Full record / Answer 26-001427.pdf

Answer 26-001427.pdf

Tim Donut US Limited Inc Petitioner V Township Of Vienna Respondent · 26-001427-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM 

VALUATION / UNCAPPING 

MTT DOCKET NO. 26-001427 

Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information 

Unit of Government 

Township Of Vienna 

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route): 

3400 

W Vienna Rd 

City or Town: 

State: 

ZIP Code: 

Clio 

= 

HE 

Telephone RA: ) 1 0-686-76 76 

Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email): 

Section 2: Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information 

First Name: 

MI: 

Last Name: 

] 

Kevin 

MacDermaid 

irm 

Name 

(| "Legacy Assessing Services, 

Inc 

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route): 

PO Box 489 

City or Town: 

State: 

ZIP Code: 

Fenton 

MI 

148430 

Telephone mere 1 0-750-1 660 

Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email): 

legacyassessing@gmail.com 

Section 3: Subject Property Information 

Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? 

If no, list all parcels that are adjoining in separate groupings. Attacha 

separate sheet if necessary. 

[ves 

[Od nNo 

BA Notapplicable 

Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of 50% or more for all tax years at issue? 

O Yes 

No

Page 2

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal 

Assessment does not exceed 50% of true cash value. 

Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES 

Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? [ml] Yes 

If yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: O March 

O July 

O December 

MI no 

If yes, cite the Board’s authority. 

If the July or December BOR revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? OI Yes 

Ino 

If yes, explain 

Was the assessment at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? [] Yes 

[= 

Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? 

Yes 

No 

If so, what is the issue date? 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE 

When was the Notice of Uncapping, if applicable, issued? 

Under what statutory section was the Taxable Value uncapped? 

Section 6: Valuation Information use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. 

Parcel Number: 18-16-400-027 

Classification of Property: 

~~ Real 

Personal [] (check one) 

Agricultural 

J 

Commercial 

Industrial [J 

Residential 

J 

~~ Timber-Cutover [J 

Developmental [J 

Utility (J (check one) 

Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) established 

by the Board of Review: 

Ie 101 

Taxable Value established by the Board of Review: 

343,736 

692,200 

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as true cash value)? 

What do you believe is the assessed value? (multiply true cash 

value by 5) 346,100 

What do you believe is the taxable value? (cannot exceed 

assessed value) 343 : 736 

S ig nature 

*Required 

Respondent or yi Representative’s Signature: 

! 

Ist 

le AW 

MARLON 

I. BROWN, DPA

PDF reading copy

← View full record