eee Forwarded Message ----- 

From: Pam Star <starpam49 @yahoo.com> 

To: Jamie Houserman <roselakeassessor @yahoo.com> 

Sent: Thursday, August 1, 2024 at 09:40:51 PM EDT 

Subject: Re: 550-024-00 Fw: Teumissen 

Hi Jamie, realize 

| had a grammatical error in one of my ending sentences 

in my last email. It should read; 

We have never had an intention to get out of paying our taxes. 

7/23

9/3/24, 7:27 PM 

about:blank 

Yahoo Mail - Re: 550-024-00 Fw: Teumissen 

Thank you 

Tony and Pam 

-eee Forwarded Message ----- 

From: Pam Star <starpam49 @yahoo.com> 

To: Jamie Houserman <roselakeassessor @yahoo.coms 

Sent: Thursday, August 1, 2024 at 03:42:03 PM EDT 

Subject: Re: 550-024-00 Fw: Teumissen 

Jamie, 

Thank you for the current assessment cards. Yes, we knew they would be incorrect. 

Correcting the incorrect assessments is why we have been in contact with you. Thank you for 

the efforts you have put forth in doing that. 

As mentioned in a previous email to you, lot 24 and lot 25 have never had any septic or well. 

The building on lot 24 is unheated. Lot 24 does have electric that was done with a permit, 

inspected and approved by Osceola County. 

The receipt from Jay's electric is the copy of what 

| have already sent, and what the county 

has, as well. 

It shows a zero balance and 

is our receipt for the electrical work done. 

The concrete slab the building is on, was here when we bought lot 24 in 1992. 

We paid cash for the building. 

Could you please tell me why you would need a receipt for 

that and for the concrete slab? 

| spoke with Vicky Schaffer, who indicated that due to the errors in our 

current assessments, corrections would need to be made from you on lots 24 and 25 at the 

December 2024 Rose Lake Township Board of Review. 

Based on that information, we are waiting to see what the revised assessment cards and 

amounts will 

be to determine whether or not we will be appealing in January. 

I have spoken with Rose Lake Township on how to go about that, if we decide that is 

needed. 

For right now, is there a form we need to submit to have the current assessment 

cards corrected? 

Is there a form we need to submit now to have corrections, 

that will be 

done, reviewed for the December meeting with the Rose Lake Township Board of review? 

We are trying to get some clarification of anything we may need to do to get the errors 

corrected and get an accurate assessment for lots 24 and 25. As indicated to you earlier our 

intention here is and never has been to evade paying property taxes. 

We appreciate the efforts you are putting forth to correct the assessment cards that were 

done incorrectly on lots 24 and 25. 

Thank you, 

Tony and Pam 

Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPad 

On Thursday, August 1, 2024, 2:21 PM, Jamie Houserman 

<roselakeassessor @yahoo.com> wrote: 

Good afternoon Pam, 

Attached are the 2024 assessments. As stated, they were 

incorrect, thus the building value was moved from lot 23 to lot 

24. Being that you did not get a permit, rather than send me a 

copy of a similar sample building, please email me a copy of the 

invoices for the building, site prep, and electrical work. 

Also, your appeal rights were explained in the postal mailed 

statement. 

At this point, 

| have not received notice that you have 

exercised this option. Based on the facts you stated below, it 

seems likely you will want to file an appeal. 

8/23

9/3/24, 7:27 PM 

about:blank 

Yahoo Mail - Re: 550-024-00 Fw: Teumissen 

Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns. 

Sincerely, 

Jamie 

Jamie Houserman, MMAO 

Rose Lake Township Assessor 

On Wednesday, July 31, 2024 at 12:18:31 PM EDT, Pam Star 

<starpam49@yahoo.com> wrote: 

Jamie, 

Thank 

please 

Thank 

you for your response. We are glad this will be reviewed. Can you 

email us copies of the current assessment cards on lots 24 and 25? 

you, 

Tony and Pam 

nt fr 

Yi 

Mail 

for iP: 

On Monday, July 29, 2024, 2:17 PM, Rose Lake Assessor 

<roselakeassessor @yahoo.com> wrote: 

Thank you. 

| will review and reply by Friday. 

Sincerely, 

Jamie 

Jamie Houserman, MMAO 

Rose Lake Assessor 

mee Original message -------- 

From: Pam Star <starpam49 @yahoo.com> 

Date: 7/26/24 6:28 PM (GMT-05:00) 

To: Jamie Houserman <roselakeassessor@yahoo.coms, 

Osceola Building Dept <building@ osceolacountymi.coms, 

Osceola.Health @flhealth.gov 

Subject: Re: 550-024-00 Fw: Teumissen 

Greetings, 

Thank you for taking the time to speak with us regarding this 

confusing situation. 

The gray building on the concrete slab on lot 24 is a temporary 

building on a cement slab, not on a permanent foundation. 

As mentioned in our conversation with you, we have no trailers on 

lot 24 or lot 25. We have never had trailers on those lots. 

| spoke with the Osceola County building department today to 

make them aware that we had not gotten a permit when we 

moved our building onto lot 24 and to ask what we needed to do 

to rectify the situation. 

| was informed that although we were 

9/23

9/3/24, 7:27 PM 

Yahoo Mail - Re: 550-024-00 Fw: Teumissen 

negligent in not pulling a permit when the building was placed, 5 

years have elapsed and so not to worry about it. 

There is no water or septic on lots 24 or 25 and there never has 

been. The temporary building on lot 24 is not heated. 

We are attaching a copy of the electric permit, inspection and 

approval for lot 24. 

it our understanding that we have to pay the revised tax bill for 

$181.54 sent to us. Since we have no revised assessment to go 

with that we are concerned and a bit confused on how a revised 

tax bill can be sent out with no new assessment. 

If we were to purchase a brand new 14x28 storage building the 

cost Would be under $10,000. 00 

eam Wil 

26 

p— 

Baspon 

3 portage gov 

Deastsomspinewsod 

iaxic X 

+ 

fy 

> 

@ 

 O shednationcom 

Cc 

8. 

we 

ea 

es 

8 oh Coe | 

[* S h £ 

+ » seaniavs 

[i 

[] Found 

a ower pikes? 

DELI 

[reow: oC PES 

a | Sent Barna Pinewood 14128 Wood Shed 

| 

RECT 

| 

Bog Homa 

8 rnc 

Caries 

& 

inp 

Gain a 

ezine 

[PRR 

Could you please provide a copy of the new assessment on lot 

24 

, this revised tax bill is based on. If you are not the person who 

provides this information, please direct us to the place where we 

can obtain it. 

From speaking with you and looking at the picture you sent of a 

5th wheel that is on lot 26, which is not owned by us, 

it appears 

we have been taxed incorrectly for several years on lot 25. 

We trust after further research and an on-site visit to the 

properties mentioned in this letter, we will receive new information 

and a new assessment on this vacant lot as well as the lot that 

has the gray building on it, ( lots 24 and 25) along with a refund 

for any taxes we have over paid. 

Meanwhile, could you please provide us with a copy of the new 

assessment that the revised taxes are based on. If you are not 

the person/ department that provides this information, please 

direct us to the proper place to find it. 

We are unclear as to why these issues cannot be resolved before 

the end of 2024. Could you please explain that? 

Thank you for your assistance in this matter 

If you have further questions please feel free to contact us. 

Thank you, 

Tony and Pam 

Sent from Yah 

for 

i 

about:blank 

10/23

9/3/24, 7:27 PM 

about:blank 

Yahoo Mail - Re: 550-024-00 Fw: Teumissen 

On Friday, July 26, 2024, 1:56 PM, Jamie Houserman 

<roselakeassessor @yahoo.com> wrote: 

Good afternoon Building and Health 

Departments, 

Please forward a copy of all permits 

(Elect, Plumb, Mech, and Building) for lots 

24 and 25 

550-024-00 & 550-025-00 

that have been issued since 1992. Thank 

you 

Well/Septic too, please 

Please contact me if you have any 

questions or concerns. 

Sincerely, 

Jamie 

Jamie Houserman, MMAO 

Rose Lake Township Assessor 

----- Forwarded Message ----- 

From: Jamie Houserman 

<roselakeassessor @yahoo.com> 

To: Pam Star <starpam49@yahoo.com> 

Sent: Friday, July 26, 2024 at 12:03:57 PM EDT 

Subject: Re: 550-024-00 Fw: Teumissen 

Looks like we lost the phone connection. 

The plan: 

| will have the measure crew 

come visit. This is the picture 

| have for 

LOT 25 that is vacant. Do you know who 

owns this? What lot it might be on? 

11/23

9/3/24, 7:27 PM 

about:blank 

Yahoo Mail - Re: 550-024-00 Fw: Teumissen 

Please contact me if you have any 

questions or concerns. 

Sincerely, 

Jamie 

Jamie Houserman, MMAO 

Rose Lake Township Assessor 

On Thursday, July 25, 2024 at 07:18:03 PM EDT, 

Pam Star <starpam49 @yahoo.com> wrote: 

This is pretty mixed up. We will call you on Friday 

afternoon. Thanks 

Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPad 

On Thursday, July 25, 2024, 7:02 PM, Jamie 

Houserman 

<roselakeassessor @yahoo.com> wrote: 

Hi Pam, 

LOT 25 has utilities and a 

wood deck, LOT 24 has the 

gray building, utilities, and a 

concrete pad that was being 

assessed to LOT 23, correct? 

Please contact me if you have 

any questions or concerns. 

Sincerely, 

Jamie 

Jamie Houserman, MMAO 

Rose Lake Township 

Assessor 

On Wednesday, July 24, 2024 at 

07:38:46 PM EDT, Pam Star 

<starpam49 @yahoo.com> wrote: 

13/23

9/13/24, 7:27 PM 

about:blank 

Yahoo Mail - Re: 550-024-00 Fw: Teumissen 

Jamie, 

Thank you for checking into 

this. There is still a misunderstanding. 

We have only one building. It appears 

that we are being taxed now for 1 

building on each lot. 

Previous tax bills reflect the difference 

in taxes for a vacant lot and a lot with 

a building on it. 

We look forward to a revised tax bill 

that shows only one lot with a 

building. 

| hope this will clear up the 

misunderstanding 

. 

If it doesn't resolve the issue please 

call us at 

231 429 0099 

Respectfully, Tony and Pam 

Teunissen 

14/23

9/3/24, 7:27 PM 

about:blank 

Yahoo Mail - Re: 550-024-00 Fw: Teumissen 

Sent from 

il 

for iP. 

On Wednesday, July 24, 2024, 

5:55 PM, Jamie Houserman 

<roselakeassessor@yahoo.com 

> wrote: 

Good afternoon 

Pam, 

Anthony inquired 

about the tax 

increase. 

Lot 24 

has historically 

been assessed as 

vacant, when in 

fact it contains a 

building that was 

inadvertently being 

assessed to Lot 23. 

We were contacted 

by the owner of Lot 

23 and the value 

has now been 

assigned to this lot. 

Please contact me 

if you have any 

questions or 

concerns. 

Sincerely, 

Jamie 

Jamie Houserman, 

MMAO 

Rose Lake 

Township Assessor 

Ee Forwarded 

Message ----- 

From: Lovells 

Township Assessor 

<lovells.assessor@yah 

00.com> 

22/23

9/3/24, 7:27 PM 

about:blank 

Yahoo Mail - Re: 550-024-00 Fw: Teumissen 

To: 

"roselakeassessor@ya 

hoo.com" 

<roselakeassessor@ya 

hoo.com> 

Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 

2024 at 05:15:55 PM 

EDT 

Subject: Teumissen 

Lot 24 and 25 

starpam49@yahoo.com 

241-429-0099 

Thank you. Please 

contact me if you have 

any questions or 

concerns. 

Sincerely, 

Jamie 

Jamie Houserman, 

MMAO 

Lovells Township 

Assessor 

23/23

9/9/24, 4:35 PM 

Yahoo Mail - Fw: Incorrect assessments on lots 24 and 25 for Teunissen 

Fw: Incorrect assessments on lots 24 and 25 for Teunissen 

From: Jamie Houserman (assessorjamie@yahoo.com) 

To: 

roselakeassessor@yahoo.com 

Date: 

Monday, September 9, 2024 at 04:25 PM EDT 

a Forwarded Message ----- 

From: Vicky Schaefer <rltclerk 

@ gmail.com> 

To: Jamie Houserman <assessorjamie @yahoo.com> 

Sent: Thursday, September 5, 2024 at 09:22:01 AM EDT 

Subject: Fwd: Incorrect assessments on lots 24 and 25 for Teunissen 

Hi Forwarded message --------- 

From: Pam Star <starpam49@yahoo.com> 

Date: Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 5:00 PM 

Subject: Incorrect assessments on lots 24 and 25 for Teunissen 

To: <(liclerk 

@ gmail.com> 

Vicky, 

| am forwarding you all the emails that have been sent and received between ourselves and Jamie. 

| have spoken to you 

in regards to our concerns and interactions with Jamie several times. Thank you for your listening ear. 

I indicated to you that in an earlier conversation with Jamie that 

| misspoke and said, “ You need to fix this.” 

At which 

she responded, “Excuse me?” 

| realized 

| had misspoken and promptly apologized to her, saying that 

| should have 

worded that differently and that what 

| had intended to say was, “ This needs to be fixed..” 

| told her again that 

| 

apologized and 

| hoped she could accept my apology and we could move forward to resolve the situation 

. She indicated 

that we could. 

The revised tax bill we received from the county was 3 or 4 times as high as it had previously been, so yes we were 

concerned, which of course is why we were calling her. 

Now it seems like no matter what information we give her it is not enough. We are unclear about why she needs 

information that goes back to 1992 and is requesting receipts for electrical that has been approved and inspected by the 

county. A reciept she and the county already have. 

In our first conversation with Jamie she asked us if we had gotten a permit to set the building on lot 24. We replied that 

we did not know we needed one and so we did not get one. We told her there was an old broken down building on the 

cement slab when we bought the property in 1992, but we had torn that down. She then asked if we got a permit to do 

that. We told her we didn’t think we needed one and had not gotten one. 

After speaking with her, we promptly called the county and told them we had put an Amish storage barn that was 

14x28 on one of our lots without realizing we needed a permit and we were calling to see what we needed to do to 

rectify that. They said that since the building had already been on the lot for more than 5 years to not be concerned 

about that. Nothing could be done at this point. They did appreciate our efforts to set things right. The builder inspector 

indicated we needed to get tie downs for the building and we are now in the process of getting someone to do that. 

In our conversation with Jamie we told her our intention was never to avoid paying property taxes. We said she was 

welcome to check back 6 or 7 years to see that no permits or improvements had been done on the property. It was 

simply vacant prior to the building being placed here. Her reply to that was, 

“ Trust me, 

| am going ALL the way back on 

that property now and 

| can tell you, this will not end well for you.” 

about:blank 

112

9/9/24, 4:35 PM 

Yahoo Mail - Fw: Incorrect assessments on lots 24 and 25 for Teunissen 

As indicated to you on the phone, this was before any of the info in regards to the incorrect assessments on lot 24 and 

25 was even submitted to her. Before the conversation was done, she told us once again that “this would not end well" 

for us. 

Why would a tax assessor even say such a thing? 

We did not know any other way to take except as a threat against us indicated she would do all she could to cause 

problems for us in regards to our assessments on lots 24 and 25. 

In the time it took us to call the county in regards to no permit for our building, Jamie had sent out a request to 

Osceola county in Reed City for all permits, mechanical, electrical, well and septic pulled on this property since 1992. 

Yesterday, July 31 

| received a request she had sent to Osceola County Florida in regards to us. We have never been to 

Osceola County FL. We do not own property there. 

It is understandable that Jamie could have simply selected Osceola 

county FL by mistake, but we were upset when we received notification from Osceola County FL, with our personal 

information attached to it, saying they would call us back regarding this matter. What matter? 

Why would she send our personal information to them? She did not have our permission to do so and we see this as a 

violation of our privacy, even if it was done in error. 

| must say that at this point we are feeling attacked and bullied by Jamie. 

| had to request our current assessment cards 

from her 4 times before she emailed them to us. 

We do not want to do anything to “ stir the pot” on all of this, so when 

| spoke with you and you offered to speak with her, 

I asked you not too. We were concerned about some form of retaliation from her if you did. 

We lived in Rose Lake Township for 23 years and have owned property here for over 30 years. We are well known in 

this community and have a reputation of being good honest people. We are not people who stir up trouble or make 

problems. We have always paid our taxes in a timely manner. In the years we lived here we were members at Dighton 

Wesleyan Church and 

| was on the church board there for 17 years. 

It makes us very sad to feel as is we are being singled out, threatened and harassed by the tax assessor for our 

township. We are now avoiding any phone calls with her for fear of more threats. 

At this point 

| am not even sure we 

would feel safe to be around her. We do not feel she should be treating us or any other taxpayers in Rose Lake 

Township the way she has treated us. 

| am reiterating all of this in this email, because 

| want our interactions with Jamie to be “ on the record” and for the 

members of the Rose Lake Township review board to be aware of what has occurred in regards to some mistakes that 

Jamie made in assessing our property. 

We are at a loss on what else to do in this situation. 

Please share this and all correspondence between ourselves and Jamie with all members of the Rose Lake Township 

Board of Review. 

We are not willing to stand by and be treated in such a hostile manner by the Osceola tax assessor. 

Please feel free to call us at 231 429 0099 if you have any questions. 

Sincerely, 

Tony and Pam Teunissen 

Yah 

iPa 

about:blank 

2/2

← View full record