Full record / 01._Property_Tax_Appeal_Petition_Form_Valuation_Poverty_Classification.a90cf5f5-9de3-44d6-bd00-a4e86f2d326c.pdf

01._Property_Tax_Appeal_Petition_Form_Valuation_Poverty_Classification.a90cf5f5-9de3-44d6-bd00-a4e86f2d326c.pdf

Shazia Manzar, Petitioner V City Of Detroit, Respondent · 25-002929-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM

VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL

MOAHR DOCKET NO. 

Do not use this form to appeal Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Special Assessment, or Non-Property tax 

disputes.

Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (e.g. Board of Review 

Decision or Notice of Uncapping) with this Small Claims Petition, if applicable. If you do not submit this document, you may be held in default.

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information

Filer Type: Individual 

First Name

Shazia

M.I.

Last Name/Company Name

Manzar

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

5419 McCulloch Cir

City or Town

Houston

State

Texas

ZIP Code

77056

Telephone Number

516-782-9940

Fax Number

E-mail Address

trafalgarventures2023@gmail.com

Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

M.I.

Last Name

Firm Name (if any)

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

City or Town

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

Telephone Number

Fax Number

E-mail Address 

Section 3: Subject Property Information

How many parcels are you appealing?

1

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? 

 *If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.

Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address]

19509 Rutherford St

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

Detroit

Michigan

48235

Taxing Authority (City or Township)

City of Detroit (Wayne)

County 

Wayne

Section 4: Issues Being Appealed (check all that apply)

True Cash and Taxable Value, Uncapping of Taxable Value

 

Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal

I am appealing the Assessed Value (AV) of my property at 19509 Rutherford St, Detroit, MI 48235, as the current assessment does not accurately reflect its fair 

market value.

The Assessor review lowered the Assessed Value to $25,500, however that is still high. I submitted my appeal for the Board of Review (BOR) and was denied. I 

did not receive final decision letter from The Board of Review (BOR), however this is reflected on the property BS&A record online. I believe my Assessed Value 

should be $16,500. Therefore, I am appealing to Michigan Tax Tribunal based on the factors noted below. 

Grounds for Appeal:

1. Recent Purchase Price Confirms Overassessment

•

I purchased this property on May 31, 2024, for $33,000, a transaction that has been duly recorded by the city.

•

The 2025 State Equalized Value (SEV) is now adjusted to $25,500, which implies a market value of $51,000 (since SEV represents 50% of market 

value).

•

This implied market value is significantly higher than the actual purchase price, indicating that the property is being over assessed.

2. Comparable Sales Support a Lower SEV & AV

•

Recent comparable sales of 2 Bedroom Frame Home and even some 3 bedrooms in similar property condition in the area indicate that similar properties 

have sold for amounts much closer to my purchase price:

o

19510 Gilchrist St, Detroit, MI 48235 – Sold on October 16, 2024 for $25000

o

19149 Murray Hill St, Detroit, MI 48235 – Sold on January 31, 2025 for $29900

o

19716 Archdale St, Detroit, MI 48235 – Sold on April 4, 2024 for $29000

•

These sales suggest that the true market value for similar properties is much closer to $33,000 rather than the $51,000 implied by the current SEV.

3. Property Condition

The condition of the property is significantly lowered than comparable properties requiring new roof, new kitchen, new windows, new bathroom, fixing electrical 

and plumbing, new furnace as well as significant inside wall repairs.

4. Requested Adjustment

•

Based on my purchase price, the comparable sales, and the condition of the property, the correct market value for this property should be closer to 

$33,000.

•

Since SEV represents 50% of the market value, the appropriate SEV should be approximately $16,500 rather than $25,500.

•

Because the Assessed Value (AV) matches the SEV, I respectfully request that my Assessed Value be adjusted to approximately $16,500 to accurately 

reflect the true property value.

Thank you for your time and consideration of this appeal. Please let me know if any additional information is required.

Sincerely,

Shazia N. Manzar

trafalgarventures2023@gmail.com

Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues

Year(s) you are appealing:

2025

Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? Yes

If Yes, check which BOR you attended AND upload the BOR decision: March

If No, check the applicable reason(s):

Did you request a Poverty Exemption at the BOR?

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

If Yes, check which BOR considered your application AND upload the BOR decision: 

 March  July  December

If No, explain why:

Section 7: Valuation Information *Use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels.

Parcel Identification Number: 22056255.

Classification of Property:

Real

Residential

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR:

25500

Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR:

25500

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)?

33000 

Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value).

16500

If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.

Section 8: Classification Information *Only the MI Dep’t of Treasury may appeal this issue to the Tribunal*

Parcel Identification Number:

 

Current Classification of Property as established by Board of Review:

What do you believe is the property’s classification?

If improved property, how is the property currently being used?

If improved property, for what use was the property designed?

Fee Information

Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition?

No

Are you appealing ONLY the denial of a Poverty Exemption?

No

If you answered yes to either or both of these questions, you are not required to pay any filing fees.

Page 4

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: 

/s/ Shazia N Manzar

PDF reading copy

← View full record